ThinkProgress Logo

Economy

Unemployment For Younger Workers Hits Lowest Point Since January 2009

In the wake of the Great Recession, younger workers have had a significant amount of trouble entering the labor force, with unemployment for workers aged 25-34 hitting 10.5 percent back in May. But according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there is a glimmer of hope for younger workers, as their unemployment rate last month hit its lowest level since January 2009:

Jobs for 25-to-34-year-olds increased by 116,000 to 30.5 million in February. Their unemployment rate fell from 9% in January to 8.7%, the lowest since January 2009, according to the Labor Department.

Just as important, the portion of Americans in that age bracket who were employed — known as the employment-to-population ratio — rose to 74.7% from 74.5% and is up from a 29-year low of 73.2% in July. In a normal economy, about 80% of 25-to-34-year-olds have jobs.

Not only has the Great Recession been bad for workers entering the workforce, but as the Economic Policy Institute noted, the entire last decade has essentially been lost in terms of entry-level wages. As this chart shows, the entry level rage of college graduates today is below where it was in 2000:

And the picture is even worse for entry-level workers with just a high school degree. As the Wall Street Journal noted, “The drop in average wages for young adults is in contrast to U.S. government figures showing that average inflation-adjusted hourly wages for production and nonsupervisory workers of all ages and education levels are up 3% from a decade ago.”

Justice

Four ALEC State Senators Behind Anti-Union Bill In Georgia

Our guest blogger is Sarah Bufkin, a former ThinkProgress intern.

Ignoring the vocal opposition of activists and labor organizers, the state senate passed an anti-protest, anti-union bill on March 7. If passed into law, the proposed measure would both make it more difficult for unions to collect dues and set exorbitant fines against many union protests against anti-worker businesses: up to $1,000 per day for those individuals charged with illegal picketing and up to $10,000 to those organizations involved with the illegal protesting.

Senate Bill 469—which GOP senators pushed onto the House’s agenda with a 34-18 vote—is sponsored by four senators who are also members of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a corporate front group that pushes “model” legislation to state lawmakers intended to push a right-wing agenda in the states. Although it’s not clear whether SB 469 is such a bill, there are reasons to fear that similar bills could make their way to other states through ALEC’s network of corporate-friendly lawmakers.

The four ALEC members behind SB 469 include Sen. Bill Cowsert (R), who works with ALEC’s Criminal Justice Task Force, and Sen. Bill Hamrick (R), who received campaign contributions from the ALEC during the 2010 election cycle even though he ran unopposed. Significantly, there are also striking similarities between sections of SB 469 and ALEC’s model Right to Work Act:

  • SB 469: Section III of SB 469 states, “No employer shall deduct from the wages or other earnings of any employee any fee, assessment, or other sum of money whatsoever to be held for or to be paid over to a labor organization except on annual written authorization from the employee which shall not exceed a period greater than one year. Such authorization may be revoked at any time at the request of the employee.”
  • ALEC: ALEC’s Right to Work model bill states, “It shall be unlawful to deduct from the wages, earnings, or compensation of an employee any union dues, fees, assessments, or other charges to be held for, transferred to, or paid over to a labor organization, unless the employee has first presented, and the employer has received, a signed written authorization of such deductions, which authorization may be revoked by the employee at any time by giving written notice.”

Although such a requirement may not seem particularly important, it moves more of the onus of dues collecting onto labor unions, thereby diverting more of their resources and time from pushing for greater benefits for their members.

Furthermore, the GA bill includes a section that threatens to charge protestors not only with criminal trespassing but also with conspiracy to commit criminal trespass—a highly irregular revision of the law that would label the conspiracy charge as a “misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature” and bring harsher legal penalties for those convicted.

The addition of the conspiracy to commit criminal trespass charge follows only eight days after 12 Occupy Atlanta supporters were arrested for criminal trespass after protesting outside AT&T’s Atlanta offices. Given that AT&T is currently one of the 23 corporations serving on ALEC’s Board of Directors, some speculate the timing is no coincidence.

But regardless of where the bill originated, the proposed legislation poses a grave threat to any activists looking to change the status quo through civil disobedience. As Martin Luther King III told a crowd at a March 1 rally, the fines and penalties proposed in SB 469 would have stymied the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. We can only hope that the Georgia House of Representatives will listen to its constituents instead of its corporate backers when deliberating this piece of legislation in the weeks to come.

NEWS FLASH

‘Jobs Gap’ Stands At 11 Million | According to new estimates from the Brookings Hamilton Project, the nation’s “jobs gap” — the number of jobs necessary to get back to pre-recession level of unemployment — now stands at about 11 million. This includes five million jobs still lost from the Great Recession and six million for new entrants into the labor force. “At a job creation rate of 208,000 per month (the average rate for the best year of job creation in the 2000s), it will take until 2020 to close the jobs gap,” Brookings founds.

Georgia May Stash More Than $100 Million Of Foreclosure Fraud Settlement Money In State’s Rainy Day Fund

Several states have already announced that they plan to use some of the funds they receive from the $25 billion foreclosure fraud settlement for budget items other than helping homeowners, despite that being the purpose of the money. Ohio plans to use some of the funds to demolish vacant homes, while Wisconsin, Vermont, Maryland, and Pennsylvania are contemplating using the money for thing entirely unrelated to housing.

According to the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Georgia is set to become the latest state to join this list, with Gov. Nathan Deal (R) set to add more than $100 million of the state’s settlement money to Georgia’s rainy day fund:

“The state constitution requires that the money go into the state treasury. The governor would prefer that it go from there to the rainy day fund,” said [Deal spokesman Brian] Robinson.

The rainy day fund is state savings to cover emergencies and hard times.

Of course, one could definitely argue that the hard times are now in terms of Georgia’s housing market. One third of the state’s homes are underwater (meaning the owner owes more on the mortgage than the house is currently worth), the 5th highest percentage in the nation. One in every 328 Georgia housing units received a foreclosure notice in January of this year.

The foreclosure fraud money was not intended to paper over state budget problems, and it certainly wasn’t meant to be stashed away in a state’s rainy day fund to be broken out whenever the governor feels like it. Deal’s decision is reminiscent of when Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) stashed money meant to save education jobs into the Lone Star State’s rainy day fund, earning him a rebuke from Congress.

Black Unemployment Has Topped 10 Percent For Most Of The Last 50 Years

Some semblance of recovery has blossomed in the American jobs market over the last three months, with more than 200,000 jobs created in each of December, January, and February and the unemployment rate falling to 8.3 percent. The private sector has added jobs for 24 consecutive months, and though the economy is still far from healthy, it has improved markedly from the bottom of the recession.

The vast majority of Americans benefiting from that recovery, however, are white. The black unemployment rate in February was 14.1 percent, and though that is an improvement from the 27-year high it reached in August, the official unemployment rate for blacks barely changed in 2011. The 9.6 percent unemployment rate America experienced during the worst of the recession, in fact, would be a drastic improvement over the black unemployment rate in most of the last 50 years, as Algernon Austin noted at the Economic Policy Institute:

Since 2008, the Black unemployment rate has exceeded 10 percent. My current projections are that the Black unemployment rate will continue to exceed 10 percent through 2015.

The sad fact is that for most of the past 50 years, the Black unemployment rate has been above 10 percent.

The extremely high unemployment rate blacks are currently experiencing is tied to another major drag on the recovery. While the private sector continues to add jobs, the public sector — where one in five blacks find employment — has shed more than 600,000 jobs at the state, local, and federal level, and those layoffs have continued despite the modest recovery.

80 Percent Of Bankruptcy Lawyers Report A ‘Substantial Increase’ In Clients Buried By Student Loan Debt

A report released last week by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York showed that the total balance of student loans in the U.S. has reached $870 billion, while 27 percent of student loan borrowers are at least 30 days behind on their payments. Since 1985, the cost of college tuition and fees has sextupled.

Average college debt now exceeds $25,000, spurring fear of a “student debt bubble.” And a recent survey of bankruptcy lawyers seems to confirm those fears, as a vast majority of them have seen an increase in clients seeking relief from student loan debt:

According to a recent survey by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, more than 80 percent of bankruptcy lawyers have seen a substantial increase in the number of clients seeking relief from student loans in recent years.

In most cases, those clients could not meet the federal hardship standards that are necessary to discharge a student loan through bankruptcy proceedings. Instead, many of these parents or guardians who co-signed the student loans face the prospect of losing their life savings, cars or homes to collection agencies for aggressive private lenders.

William Brewer, head of NACBA, has said, “This could very well be the next debt bomb for the U.S. economy” (though it won’t reach the level of the mortgage bubble, due to the sheer size of the U.S. mortgage market).

Student loans are one of the few debts that are not easily discharged in bankruptcy, and restrictions on discharging loans from for-profit colleges have coincided with that industry’s rapid growth (and the student debt that comes along with it). The Roosevelt Institute’s Mike Konczal has suggested undoing some of the restrictions on discharging student loans that were instituted in the 80s and 90s, since “it is hard to see these as anything other than a giant subsidy to private agents.”

The Housing Crisis Pushed Black Homeownership Rate Below 1990 Level

Photo by flickr user gilsonrome

The housing crisis created a drop in homeownership rates across the board, but the number of Black and Latino homeowners decreased at a significantly higher level than it did for white Americans. A new report from the Bipartisan Policy Center reveals an astounding drop in homeownership rates among people of color. Specifically, the Black community saw levels of homeownership drop to pre-1990s levels:

Between 2004–2006 and 2010, however, homeownership rates dropped sharply, and more so for Hispanic and black households than for white non-Hispanics. The overall homeownership rate of 65.1 percent in April 2010 was 1.1 percentage points lower than 10 years earlier. Blacks ended the 2010s with a lower homeownership rate, 44.3 percent, than their 1990 rate of 45.2 percent and two percentage points lower than just 10 years earlier… The homeownership rate for black non-Hispanics now lags the white non-Hispanic rate by nearly 28 percentage points, compared with 26 points in 2000 and just less than 25 points in 1990…..

…While the housing crisis has hurt people of all races and ethnicities, it has been devastating for many Hispanic and black families, reducing their median wealth by one half to two-thirds and significantly increasing the number of households with negative net worth.

Image courtesy of the Bipartisan Policy Center

The correlation between skin color and homeownership is not coincidental; during the housing crisis, Black and Latino homeowners were twice as likely to be foreclosed on. Indeed, in California Black and Latino homeowners are said to make up 50% of foreclosures but only 30% of homeowners.

During the housing crisis, the Center for American Progress found, there were huge racial disparities in the makeup of high-priced lending with banks targeting people of color. One of the banks that received a government bailout, was even accused of having steered people of color toward subprime loans. Undoubtedly, these dubious and racist banking practices led to the homeownership numbers we see today.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is now taking steps to ensure the end of discriminatory lending practices. The damage, however, seems to have been done.

Churches Mark Lent By Moving Their Money, Asking Wall Street Banks To Repent For Mortgage Crisis

Religious organizations have been at the forefront of the nationwide “Move Your Money” movement, a campaign to get consumers to move their money from Wall Street financial institutions to community banks and credit unions. Before Thanksgiving, churches moved $55 million away from Wall Street banks and pledged to move at least $100 million more. In late February, a San Francisco coalition moved $10 million from Wells Fargo.

More churches are now joining the movement as a way to observe Lent. As congregations across the country observe the period between Ash Wednesday and Easter by sacrificing and repenting, religious leaders are asking big banks that have wrongfully foreclosed on homeowners and exacerbated the pain of the housing crisis to do the same, the New York Times reports:

And [Rev. Ryan Bell] has committed his congregation to one other religious obligation. He is withdrawing the church’s money, several hundred thousand dollars, from its account with the Bank of America. By the April weekend when Christians mourn Jesus’ crucifixion and celebrate his resurrection, Mr. Bell said, he will have moved the assets to a local bank as a protest against Bank of America’s role in mass foreclosures and to issue a call for its repentance.

“To right the wrongs of the world is as much a part of the Lenten experience as to repent ourselves,” Mr. Bell, 40, the pastor of Hollywood Adventist Church near Los Angeles said in a phone interview this week. “During this season, when we individually are examining our lives, we think it’s appropriate for the institutions that affect us to examine theirs.”

According to consulting firms, the nation’s 10 biggest banks could lose $185 billion in customer deposits because of customer defections. Bank of America, which could lose $42 billion in deposits, is the most vulnerable, and it has faced pressure from religious organizations to decrease foreclosures and offer more loan modifications. As part of a mortgage settlement with the federal government and state attorneys general, Bank of America will offer 200,000 loan reductions in the coming months.

Bank of America has become a prime target for consumers and Move Your Money campaigns because of questionable and potentially illegal foreclosure practices, including using fraudulent robo-signers, improperly foreclosing on military members, speeding up its rate of foreclosures, and foreclosing on homeowners it had previously approved for modifications. In response, religious leaders like Bell and Rev. Robert Rien, a California priest, have continued efforts to move money away from the bank. “It’s a grain of sand to Bank of America,” Rien, who moved $135,000 from Bank of America, told the New York Times. “But we needed to send a message that you can’t do this to people.”

Econ 101: March 12, 2012

Welcome to ThinkProgress Economy’s morning link roundup. This is what we’re reading. Have you seen any interesting news? Let us know in the comments section. You can also follow ThinkProgress Economy on Twitter.

  • Americans took 10.4 billion rides on public transportation in 2011, the second highest total since 1957. [New York Times]
  • The latest round of bank stress tests are expected to show improving balance sheets at the nation’s financial firms. [New York Times]
  • Business groups are pushing back on a provision of Wall Street reform that subjects certain too-big-to-fail financial firms to enhanced regulation. [The Hill]
  • Greece’s debt swap may provide only a short-term reprieve from the Eurozone crisis. [CNBC]
  • How banks won concessions in the $25 billion foreclosure fraud settlement. [Wall Street Journal]
  • House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Barney Frank (D-MA) has joined the calls for the nation’s top housing regulator, Edward DeMarco, to be replaced. [The Hill]

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up