“There will be no rate increases at this point,” Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said. “The application was in error. There were all kinds of methodological mistakes.” [...]
WellPoint acknowledged the errors in its rate filing, calling them “inadvertent miscalculations.” Anthem, it said, would file new rate increases for individual policy holders in May, but a spokeswoman declined to say exactly when or indicate how large they would be. …The report from the actuarial consulting firm, Axene Health Partners of Winchester, said that, among its errors, Anthem overstated medical costs by inflating the effect of aging. Reworking the numbers could reduce the average rate hike by 10.2%, it found.
For months, WellPoint, along with AHIP, insisted that growing provider costs and the departure of healthier people from the risk pool necessitated the steep increases, but this report helps explain why the rates were so much higher than medical inflation. Even if we bend over backwards and assume that the company was inadvertently making mistakes without checking its math that doesn’t bring us to a comfortable solution. The sheer carelessness of committing “methodological errors” that cost beneficiaries thousands of dollars is appalling, particularly for an industry that spends millions convincing the public it’s moving to contain health care spending.
In too many states, regulators don’t force insurers to live up to their own hype and as a result companies don’t have any incentive to double check their figures or submit lower increases. Democrats have already seized on the story to argue for a national rate review board that could reject unreasonable increases in states that lack such authority, but I suspect that any real action will occur on the state level. State regulators must begin auditing insurers and literally reviewing the math behind premium increases.
Consumer Watchdog has also put out a release urging Congressional investigators to look into “whether Anthem Blue Cross executives made misrepresentations to Congress in testimony claiming the company’s rate increase was actuarially sound,” arguing that if Americans are required to purchase coverage, insurance companies should be required to show that the premiums they charge are reasonable.
If they don’t, more stories about insurer antics and abuses could very will bring about the kind of public option and rate review provisions that Democrat’s weren’t able to stuff in this health care bill.