ThinkProgress Logo

LGBT

NEWS FLASH

ThinkProgress Is Live-Blogging The GOP Debate | Just as we’ve done with two prior GOP debates, tonight ThinkProgress will bring you the best analysis we can offer in real-time. The debate kicks off from the Reagan Presidential Library at 8 p.m. on MSNBC. It will be moderated by NBC’s Brian Williams and Politico’s John Harris.

NEWS FLASH

Iraqi LGBTs Face Unfair Treatment And Violence | A new report from the United Nations Commission for Human Rights suggests that members of Iraq’s LGBT community are still facing violence, particularly because “homosexuality is largely taboo in Iraq and seen as incompatible with the country’s culture and religion.” One report documents the police kidnapping of six people (three men, one woman, and two transgender people) who were arrested and allegedly tortured.

Poll: Plurality Of Conservative Voters Oppose North Carolina’s Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment

A majority of North Carolinians oppose same-sex marriage but would also vote down a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman, a new Public Policy Polling (PPP) survey finds. Fifty-five percent of respondents said they would reject changing the constitution to prohibit gays and lesbians from marrying, which could come to a vote in the House as early as next week, including 63 percent of Democrats, 52 percent of independents, and even a plurality — 47 percent — of Republicans.

PPP explains that North Carolinians oppose the measure because they generally “favor of gay couples receiving the same legal rights as married couples do”:

When given the option of civil unions, 29% want them, and a quarter still favor full marriage rights, for 54% in support of legal equality, similar to the 55% who oppose the amendment. That includes 63% of independents and 68% of Democrats. “It’s pretty simple: North Carolinians don’t support gay marriage but they also don’t think this constitutional amendment is necessary,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “And they also think this particular proposal goes too far by targeting civil unions, which many voters in the state support.”

Look:

Yesterday, supporters of the constitutional amendment held a press conference at at which one preacher inserted a key into a lock to demonstrate how to consummate a marriage.

NEWS FLASH

Colbert Apologizes To Gays For Assuming Natural Disasters Were Their Fault | Last night, Stephen Colbert opened his show with a “rare public apology” to the gay community. He explained, “I know from my TV preacher friends that God sends hurricanes and earthquakes to punish gayness.” Naturally, the recent disasters that struck the east coast made him assume “how gay did the gays gay it this time?” Of course, Michele Bachmann explained the real reason for them was not the gays:

Supporters Of NC Anti-Gay Amendment Insert Key Into Lock To Demonstrate How To Consummate A Marriage

State Republican lawmakers in North Carolina are planning to introduce a constitutional amendment outlawing same-sex marriage during a special session of the legislature next week. The state already prohibits gay and lesbian couples from marrying, but advocates of the measure believe that an amendment, which could come to the ballot as early as November 2012, would prevent judges from overturning the existing law.

To promote the effort, House Speaker Pro Tem Dale Folwell (R) held a press yesterday alongside ultra-conservative ministers who argued against civil marriage by maintaining that homosexuality is prohibited in the Bible. NC Policy Watch’s Rob Schofield offers the following details:

According to at least one of the speakers called to the podium by Folwell, an anti-LGBT marriage amendment is necessary in North Carolina because homosexual acts violate biological rules. According to a Rev. Johnny Hunter, sexual acts between two people of the same gender are “immoral and unnatural.” Hunter explained that only heterosexual acts allow a marriage to be properly “consummated.”

At one point, Hunter inserted a key into a lock to demonstrate a proper biological relationship. Watch it:

Democrats outlined their opposition to the amendment during a separate press conference yesterday, urging the legislature to focus on job creation and warning that the measure would dissuade businesses seeking to attract diverse employees from investing in the state. Folwell rejected their claims and explained that employers should not make decisions based on the needs of their employees. “Any business that is making a decision on whether to come or leave North Carolina on this issue that is already the law, I think that is an incorrect way to be making business decisions,” he said. Watch it:

Alyssa

Strength Isn’t The Only Way For Female Characters To Be Well-Developed

I missed this piece by Carina Chocano from a couple months back about how much she hates the short-hand “strong female character,” but I wanted to come back to it because I think it dovetails with some conversations we’ve had about plausible female action heroines and how to make female characters seem “strong”:

It started, innocuously enough, with lunch in the kitsch-yet-sinister town of Celebration, where we hoped to be lucky enough to experience a postprandial, regularly scheduled fake snowfall. It took a darker turn after we piled back into the S.U.V., headed to their house to pick up the guns and drove to the indoor gun range. As Rush Limbaugh fulminated at top volume, I slumped in the back seat like a sullen 13-year-old, a gun case resting heavily on my lap, and wondered how I had arrived at this place. What did it mean that I was here? Could I be here and still be me? Who was I? Within about 15 seconds of stepping inside the shooting range, before the guy behind the counter could take my gun order, I burst into tears, ran outside and spent the next couple of hours alone in the car reading Jane Austen.

So here is the question I’m posing: If this story were a scene in a movie, and the movie were being told from the point of view of a young woman, would you describe that protagonist as a “strong female character”? Or would you consider her to be weak?

If weak, would you find it possible to relate to her on the basis of something other than her sex characteristics? Or would identifying with this “feminine” behavior threaten your sense of self, whether you were a man or a woman? Would you consider the scene funny, or not, and if not, why not? And what would a “strong female character” in a movie have done in this situation, anyway? Toss off an epigram and then shoot the radio? Reveal a latent talent for martial arts, jump the rifle-range counter and start pummeling the guy at the desk? Confidently march out the door to the strains of a Motown anthem and never look back? And what would she be wearing? Would boots or stilettos need to be involved? Or would flip-flops or ballet flats be O.K.?

I guess I agree that it might be more useful to have a broader definition of Well-Developed Female Characters, of which Plausible Female Action Heroines is a subset. A movie that’s stuck with me for years is In Her Shoes, the adaptation of Jennifer Weiner’s novel of the same name, in which Toni Collette plays a successful professional woman who’s had her self-confidence repeatedly sabotaged by her spoiled, manipulative, but also illiterate younger sister, played by Cameron Diaz in one of her best performances. Neither character is a particularly good person, but the movie holds them responsible for their actions and helps them both to grow. Collette’s character needlessly sabotages a relationship with a man who genuinely loves her, and works to find and address the reasons she’s pushing him away. Diaz’s character, after burning her bridges, goes to live with her grandmother in a retirement community, learns to read, figures out what she wants to do with her life, and makes genuine amends to her sister. Both could easily be stereotypes, but they’re shaded with a specificity that makes them pop off the page. That they don’t start out strong and confident doesn’t matter, because their arcs are interesting and realistic. Ditto for Bridesmaids, which is a story of someone who’s been dealt two knockout blows in short succession finding her way back to herself and to being a decent person again. Annie doesn’t need to be perfect to be compelling.

And it’s worth considering that Plausible Action Heroines don’t all have to present the same way. One of the things I liked a great deal about Avatar: The Last Airbender was the way Katara’s healing powers, a more traditionally feminine water tribe skill, were presented as equal and complementary to combat skills. Similarly, the Kyoshi Warriors have a fighting style that turns feminine accessories like fans into key weapons in their arsenal. When Sokka meets them, he has to be more feminine, rather than less, to become a more skilled fighter. If we had more portrayals of traditionally feminine skills and attributes as sources of strength and power, I think showing women as strong when they take on traditionally male attributes or roles wouldn’t feel like lazy shorthand and instead could be part of a Balanced Action Diet. We need Michelle Yeohs, Sigourney Weavers, and Hit-Girls along with our Angelinas.

NEWS FLASH

State Department Advocates Against Uganda’s ‘Kill The Gays’ Bill | Johnnie Carson, the Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, has confirmed the State Department is condemning Uganda’s proposed “Kill The Gays” bill, saying, “I have spoken to the most senior officials in the Ugandan government about this issue, and stand ready to add my voice as required in the future. Our ambassador and embassy in Kampala will continue to monitor any anti-​gay and lesbian legislation and we will speak out forcefully to prevent its passage.” Reports indicate the Ugandan legislature will be reconsidering the bill soon.

Justice

Memo To Bachmann: 10 Women Who Are More Important Than Anti-Feminist Phyllis Schlafly

Last month, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) became the first woman to win an influential Iowa Republican straw poll — a victory that would have been impossible before the many decades of feminist activism that proceeded Bachmann’s entrance onto the national scene. Yet, at a Tea Party event with the conservative Eagle Forum last July, Bachmann lauded Forum founder Phyllis Schlafly, who spent nearly her entire career fighting to make it impossible for women to participate equally in American society:

BACHMANN: If I could just say a couple of words about Phyllis Schlafly, she is my heroine and my example as a forerunner…She truly is the mother of the modern conservative movement. I think she is the most important woman in the United States in the last one hundred years. Whatever Phyllis Schlafly says, it’s important that we listen, because she’s there on every issue, on every front. She is our hero, our heroine, our stalwart and I absolutely adore her. So God Bless you, my dear mentor and the person I hope to be some day.

Listen:

Schlafly dedicated decades to transforming “feminism” into a dirty word. Viewing it as “the most dangerous, destructive force in our society today,” she insists that working mothers pursue “false hopes and fading illusions;” that men should not marry these “career women;” that “women in combat are a hazard to other people around them;” and that, by getting married, women agreed to have sex and thus cannot be raped. Schlafly also waged a successful battle against the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) — a constitutional amendment that states “equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.”

Yet, for all of Schlafly’s efforts to maintain women’s second class citizenship, her war on women’s rights was ultimately a failure. Here’s just a small sampling of the many women who made far more important contributions to American history than Bachmann’s “most important woman in the United States”:

  1. Frances Perkins: Perkins was the first woman to serve as a cabinet secretary, and she remains one of the most influential figures to hold any job in government. As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Secretary of Labor, Perkins spearheaded countless protections for workers and unions, including the minimum wage and overtime laws. She also chaired the commission that produced Social Security.
  2. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Justice Ginsburg became the single most important women’s rights attorney in American history long before she joined the federal bench. While Schlafly was fighting to keep women from enjoying equal rights under the Constitution, Ginsburg successfully convinced the Supreme Court that the Constitution’s guarantee of Equal Protection applies to women.
  3. Katharine Graham: After her husband’s suicide in 1963, Katharine Graham took control of the Washington Post Company, becoming the highest-ranking woman in American publishing to that date. Her courageous decision to publish the Pentagon Papers crystallized opposition the Vietnam War, and her backing of reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward during their reporting on the Watergate scandal (despite a warning from Attorney General John Mitchell that “Katie Graham’s gonna get her tit caught in a big fat wringer if that’s published.”) helped bring down a president.
  4. Nancy Pelosi: Pelosi was not simply the first woman to serve as speaker of the House, she is also one of America’s most accomplished lawmakers. As minority leader, she led her party to almost universally oppose President Bush’s failed plan to privatize Social Security. As speaker, she presided over two of the most successful House sessions in American history, leading a divided caucus to enact the landmark Affordable Care Act despite unanimous GOP opposition.
  5. Read more

Recalling Ronald Reagan’s LGBT Legacy Ahead Of The GOP Presidential Debate

As the eight Republican presidential hopefuls taking part in tonight’s debate try to outdo each other in lauding the leadership and vision of President Ronald Reagan at his presidential library in Simi Valley, California, LGBT Americans will likely recall his administration’s deadly silence at the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Those close to Reagan claim that he didn’t share the strong homophobia of his social conservative allies — the Reagans, after all, welcomed the first gay couple into their private residence and as governor, Reagan opposed a California initiative to prohibit gays and lesbians from teaching in public schools — but his refusal to speak out about the HIV/AIDS epidemic contributed to the deaths of thousands of Americans and devastated the gay and lesbian community.

Reagan remained silent about HIV/AIDS from the very first confirmed cases in 1981 until the end of his second term, not speaking out about the disease until May 31, 1987. By the time Reagan addressed the epidemic at the Third International Conference on AIDS in Washington, 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS and 20,849 had died. The disease had spread to 113 countries, with more than 50,000 cases in 1987. As Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote in the Washington Post in 1985, “It is surprising that the president could remain silent.” “Perhaps his staff felt he had to, since many of his New Right supporters have raised money by campaigning against homosexuals.”

Indeed, Reagan — who during his 1980 campaign said that society cannot “condone” the “alternative” gay “lifestyle” — could have chosen to end the homophobic rhetoric that flowed from his administration and most ardent supporters. The Moral Majority’s Rev. Jerry Falwell claimed that “AIDS is the wrath of God upon homosexuals,” and Reagan’s communications director Pat Buchanan said AIDS is “nature’s revenge on gay men.” “The poor homosexuals — they have declared war upon nature, and now nature is exacting an awful retribution,” Buchanan wrote in a 1983 op-ed for the New York Post, concluding that homosexuals should not be permitted to handle food and that the Democratic party’s decision to hold their next convention in San Francisco would leave delegates’ spouses and children at the mercy of “homosexuals who belong to a community that is a common carrier of dangerous, communicable and sometimes fatal diseases.”

Dr. C. Everett Koop, Reagan’s surgeon general, later explained that “intradepartmental politics” kept Reagan out of all AIDS discussions for the first five years of the administration “because transmission of AIDS was understood to be primarily in the homosexual population and in those who abused intravenous drugs.” The president’s advisers, Koop said, “took the stand, ‘They are only getting what they justly deserve.’”

In light of this history, the LGBT civil rights organization GetEQUAL has organized a protest around today’s debate, calling for the GOP candidates to evolve beyond the homophobia of the Reagan years. “While the GOP candidates jockey for a position at the front of the political pack, our youth are taking their own lives in record numbers,” says Robin McGehee, director of GetEQUAL. “It’s time for these candidates to lead, rather than follow the bigoted and discriminatory philosophies of fringe, right-wing activists who insist on demonizing fellow Americans for political gain.”

  • Comment Icon

NEWS FLASH

Obama Administration Finalizes LGBT-Friendly Hospital Policy | The Department of Health & Human Services has finalized new policy on hospital visitation rights for same-sex couples. According to a memo released today, hospitals that receive Medicare and Medicaid funds must allow patients to designate their own visitors as well as who can make emergency medical decisions, including same-sex partners. The Health Resources & Services Administration will also announce a $248,000 grant to help train community health centers on how to better serve LGBT populations.

Fox News’ Medical A-Team’s Doc Keith Ablow: ‘Chaz Bono Is Not A Man! Chaz Bono Is Not A Man!’

Fox News is not benching “Dr.” Keith Ablow for his rampant transphobic comments about Chaz Bono joining Dancing With The Stars as a contestant — they’re giving him more air time. Ablow railed against Bono last week, suggesting parents should not let their kids watch DWTS because seeing Bono (who is transgender) will encourage “toxic” gender dysphoria in them. For whatever reason, he was on Fox Business’ America’s Nightly Scoreboard to continue his hurtful, unprofessional screed against transgender people:

ABLOW: There are a lot of kids who will be watching. Look. Kids go through phases. Adolescents. There may be tomboys watching who are girls. They don’t really need to be encouraged to say, “Hey, wait! Wait a second. Maybe I’m not just a tomboy. Maybe I’m a boy!” [...]

Human beings have their behavior kindled. They model their behavior on others. And listen, if we had somebody who couldn’t walk on Dancing With The Stars, I’d applaud unless you told me, “Hey, by the way, do you know he cut off his own legs?” Then I’m not applauding! [...]

The emperor has no clothes. Chaz Bono is not a man! Alan, Chaz Bono is not a man!

Watch it:

Bono rebutted these claims yesterday, telling George Stephanopoulos that “people who don’t have gender dysphoria aren’t going to catch it by watching me dance on television.” If anything, Bono said, young people who actually do have gender dysphoria will benefit from having a role model they can identify with.

It’s quite clear that Ablow really does not understand the first thing about gender identity (like that it’s not contagious) and that he has no concern for psychological professional standards, which all call for the affirmation of gender identity. Given that Fox News has no problem endorsing his views as a member of its “Medical A-Team,” the network seems more interested in propagating transphobia than actually educating its audience.

Update

The president of the American Psychological Association, John M. Oldham, has responded to Ablow’s claims:

OLDHAM: The American Psychiatric Association (APA) recognizes gender identity disorder (GID) as a psychiatric disorder that involves significant distress or impairment in functioning. The APA supports access to appropriate diagnosis and treatment for persons with GID and recognizes that the decision to undergo gender transition is a deeply personal one. The APA opposes all forms of discrimination against persons with GID. There is no evidence that viewing a television game show with a transgender contestant would induce Gender Identity Disorder in young people.

  • Comment Icon

Appeals Court Unanimously Overturns Arizona Effort To Deny Health Benefits To Domestic Partners

A federal appeals court has blocked Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R) effort to take away health benefits from the partners of gay and lesbian state employees, ruling that a state can’t selectively withdraw benefits from same-sex couples. Brewer eliminated health benefits from the spouses of domestic partners – gay or straight, citing budget concerns, but the policy adversely affected same-sex couples who cannot marry in the state due to a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Lambda Legal sued the state on behalf of 10 state employees, and in July of 2010, a district judge rejected the state’s claim that “the elimination of benefits will not harm the families of gay and lesbian employees” and temporarily prevented the benefit cuts, saying that the law “violated the U.S. Constitution’s equal-protection clause by making it impossible for homosexuals to get health coverage for their partners.” Yesterday, the three-judge panel on the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s decision:

The state is correct in asserting that state employees and their families are not constitutionally entitled to health benefits. But when a state chooses to provide such benefits, it may not do so in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner that adversely affects particular groups that may be unpopular. [...]

Defendants nevertheless contend on appeal that this law is rationally related to the state’s interests in cost savings and reducing administrative burdens. As the district court observed, however, the savings depend upon distinguishing between homosexual and heterosexual employees, similarly situated, and such a distinction cannot survive rational basis review.

A Brewer spokesperson said the governor is now considering a further appeal and reiterated that lawmakers “eliminated domestic partner benefits across the board for both gay and straight couples in response to the state budget crisis.” During the challenge, however, “plaintiffs presented a study showing a cutoff of benefits to same-sex partners would achieve only minimal savings – no more than $1.8 million a year for fewer than 300 partners in a state with a $7.8 billion budget.” The state had offered no rebuttal.

  • Comment Icon

The Morning Pride: September 7, 2011

Welcome to The Morning Pride, ThinkProgress LGBT’s 8:45 AM round-up of the latest in LGBT policy, politics, and some culture too! Here’s what we’re reading this morning, but let us know what you’re checking out too. Follow us all day on Twitter at @TPEquality.

- Shannon Minter and Ari Ezra Waldman offer some legal commentary on yesterday’s Prop 8 proceedings and Sean Chapin provides video of the dueling protests outside the courthouse.

- Both Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain joined Mitt Romney at Monday’s presidential forum in suggesting religious organizations are entitled to government subsidy, even when they discriminate against same-sex couples.

- The Department of Justice continues to advocate on behalf of same-sex binational couples whose relationships are threatened by the Defense of Marriage Act.

- The Washington Blade asks: will President Obama’s jobs speech tomorrow be LGBT-inclusive?

- Fred Karger sits down with The New Civil Rights Movement.

- The National Organization for Marriage endorses the idea that normalizing homosexuality will lead to “sexual anarchy.”

- New Jersey’s new anti-bullying legislation goes above and beyond what any state currently has in place.

- Lambda Legal will be filing a federal employment discrimination lawsuit this morning in Texas on behalf of a former state employee.

- California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) has signed into law the Equal Benefits bill (SB 117), which prevents the state from entering into major contracts with companies that discriminate against same-sex couples.

- According to someone at the Minnesota for Marriage booth, “You know, in Europe, people are marrying animals!” She did not know which country or which animals.

- Cornell University students are questioning whether someone who founded an ex-gay clinic in Qatar should be on the board of their medical college.

- Carl Siciliano tells Sojourners magazine that religious rejection is responsible for the large LGBT youth homeless population.

- North Carolinians continue to weigh in on a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

- A Scottish soldiers is the first in the country to ever be convicted of a crime motivated by transphobia.

- Read the story of a gay Ugandan refugee living in the San Francisco Bay Area.

  • Comment Icon

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up