ThinkProgress Logo

LGBT

Alyssa

An Open Letter to the Guys Who Told Me They Want to See Lara Croft Get Raped

In last week’s conversation about the fact that Lara Croft will be threatened with sexual assault in the latest release of Tomb Raider, commenter Yitzhak Ben-Moshe wondered “One wonders how many sick puppies will let it go and watch the rape happen. Disgusting.” No sooner had he said that than two people showed up in the feed to validate his fears. “As long as you get to watch Lara Croft get raped uncensored, I’ll pre-order the special edition right now,” wrote Jordan Cunningham. “I been wanting to see that foe nearly a decade.” And Eric Ericsson chimed in “Rape in my tomb raider? Oh boy, I cannot wait to raid her tomb.” This letter is to them.

Dear Jordan and Eric,

I have a lot of questions for both of you, but let’s start with this one: why do you want to see Lara Croft get raped?

I ask because I’d be willing to bet it’s something you hadn’t considered much before Ron Rosenberg and company laid out the scenario (one they’re now walking back) for the new Tomb Raider game that will give Lara Croft a backstory. And once you heard that Lara Croft was going to be at risk of rape in the new game, you jumped on the idea. But I still want to know why. It’d be one thing if you wanted to see the character have fairly explicit consensual sex—Lara Croft has been marketed to us as a hot, adventurous woman for years, and all manner of non-exploitative fantasies can come out of the way she’s been sold in-game and on-screen. But no, what Jordan wants is to see her get “raped uncensored,” and Eric wants the chance to do it himself.

So, in all seriousness, why do you want to see Lara Croft get raped?

Do you think she has an obligation to be sexually available, if not to you in real life, to someone else in-game, and if she violates that obligation, that it should be enforced upon her? One of the hard, immutable truths of adulthood is that no one owes you, and there is no mechanism to guarantee that everyone gets some mysteriously-allotted fair share of happiness and sexual satisfaction. I get that there’s this fantasy of a time before feminism when women were more broadly sexually available to men, when some men think they would have experienced less of that pain of loneliness and that fear of rejection that is baked into modern life. But I’d bet if you think about it carefully, you’ll acknowledge to yourself that it’s not really true, that participation in that fantasy was limited to certain very powerful and wealthy men, that it probably wouldn’t have served you as well as you think it would, that then, as now, you would have been required to exercise persuasion and charm and negotiation to get what you wanted. This fantasy of yours, it’s a fantasy. And nothing, not pretending you’re owed something, not seeing a video game character get raped, is ever going to bring it back.

So if it’s not that, is it entertaining to you to see this powerful woman reduced in some way, made vulnerable to something whether you’re the person enforcing her powerlessness or not? Because if that’s the case, really, what are you so frightened of? Lara Croft is not some sort of proof that men have been replaced as adventurers, or that men are unnecessary. To paraphrase Orson Scott Card’s Piggies talking about their desire to participate in the full life of the universe alongside humanity, feminism is not about being there first, about rendering men irrelevant. It’s about being there, too. I’d think that needing to see Lara Croft, or any other strong woman, made vulnerable isn’t pushback against misandry, the unicorn of oppressions. It’s evidence of fear, proof of John Scalzi’s theory that relying on patriarchy is really playing the game of life on the easiest setting rather than being willing to collaborate, and in some cases compete. If that’s what you really want, to be spared the presence of women in your lives because you find us threatening and upsetting, you may be able to find a way to do that, for a little while longer. But I don’t think it’s going to last. You can’t put all of us in whatever it is you perceive to be our places. There are too many of us. And whether you want to acknowledge it or not, there are a lot of men who will tell you that having women is a value add to their lives, not a painful surrendering of territory. You can fight for whatever barren rock you want to make your last stand on. But why not check out what men and women are building together? If you like what you see, then welcome.
Read more

NEWS FLASH

Eagle Scout Renounces Award Over LGBT Ban | Twelve years ago, a group called Scouting for All — dedicated to pushing Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to end its discriminatory policies — invited former Eagle Scouts to turn in their badges in protest. More than 60 did so. Now, with the recent controversy over the removal Ohio mom from her position as a Cub Scout leader because she is a lesbian and the BSA’s announcement it will consider eliminating its ban on openly gay Scouts and leaders, another former Eagle Scout has joined in the effort. This weekend, Naka Nathaniel announced on in a Daily Beast editorial and an MSNBC interview that he has renounced his Eagle Scout award. Nathaniel explained “I hope that the national organization does the right thing and strikes down its discriminatory positions. Until that happens, I can’t soar with the Eagles. Instead, I skulk in shame with my fellow Eagles who haven’t stood up for what’s right.”

Watch the video:

[Full disclosure: the author of this post was one of the more than 60 Eagle Scouts who returned his Eagle Scout award, in 2000.]

Mormon Ex-Gay Therapists Attack Family Acceptance Literature

Last week, the Family Acceptance Project released new literature encouraging Mormons to be more accepting of LGBT youth. The 25-page booklet, part of the “Supportive Families, Healthy Children” series, blends aspects of the Mormon faith with research about how best to support the mental and physical health of young people questioning their sexuality or gender identity. Unfortunately, the LDS-run Deseret News couldn’t resist inviting ex-gay therapists Ty Mansfield and Laurie Campbell to critique the guide:

MANSFIELD: The pamphlet’s assumption of a predetermined and rubber-stamped ‘LGBT’ identity is problematic… Those who take their religion seriously also understand the sacred responsibility of nurturing values and identities that are more in harmony with the deeply held spiritual beliefs from which they arise – and they’ll continue to look for guidance primarily from church leaders as opposed to ‘LGBT’ research institutes to help them in that regard.

CAMPBELL: What about those LDS youth who are attracted to the same gender yet do not want to identify as gay and hope there might be an opposite-sex relationship for them later in life? To label them as ‘gay’ or ‘lesbian’ can be harmful… They may have a deep, spiritual sense that their attractions do not define them, but are confused by what the world has to say. If LDS parents depart from gospel truths and rush to define attractions as being a permanent ‘orientation’ when that is not necessarily the case, it can worsen the child’s distress and confusion.

These comments reflect a growing new approach to opposing LGBT identities that tries to distinguish itself from ex-gay therapy. Rather than telling young gay people to not be gay, these anti-gay therapists are simply telling them not to act on their gay identity. The distinction between self-identification and whether a person allows that identity to be an authentic part of their lives is negligible.

Campbell’s comments are the most telling — and flagrantly wrong. The obvious implication of promoting an opposite-sex relationship “later in life” is to convey that a same-sex relationship is inferior or wrong. What’s harmful to young people is discouraging them from identifying with their actual sexual orientation or communicating in any way that their family would be less accepting if they did. That’s the overarching point of the new guide.

The misguided way these therapists responded echoes the controversy over the unique case of Josh Weed, the “happily married” gay Mormon who may be advocating similar approaches in his own work as a therapist. If anti-gay activists continue to embrace this artificial distinction between orientation and identity, it must be called out as the harmful ex-gay repression that it is.

NEWS FLASH

Pentagon Promotes Upcoming ‘Pride Month Event’ | The Defense Department is distributing the following poster to promote its first ever Pride Month Event, as teased last week. It’s still unclear exactly what will take place at this historic new ceremony, but a time and place have been set for Tuesday, June 26 at 1:00 PM in the Pentagon Auditorium.

(HT: Joe.My.God.)

Update

MetroWeekly has more info on the event: DOD General Counsel Jeh Johnson, who co-chaired the working group to implement repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, will keynote the event. Follow his remarks there will be a panel discussion on “The Value of Open Service and Diversity.”

Justice

Pawlenty Walks Back Romney’s Promise To Veto The DREAM Act

Following President Obama’s announcement on Friday that immigration officials would stop deporting DREAM Act-eligible students, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney criticized Obama for failing to pass comprehensive immigration reform, but has repeatedly refused to say if he would repeal the measure.

On Monday morning, Romney surrogate Tim Pawlenty tried to create additional breathing room for the former Massachusetts governor. During an appearance on CNN’s Starting Point, Pawlenty sought to dismiss Romney’s promise to veto DREAM, suggesting that he may ultimately sign the measure if elected president:

SOLEDAD O’BRIEN (HOST): As I’m sure you know, Mitt Romney said that if he were elected he would veto the DREAM Act, right?

PAWLENTY: There are a lot of things labeled the DREAM Act, Soledad, so we have to be careful. What Governor Romney has said is when it comes to Senator Rubio’s ideas about the DREAM Act that he would be open to that. That legislation hasn’t been put in final form yet but he said he would consider it or at least look at it. He has said in other settings and times he would be willing to allow a pathway to legal status for children no are in this situation. For example, if they serve in the military and are honorably discharged. As it relates to the issue of children and through no fault of their own are under that circumstance, he said I’m open to try to explore or consider a permanent solution and I think these a reasonable gesture on his part.

Watch it:

In reality, Romney was far more dismissive of efforts to help undocumented students during the GOP presidential primary. “For those who come here illegally, the idea of giving them in-state tuition credits or other special benefits I find to be contrary to the idea of a nation of law,” Romney told a crowd in Iowa in December and flatly promised to veto DREAM.

His views shifted in April, however, when he expressed support for the DREAM Act, saying the Republicans need to propose a GOP version of the bill and other initiatives to win support from Hispanic voters.

But given Obama’s announcement last week, that GOP alternative — which is supposedly being drafted by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and is remarkably similar to the White House policy — may fail to materialize, leaving Romney floundering for a position on the issue.

NEWS FLASH

Webcam Bully To Be Released After Only 20 Days In Jail | Dharun Ravi is expected to be released after serving only 20 days in jail. Ravi was convicted on 15 counts, including bias intimidation, for spying on his roommate Tyler Clementi, who later committed suicide. The reason he’s being released 10 days early is for good behavior and for working, but he will still spend several years on probation.

NEWS FLASH

Montana Senator Max Baucus Endorses Marriage Equality | After the Montana Democratic Party platform convention unanimously endorsed marriage equality last Saturday, Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) announced he now supports same-sex marriage rights. The Senate Finance Chairman tweeted that he is “Very proud of @MtDems’ vocal support for ‪#marriageequality‬ over the weekend,” and a spokeswoman confirmed to ThinkProgress that the unverified Twitter account is indeed that of the Senator. Baucus also said in a statement that adults “should be free to choose who they spend their lives with a committed relationship.”

WATCH: A White House Pride Trans Marriage Proposal

Dr. Scout — yes, that’s his full name — was last invited to the White House by the Obamas in 1993 as a queer/trans-identified honoree of the group Public Allies, on which both Barack and Michelle served in leadership capacities. Now the leader of the Network for LGBT Health Equity at The Fenway Institute, Scout accepted the President’s invitation to the White House Pride reception in a very different capacity, but did not squander the opportunity. Shortly after the President’s remarks, Scout took to one knee to propose to his partner Liz Margolies.

Margolies was hesitant at first because of her distrust for the institution of marriage, but soon relented and accepted, boasting a bit later, “I’m engaged!” Scout shared some of his thoughts about why he thought Margolies should marry him:

SCOUT: Because the last three and a half years, you have been an amazing adventure. Because you try harder than anyone in the world. Because while I’m a little scared to spend the rest of my life with you, because you’re so damn fierce, I’m also amazingly excited about the possibility.

Watch it:

Because Scout is legally male, their marriage will be treated legally as any typical heterosexual marriage. With a momentous proposal like this, however, their marriage is guaranteed to be anything but typical.

NEWS FLASH

POLL: Majority Of Maine Voters Support Marriage Equality Law | This fall, Maine voters will decide whether to approve a new marriage equality law, the first time a state has attempted to use a ballot to advance the rights of same-sex couples. Though Maine voters rejected a similar law just three years ago, a new poll suggests they will sing a different tune in 2012. According to MassINC Polling Group and WBUR, 55 percent support the new law exactly how it is worded, with only 36 opposed. Both Democrats (68 percent) and Independents (59 percent) showed strong favor, but only 36 percent of Republicans would approve the new law.

President Obama Promises To Be ‘Fellow Advocate’ For LGBT Equality

On Friday afternoon, President Obama spoke at the White House Pride Month reception, highlighting LGBT victories from his term so far and the work still ahead. He noted the ongoing challenge of HIV prevention, the need to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and the systemic bullying taking place in schools. Obama also committed to being a “fellow advocate” for the LGBT community moving forward:

OBAMA: So we still have a long way to go, but we will get there.  We’ll get there because of all of you.  We’ll get there because of all of the ordinary Americans who every day show extraordinary courage.  We’ll get there because of every man and woman and activist and ally who is moving us forward by the force of their moral arguments, but more importantly, by the force of their example.

And as long as I have the privilege of being your President, I promise you, you won’t just have a friend in the White House, you will have a fellow advocate for an America where no matter what you look like or where you come from or who you love, you can dream big dreams and dream as openly as you want.

Watch it:

The Morning Pride: June 18, 2012

Welcome to The Morning Pride, ThinkProgress LGBT’s daily round-up of the latest in LGBT policy, politics, and some culture too! Here’s what we’re reading this morning, but please let us know what stories you’re following as well. Follow us all day on Twitter at @TPEquality.

- Target has officially sold out of all its Pride shirts.

- Check out this great conversation about trans issues with Evan Morris, a high school student.

- A memorial was held this weekend for Brandon Joseph Kaleioka Elizares, an El Paso teen who committed suicide after being bullied for being gay.

- The National Organization for Marriage boasts “The Big Mo for Marriage.”

- Glenn Beck is apparently developing his own gay-free Glee alternative known as “the Oedipus Project.”

- The annual governmental cost for subsidizing religion is an estimated $71,000,000,000.

- Meet two two-dad families who celebrated Father’s Day yesterday: Wil and Joe Wesley and Bob Page and Dale Frederiksen.

- A new poll finds a record 64 percent of people in Scotland support marriage equality.

  • Comment Icon

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up