ThinkProgress Logo

LGBT

Top 5 Examples of Perry’s Anti-Gay Agenda

As the hours tick down until Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) announces his candidacy for the GOP presidential nomination, many outlets are speculating as to whether or not he will win the vote of the religious right with his vocal social conservatism. Just last month, he stirred up controversy with various Christian groups by flip-flopping on whether or not gay marriage should be legal. But Perry’s anti-gay record should speak for itself:

1. Perry has come down fiercely against gay marriage, both in Texas and nationally.

“Gay marriage is not fine with me,” Perry told Tony Perkins of the anti-gay Family Research Council last month. Contrary to his states’ rights rhetoric on issues like health care and education mandates, he is in favor of a federal amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. While serving as governor, he pushed for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Texas. After voters approved the amendment, he signed it symbolically at a Christian school, declaring that now gay marriage is “beyond the reach of activist judges.”

2. He supports a Texas law that criminalizes sodomy, even though it has been unconstitutional since 2003.

When asked for his views on the 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling an anti-sodomy law unconstitutional, Perry responded with, “I think our law is appropriate that we have on the books.” He later blamed the decision on the Supreme Court’s “nine oligarchs in robes” in his second book, Fed Up! Texas lawmakers have introduced legislation to repeal the statute during three separate legislative sessions, and yet Perry has not supported any of them. In 2010, he even ran for re-election on a GOP platform explicitly supporting the criminalization of gay sex.

3. Perry criticized President Obama for signing hate-crimes legislation in 2010.

When running against U.S. Senator Kay Hutchinson in 2009, his campaign conducted a series of robocalls calling out Obama for “making homosexuality a protected class” by signing hate-crimes protections for the LGBT community into law. Instead, he is looking to hire Robert Black, one of his former staffers who is prone to hateful speech himself. Black made the papers in 1998 for likening the Log Cabin Republicans, a group of gay conservatives, to the Ku Klux Klan and characterizing the organization as “deviant.”

4. He is cultivating relationships with anti-gay hate groups.

As has been widely reported, the American Family Association–which the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated an “anti-gay hate group”–organized and funded in large measure Perry’s Aug. 6 prayer rally in Houston. The Response, which drew around 30,000 attendees, was also affiliated with pastors who described the gay movement as coming from the “pit of hell” and who blamed Hurricane Katrina on gays. He has also reportedly spoken with several members of the New Apostolic Reformation in a June closed-door meeting aimed at developing a counter-strategy to Obama in 2012. Rachel Maddow described anti-gay sentiment as “prominent in NAR preaching, where hurricanes, tornadoes, dead birds and the rise of the Nazis are all blamed on gays and lesbians.”

5. And if you don’t agree with him, Perry thinks you should live elsewhere.

When asked by a local NBC anchor for his response to the gay veterans protesting the new constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in 2005, Perry retorted, “Texans made a decision about marriage and if there’s a state that has more lenient views than Texas, then maybe that’s a better place for them to live.”

Sarah Bufkin

Alyssa

Republicans, Defense Spending, And Public Support For The Arts

It’s always laughable when Republicans try to demonstrate how serious they are about cutting spending by going after the relatively minuscule budgets of the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. But it’s also a reminder that what Republicans oppose isn’t all funding for the arts — it’s just funding for some kinds of projects.

Among the things included in the defense spending that until the debt ceiling deal was such a sacred cow? Support for a wide array of military groups and the United States Armed Forces School of Music, which essentially represents the direct purchase of art by the U.S. government. I’m sure there are good arguments to be made for the existence of these musical groups, including unit cohesion and service pride, preservation of musical traditions, and really awesome covers of Adele’s “Rolling in the Deep”:

But if you don’t think government should support the arts, it probably shouldn’t matter if the artists are servicemembers or starving.

NEWS FLASH

Values Bus’ Twitter As Empty As Its Events | Just as the tour itself has had very few attendees, the Values Bus trekking across Iowa this week to highlight Republican presidential candidates hasn’t picked up any steam on Twitter either. Jeremy Hooper points out that the Values Bus, a project of the National Organization for Marriage and hate group Family Research Council, has only about 50 followers, which includes several journalists and progressive bloggers. Is there anything about the conservative bus tour that’s not a flop?

Gay Man Challenges Pawlenty On Opposition To Marriage Equality: ‘Do You Think I’m A Second Class Citizen?’

A gay man challenged Tim Pawlenty on his opposition to same-sex marriage this afternoon, as the candidate was speaking on the ‘Soap Box’ at the Iowa State Fair. “You are discriminating against me and it hurts, it really does,” the man told him. Pawlenty said he would “never be at the point where I say that every domestic relationship is the same as traditional marriage”:

Q: I thought our country was about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone, no exceptions. So Tim Pawlenty, I want to know know — when will you stand up for me…because you are discriminating against me and it hurts, it really does.

PAWLENTY: I understand we have a difference of opinion on this issue…the relationship between a man and a woman in a traditional marriage is important to our country, our society, our culture…

Q: I support that you have your moral values, but that is something that is hurting my future and how I get to live my life…why does government get involved in our marriages? … Do you think I’m a second class citizen?

PAWLENTY: We’re just going to have a respectful disagreement, sir.

Watch it:

Update

Andy Birkey at the Minnesota Independent has identified the young man as Gabe Aderhold, a senior at Edina High School.

Politics

VIDEO: Sarah Palin Tells ThinkProgress ‘Mitt Romney Was Right’ That Corporations Are People

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa.

Yesterday, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) made a major gaffe on the campaign trail when he told a crowd of Iowans that “corporations are people.” Romney’s statement was particularly tone deaf because average citizens’ incomes have stagnated for more than a decade while corporations are currently enjoying record profits.

Today, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) kicked off a bus tour of Iowa at the state fairgrounds where Romney had stumped the day before. ThinkProgress asked Palin if she agreed with Romney’s belief that corporations are people. Tossing aside previous efforts to position herself as a populist leader, Palin sided with corporations, declaring, “Mitt Romney was right.”

KEYES: Governor, are corporations people?

PALIN: The people pay the taxes. It’s not an entity — the corporation itself — that pays the taxes. It’s the people who pay the taxes. So Mitt Romney was right.

Watch it:

Note to Palin: corporations as legal entities do in fact pay taxes. While the entity has a tax bill, there is someone somewhere that ultimately has less money as a result.

Unfortunately, Palin is not the first GOP bigwig to defend Romney’s assertion that corporations are people. Yesterday, ThinkProgress spoke with Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) who vociferously backed up Romney, saying, “all of us are corporations.”

Bachmann Redefines ‘Submission,’ Mentor’s Belief That ‘Man Is Head Of Wife’

At last night’s GOP debate, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) was asked if she would employ her belief that a woman should be submissive to her husband as president. The question elicited loud boos from the audience, and when Bachmann finally responded, she redefined the word “submit,” saying that she and her husband interpreted it to mean mutual “respect.” Watch it:

Leave aside that the egalitarianism of mutual respect is the complete opposite of one person submitting to another. By compromising her belief in submission, Bachmann not only provided another example of doublethink in the debate, she also directly violated the teachings of John Eidsmoe, her close college mentor. Bachmann served as Eidsmoe’s research assistant at Oral Roberts University and now describes him as “a great influence,” “a wonderful man,” and “absolutely brilliant.”

Brian Tashman at People for the American Way’s Right Wing Watch has been reading Eidsmoe’s book God & Caesar, which is about how Christians should engage in politics and government. Eidsmoe affirms the belief that, according to the Bible, the man is the “head of the house” and the husband is the “head of the wife.” But Eidsmoe doesn’t stop there; he goes on to condemn the rise of feminism and women who have careers, particularly any who try to suggest being a housewife is not fulfilling enough:

Many had planned all their lives to become housewives and mothers, believing such a calling would bring meaning and fulfillment to their lives. Now they are told by the feminists that it is ‘demeaning’ and ‘unfulfilling’ to be a housewife, and they don’t know what to believe. They are frustrated as housewives and feel guilty for not being ‘more,’ but don’t feel any inclination for anything else. And the husband, who planned all this life to be a traditional husband and father and thought he was marrying a traditional wife, feels threatened, insecure, and resentful about these changes in his wife. If the wife goes to work, he may resent sharing housework; that wasn’t what he bargained for when he entered the marriage (p. 124).

Bachmann did not clarify whether her husband would be “head of the house” if the house is the White House. It seems that her actual beliefs are those which best cater to what she actually wants to do. That’s hardly submission.

Herman Cain: Don’t Change The Constitution…Unless It’s To Ban Marriage Equality

During an appearance at the Iowa State Fair this afternoon, businessman and Tea Party presidential candidate Herman Cain told openly gay CNN anchor Don Lemon that he doesn’t support changing the constitution…unless it’s to prevent gays and lesbians from getting married:

CAIN: Don’t re-write the constitution, enforce the Constitution, that’s what that whole movement is about.

DON LEMON: Don’t rewrite the constitution? Even when it comes to gay marriage, same-sex marraige?

CAIN: Don’t rewrite the constitution. Now, there is a difference between rewriting the constitution and adding something to the constitution. There is a difference between that, okay?

Watch it:

New HRC Poll: Gays More Popular In Utah Than Obama

The Human Rights Campaign has released a new poll showing that Utahns have “warmer feelings toward gay and lesbian people than they do toward President Barack Obama.” Gay and lesbians scored a 51 percent approval rating, while Obama received an average 38 points, the survey found. Seventy-seven percent of residents would also support extending anti-discrimination protections in housing, employment and public accommodations to the LGBT community, and “42 percent said their feelings about LGBT people have become more accepting over the last five to 10 years.” A majority — 63 percent — still oppose same-sex marriage.

The poll comes as HRC kicks off its 17-city equality tour in Salt Lake City, Utah today, which is meant to highlight the growing acceptance of gay and lesbian people in the state. Watch local news coverage of the events:

NEWS FLASH

Anti-Gay Indiana State Rep Caught Exchanging Money For Gay Sex | Indiana state Rep. Phillip Hinkle (R) is in the media spotlight today under allegations he offered a young man money for sex Saturday night. Joe Jervis notes that Hinkle, who is married to a woman and has children, voted in favor of the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and civil unions in Indiana, which will require a second vote by the legislature to pass next year. Hinkle also prides himself on supporting a bill that required Indiana to offer “In God We Trust” license plates. Bil Browning adds that there are likely some other anti-gay Indiana legislators whose stories have not yet come to light.

Health

Tenther Of Convenience: Romney’s ‘Federalism’ Argument Applies To Obamacare, But Not Marriage Equality

During last night’s GOP presidential debate in Ames, Iowa, Mitt Romney (R) distinguished his signature 2006 health care reform law from the Affordable Care Act by arguing that as governor, he offered a “state solution” to a “state problem,” while President Obama’s Affordable Care Act imposed a one-size-fits all system on all 50 states. “We put a plan together that was right for Massachusetts,” Romney explained, “the president took the power of the people and the states away from them.”

But minutes later, he used the exact opposite argument to oppose same-sex marriage. When asked if states should have the right to enact marriage equality legislation, Romney responded that they should not, insisting that “marriage should be decided on the federal level” through a constitutional amendment that would deny gay and lesbian people the right to wed or raise children:

ROMNEY: You might wonder, why is that? Why wouldn’t you just let each state make their own decision? And the reason is, people move from state to state of course in a society like ours. They have children as they go to different states, if one state recognizes the marriage and the other does not, what’s the right of that child? What kind of divorce potential proceeding would there be in a state that didn’t recognize the marriage in the first place?

Watch it:

Romney’s rationale for a single, national definition of marriage could also apply to America’s fractured health care system, in which individuals become uninsured if they lose their jobs, move to a state in which their insurer does not operate or one in which they would no longer qualify for health care assistance. As a result, health care costs are shifted throughout the system — from state to state, ultimately increasing federal spending. In 2006, Romney himself recognized this inefficiency and repeatedly suggested that the federal government could adopt Massachusetts’ plan as a model for reforming the national system.

And so Romney is a tenther of convenience. In trying to obscure the fact that the Affordable Care Act was largely modeled off of his health care proposal, Romney berates a president for forcing states to conform to a single national law and argues that they should be free to enact their own reforms. But should a state like New York or Vermont or Massachusetts pass a marriage law with which Romney disagrees, he demands that it conform to his views of marriage and proposes a constitutional amendment that would overturn “the power of the people and the states.”

NEWS FLASH

Gay Military Advocates Call On Panetta To Address Inequities In Military | Aubrey Sarvis of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network called on Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta yesterday to adopt a military policy of nondiscrimination based on sexual orientation and address inequities in areas of family support, pay, and benefits for the families of gay, lesbian, and bisexual servicemembers following the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. By including sexual orientation in the Human Goals Charter and enforcing that commitment through the Military Equal Opportunity program, Panetta could ensure that servicemembers have an avenue of recourse outside the chain of command if they experience harassment or discrimination.

The Morning Pride: August 12, 2011

Welcome to The Morning Pride, ThinkProgress LGBT’s 8:45 AM round-up of the latest in LGBT policy, politics, and some culture too! Here’s what we’re reading this morning, but let us know what you’re checking out too.

 

- Check out our coverage of last night’s GOP debate, including Rick Santorum calling out Michele Bachmann for not being anti-gay enough, Santorum pretending not to be anti-gay when it supports his position on Iran, and a round-up clip of all the anti-gay rhetoric from the evening.

- Carlos Maza at Equality Matters points out what a flop the Family Research Council/National Organization for Marriage “Values Bus” tour has been: “Not making appearances so far? Actual voters.”

- Another town clerk in New York has decided she can’t sign same-sex marriags licenses because of her religious beliefs, but rather than resign, she’s seeking special permission to delegate the task to her deputy.

- Though Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz backed out of his appearance at the anti-gay Willow Creek megachurch in Chicago, education activist Michelle Rhee will be speaking there later this morning.

- A lesbian woman in Brooklyn is suing her employer for sexual harassment, but her bosses say she’s “too ugly to harass.”

- A piece in the San Francisco Sentinel calls out the incongruity of the Catholic Church’s anti-gay advocacy, concluding, “Because in the theological universe that our bishops are constructing to support their personal biases, there is sin, and then there is gay sin, and gay sin is so much worse.”

- Ariel Gore explores her frustration with straight privilege in a post aptly titled, “How Am I Sick of Your Straight Wedding Plans? Let Me Count the Ways.”

- At the New York Times, Jennifer Boylan writes about her own frustration with how the transgender community feels “they’ve been sold out by the gay-rights movement.”

- Two days after Chile’s president introduced a civil unions bill, members of Chile’s Independent Democrat Union introduced a constitutional amendment that would limit marriage to the union of a man and a woman.

- If Rupert Murdoch things he’s going to make money off same-sex couples, he’ll have to get past this week’s Dallas Voice editorial first:

  • Comment Icon

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up