Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Federal Court Smacks Gun Group’s Attempt To Keep Election Spending Secret

By Josh Israel

"Federal Court Smacks Gun Group’s Attempt To Keep Election Spending Secret"

Share:

google plus icon
Judge Dana L. Christensen

Judge Dana L. Christensen

A federal judge upheld Montana’s campaign finance disclosure laws as constitutional. His summary judgment ruling, released Tuesday, found that “the public’s right to know who is financing political campaigns vastly outweighs the minimal burden imposed by the incidental committee.”

The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), a Virginia-based tax-exempt group which aims to protect gun rights “without compromise,” sought to distribute a mailing to Montana voters but refused to register as a political committee as required under state law. It claimed that the state’s law violated its right to “free speech and association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution,” and sought an injunction to stop the law, last October.

Judge Dana L. Christensen of the United States District Court for the District of Montana determined that the NAGR’s challenge failed “on all fronts,” forcing them to either disclose who funds their efforts or to avoid political activity in the state of Montana.

‹ Reform To Mandatory Minimum Sentences Will Apply To Pending Cases, Attorney General Says

Catholic University Claims It Does Not Have To Allow Unions Because Religious Freedom ›

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.