ThinkProgress Logo

Economy

Education

Education Subcommittee Chair’s Response To Low Student Achievement: Blame Parents

Our guest blogger is Theodora Chang, Education Policy Analyst at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA)

What’s the most significant cause of poor student performance? Inequitable school funding? A shortage of strong school leaders? At least for Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), the answer is none of the above. Instead, he targets parents in a recent interview:

The blame in the end goes to the parents — to the mom and the dad, that’s where the blame lies. You could send my kids to any school, and I guarantee you that they are going to get straight A’s. My wife is standing behind them whacking them over the head every time they stop doing their homework…we stand over them like little dictators and make them do exactly what they’re supposed to do…If a parent doesn’t do that, there’s only so much an educator can do, no matter how good they are, no matter how much money is invested in that school.

As the Chair of the House Education & Workforce Committee’s Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, Hunter plays a significant role in ESEA reauthorization, and his response to low student achievement is troubling. Family involvement is integral to a child’s education and future, but policies should actively engage parents instead of blame them. For example, the School District of Philadelphia was recently highlighted for its efforts to boost student achievement by offering free classes to families of enrolled students on topics ranging from math to computer training.

In addition, Hunter’s comments entirely ignore the fact that systemic inequities contribute greatly to low student achievement. New research shows that low-income students have unequal access, on average, to the highest-performing teachers. Funding formulas and loopholes shortchange high-poverty schools. Districts have varying levels of educational efficiency.

Addressing these inequities requires reforming an Elementary and Secondary Education Act that is badly in need of repair. Its teacher policy ensures teachers have degrees and credentials but it doesn’t make sure the teachers are effective at improving student learning. Schools are required to implement improvement strategies that are not strong enough to help them improve, and they get zero credit for making growth.

Reauthorizing ESEA is an effective way to stop perpetuating institutional problems that contribute to low student achievement. Failing to act means that students and families will have no one to blame but Congress.

Paul Ryan’s ‘Compassionate’ Budget Would Gut The Food Safety Net

The House today will vote on House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) 2012 budget, his radical plan to dismantle Medicare and Medicaid while providing a healthy tax cut for the rich and corporations. Ryan’s budget has received a fair amount of criticism — and is making some House Republicans queasy — so Ryan took to the Washington Post today to defend himself:

Our budget offers a compassionate and optimistic contrast to a future of health-care rationing and unbearably high taxes. We lift the crushing burden of debt, repair the safety net, make America’s tax system fair and competitive, and ensure that our health and retirement programs have a strong and lasting future.

This so-called “compassionate” plan would double health-care costs for seniors, endanger vital Medicaid services, and likely increase taxes on the middle-class to finance tax cuts for the rich. But it would also undermine another important part of the social safety net: the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps):

Converting SNAP to a block grant, as Chairman Ryan proposes to do beginning in 2015, would hurt the tens of millions of Americans who rely on the program. SNAP would largely lose the ability to respond to rising need, forcing states during economic downturns to cut benefits or create waiting lists for needy families.

Turning SNAP into a block grant to states would severely restrict the program during an economic downturn when it is most necessary. There was little increase in household hunger between 2008 and 2009 — despite the economy’s weakness — because of SNAP and the food safety net. Currently, three-quarters of SNAP benefits go to households with children and nearly one-third go to households with a senior citizen or person with a disability.

As the economy improves, SNAP spending will decrease back to its normal levels. And the SNAP program in its current form is hardly generous. The benefits breaks down to about $4.50 per person per day. Currently, one in seven residents of Ryan’s own district did not have enough money to provide adequate food at some point in 2010.

SNAP is an effective anti-poverty program that is most important when the economy takes a turn for the worse. The budget that the House will vote on today would kick the legs out from underneath the program, with no clear benefits.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up