ThinkProgress Logo

Economy

REPORT: Six Ways Conservatives Encourage And Abet Corporate Tax Dodging

Last weekend, Americans across the country organized protests as part of a growing Main Street Movement to stand with organized labor and demand that the burden of deficit reduction not be placed solely on the backs of the middle class and public employees. US Uncut, modeled on UK-inspired demonstrations against tax dodgers, protested outside of multiple Bank of America branches, noting that BofA paid nothing in federal taxes in 2009.

BofA is hardly alone in this regard. Many companies — such as Boeing, General Electric, and Wells Fargo — have paid nothing to the federal treasury in recent years. Others — such as Google and Pfizer — have dramatically lowered their tax rate. Though the U.S. has a high statutory corporate tax rate, the effective tax rate that corporations actually pay is far lower, due to the myriad loopholes and credits in the corporate tax code, as well as the widespread sheltering of income in tax havens. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found, “corporate tax revenues are now at historical lows as a share of the economy.”

Of course, corporations could not get away with this behavior if policymakers actually set and enforced rules that prevented it. But conservatives in Congress have gone to great lengths to allow tax avoidance to continue. Here are six ways in which conservatives aid and abet corporate tax avoidance:

PROTECTING OFFSHORE DEFERRAL: The Obama administration and Senate Democrats last year proposed ending the practice of allowing corporations to claim domestic tax credits for profits they earn overseas while deferring tax payments on those profits. Republicans blocked the bill in the Senate. Corporations use offshore deferral to lower their effective tax rate by 20 points or more.

SLASHING THE IRS BUDGET: In their proposed spending plan for the rest of the fiscal year, House Republicans suggested cutting the Internal Revenue Services’s budget by $600 million, even though “every dollar the Internal Revenue Service spends for audits, liens and seizing property from tax cheats brings in more than $10.” IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman said that a $600 million cut in this year’s budget “would result in the IRS collecting $4 billion less” through tax enforcement programs.

PUSHING FREE TRADE WITH TAX HAVENS: Republicans in Congress have been pushing for rapid, uncritical ratifying of a free-trade pact with Panama, even though Panama has a notorious reputation as a tax haven. Before advancing the agreement, the Obama administration is pushing for “implementation of a tax information exchange agreement the two countries signed last year to address tax haven concerns.”

ENACTING REPATRIATION HOLIDAYS: When corporations bring money they earn overseas back to the United States, they are required to pay the full statutory corporate tax rate. But in 2005, they were allowed to bring money back at a drastically lower rate (delivering a windfall to executives and none of the expected economic benefits). Both Republicans in Congress and conservative activists are pushing for yet another repatriation holiday.

ENDORSING TAXPAYER GIVEAWAYS: House Republicans (joined by 13 Democrats) voted unanimously this week to preserve big oil subsidies worth billions of dollars a year, even as Big Oil companies continue to reap record profits. In fact, Republicans have continually protected billions in annual giveaways to Big Oil, allowing those corporate giants to pay nothing into the federal treasury.

PUBLICLY DEFENDING THE DODGERS: Both House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) have said that widespread corporate tax evasion is a good reason to lower the statutory corporate tax rate. When asked by ThinkProgress if it was fair that Bank of America pays no federal corporate taxes, former governor and 2012 GOP presidential contender Tim Pawlenty replied “the corporate tax rate in America is too high.”

For more information, read today’s Progress Report, “Making Corporations Pay Their Fair Share.”

Education

Ohio Advances Union-Busting Bill After Ohio Teachers Agree To Some Of The Nation’s Largest Pay Cuts

Yesterday, the Ohio state senate approved SB5 — its union-busting bill that strips public employees of their right to collectively bargain — by one vote, 17-16. Six Republicans joined all the chamber’s Democrats in voting against the legislation. Earlier in the day, Ohio’s senate Republicans had to pull some procedural shenanigans just to get the bill out of committee, removing an anti-SB5 Republican from the relevant committee and replacing him just hours before the vote.

As we’ve noted before, SB5 would essentially remove collective bargaining rights from Ohio’s teachers, and allow districts to unilaterally terminate teacher contracts. Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) has said that if the state legislature doesn’t pass the bill, he will insert its provisions into his budget proposal.

But the entire effort to enact SB5 is based on the faulty premise that public employees somehow caused Ohio’s budget deficit (which was actually caused, as in other states, by the bursting of the housing bubble and the subsequent Great Recession). And as a new report from Innovation Ohio shows, Ohio’s teachers have already agreed to a significant pay cut:

Far from being uncooperative or unyielding, Ohio teachers have made one of the largest financial sacrifices in the country, resulting in an average pay cut of 4% in 2008-09, the worst year of the recession.

In fact, Ohio’s teachers have sacrificed more than almost any group of educators in the nation:

Only Utah and Michigan’s teachers have seen larger pay cuts between 2008 and 2009. In terms of individual grades, Ohio’s kindergarten teachers saw a cut of 6.1% – the fourth-largest cut in the country. Its elementary school teachers saw a cut of 2.4% – again the fourth-largest in the nation. Its middle school teachers saw a cut of 5.8% –the nation’s second-highest cut behind Michigan. And its high school teachers saw a cut of 1.1%, which was the eighth-biggest in America.

Ohio was one of only six states whose teachers saw salary cuts to all four categories of teachers (kindergarten, elementary, middle and high schools) between 2008 and 2009. Equally notable is that these results occurred under Ohio’s current collective bargaining law.

Overall, as the Economic Policy Institute has found, Ohio’s public employees are paid six percent less than their private sector counterparts. Innovation Ohio also cast doubt on some rosy projections Kasich has regarding how much SB5 might save the state, as current data shows that “the more states erode teachers’ rights to collectively bargain, the more it likely will lead, on average, to higher salary increases that are more volatile, producing much less cost certainty for districts and taxpayers than the state’s current system.”

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) did much the same thing in his state, plowing ahead with his union-busting effort even after the state’s workers agreed to meet his pay cut demands. If Kasich were actually serious about tackling his state’s deficit, he wouldn’t be proposing to double it with a slew of tax cuts, and he could look at ending several provisions in his state’s tax code that solely benefit the rich and special interests.

Missouri State Republicans Filibuster Jobless Benefits Extension: ‘Enough Is Enough’

Missouri State Senator Jim Lembke (R)

Republicans in the Senate have led several high-profile crusades against extending unemployment benefits, even as the effects of the Great Recession are still being felt by families across the country. Former Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) last year replied “tough sh*t” to Democrats trying to pass an extension, and it wasn’t until President Obama agreed to an extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest two percent of Americans that the GOP finally allowed a long-term jobless benefits extension to move forward.

But it isn’t only at the federal level where Republican lawmakers are blocking unemployment benefits. In Missouri — where the unemployment rate is currently 9.5 percent — Republican state senators are filibustering legislation that needs to pass today in order to prevent unemployed workers from losing their benefits:

With the aid of several conservative freshman senators, [Senator Jim] Lembke (R) managed to successfully hold up the debate on the bill, which funds unemployment benefits for those Missourian unemployed for between 79 and 99 weeks. The extension bill has already passed through the House and is expected to easily pass the Senate when it is called up for a vote.

“Ninety-nine weeks is too much,” Lembke said. “It’s too long. Enough is enough.”

States need to affirmatively accept the final tier of extended jobless benefits from the federal government — which funds weeks 79 through 99 — by agreeing to certain guidelines regarding which workers qualify for benefits. Accepting the benefits does not cost Missouri anything, but Lembke said he is blocking them in order to send a message to Washington regarding federal spending habits. Even the Republican President Pro Tem of the state senate refused to back the filibuster, asking Lembke, “Is this the best method to get [your point] across to the federal government?”

Republican lawmakers in the Idaho state house yesterday also made an attempt to block their state from accepting the final tier of unemployment benefits, but were ultimately overruled. “It’s time to lead the horse away from the trough and make him go to work,” said Idaho state Rep. Marv Hagedorn (R), who voted against Idaho accepting the extended benefits.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up