ThinkProgress Logo

Security

FLASHBACK: One Year Ago, Bush Said He Would ‘Rely Upon Gen. Casey’s’ Advice On Troop Levels

casey328383.jpgOne year ago, President Bush was unsure of the next move to make in the Iraq war. In a Rose Garden briefing, Bush expressed that he was very open to outside advice but that his final decision would ultimately rest on the advice given to him by then-Multinational Force commander Gen. George Casey:

BUSH: Well, I think — I’ve gotten a lot of advice from people. You know, one of the interesting debates from the outside community is troop levels. I’ve got people who say, you need to increase the number of forces — now. I’ve gotten people that said, well, the role of the United States ought to be more indirect than it has been, in other words, in a supporting role. To those folks, I say, look, I’m going to rely upon General Casey.

But Casey was always an outspoken opponent of the escalation. As early as December 2005, Casey publicly warned against an increased U.S. presence in Iraq:

As I’ve said before this is not a conventional war, and in this type of war that we’re fighting, more is not necessarily better. In fact, in Iraq, less coalition at this point in time, is better. Less is better because it doesn’t feed the notion of occupation, it doesn’t work the culture of dependency.

Again, in January 2007, Casey insisted that an escalation of troops was not necessary and could be “counterproductive.” But Bush quickly canned Casey, claiming that Casey “had become more fixated on withdrawal than victory.” In fact, Casey’s sentiments were echoed by all members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and bipartisan members of Congress, all recognizing the futility of increasing troop levels.

Instead of listening to his own military commanders, Bush appointed the loyal General David Petraeus, who “cannot be trusted to give an unbiased assessment on Iraq,” to promote the escalation strategy. The Bush administration and Petraeus are now actively colluding to extend the U.S. stay in Iraq.

Culture

Reseed?

All this talk of reseeding the playoffs thanks to the West’s superiority seems a bit premature to me. Let’s review some history:

1996 Finals winner: Chicago (East)
1997 Finals winner: Chicago (East)
1998 Finals winner: Chicago (East)
1999 Finals winner: San Antonio (West)
2000 Finals winner: Los Angeles (West)
2001 Finals winner: Los Angeles (West)
2002 Finals winner: Los Angeles (West)
2003 Finals winner: San Antonio (West)
2004 Finals winner: Detriot (East)
2005 Finals winner: San Antonio (West)
2006 Finals winner: Miami (East)

There’s nothing about the present day that seems unusually imbalanced. Indeed strictly in terms of the finals the current era seems unusually balanced, rather than the reverse. I’m not dogmatically opposed to shaking things up, but the system doesn’t seem especially broken.

Politics

McCain Hypocritically Attacks Reid For Criticizing General

The Politico leaked word today that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) was critical of outgoing Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Peter Pace and Iraq commander Gen. David Petraeus during a conference call Tuesday. Reid reportedly called Pace “incompetent.”

Within hours, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) released a statement charging that Reid’s remarks were “incredibly disappointing” and “highly inappropriate.”

McCain’s outrage is pure hypocrisy. Last February, when Gen. George Casey stepped down as the top U.S. commander in Iraq and was nominated as Army chief of staff. McCain was highly critical of his appointment, going so far as to issue an “extremely rare public reprimand” to Casey during a Senate hearing:

While there are very pressing questions about the future of the Army, you will, of course, in this hearing be asked to review the mistakes in American strategy in Iraq during your command, how the previous Iraq strategy was formulated, why it failed, and why it was not changed sooner, and the lessons that were learned…And you’ll need to explain why your assessment of the situation in Iraq has differed so radically from that of most observers and why your predictions of future success have been so unrealistically rosy.

Apparently only John McCain gets to have an opinion on high-ranking military officials.

Digg It!

Climate Progress

Southern Baptists Vote to Become Denyers

The 8500 delegates of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination (16 million members) “approved a resolution on global warming Wednesday that questions the prevailing scientific belief that humans are largely to blame for the phenomenon.” Sad.

The resolution “also warns that increased regulation of greenhouse gases will hurt the poor.” But that’s true only if the regulation is poorly designed, as I’ve noted before. The poor will, however, suffer the most from global warming.

This resolution puts Southern Baptists in the same league as Denyers like Michael Crichton and Planet Gore.

Politics

Gonzales bypasses Senate, appoints interim U.S. attorney.

This morning, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) “revealed that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales once again used an interim appointment authority at the heart of the US Attorneys controversy that Congress banned in a bill sent to the President for signature on June 4.” In a statement to Raw Story, Leahy’s spokeswoman explained what happened:

“It just so happens the committee got notice yesterday, that on June 16, George Cardona‘s 210 days as Acting U.S. Attorney in the Central District of California will have run out and the Attorney General will appoint him as an interim U.S. Attorney at that time. (i.e. still using the end-run authority because Bush has slow-walked signing the bill).”

Cardona replaced former U.S. attorney Debra Wong Yang, who at one point had been named for firing by Harriet Miers before resigning to join a corporate law firm.

Climate Progress

Second Annual Seed Science Writing Contest

The contest is designed to foster young talented writers – and will feature 1200 word essays that tackle the question: “What does it mean to be scientifically literate in the 21st Century?” The essays will be judged by a panel of Seed editors and special guest judges. The winners will receive a monetary prize and have their essays published in the September/October issue of Seed Magazine.

Deadline is July 1. Details are here.

Media

The Tomorrow People

A few weeks back I was talking to an adviser to one of our Democratic campaigns who was making an observation about the narrow focus of our political debate at any given time. Right now, we’ve very concerned with Iraq. We’re also pretty concerned with events in some countries near Iraq — Iran, Israel, Egypt, etc. These related issues form a kind of rough-and-ready political spectrum that we understand and can refer to in convenient shorthand.

But it’s a big world out there. Today, I read Rick Perlstein’s long article on China and also Gary Schmitt’s brief op-ed on the subject. I also recently read a long James Fallows article about China in The Atlantic. What’s striking is that though Rick and Schmitt are definitely saying different things, the lefty historian and the former PNACster also have a great deal in common — a common sense that the country is in the grips of an establishment (one that includes me and, quite possibly, Jim Fallows) of dupes caught in the grips of an unduly benign view of China and its rise.

At any rate, if we’re fortunate as a nation, the current series of blunders in the Gulf region will come to an end at some point, and China-related issues will start looming much larger. At that point, you can probably expect to see a lot of things configure themselves in different ways from how they are at the moment.

Politics

Justice Dept. IG Investigating Possible Gonzales Obstruction Of Justice Incident

gonzalesiginv.jpgThe Senate Judiciary Committee revealed today that the Justice Department’s Inspector General Glenn Fine is investigating whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales may have acted unethically or illegally by attempting to “coach” Monica Goodling’s testimony.

In May, Goodling testified before Congress that, prior to resigning from the DoJ, she had an “uncomfortable” conversation with Gonzales, in which he “laid out” his version of the attorney firings and asked if she “had any reaction to his iteration.” Goodling said she did not think it was “appropriate for us to talk about that at that point.”

ThinkProgress raised the question of whether Gonzales’ actions could have constituted obstruction of justice. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) raised a similar concern.

On June 5, Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) sent a letter to Fine, asking, “Does the expansion of your inquiry include this matter?” referring to the Goodling allegations. Today, Fine responded:

In your letter, you referred to Monica Goodling’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on May 23, 2007, in which she stated that she had a meeting with the Attorney General in which the process leading to the removal of certain U.S. Attorneys was discussed. You asked whether our investigation includes this matter.

This is to confirm that the scope of our investigation does include this matter.

Read the full letter here.

In a statement released earlier today, Leahy voiced concerns that Fine’s investigation may be getting “too close for comfort” for the White House, and that the administration may try to shut it down:

The last time an internal investigation at the Department of Justice got too close for comfort the White House shut it down. I hope this investigation will not suffer the same fate as the OPR inquiry into the warrantlesss wiretapping program. This internal investigation is an important step in getting to the truth behind this matter, and they should be allowed to do their jobs without interference from this Administration.

UPDATE: Steve Benen notes, “Back on April 19, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales testified, under oath, that he had not spoken with ‘witnesses’ in the U.S. Attorney scandal about the events surrounding the purge because it would have been inappropriate. He told the Senate Judiciary Committee, ‘I haven’t talked to witnesses because of the fact that I haven’t wanted to interfere with this investigation and department investigations.’”

Digg It!

Media

Made in the USA

If you want to learn more about the US role in promoting Fatah-Hamas warfare, check out Tony Karon. Deliberately initiating a proxy war and then having your proxy lose is really just incredibly shoddy. I’ve said before that we should hope for a Democratic Party that puts something better on the table than superior implementation of a Bush-esque worldview, but it really would be nice to see some better implementation.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up