ThinkProgress Logo

Election

Key Romney Transition Aide Was Tom DeLay Aide Turned Revolving Door Lobbyist

Drew Maloney

Drew Maloney

In recent weeks, Mitt Romney has dispatched a two-person team to meet with Congressional Republicans to discuss his theoretical transition should he win in November. Along with former Utah Gov. and George W. Bush administration Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt (R), that team includes Republican National Committee external affairs adviser and Romney “fixerDrew Maloney.

Who is Maloney?

After several years working as an aide to then-Reps. Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Ed Bryant (R-TN), Maloney became legislative director and administrative assistant (chief of staff) for then-Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) in 1999, at the age of 30. Perhaps because DeLay was convicted in 2010 of money laundering and conspiracy to illegally funnel corporate money to Texas candidates, Maloney’s official biography identifies his former boss as only the “Republican House Majority Whip,” noting that he “managed the Whip’s congressional office and played an intricate part in formulating the energy, judiciary, commerce and campaign finance reform policy initiatives.” DeLay, a consistent opponent of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law actually argued that there was “not enough money” American politics. The Texas Republican raised hundreds of thousands of dollars from the oil and gas industry and was Big Oil’s point person in Congress.

Over his two-and-a-half years in DeLay’s office, Maloney was a frequent traveler to exotic places on industry’s dime. Among the highlights were week-long trips to the United Kingdom ($3,845, paid for by the Nuclear Energy Institute) and Brazil ($8,342, bankrolled by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce). These controversial junkets were banned in 2007 by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act.

In 2002, Maloney traveled through the revolving door from Congress to federal lobbying. As managing director of the Federalist Group — now Ogilvy Government Relations — Maloney quickly began representing the energy industry before the Republican Congress he had just left.

In June 2002, Maloney organized an energy industry golf fundraising event for his former boss, DeLay. When the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct later investigated the event, Maloney told the ethics panel that he had asked companies to give $25,000 to $50,000 each to DeLay’s fundraising committees, including his Texans For A Republican Majority PAC (TRMPAC), which could accept unlimited “soft money” donations from corporations. While the ethics committee did not find the solicitation was itself improper, it did determine that Maloney’s fundraiser event for DeLay was “was not consistent with House standards of conduct providing that fundraising activities should not involve even an appearance that donors are being provided with special access to a Member in his or her official capacity.”

Three months later, Maloney suggested to Delay’s fundraising team a group of companies with “asbestos problems” which might support TRMPAC out of interest in tort reform.

While Maloney stepped down from his job as CEO at Ogilvy Government Relations this June to take his apparently unpaid position at the Republican National Committee, the clients he represented in 2012 include a wide swath of dirty energy companies and Wall Street banks who would stand to gain from Romney’s deregulatory approach. They included the American Petroleum Institute, Chevron, Hess, Excelon, Sempra, and GenOn Energy, as well as Blackstone Group, Highstar Capital, National Bank, and Visa. His client list and record are yet another indication that profit for Wall Street and Big Oil would be the priorities for a Romney administration.

LGBT

Focus On The Family’s Political Arm Launches $1.2M Mail Blitz For Romney, Anti-Gay Senate Candidates

Focus on the Family Action, the secret-money political arm of Focus on the Family, disclosed Monday that it has made a $1.2 million independent expenditure of direct mailings to voters in several swing states in support of Mitt Romney and six anti-LGBT Senate hopefuls.

The group said it spent:

1. $784,644.48 for Mitt Romney. The group’s mailings to Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin were both supportive of Romney critical of to Barack Obama. Romney has signed a pledge to push for a marriage inequality amendment to the constitution and gave a shout-out to Focus on the Family in his Denver campaign rally on Monday.

2. $71,404.18 for former Sen. George Allen (R-VA). Allen has argued homosexuality is not “acceptable” and should be “illegal.” A prominent anti-LGBT equality section on his campaign website notes that he will even oppose hate crimes protections for LGBT Americans that were enacted in 2009.

3. $67,896.06 for former Gov. Tommy Thompson (R-WI). Thompson has tried to present himself as a moderate in this campaign, but has a long history of opposing LGBT equality, dating back to the early 1980s.

4. $52,413.67 for Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO). Though conservatives have distanced themselves from Akin after his controversial comments that women who are victims of “legitimate rape” are unlikely to become pregnant, his stridently anti-LGBT record apparently put him in line with Focus on the Family. When President Obama announced his support for marriage equality, Akin lambasted him for showing an “unquenchable desire to tear down the traditional family unit brick by brick.”

5. $15,356.87 for Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT). Rehberg proudly pranked a colleague with a gay-mocking “Idaho Travel Package” while dismissing LGBT equality as “extremist.”

6. $33,839.41 for Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV). Though Heller has tried to avoid talking about his opposition to LGBT families throughout this campaign, he has voted against equality at every single opportunity over his time in Congress.

7. $184,124.26 for State Treasurer Josh Mandel (R-OH). Mandel has said the fight against marriage equality is one from which he will “will never, ever back down.”

All totaled, Focus on the Family Action (which now calls itself “CitizenLink”) spent $1,209,679 to encourage voters in key swing states and in states with close Senate races to vote for anti-equality candidates.

Ryan Challenged By Voter To Provide Policy Specifics, Fails To Deliver

A woman at a rally in Clinton, Iowa challenged Paul Ryan for not providing specifics about the GOP presidential proposals on Tuesday, echoing a growing concern among reporters, pundits and voters alike:

QUESTION: My question is, you know, you keep talking about China and jobs and then we talk about the unemployment, but where are the answers? I mean, why aren’t you more specific? I heard you, was it Sunday, when you were on Fox. And you didn’t answer his question about what are your plans.

RYAN: No look, when you get in a math conversation it can take a little while….when you’re on a 30-second T.V. show, you can’t do it as much. But the point is, go to our website. Mitt Romney has put more specifics, more details…than the incumbent president of the United States has.

Watch it:

Ryan appeared unable to respond in specifics, even as he spent more than 8 minutes laying out the ticket’s proposals. Instead, he recycled the campaign’s 5-point plan — in generalities — with standrad replies he often employs on the stump like, build the Keystone Pipeline, allow parents to send their children to charter schools, and open new markets for American products.

“We have to cut spending,” Ryan said, towards the end of his answer, without specifying the reductions. He didn’t identify any tax loopholes Romney/Ryan would close in order to ensure that their proposal of implementing a 20 percent tax cut across the board remains revenue neutral. “Our tax plan is really simple…there is only one person who has raised taxes and is promising to raise taxes in the future who is running for president. And his name is Barack Obama,” he said.

NEWS FLASH

George Will: Obama Is Winning Because He’s Black | Washington Post columnist George Will suggested in his Tuesday column that President Obama was only ahead in the polls because he’s African-American. After dismissing Obama’s record as being obviously “in shambles,” Will suggested that Americans were supporting him only because they didn’t want to see a black president fail, writing that “the nation, which is generally reluctant to declare a president a failure — thereby admitting that it made a mistake in choosing him — seems especially reluctant not to give up on the first African American president. If so, the 2012 election speaks well of the nation’s heart, if not its head.” Credible academic estimates suggest Obama lost a net 3 to 5 percent of the national vote in 2008 as a consequence of his race.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up