Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Charlie Gibson’s Cocktail-Napkin Economics

By Guest Contributor  

"Charlie Gibson’s Cocktail-Napkin Economics"

Share:

google plus icon

Our guest blogger is Robert Gordon, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

gibson.jpgTonight Charlie Gibson channeled cocktail-napkin economics to argue, with the certainty that usually comes only from religion, that cutting capital gains taxes raises revenue.

As Jason Furman explains here, and as Len Burman explains here, the best evidence suggests otherwise. Cutting these taxes may lead to a temporary spike in revenue, because people sell stock to realize gains while rates are low. But over the long term, the biggest owners of stock—the wealthiest Americans—will mostly save what they will save, regardless of fluctuations in the rate.

The Congressional Budget Office notes that “the potentially large difference between the long- and short-term sensitivity of realizations to tax rates can mislead observers into assuming a greater permanent responsiveness than actually exists.”

Charlie Gibson tonight misled millions of observers of a presidential debate.

‹ Earmark Accounting Leaves Two Thirds Of McCain Tax Proposal Unfunded

McCain Adviser Carly Fiorina Acknowledges Tax Incentives For Corporations To Move Offshore ›

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.