Advertisement

Flint congressman’s staff reportedly barred from EPA event on water contamination

Not a good look for the EPA.

Reps. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., center, Elijah Cummings, D-Md., right, and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., attend a news conference in Flint, Mich., on the city's water crisis. (Credit: Getty Images/Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
Reps. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., center, Elijah Cummings, D-Md., right, and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., attend a news conference in Flint, Mich., on the city's water crisis. (Credit: Getty Images/Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is having a rough week. On Tuesday, it was revealed that reporters from the Associated Press, CNN, and E&E News were barred from entering an EPA summit on toxic chemicals. When an AP reporter tried to enter the summit, she was reportedly “forcibly” removed. Though the EPA eventually relented and allowed press to cover the event, it was too late to stop an afternoon of negative coverage.

Wednesday did not prove any better for the agency’s image. In a tweet, Rep. Dan Kildee (D-MI) said the EPA barred his staff from attending a summit on water contamination.

What’s especially concerning about this move is that Kildee represents Flint, Michigan, the site of an ongoing toxic water crisis. It shouldn’t have been a surprise to EPA officials that Flint’s congressional representative would find it necessary to attend an event concerning the very issue plaguing his constituents.

Advertisement

The state government recently stopped providing bottled water to the town, arguing that Flint’s water is now safe. This move did not sit well with residents. On Tuesday, Gov. Rick Snyder’s (R) office was stormed by 100 protesters who demanded the state begin providing bottled water once again. And as Mother Jones has reported, residents aren’t buying local officials’ claims and scientists are hesitant to agree with the government that the water is safe to drink.

Kildee wasn’t the only member of Congress with something to say about the controversy. Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) questioned who the EPA was really serving with this event, saying on Twitter that the agency was “more concerned with protecting the EPA chemical summit from the public than it is with protecting the public from harmful chemicals.”

In addition, the EPA once again barred press from covering Wednesday’s event. This move prompted a swift and pointed response from the Society of Environmental Journalists, who told EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt in a letter “there is no justification for secrecy here.”

Advertisement

The EPA defended itself, with spokesman Jahan Wilcox telling Politico that “the National Leadership Summit on PFAS scheduled is not a federal advisory committee event. The purpose of this event is for EPA’s state, tribal, and federal government partners and national organizations to share a range of individual perspectives on the Agency’s actions to date and path forward on [the chemicals].”