ThinkProgress Logo

Election

Economy

Romney Flips On His Own Tax Plan, Admits He’d Give Huge Tax Break To Top 1 Percent

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney released his latest tax reform plan today in Arizona and highlighted specifically the fact that it provided a 20-percent across-the-board cut in marginal tax rates for all Americans.

Upon unveiling the plan, Romney claimed that it would actually force the richest Americans to pay their fair share. Speaking of tax exemptions and deductions, Romney said, “For the high-income folks, we’re going to cut back on that, so that we make sure that the top 1 percent keeps paying the current share they’re paying or more.”

But when former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) attacked Romney at the GOP debate tonight, Romney admitted that his tax plan contained a massive tax cut for the wealthiest Americans:

SANTORUM: Governor Romney even today suggested today raising taxes on the top 1 percent, adopting the Occupy Wall Street rhetoric. I’m not going to adopt that rhetoric. I’m going to represent 100 percent of Americans. We’re not raising taxes on anyone.

ROMNEY: Number one, I said that we’re going to cut taxes on everyone across the country by 20 percent, including the top 1 percent. So that’s number one.

Watch it:

According to analysis by Center for American Progress Tax and Budget Policy Director Michael Linden, Romney’s claims that his plan would raise taxes on the rich was false. His later claims, that it would provide a tax break to the rich, are indeed true.

Romney’s plan to give a 20-percent tax cut, lowering rates for the wealthiest Americans from 35 percent to 28 percent, and repeal the alternative minimum tax would, as Romney admitted tonight, provide a huge tax break to the richest Americans, at a cost four times higher than the Bush tax cuts. “The enormity of these tax cuts is mind-boggling,” Linden said. “Even more unbelievable is how skewed they are to those the very top of the income ladder.”

Politics

CHART: The 19 Super PAC Donors Who Have Poured $47 Million Into The GOP Race

Sheldon Adelson

Sheldon Adelson

Once again this week, independent-expenditure-only “Super PACs” disclosed their donors for the month of January 2012. A ThinkProgress analysis of these new filings and previously available data reveals that 19 wealthy donors have already given a million dollars or more each, combining to funnel $46.75 million to Republican-allied Super PACs so far this cycle.

It comes as little surprise that this list is dominated by financial sector investors (8), energy and chemical producers (4), and real estate developers (3). All are white. Only one, the wife of casino tycoon Sheldon Edelson, is female. The Obama administration has backed financial sector consumer protections and environmental regulations unpopular with big Wall Street and big energy.

The 19 donors’ contributions accounted for about 53 percent of the $88.2 million combined receipts for those committees. Here are the 19:

Donor Donations Sector
Harold Simmons/Contran Corp. $14.1M Chemicals
Sheldon Adelson $5M Casinos and hotels
Miriam Adelson $5M Casinos and hotels
Bob Perry $3.5M Real Estate/Construction
Peter Thiel $2.6M Finance/Investment
Jon Huntsman Sr. $2.2M Chemicals
Jerry Perenchio Living Trust $2M Media
Julian Robertson $1.25M Finance/Investment
Robert B. Rowling $1.1M Energy
Edward Conard $1M Finance/Investment
Robert Mercer $1M Finance/Investment
John Paulson $1M Finance/Investment
Paul Singer $1M Finance/Investment
Foster Friess $1M Finance/Investment
Rooney Holdings Inc. $1M Real Estate/Construction
William Dore $1M Energy
Whiteco Industries $1M Real Estate/Construction
F8 LLC (Jeremy Blickenstaff) $1M Finance/Investment
Eli Publishing (Steve Lund) $1M Cosmetics

These donations went to Super PACs backing GOP hopefuls Newt Gingrich (Winning Our Future), Ron Paul (Endorse Liberty), Mitt Romney (Restore Our Future), Rick Santorum (Red, White & Blue), backing former candidates Jon Huntsman Jr. (Our Destiny), Rick Perry (Make Us Great Again), and Republican candidates in general (American Crossroads).

To equal just their Super PAC contributions, political campaigns would need to collect more than 18,000 checks for $5,000 — the individual limit. Republican strategist Christopher LaCivita told the New York Times that these super donors are “serious business tycoons.” And these serious business tycoons are seriously overwhelming the political system with their contributions.

Politics

Republican Congressional Candidate Says Rep. Raúl Grijalva’s ‘Allegiance Is Not To America’

AZ-3 GOP candidate Gabriela Mercer

TUCSON, Arizona – A Republican congressional candidate in southern Arizona declared this morning that her Democratic Latino opponent’s “allegiance is not to America.”

Gabriela Saucedo Mercer, the favorite to win the Republican nomination in Arizona’s new 3rd congressional district, made the charge against Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) while speaking at a Tucson Tea Party rally. Grijalva, who was born in Arizona, has served his state and country for decades.

After dismissing Grijalva, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, as a “communist” — “what is progressive about communism?” Mercer asked — she told the crowd that the congressman is “anti-America.” “His allegiance is not to America,” Mercer declared. “Grijalva was born here, but he hates the American way”:

MERCER: I don’t understand what is wrong with this guy. Excuse me, Representative Grijalva. He’s not only anti-business, he’s anti-America. Wait a minute Gabby, why did you say that? Grijalva voted against the protection of the Pledge of Allegiance, because his allegiance is not to America. Grijalva was born here, but he hates the American way.

Watch it:

Calling a prominent sitting congressman a traitor to his country is about as serious a charge as one can make. In 2008, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) called for an investigation into “anti-American members of Congress,” sparking a firestorm of backlash that almost cost her re-election in a comfortably Republican district.

Last January, then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was shot in the head less than 10 miles from where Mercer made her comments, leading the nation to question whether the level of animosity in our political rhetoric had gotten out of hand. Politics is unquestionably a realm not for the faint-hearted, but questioning opponents’ patriotism, much less calling them out-and-out traitors, has no place in American elections.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up