ThinkProgress Logo

Immigration

Health

Washington Wants To Deny Health Benefits To Formerly Undocumented Immigrants — But Americans Don’t

With Congress engaged in a contentious fight over how to overhaul the nation’s broken immigration system, lawmakers from both parties — including President Obama — see eye-to-eye on at least one aspect of the debate: previously undocumented immigrants who achieve provisional legal or deferred action status should not be eligible for government health care benefits or insurance subsidies.

But according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s (KFF) February tracking poll, Washington is out of touch with a strong majority of Americans, who believe that such immigrants should be able to access care with the help of government resources:

The survey finds that even Republicans are relatively split on providing Medicaid benefits to low-income immigrants with provisional legal status. KFF’s report goes on to underscore the largely-ignored reality that even lawfully present immigrants — including those who were never undocumented, and particularly those with low incomes — have to jump through hoops in order to gain coverage. KFF conducted a more thorough analysis on this exact issue earlier this month in order to highlight the discrepancies between naturalized citizens’ and low-income immigrants’ access to services:

The long waiting periods that low-income immigrants must endure in order to get Medicaid coverage are particularly troubling given the fact that poorer immigrants likely cannot afford private insurance on the individual market and usually work for employers that do not provide their workers with health coverage. That perfect storm of coverage gaps perpetuates a system in which poor immigrants are forced to pursue care at underground, cash-only local clinics with little public oversight, such as Los Angeles’ ubiquitous neighborhood “bodega clinicas.”

Eliminating these barriers to health coverage by eliminating the Medicaid waiting period for low-income legal immigrants and allowing DREAMers and other immigrants who achieve provisional legal status — assuming comprehensive immigration reform passes, that is — to access Medicaid and Obamacare’s insurance subsidies would actually strengthen America’s health care system, as more people would be able to afford their care and receive cost-saving preventative services. Such reform policies are clearly supported by the factual evidence — and also, as it turns out, by the American people.

GOP Rep Compares Obama Administration To Communist Cuba

Bracing for automatic budget cuts set to go into effect tomorrow, the Department of Homeland Security released about 10,000 nonviolent detainees from immigration detention centers on Monday. Republican lawmakers have railed against the move, even as two attempts to avert the so-called sequester cuts were derailed in the Senate today. Rep. Lou Barletta (R-PA) went so far as to compare the DHS’ release of detainees to communist Cuba:

This reminds me of Fidel Castro’s release of criminals in the Mariel Boatlift in 1980…This is unacceptable, irresponsible and reckless. If this is the best cost-savings that Secretary Napolitano can do, then we have to begin to seriously question her judgment…How many criminals have now been released on our streets? And the president shrugs his shoulders and pretends that someone else is responsible. At a certain point, President Obama must take ownership of what goes on in his own administration.

The Mariel Boatlift was a mass exodus from Cuba to the US that erupted into controversy when it was discovered some of the refugees were from Cuban jails and mental hospitals. But according to a Congressional report, just 10 percent of the 125,366 Cubans who came to the US had a criminal record or a history of mental illness that would have prevented them from immigrating to the US. These so-called “excludables” returned to Cuba 4 years later. Even so, “Marielitos” endured a stigma from political and media portrayals of the refugees as criminals.

Like Marielitos, the detainees being released by the DHS have been stigmatized as dangerous criminals by anti-immigrant lawmakers like Barletta. All 10,000 detainees were convicted of nonviolent immigration-related crimes. In fact, the largest growing segment of the US prison population are detained for nonviolent immigration offenses. ICE detainees are often never even convicted of an immigration crime, but are simply sent to languish indefinitely in detention centers, while awaiting a trial. Thousands of detainees in 2010 actually turned out to be American citizens.

Justice

BREAKING: Congress Finally Reauthorizes Violence Against Women Act

After nearly a year of partisan infighting on Capitol Hill, the House of Representatives and the Senate have finally agreed to send a reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act to President Obama’s desk.

On Thursday, by a vote of 286 to 138, the House passed the bipartisan Senate-approved version of the bill — one that includes added protections for LGBT, Native American, and undocumented victims of domestic violence. All 138 votes against the bill were Republicans.

A watered down Republican version of the bill, which was offered as a substitute amendment, failed to garner enough votes to slow the process. It was struck down by a vote of 257 to 166. Sixty Republicans voted against their own party’s replacement measure.

Twenty-seven members of Congress, all Republicans, voted against both versions:

During the last session of Congress, the GOP-led House approved their watered-down VAWA, while the Senate included expanded provisions in the version it passed. The two were never reconciled, and Congress failed to renew the 18-year-old domestic violence law by the time it disbanded at the end of 2012.

Update

Curiously, of the 27 who voted against both versions, 14 actually voted for the House version last time around. A spokeswoman for Rep. Doc Hastings (R-WA), told ThinkProgress that he objected to the Native American provisions in both versions — provisions not found in the 2012 House version. A spokesman for Rep. Tom Petri (R-WI) said that while he supported the principal, he voted against it because the bill did not go through “regular order” and “a better bill could have been produced if it had gone through the committee process.” It is not yet clear what made the other 12 members change their minds: Reps. John Culberson (R-TX), Jeff Duncan (R-SC), John Duncan (R-TN), Steve Fincher (R-TN), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Walter Jones (R-NC), Doug Lamborn (R-CO), Kristi Noem (R-SD), Pete Olson (R-TX), Mike Pompeo (R-KS), David Schweikert (R-AZ), and Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI).

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up