ThinkProgress Logo

Media

Hannity’s Hypocrisy: Criticizing Colleges For Taking Money From Saudi Prince Who Funds Fox

Sean Hannity and his guest last night attacked Harvard and Georgetown Universities for accepting money from Saudi Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal:

HANNITY: Now, you may remember this Saudi prince from the days after September 11, when Rudy Giuliani turned down his so-called gift of $10 million, because he said that the U.S. needed to, quote, “reexamine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause,” unquote.

Well, Harvard and Georgetown universities are now accepting $20 million each from Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal for their Islamic studies programs. … This is a bad guy. Rudy was right to decline the money. Why would these universities take money from him?

MINITER (GUEST): Because these universities already believe this message. They already believe that America is the problem, that our support for Israel and our arguments against terrorism are the problem. And some professors on these campuses — Churchill doesn’t teach there, but they still do teach at Harvard and at Georgetown in many cases — they believe his message.

So it’s not as if this Saudi prince is changing their views. He is rewarding them financially for views they already have.

Hannity conveniently forgot to mention that his own employer, Fox News, also accepts money from Talal; he owns 5.5% of Fox News. Not only is Talal “rewarding them [Fox News] financially for views they already have,” he’s also changing their views.

(HT: News Hounds)

Politics

Help ThinkProgress Keep The Heat On

Thanks for reading ThinkProgress. In less than a year, you’ve helped us become a prominent voice in the blogosphere – ThinkProgress is currently ranked #16 out of 22.9 million blogs by Technorati.com.

Each day we provide you with research and analysis you can’t find anywhere else. Increasingly, we’ve added video and audio to bring these stories to life. And we’re having an impact. Our in-depth coverage of stories like Katrina, the CIA leak scandal, and the Alito nomination has been covered frequently by the mainstream media, including the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and yes, even Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly.

ThinkProgress doesn’t have advertisements, but we can’t exist without financial support. So, for the first time, we are asking for your help.

Please consider supporting ThinkProgress with a donation to the American Progress Action Fund.

But wait, there’s more! When you contribute $50 or more, you’ll receive an advance copy of the new book, “Get This Party Started: How Progressives Can Fight Back and Win.” It features contributions by American Progress CEO John Podesta, E.J. Dionne, Howard Dean and other important progressive thinkers. It’s the blue print for how progressives can take back power and keep it. If you make a donation before Dec. 16, we will even deliver it to you in time for the holidays.

Please donate NOW. We need your backing to continue to provide the quality of work you’ve come to expect.

Security

Take The Time To Get PATRIOT Right

[Our guest blogger, Patrick Leahy (D-VT), is the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.]

The Bush’s Administration’s tendencies to unilateralism – aided and abetted by conservative leaders in Congress – have produced some of the worst decisions, scandals and excesses of the last four years.

It’s happening again with the rewrite of the USA PATRIOT Act, but you may not be aware of the details. Read more

Security

BREAKING: As Torture Amendment Nears Passage, Pentagon Rewrites Army Detainee Standards

With Congress on the verge of passing the sweeping McCain amendment, the Bush administration has taken its drive to permit torture to new depths.

The basis of the McCain amendment is establishing the Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation as the uniform standard for interrogation. That manual explicitly prohibits the use of so-called “coercive interrogation techniques.” As former Army interrogator Peter Bauer has written, “the standard interrogation techniques found in the US Army Field Manual 34-52 were far more effective than such abusive behavior as stress positions, sensory deprivation, and humiliation. We obtained more information – and more reliable information – with our basic skills than we did with even days of harsh treatment.”

Realizing this, the Pentagon has one-upped McCain, and simply rewritten the manual:

The Army has approved a new, classified set of interrogation methods that may complicate negotiations over legislation proposed by Senator John McCain to bar cruel and inhumane treatment of detainees in American custody, military officials said Tuesday.

The techniques are included in a 10-page classified addendum to a new Army field manual that was forwarded this week to Stephen A. Cambone, the under secretary of defense for intelligence policy, for final approval, they said.

The addendum provides dozens of examples and goes into exacting detail on what procedures may or may not be used, and in what circumstances. Army interrogators have never had a set of such specific guidelines that would help teach them how to walk right up to the line between legal and illegal interrogations.

The political fall-out from this move is sure to be significant. The New York Times notes that McCain will likely be “furious” with the changes, and an unnamed Pentagon official is quoted, “This is a stick in McCain’s eye. It goes right up to the edge. He’s not going to be comfortable with this.”

The idea that we have a “Vice President for Torture” now appears quaint. What we really have is an entire administration, openly and unapologetically for torture.

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up