ThinkProgress Logo

Economy

Education

Sen. Paul Appointed To Education Committee On Same Week He Proposed Abolishing The Education Dept.

Last week, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) released a “budget” outlining $500 billion in spending cuts that he believes can be implemented next year. Among the cuts is eliminating the entire Department of Education, except for the Pell Grant program, as Paul feels that “the mere existence of the Department of Education is an overreach of power by the federal government.”

So, naturally, Senate Republicans have seen fit to appoint Paul to the Senate Education Committee:

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., aka Mr. Let’s-Ditch-the-Department-of-Education, got a seat on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Paul is also a member of the Senate’s new tea party caucus.

The federal government only accounts for about nine percent of overall education spending in the country, but plays a number of important roles, including providing funding to high poverty districts. For instance, in Paul’s home state of Kentucky, 9 percent of students attending the Beechwood Independent School District are low-income, and the school receives just 4 percent of its funding from the federal level. However, 85 percent of the students at the Jackson County School District are low-income, and that district depends on the federal government for nearly one-fifth of its funding.

Paul is also quite ignorant when it comes to what the Department of Education actually does. “The Department of Education has increasingly meddled with the more traditional idea of education being tailored to the needs and requirement of communities and states,” Paul stated, even though, as Igor Volsky noted, “there is a legislative prohibition on the federal government getting involved with local curriculum.” This reality hasn’t stopped Paul from fearmongering about “somebody in Washington deciding that Susie has two mommies is an appropriate family situation and should be taught to my kindergartner at school.”

In a bit of a double-whammy, the same Senate committee that oversees education also deals with workplace safety regulations, which Paul does not believe should ever be allowed to exist. In fact, Paul has said that mine safety regulations are unnecessary because “no one will apply” for jobs at unsafe mines. “The bottom line is: I’m not an expert, so don’t give me the power in Washington to be making rules,” Paul has said with regard to workplace safety.

Gov. McDonnell: It’s ‘Counterproductive And Detrimental’ To Inform Workers Of Their Workplace Rights

Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA)

In December, the National Labor Relations Board announced that it would seek comment on a regulation requiring private-sector businesses to post a simple, one-page poster informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Among other things, the poster details workers’ rights to form a union, collectively bargain, and raise workplace complaints with a supervisor, as well as their right to forego participating in any of those activities.

This seems like a rather benign regulation, and one with which it would be exceedingly easy to comply. However, Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) feels so strongly about this particular requirement that he criticized it during testimony before the House Education and Labor Committee (which was examining the “state of the American workforce”):

I am concerned –- especially as the Governor of a Right to Work state — about the December announcement of the National Labor Relations Board announcing its intention to publish in the Federal Register a proposed rule requiring almost all private sector employers to post in the workplace a notice to employees outlining their rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

The poster entitled, “Employee Rights” lists seven bullet points that state employees have the right to organize, form or join a labor union and repetitively state they have the right to negotiate their wages, benefits and working conditions with their employer. This is counterproductive and detrimental to the message we are trying to send in Virginia.

So to McDonnell, it is “counterproductive and detrimental” to inform workers of their rights? McDonnell concluded by saying that he hopes Congress “will move aggressively and quickly to remove the obstacles that hinder job growth in our great Commonwealth and nation.” He didn’t explain how a piece of paper hanging on the wall in any way blunts job creation.

McDonnell’s concerns notwithstanding, the proposed poster lays out important information for workers, including a section explaining what employers are not allowed to do if workers decide they want to unionize. In the last few decades, employers have become increasingly brazen in their union-busting activities. Under the NLRB, employers can’t fire workers or threaten to close a workplace if the employees explore unionizing. However, employers threaten to close plants in 57 percent of union organizing drives and threaten to cut wages and benefits in 47 percent, while ultimately firing pro-union workers 34 percent of the time.

A study from the Economic Policy Institute found that over the last 20 years “employer opposition [to unionization] has intensified…and the nature of campaigns has changed so that the focus is on more coercive and punitive tactics designed to intensely monitor and punish union activity.” And if it were up to McDonnell, workers would stay in the dark regarding whether such actions violate their rights and the law.

Income Inequality In The U.S. Is Worse Than In Egypt

Protests in Egypt continued for a seventh day today, and pro-democracy demonstrators are organizing a “march of millions” to take place tomorrow. As financial markets dip across the Middle East, financial prognosticators are trying to divine what continued unrest will mean for the economies of the Middle East and the price of oil.

One of the driving factors behind the protests is the decades-long stagnation of the Egyptian economy and a growing sense of inequality. “They’re all protesting about growing inequalities, they’re all protesting against growing nepotism. The top of the pyramid was getting richer and richer,” said Emile Hokayem of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in the Middle East.

As Yasser El-Shimy, former diplomatic attaché at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, wrote in Foreign Policy, “income inequality has reached levels not before seen in Egypt’s modern history.” But Egypt still bests quite a few countries when it comes to income inequality, including the United States:

According to the CIA World Fact Book, the U.S. is ranked as the 42nd most unequal country in the world, with a Gini Coefficient of 45.

In contrast:

– Tunisia is ranked the 62nd most unequal country, with a Gini Coefficient of 40.

– Yemen is ranked 76th most unequal, with a Gini Coefficient of 37.7.

And Egypt is ranked as the 90th most unequal country, with a Gini Coefficient of around 34.4.

The Gini coefficient is used to measure inequality: the lower a country’s score, the more equal it is. Obviously, there are many things about the U.S. economy that make it far preferable to that in Egypt, including lower poverty rates, higher incomes, significantly better infrastructure, and a much higher standard of living overall. But income inequality in the U.S. is the worst it has been since the 1920′s, which is a real problem.

Currently, the top one percent of households make nearly 25 percent of the total income in the country, after they made less than 10 percent in the 1970′s. Between 1980 and 2005, “more than 80 percent of total increase in Americans’ income went to the top 1 percent.”

According to the latest data, “the gaps in after-tax income between the richest 1 percent of Americans and the middle and poorest fifths of the country more than tripled between 1979 and 2007.” And there’s even a stark divide within that one percent. “The share of the nation’s income flowing to the top one-tenth of 1 percent of households increased from 7.3 percent of the total income in the nation in 2002 to 12.3 percent in 2007,” the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities noted.

Yale economist Robert Shiller has said that income inequality “is potentially the big problem, which is bigger than this whole financial crisis.” “If these trends that we’ve seen for 30 years now in inequality continue for another 30 years…it’s going to create resentment and hostility,” he said. But tax and spending policies that provide adequate services and allow for economic mobility — along with a robust social safety net — can head off trouble that may come down the road.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up