ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Klein: Shopkeepers In McCain’s Baghdad Market Are All Supporters Of Al-Sadr

In April, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) made a heavily-publicized trip to Baghdad as part of an effort to prove that Americans were “not getting the full picture” of what was going on Iraq. During the trip, McCain was escorted through a Baghdad market with 100 soldiers, 3 Blackhawk helicopters, and 2 Apache gunships.

On NBC’s Chris Matthews Show this morning, Time magazine columnist Joe Klein described his own recent trip to the same market.

“I took the John McCain Shorga market walk in Baghdad three or four days ago,” said Klein. “And I talked to the shop keepers, and you know what? All the shopkeepers there are supporters of Muqtada al-Sadr.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/kleinmarkmcc.320.240.flv]

Al-Sadr, whose role in Iraq McCain has misunderstood in the past, has repeatedly called on Iraqis to attack American soldiers. The most recent National Intelligence Estimate for Iraq described him as one of the “very effective accelerators” of Iraq’s civil war. The fact that ordinary shopkeepers in Iraq are strongly supportive of Sadr’s efforts underscores the widespread resistance to the U.S. military presence.

McCain will be in Iraq again on Monday, though his shopping plans are unknown.

Digg It!

Yglesias

If This Be Minimalism

Cass Sunstein has a really strange TNR piece trying to make the case that even though Alito and Roberts vote all the same ways as Roberts and Scalia, there’s an important difference in that the former two are “minimalists” (which Sunstein thinks is good) whereas the latter two make sweeping theoretical claims.

The obvious riposte to this is: So what? That they have a different literary style is neither here not there unless you have some reason to believe they might rule differently (ruling on cases, after all, is what justices do) from their conservative colleagues in the future, and Sunstein has none. At any rate, see Jonathan Zasloff and Scott Lemieux for more on this if you’re interested.

Photo by Flickr user Blmurch used under a Creative Commons license

Politics

Lieberman Uses Foiled British Terror Plot To Push For Greater U.S. Domestic Spying

Appearing on ABC’s This Week, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) used the foiled terror attempts in London to call for greater domestic spying here in the United States. Lieberman said, “I hope these terrorist attacks in London wake us up here in America to stop the petty partisan fighting going on about…electronic surveillance,” in apparent reference to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subpoenas for documents related to Bush’s NSA warrantless wiretapping program.

Lieberman claimed, “We’re at a partisan gridlock over the question of whether the American government can listen into conversations or follow email trails of non-American citizens.” This is false; the NSA spying program covered the surveillance of American citizens. The “gridlock” exists over whether the administration will cooperate with Congress by explaining why it feels current law is inadequate and why President Bush decided to ignore the law in authorizing a spying program that almost led to mass resignations at the Department of Justice.

Liebermen went further in his calls for greater domestic spying. “The Brits have got something smart going. … They have have cameras all over London. … I think it’s just common sense to do that here much more widely.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/07/liebermanspying.320.240.flv]

In the same interview, Lieberman said of the situation in Iraq, “The surge is working.” He refused to say whether he would back a withdrawal if Gen. Petraeus reports in September that progress is not being made.

Also, Lieberman reaffirmed his previous statements that Democratic candidates do not have “strong and muscular” approaches to foreign policy. Today, he said, “I would say that Democratic candidates, in the larger questions of American security, have been disappointing.”

UPDATE: In Aug. 2006, Lieberman seized on a terror plot in Britain to criticize Ned Lamont’s opposition to the war in Iraq.

UPDATE II: Atrios recalls Lieberman’s claim that a “complete withdrawal is possible by late 2007 or early 2008.”

Digg It!

Politics

Putin arrives for Kennebunkport retreat.

fishing“President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet for two days at the Bush family home in Kennebunkport, ME., a first for any foreign leader.”

The Russian leader gets two presidents in one visit: Bush’s dad, former President George H.W. Bush, owns the home and is playing low-key host to the meetings. Putin also will be feted with spectacular views, sparkling New England summertime weather, lobster at nearly every meal, and possibly a striper fishing excursion on the elder Bush’s speedboat.

Politics

Independents

Big survey, little new information. Many independents are actually partisans. Many others just have no idea what they’re talking about. A few really do pay attention and swing anyway. The party that wins more independent votes tends to win elections. For some reason this leads the Post to conclude that “frustration with political combat in Washington and widespread skepticism toward the major parties” might be “enough to provide the spark for an independent candidacy by New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg” even though this is always what independents think and third parties never win.

Climate Progress

Gore Launches Live Earth Pledge

Al Gore has a major op-ed in the New York Times today on global warming. He writes:

This is not a political issue. This is a moral issue, one that affects the survival of human civilization…. Put simply, it is wrong to destroy the habitability of our planet and ruin the prospects of every generation that follows ours.

Gore explains that next week’s Live Earth concert — which Climate Progress will blog live on — will focus on action and ask “everyone who attends or listens to the concerts to sign a personal pledge to take specific steps to combat climate change.”

You can read and sign the seven-part pledge at algore.com. Here it is:

Read more

Media

De Farco

From typo to coinage, Scott Lemieux defines a “de farco overruling” of a precedent as “A case, such as Carhart II, in which the Court makes a farcically trivial or specious distinction in order to avoid formally overruling a precedent.”

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up