ThinkProgress Logo

Health

NEWS FLASH

Republican Threats To Women’s Access To Contraception Could Affect Millions | With renewed attacks on Sandra Fluke’s activism in support of access to affordable birth control, an increasing number of religious organizations suing for the right to deny contraceptive coverage for their employees, and the passage of a Missouri law that allows any employer to drop birth control coverage from their insurance plans if they morally object to it, the War on Women has intensified in the past few weeks. The National Women’s Law Center crunched the numbers to find how many women could be impacted by federal and state-level attacks on contraceptive coverage, if Republican lawmakers have their way:

47 million women would lose contraceptive coverage with no co-pay if the House successfully repeals President Obama’s health care reform law.

40.2 million women could have their decision about birth control taken out of their hands if Congress allows employers to choose to deny workers contraception coverage in their insurance plans.

7 million women would lose access to affordable birth control through their Medicaid plans if states do not accept the Medicaid expansion under Obamacare.

4.7 million women would lose their access to contraception from the Title X family planning program if the House succeeds in ending the funding for the program.

2.2 million women would not be able to continue to get their birth control if conservative lawmakers succeed in their repeated attempts to defund Planned Parenthood.

Election

Romney And Bain Boosted Agriculture Giant Monsanto In Spite Of Toxic Past

Biotechnology firm Monsanto Company, which currently owns most of the patents for America’s staple crops, is already cozy with American lawmakers. A new Nation report, however, indicates that “a very old friend in a very high place” may usher in the corporation’s most prosperous years yet.

The Nation’s investigative report has uncovered how Mitt Romney personally helped Monsanto shed its string of toxic chemical-related scandals and reinvent itself to dominate American agriculture. Monsanto, an early Bain & Company client, was so impressed with Romney that they started bypassing his superiors to deal with him directly. Romney’s close relationship with then CEO John Hanley prompted his boss to create Bain Capital to keep Romney from leaving and taking their largest consulting client with him.

From 1977 to 1985, Romney helped navigate Monsanto through very rocky waters. The agribusiness was flooded with lawsuits after Congress banned the toxic coolant PCBs, a Monsanto product that has been linked to cancer and neurological disorders. At the same time, Monsanto’s Agent Orange toxin, used to defoliate jungles in the Vietnam War, was linked to the contamination of millions of Vietnamese and American soldiers and had been dubbed “the largest chemical warfare operation” in human history.

Tom Philpott at Mother Jones dug up a 2002 article describing Monsanto’s attempts to hide its toxic waste disposal even after managers discovered fish “spurting blood and shedding skin” within 10 seconds of the PCB dump:

Monsanto Co. routinely discharged toxic waste into a west Anniston [Alabama] creek and dumped millions of pounds of PCBs into oozing open-pit landfills. And thousands of pages of Monsanto documents—many emblazoned with warnings such as “CONFIDENTIAL: Read and Destroy”—show that for decades, the corporate giant concealed what it did and what it knew.

Faced with costly litigation, Monsanto relied on Romney to create their new public image — one that did not involve poisoning soldiers or dumping chemicals in rivers:

Dr. Earl Beaver, who was Monsanto’s waste director during the Bain period, says that Bain was certainly “aware” of the “PCB and dioxin scandals” because they created “a negative public perception that was costing the company money.” So Bain recommended focusing “on the businesses that didn’t have those perceptions,” Beaver recalls, starting with “life science products that were biologically based,” including genetically engineered crops, as well as Roundup, the hugely profitable weed-killer. “These were the products that Bain gave their go-ahead to,” Beaver contends, noting that Romney was a key player, “reviewing the data collected by other people and developing alternatives,” talking mostly to “the higher muckety-mucks.”

These “life science products” are now Monsanto’s calling card and have allowed the company to completely dominate the agriculture world in spite of its dark past. Still, Monsanto continues to attract controversy, as several Occupy Monsanto protests plague their facilities this week. Their new line of genetically modified seeds and chemicals are unleashing even more problems, including a new crop of “super weeds” and “super pests” that have risen up in the pesticide arms race.

Romney was simply doing his job by helping Monsanto reinvent itself. Financially speaking, he succeeded immensely. However, he’s signaled that he would lift up the agricultural giant even higher should he become president; for one thing, his Agricultural Advisory Committee is packed full of Monsanto lobbyists and partners. As the 2012 Farm Bill seems destined to languish until after the election, Romney would undoubtedly approve the “Monsanto rider” tucked into the House bill that would render the USDA impotent in blocking unsafe or untested products, forbid outside studies of Monsanto products’ safety, and exempt itself from environmental law. It would also allow Monsanto to rush clearance of its not-yet-approved “Agent Orange corn,” designed to resist that same defoliant that led the company to pay out a $180 million settlement to 52,000 contaminated troops during its Bain years.

GOP Congressman Calls Planned Parenthood A ‘Racist Organization,’ Compares Abortion To Slavery

Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS)Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) compared abortion to slavery and said that Planned Parenthood was a “racist organization” that was “created for the sole purpose of killing” children of color at a conservative religious conference in Washington, DC, Friday.

To loud applause, the congressman unleashed a series of intense accusations about the women’s health organization. He cited his adopted children as the “targets” of Planned Parenthood’s abortion services and said that, outside of slavery, abortion “is the darkest stain on our nation’s character”:

Perhaps the biggest war against our liberties is the war that is being waged against those that are not here today, the unborn. Besides slavery, abortion is the other darkest stain on our nation’s character and this President is looking for every way possible to make abortion or available and more frequent. And he wants you to pay for it. Even if you disagree with it.

Welcome to another provision of Obamacare. Like the pro-slavery forces that invaded Kansas the pro-abortion forces in Washington and elsewhere want us to believe that abortion is not murder. [...]

Ladies and gentlemen, I am the adoptive father of four children, each of them either Black, Hispanic, Native American, and I am incensed that this President pays money to an entity that was created for the sole purpose of killing children that look like mine — a racist organization and it continues to target minorities for abortion destruction. Shame on this President and shame on that party.

Watch it:

Federal funding for Planned Parenthood goes to cancer screenings, checkups, and STI testing. The organization serves roughly 5 million adults and youth a year for those purposes. Under the Hyde Amendment, it is barred from receiving federal funding for abortion services. Neither does Obamacare require any person to pay for abortion services against their religious beliefs. The law does require insurance companies to provide women copay-free birth control, but the abortion pill and procedure are not required to be covered.

NEWS FLASH

Virginia Board Votes To Force Existing Abortion Clinics To Comply With New, Restrictive Regulations | The Virginia Board of Health voted 13-2 today to require existing abortion clinics to meet newly-instated facility regulations. Previously, board members decided to grandfather in existing providers so that they were not forced to spend thousands of dollars on unnecessary updates, but state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli refused to approve the decision. Ahead of the vote, the board only allowed 100 people into the meeting and limited public comment about the regulations to one hour, but opponents gathered outside to protest the expanded regulations. ProgressVA accused the board of prioritizing “political agendas over evidence-based medicine.” “It is simply disgraceful that the Board would bow to right-wing bullying,” Anna Scholl, executive director of ProgressVA, said in a statement.

Protesters Await Virginia Abortion Clinic Regulation Decision

The Virginia Board of Health is expected to make a decision later today on whether existing abortion clinics must comply with newly-instated facility regulations that would require abortion providers to make thousands of dollars in updates and may force some clinics to close altogether. Protesters waiting outside of the board of health consider the new laws “Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers” (TRAP), which are implicitly meant to limit women’s access to legal abortions through regulation of the provider, instead of the patient.

The Board of Health previously grandfathered in existing providers, saying they were exempt from the new regulations. But Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli — who protesters jokingly refer to as ‘Cooch’ — refused to sign off on their decision. Yesterday, the Virginian-Pilot reported that Cuccinelli essentially threatened the Board into reconsidering its decision, saying that otherwise they’d be denied state-funded legal services in the future.

Officials barred testimonies by doctors and advocates opposed to the regulations today, a move that further enraged pro-choice activists. In a statement, the Virginia Health Coalition said, “If passed, the regulations may end access to legal abortion in Virginia, creating the most restrictive state abortion regulations in the country and ending access to critical cancer screenings and annual care for thousands of Virginia women.”

(HT: @maehemsez for the photos)

STUDY: New York Public Schools Have ‘Shocking’ Gaps In Sex Education

Although more than three fourths of New York residents support teaching comprehensive sex education in public schools, the state does not currently mandate this type of curriculum. However, after surveying over 80 school districts across the state to assess their health programs and discovering “glaring inaccuracies” in dozens of schools’ sex ed materials, the New York Civil Liberties Union is recommending that the state reconsider its position to “reverse this failure.”

The NYCLU compiled their findings in a report that points out the potentially devastating consequences of failing to provide comprehensive sexuality education to New York’s students:

According to the Centers for Disease Control and prevention, 44.5 percent of New York’s male high school students and 39.6 percent of female students are sexually active — but a third of sexually active boys report that they don’t use condoms, and nearly 80 percent of sexually active girls say they don’t use oral contraceptives. The need for comprehensive sex education is explicit and urgent — but New York does not require sex education in public schools. [...]

The physical health and sexual and emotional well-being of New York’s youngest residents is being compromised daily in its schoolrooms. Low sex-ed literacy results in unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections including HIV and a lowered well-being for the state’s youth. All of these factors together limit young people’s education, hobbling their potential for personal and economic independence, and adding significant costs to the state.

As one of the co-authors of the report put it, the study revealed that what currently passes for sex ed in some New York schools is “shocking.” The report found that lessons on reproduction and human anatomy were often inaccurate and incomplete, especially because nearly 2 in 3 school districts excluded any mention of female genitalia in their instruction. One school district referred to the vagina as a “sperm deposit.” The courses also lacked practical instruction — while 80 percent of the districts included in the study included some mention of condoms, only about one in three districts taught students how to use them. And a heterosexual and religious bias runs throughout the states’ sex ed curricula, either ignoring or stigmatizing LGBT relationships and emphasizing shame-based messages about sexuality and abstinence.

With the exception of New York City — which enacted a comprehensive sex ed policy just last year and was therefore excluded from the study — New York State has broad guidelines on sexual health that do not currently require general sexuality education in every school district or specifically approved, medically accurate instruction materials in classrooms. In light of its findings, the NYCLU is calling on the State Education Department to update its regulations immediately.

NEWS FLASH

Number Of Cases In U.S.’ Worst West Nile Outbreak May Have Peaked | Officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have warned that the U.S. will see the largest outbreak this year of West Nile virus infections, which is spread by mosquitoes. Last week, reported cases of West Nile jumped 35 percent, but federal officials think the growing number of cases has peaked and that the rate of new infections will slow. “We think the worst part of the epidemic is behind us,” said Dr. Lyle Petersen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Vector-Borne Diseases. As of Tuesday, the CDC said 2,636 cases of the virus had been reported this year, including 118 deaths.

NEWS FLASH

HIV Vaccine Trials Struggle To Enroll Women | Although the HIV virus disproportionately affects women in developing countries, only about one fifth of participants in vaccine trials in most of Africa’s sites are women. Since women’s immune response to vaccinations could be different than men’s, scientists worry that the decreased number of female participants in their trials could result in a vaccine that won’t be as effective at combating HIV in women. “We could end up with a vaccine that we can only say elicits a good immune response in men. We will not know if it works equally well in women,” the director of a HIV vaccine development group in Uganda explained. Some HIV researchers speculate that women are less likely to participate in trials because — even as adults — they have to seek consent from their partners or parents, many of whom may not support the idea. Continuing to combat HIV stigma may encourage a greater number of women to seek out HIV vaccine trials and medical care.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up