ThinkProgress Logo

Media

Schumer’s Postgame Analysis

Talking to reporters after the hearings, Chuck Schumer says: “since nobody can put together a coherent story about how this list was put together . . . the arrow points more and more to the White House.” He says when you have all these DOJ officials “playing Abbott and Costello, pointing the finger at somebody else, something is amiss.” He predicts the White House won’t want Gonzales to stay on, and says he shouldn’t stay on. The main point, however, is that Gonzales is neither here not there — attention must be paid to the White House.

More broadly, I would also add that while it’s nice to see some Republicans getting semi-tough about this, that if the GOP was still in the majority their “no oversight” policies would still be in place and none of this would have ever come to light.

Politics

Gonzales reviews are in: ‘Like clubbing a baby seal.’

CNN’s Dana Bash:

Loyal Republican after loyal Republican in this hearing room, and more specifically, in private to CNN today have made it clear that they are frankly flabbergasted by how poorly they think the attorney general has done in this hearing. … During the lunch break, in private, several very loyal Republicans made it clear to CNN that they were really dripping with disappointment.

CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux:

[White House officials] believe Gonzales is in trouble. … Two senior White House aides here describing the situation, Gonzales’ testimony, as “going down in flames.” That he was “not doing himself any favors.” One prominent Republican describing watching his testimony as “clubbing a baby seal.”

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/04/dana419.320.240.flv]

Media

Pros and Cons

Good stuff from McSweeney’s as John Moe runs down the pros and cons of the Democratic contenders. I think Petey’s gonna like this one.

Yglesias

New BHTV

Yglesias. Drezner. It’s talking about stuff on BloggingHeadsTV!

Yes! In retrospect, I feel like we spent a weirdly long amount of time talking about the weather, rather than weightier matters. We didn’t even use it as a segue for discussing global warming or anything. But it’s all brilliant. You can even hear some early efforts to talk about my book.

Politics

Convention Brokering

Mike Tomasky looks at the numbers and sees the possibility of a brokered convention. As a corollary to my view that it’s never a good time for a third-party presidential candidacy, I’ve decided that it’s also never a good time to predict a brokered convention. I completely agree with Tomasky’s logic, but similar logic applied in 2004, to some extent in 1992, to a large extent in 1988, etc., etc., etc. The rules of delegate-allocation strongly suggest that multicandidate races should end without anyone securing a majority. In practice, that’s not how it works. People are muscled out of the race and nothing get brokered.

So, on the one hand, I think Tomasky’s right. On the other hand, I’m pretty certain he’s wrong. In the event of brokering, the easy case is that Edwards has more delegates than Obama, Edwards + Obama equals a majority, and so we get an Edwards-Obama ticket. I feel like it would be weird for Edwards to run for Vice President a second time if the delegate counts are flipped, but that could happen, too. If there’s serious deadlockage, though, then Al Gore, older, wiser, and heavier, becomes president. Indeed, I’m eagerly awaiting paranoid conspiracy theories about Gore’s efforts to manipulate the primary in order to cause a deadlock.

Politics

Centcom: No more ‘long war.’

“In this case, the idea that we are going to be involved in a ‘Long War,’ at the current level of operations, is not likely and unhelpful,” Centcom spokesman Lt. Col. Matt McLaughlin said. “We remain committed to our friends and allies in the region and to countering al-Qaida inspired extremism where it manifests itself. But one of our goals is to lessen our presence over time, [and] we didn’t feel that the term ‘Long War’ captured this nuance.”

Politics

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) to Gonzales:

You should resign.

COBURN: Mr. Attorney General, it’s my considered opinion that the exact same standards should be applied to you in how this was handled. It was handled incompetently, the communication was atrocious. It was inconsistent. It’s generous to say that there was misstatements, that’s a generous statement. And I believe you ought to suffer the consequences that these others have suffered, and I believe the best way to put this behind us is your resignation.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/04/coburn419.320.240.flv]

Digg It!

Yglesias

This Little Piggyback Went to Market

Tim Lee has a nice post up about the latest efforts to frighten you out of putting up a WiFi network in your house that lacks password protection. Obviously, that password feature is a good thing and people have every right to use it if they so choose. In pratice, though, it’s extremely unlikely that anything bad will happen to you as a result of running an open wireless network. More to the point, efforts to stigmatize logging on to open networks as a kind of “stealing” are absurd.

The issue here is that lurking deep in the hearts of telecom companies is the prospect that a bunch of friendly people living near one another might formalize a relationship where several households wirelessly shared a single internet connection. Alternatively, the dark threat of a world where there are so many open home- and business-based wireless networks around that it cuts into the market for selling people portable internet access. And if I were a Comcast executive, I guess I’d say it was smart for my company to worry about this at least a little. But the rest of us have nothing to worry about and journalists should be making that clear, not getting spun.

Security

Pentagon Confirms: Bush Hyped False Iraq Deadline

The Associated Press has a major story out confirming that President Bush has been hyping a false Iraq spending deadline.

For weeks, the Bush administration has been trying to force Congress to abandon its support for an Iraq withdrawal timeline by claiming that a “clean” Iraq spending bill must be signed by mid-April or U.S. troops will suffer. In one speech, President Bush warned Congress that “the clock is ticking for our troops in the field“:

BUSH: Congress continues to pursue these [withdrawal] bills, and as they do, the clock is ticking for our troops in the field. Funding for our forces in Iraq will begin to run out in mid-April. Members of Congress need to stop making political statements, and start providing vital funds for our troops.

Days later, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a report showing that the Army actually has enough money in its existing budget to operate through June. But Bush and his Iraq allies wouldn’t accept it. Here’s Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Fox on 4/1/07:

FOX: So, Senator McConnell, is this talk about an April deadline for getting the funding bill to the president, is that something of a scare tactic?

MCCONNELL: Well, the problem is CRS is wrong.

But now, the AP reports, the CRS numbers have been confirmed by the Pentagon:

The Pentagon says it has enough money to pay for the Iraq war through June, despite warnings from the White House that troops are being harmed by Congress’ failure to quickly deliver more funds.

The Army is taking a series of “prudent measures” aimed at making sure delays in the bill financing the war do not harm troop readiness, according to instructions sent to Army commanders and budget officials April 14.

President Bush can’t even fear-monger right these days.

Digg It!

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up