ThinkProgress Logo

Health

Oprah Clashes With Coburn On Protect Our Children Act

Yesterday, Oprah Winfrey urged her viewers to contact their senators and ask them to support the Protect Our Children Act (HR 3845/S 1738), which authorizes over $320 million over the next five years for law enforcement to investigate child exploitation:

This is what we want to do. Want to get these guys and put them in jail. So, tell us about the Protect Our Children Act. It’s going before the U.S. Senate this month. We only have a few days.

Watch it:


The bill is being blocked by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), who, in July, successfully derailed the legislation when it was included in the “the so-called Coburn omnibus,” a package of nearly 40 uncontroversial bills that extended funding for cancer research and crime prevention.

Now, Senate Democrats are gearing up for a re-match. According to the Hill, “Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), spurred on by activists and TV talk show host Oprah Winfrey…has sent word to Senate Democrats that it would like to bring the so-called Coburn omnibus bill to the floor soon, setting up a rematch with the conservative Oklahoma Republican who has often brought the Senate to gridlock.”

Indeed, in his three short years in the Senate, Coburn has earned the reputation of “a fly in the soup,” abusing the senate’s hold privilege to prevent “the Senate leadership” from bringing matters to a vote. He “initially blocked” S 1738 “because it would have authorized nearly a billion dollars over eight years to fund a law enforcement crackdown on child exploitation,” but now “questions the efficacy of a new program.”

Far from controversial, the bill is co-sponsored by conservative Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Ted Stevens (R-AK) and is estimated to cost just $3 per American over the 2009-2013 budgeted period.”

Cross-posted at ThinkProgress.

STUDY: McCain’s Health Plan Will Increase Costs, Reduce Coverage

mccainbannerhealth.jpg

An independent study of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) health care plan, published today in Health Affairs, concludes that McCain’s proposal “would almost certainly…increase family costs for medical care.” Here are the details:

MCCAIN PROPOSAL: Eliminate the current tax exclusion for employer-sponsored coverage.

CONSEQUENCE: Twenty million people would lose coverage, but “the effect could be much larger.

- Cost of employers-sponsored coverage would increase. By equalizing the tax status of the individual and group markets, “low-risk employees would have less incentive to remain in employer-sponsored groups,” would leave the employer-risk pool, increasing costs for those left behind.

- Employers could discriminate against workers. Employers would no longer have to abide by rules “which require firms to provide similar benefits to high-and-low wage employees.”

MCCAIN PROPOSAL: Push Americans into the unregulated individual market.

CONSEQUENCE: Americans will have “far less generous policies that those they have today.

- Nongroup plans are more expensive than group plans. “It is much more expensive to sell insurance to millions of individuals one individual at a time than it is to sell top a much smaller number of employer groups.” For a family that moves from the group to the individual market, “nongroup insurance will raise premiums for an identical policy by more than $2,000 per year.”

- Cheaper but less substantive policies. Insurance providers could have an incentive to develop “bare-bones” insurance policies costing little more than the $5,000 tax credit for families…however, for most uninsured families, the benefits of such policies in terms of protection from financial risk and access to medical care would likely be very small…”

- Less healthy people will not find coverage. According a recent survey, less healthy individuals found it almost impossible to find affordable coverage in the individual market.

- High-Risk Pools will only cover 3 million people. McCain has proposed to fund his Guaranteed Access plan to the tune of $7-10 billion, which could only cover three million people and leave millions without affordable insurance.

MCCAIN PROPOSAL: A national insurance market in which insurance could be purchased across state lines.

CONSEQUENCE: Consumers would lose important protections “designed to establish minimum levels of coverage.

- Important consumer protections will be lost. Companies will charter in states with scarce regulations, and will no longer have to provide mental health parity, cancer screenings, or abide by regulations that “limit the rates that can be charged to higher-cost consumers and that limit who can be excluded for a health plan.

Under McCain’s plan, “upward of forty million Americans would be uninsured — and that number would likely grow over time.” In fact, since McCain’s health care tax credit would “not automatically adjust as health care costs increase,” Americans will have to stretch their credits to afford the same coverage every year.

As columnist Bob Herbert notes in today’s New York Times, “this entire McCain health insurance transformation is right out of the right-wing Republicans’ ideological playbook: fewer regulations; let the market decide; and send unsophisticated consumers into the crucible alone. You would think that with some of the most venerable houses on Wall Street crumbling like sand castles right before our eyes, we’d be a little wary about spreading this toxic formula even further into the health care system.”

For more on McCain’s health care plan, click here and here.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up