ThinkProgress Logo

Economy

NEWS FLASH

National Journal: ‘It’s hard to read the S&P analysis as anything other than a blast at Republicans’ | The National Journal takes a close look at the S&P decision to downgrade U.S. credit. The conclusion: “It based it on the political game of chicken over the debt ceiling, a game that Republicans initiated and pushed to the limit, and on a growing gloom about the partisan deadlock. Part of S&P’s gloom, moreover, stemmed explicitly from what a new assessment of the GOP’s ability to block any and all tax increases.” Read the full analysis here.

If Public Sector Payrolls Were at 2009 Levels, The Unemployment Rate Would Be 8.4 Percent

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the private sector added 154,000 jobs in July, while the public sector lost 37,000. And this is by no means a new phenomenon. As Matt Yglesias reported last month, the federal government alone has lost more than 500,000 jobs since President Obama took office.

All in all, BLS has found that federal, state, and local government payrolls fell by 1,130,000 between June 2009 and July 2011. So if government payrolls were the same today as they were back in 2009, the unemployment rate would be significantly lower, standing at 8.4 percent, instead of the current 9.1 percent. On the graph below, the darker line is the actual unemployment rate, while the lighter line is what it would have been in the absence of public sector layoffs:

In fact, without all the public sector layoffs, the unemployment rate never would have gone above ten percent. Despite the fact that private sector employment has been growing for months, while the public sector has been hemorrhaging jobs, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) still reacted to Friday’s jobs report by blaming lackluster job growth on Congress’ “spending binge.” Earlier this week, Sens. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) introduced legislation to layoff another 300,000 federal employees.

Sean Savett

Center for American Progress Director for Tax and Budget Policy Michael Linden produced the chart for this post.

Town Hall Attendee Tells GOP Rep. Joe Walsh: ‘Let’s Tax The Rich’

At a Thursday town hall meeting in Wauconda, Illinois, Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) railed against defense cuts and entitlement programs, telling attendees that Americans refuse to have a discussion about how best to rein in the nation’s deficit and debt. But when Walsh asked how Americans planned to pay for those programs, he was caught off guard by a quick answer from one of the event’s attendees:

WALSH: This country, for years, has put off the discussion, how are we going to pay for that? Let’s have the discussion!

MAN: Let’s tax the rich.

WALSH: Let’s tax the rich, they say! (Applause) All I’m saying is —

MAN: We used to!

WALSH: Don’t know where you’re going to get the money.

Watch it, courtesy of Americans United for Change:

Republicans continue ignore that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are among the main drivers of American debt and that falling tax rates on the rich have led to widening income gaps between the richest and poorest Americans. That, of course, hasn’t stopped the rich from taking advantage of loopholes — in 2009, more than 1,400 American households earned $1 million and yet avoided paying income taxes altogether. And Walsh’s town hall attendees aren’t alone. According to recent polling, Americans support raising taxes on the rich by wide margins. It’s only Republicans like Walsh who refuse to have that discussion.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up