ThinkProgress Logo

Media

CBS On The Defensive, Offers Third Phony Rationale For Firing Gen. Batiste

batisteAs Keith Olbermann first reported on Thursday, Gen. John Batiste’s consulting arrangement with CBS was terminated due to his participation in a VoteVets ad. In post entitled “Revisiting the Batiste Decision,” the CBS News blog cites the following standard as a rationale for Batiste’s firing:

Simply stated, it is the policy of CBS that it will not take any part in any partisan political process in any form.

This is the third different explanation CBS has offered for canceling Batiste’s contract, and like the others, it is not a satisfactory explanation given the record. Batiste was fired for appearing in a VoteVets ad that did not advocate the election or defeat of any candidate. VoteVets itself is a non-partisan organization.

To recap, here are the previous faulty rationales offered by CBS for firing Batiste:

Reason #1: Batiste was engaging in ‘advocacy.’ CBS VP Linda Mason said Friday, “We ask that people not be involved in advocacy.” But Greg Sargent revealed instances in which CBS News military consultant Michael O’Hanlon has engaged in advocacy for the Iraq escalation.

Reason #2: Batiste was ‘raising money’ for VoteVets. Mason later amended her statement, saying “It isn’t just that he took an advocacy position. … General Batiste took part in a commercial that’s being shown on television to raise money for veterans against the war.” But the VoteVets ad that Batiste appears is not a fundraising ad.

Reason #3: Batiste was taking part in the ‘partisan political process.’ In fact, Batiste consciously avoided engaging in partisanship. Newsweek reports, “Batiste says he remains a ‘diehard Republican’ and has no intention of wading directly into the presidential campaign. … He took part in the VoteVets.org campaign, he says, because it’s a ‘nonpartisan group.’

Were CBS truly concerned about not allowing its consultants to engage in the partisan political process, it would not have a McCain presidential campaign aide currently on staff.

Politics

McNulty: I did it for my kids.

NBC News chief Justice correspondent Pete Williams reported that McNulty wrote a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, in which he explains, “I intend to step down sometime this summer. The financial realities of college-aged children and two decades of public service lead me to a long-overdue transition in my career.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/05/pwillgonzo.320.240.flv]

Williams reported “it’s no secret” that McNulty and Gonzales “have been at loggerheads. They didn’t agree on how to handle the announcement of these firings of the U.S. attorneys.”

Politics

BREAKING: Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty To Resign

mcnulty

The AP reports:

Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty said Monday he will resign, the highest-ranking Bush administration casualty in the furor over the firing of U.S. attorneys, The Associated Press has learned.

McNulty, who has served 18 months as the Justice Department’s second-in-command, announced his plans at a closed-door meeting of U.S. attorneys in San Antonio, according to two senior department aides. He said he will remain at the department until this fall or until the Senate approves a successor, the aides said.

UPDATE: Last week, the New York Times suggested that McNulty was considering resigning, possibly over a growing divide between his supporters and those of Gonzales:

[T]here has been tension between Gonzales loyalists and backers of Paul J. McNulty, the deputy attorney general.

Friends of D. Kyle Sampson, Mr. Gonzales’s former top aide, and Mr. Sampson’s former deputy, Monica Goodling, blame Mr. McNulty’s February testimony for accelerating the furor over the ousters by prompting prosecutors to speak openly about their dismissals. But Mr. McNulty’s allies have faulted Mr. Sampson for misleading Mr. McNulty and other officials about the origin of the dismissals and the extent of White House involvement.

Mr. McNulty is said by associates to be considering whether to step down soon.

UPDATE II: Gonzales releases a statement: “Paul is an outstanding public servant and a fine attorney who has been valued here at the Department, by me and so many others, as both a colleague and a friend. He will be missed. On behalf of the Department, I wish him well in his future endeavors.”

UPDATE III: The pro-McNulty spin on his leaving: “Justice aides said he has been considering leaving for months and never intended to serve more than two years as deputy attorney general. But his ultimate decision to step down, the aides said, was hastened by anger at being linked to the prosecutors’ purge that Congress is investigating to determine if eight U.S. attorneys were fired for political reasons.”

UPDATE IV: From a 4/16/07 Wall Street Journal article titled, “Gonzales Deputy, in Crossfire, Looks for Quiet Exit“:

With Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on the ropes over the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, his deputy, Paul J. McNulty, is quietly testing the waters for a new job. [...]

Even before the controversy erupted, Mr. McNulty, 49 years old, had been making plans to join the private sector after 24 years in government, which included a term as U.S. attorney in Virginia’s Eastern District, people familiar with his plans said. Knowing he would like to take a higher-paying job, partly to cover tuition for his four college-age children, well before the end of the administration, his friends recently have sent out feelers on his behalf for possible corporate and law-firm jobs, the people said.

UPDATE V: Sen. Schumer (D-NY) responds: “It seems ironic that Paul McNulty who at least tried to level with the committee goes while Gonzales who stonewalled the committee is still in charge. This administration owes us a lot better.”

Digg It!

Politics

Feingold-Reid to be brought to a vote.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced today that he will bring the Feingold-Reid Iraq legislation to a vote as early as this week. Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/05/reidfeingold51407.320.240.flv]

“The bill stipulates that George W. Bush must begin withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq within 120 days of the bill’s passage and that ‘no funds appropriated or otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or expended to continue the deployment in Iraq of members of the United States Armed Forces after March 31, 2008.’” The AP has more.

UPDATE: Reid’s full floor statement is HERE.

Media

Web 2.0 Meets International Relations

The internet allows for the creation of a lot of content that walks the line between “cool” and “dumb.” For example, the PostGlobal Power Baromete from my good friends at WashingtonPost/NewsweekInteractive:

PowerChart

I’ve done this up just as a static image. On their actual page you can click where it says “supporting data” and find some supporting data. It’s not clear, though, that the data is actually “data” at all, as opposed to just commentary. If the feature ever really took off, you might get a lot of people writing “wow! China’s skyrocketing in the PostGlobal Power Barometer” which, in turn, would lead their rankings to go up even higher.

Climate Progress

20-what in 10?

On Monday, President Bush made the announcement that he intends on asking Congress to pass legislation requiring a 20% reduction in gasoline consumption in the next 10 years. He first proposed the idea in this year’s State of the Union Address. Overall, it’s catchy and it has a ring to it, but it’s way off key.

Through increased CAFE standards and alternative fuels, Bush is hoping he can begin to break our country’s ‘addiction to oil.’ In short, we are too dependent on a resource vulnerable to supply disruption.

There are several problems with Bush’s proposal. The first is that “alternative fuels” can mean coal-to-liquid fuel, whose lifecycle releases double the greenhouse gas emissions of the gasoline we use now. The second is that “alternative fuels” can also mean corn ethanol, which have little or no greenhouse gas benefit and whose production is already driving up the price of corn.

Third, Bush has the authority today to increase fuel economy standards for cars. For six years he has refused to use that authority, and now that his presidency is a lameduck, he wants Congress to give him slightly different authority. He is all hat and no cattle.

Meanwhile, this week the House Rules Committee considers a provision mandating a Department of Defense study on how climate affects the department’s “facilities, capabilities and missions.” (E&E, subs. req’d) And as we’ve seen multiple times, other govermental agencies that we could consider national security threat indicators are factoring climate change into their analyses.

A better option would be for Bush to endorse a low-carbon fuel standard, similar to the bills Sen. Obama (D-Ill.), Sen. Boxer (D-Cali.) and Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wa.) have introduced. Or to look into other strategies like the Energy Future Coalition’s 25 x 25 initiative to promote domestic, renewable energy.

Politics

Alaska Congressmen Attempt to Earmark ‘Bridge to Nowhere’ For Personal Profiteering

btn28374.JPGIn 2005, Congress defeated the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” earmark spearheaded by Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), which would have spent $200 million connecting mainland Alaska to an island home to 50 people.

Roll Call reports today that members of Alaska’s congressional delegation are persisting in making another bridge in the Alaskan tundra. Their pet project this time is for a bridge in the sparsely populated Knik Arm region, and the earmark “could mean a significant windfall for a number of people close to the Congressional delegation…some of whom purchased land in the area.”

Both Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Rep. Don Young (R-AK) have several relatives and former aides who own land or stock in companies with property in the Knik Arm region. Most notorious, however, is Stevens, whose underlings stand to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from the bridge:

George Lowe, Chief of Staff: “[O]wns a 2.6 acre parcel of undeveloped land on the Knik Arm…Borough records show that Lowe’s land went from being appraised at $47,000 in 2005 to $57,500 in 2006.”

Lisa Sutherland, former aide: “[O]wns just under four acres on Knik Arm, which they purchased in October 2002. The value of the land went from $38,400 in 2005 to $65,000 in 2006, according to the assessment.”

Trevor McCabe, former aide: Owns stock in Point Bluff LLC, which holds tens of acres of land in the area. “McCabe and his wife also own a separate parcel on Knik Arm, 3.7 undeveloped acres. … The value of that property went from $37,800 in 2005 to $62,400 in 2006, according to the property assessment.”

Sen. Stevens’ cronyism here is a continuation of years of abuse of his power for personal gain. His son, Ben Stevens has received millions of dollars in consulting fees from several of Sen. Stevens’ projects (see the list HERE). For example, Sen. Stevens secured more than $10 million in federal aid to put the 2001 Special Olympics Winter Games in Anchorage. Ben Stevens ran those Olympics and received over $700,000 in salary for doing so.

Sen. Stevens also helped settle a disputed contract favorable to VECO, an Alaskan oil company which recently pleaded guilty to bribing at least four Alaskan officials, including paying over $200,000 in bribes to Ben Stevens.

Politics

‘Light on facts’ Padilla trial begins.

U.S. citizen Jose Padilla, “once accused as a ‘dirty bomber’ and confined for more than three years in a Navy jail as an ‘enemy combatant,’ finally goes to trial here today on less sensational charges.”

The scenario federal prosecutors plan to present has nothing to do with the accusations in 2002 by then-attorney general John Ashcroft and President Bush that turned a former Chicago gang member into one of the most notorious terrorism suspects since the 9/11 attacks.

Instead, prosecutors…contend that Padilla, who converted to Islam after serving time in prison as a juvenile, left the USA in 1998 and trained in Afghanistan for ‘violent jihad,’ court papers say. Padilla, 36, is not charged with participating in a specific attack.

U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke warned prosecutors last summer that the indictment was “light on facts.”

Veteran investigative journalist Lew Koch will be covering the trial for FireDogLake. Rick Perlstein has more.

Yglesias

When Did American Feminists Stop Beating Muslim Women?

Also via New Republic editor in chief Martin Peretz, a recommendation that I read a “powerful critique” that “should be embarrassing to true feminists.” It’s by Christina Hoff Sommers in The Weekly Standard. The headline is “The Subjection of Islamic Women” but, obviously, neither Sommers nor the Standard nor Peretz actually cares about Islamic women. Rather, the subhead — ” And the fecklessness of American feminism” — captures the point she’s trying to make:

If you go to the websites of major women’s groups, such as the National Organization for Women, the Ms. Foundation for Women, and the National Council for Research on Women, or to women’s centers at our major colleges and universities, you’ll find them caught up with entirely other issues, seldom mentioning women in Islam.

Ah, yes. Certainly no U.S. feminist groups have set up a Help Afghan Women site or anything of that nature. And, of course, American feminist leaders have famously failed to call on American women to “Stand With Our Sisters in Iran”. Back in the real world, American feminists ignore the poor state of women’s rights in Muslim countries in much the same way that Western human rights groups ignore North Korea — only in the imagination of bad-faith conservative critics.

The Republican Party, meanwhile, most often takes note of women’s severely subordinate status in many Muslim countries when Republican presidents are hoping to collaborate with Islamist governments in order to block women’s rights treaties.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up