ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

O’Hanlon Teams Up With AEI’s Kagan To Advocate Pre-Emptive Strike On Pakistan

kaganohanlon31.GIFIn the wake of the recent crisis in Pakistan, Iraq escalation architect Frederick Kagan of AEI and Brookings analyst Michael O’Hanlon penned a column yesterday urging the U.S. to weigh a military option in Pakistan to secure its nuclear stockpiles:

[T]he United States simply could not stand by as a nuclear-armed Pakistan descended into the abyss. … We need to think — now — about our feasible military options in Pakistan, should it really come to that. … Pakistan may be the next big test.

As the “intellectual architect” of the Iraq “surge,” Kagan (who also advocates war with Syria and Iran) was personally invited by the White House to help “hammer out” the escalation strategy last year. O’Hanlon has backed war with Iraq since 2002 and is a chief proponent of a long-term occupation of Iraq.

In the op-ed, they recommend the use of Special Forces to secure the nukes, or a “broader option” requiring “a sizable combat force.” “Somehow, American forces would have to team with Pakistanis to secure critical sites and possibly to move the material to a safer place,” they write. “Moderate Muslim nations” would join the U.S. in organizing a combat force in Pakistan.

The duo claims it is not “strategically prudent to withdraw our forces from an improving situation in Iraq” to implement these plans. But such a plan would eviscerate the “out of balance” U.S. military, according to Gen. George Casey. The National Security Network adds:

Kagan and O’Hanlon clearly have a hidden stash of U.S. soldiers. Even if you were sending “just” 40,000-50,000, our military could not sustain that operation without taking our troops out of Iraq.

O’Hanlon and Kagan’s strategy depends on cooperation from Pakistan and “moderate Muslim nations,” but such cooperation is unlikely as President Bush’s approval rating in Pakistan is currently at nine percent and at similar levels across the Muslim world.

The White House said in July that it would consider strikes against al Qaeda in Pakistan, which drew “a chorus of protests in Pakistan” and caused greater instability. No matter the consequences, the military option is always on the table for O’Hanlon and Kagan.

Politics

Townsend’s goodbye to Bush: ‘You are such a man.’

Outgoing Homeland Security Adviser Frances Fragos Townsend today sent President Bush a three-page handwritten letter announcing her resignation. A highlight from the letter:

In 1937, the playwright Maxwell Anderson wrote of President George Washington: There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, til all men walk on higher ground in their lifetime.

Mr. President, you are such a man.

townsend4.gif

See a full-size version of the letter HERE.

Digg It!

Climate Progress

Study finds climate change ‘serious threat’ to coastal towns … and Spears not good mom

britneyseatbelt1uz.jpgOkay, I’m just kidding about Spears — not about her lack of mothering ability, of course, but that we need a study on the subject.

But an Australian publication really did print a story with the headline “Climate change ‘serious threat’ to coastal towns.” And there really is a new study: “The Victorian Coastal Strategy … predicts a bleak future for many coastal towns as they come under stress from climate change and population growth.”

Why is the painfully obvious still news? Well, this is Australia, after all, the only other industrialized country besides you-know-who that failed to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

The grim reality of climate impacts is only starting to sink in on Australia: Too little water inland (leading to mega-wildfires), too much along the coast. Hmm. Sounds like Hell and High Water….

[One final thought: Spears has finally been banned from driving with her kids -- when will we banned from building traditional coal plants?]

Yglesias

Historical Document: Holbrooke on Iraq, January 2001

I’ve written in the past in praise of the Clinton administration’s focus on terrorism as it closed out its second term, and the misguided nature of the Bush administration’s decision — from Day 1 — to refocus things on Iraq. Of course, not all Clinton administration officials were especially prescient on this score:

The effort to contain Iraq over the past 10 years, “while it is far from satisfactory,” has been better than nothing, Holbrooke said. However, “the lack of sufficient solidarity among the enforcing nations and voting nations has undermined” the effort, he added.

The economic embargo imposed after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait remains in force until the UN certifies that Iraq has eliminated its weapons of mass destruction. But nations have violated the sanctions and three permanent members of the UN Security Council have been pressing for the certification. In the meantime, Iraq has refused to allow UN weapons inspectors into the country since December 1998. “Saddam Hussein’s activities continue to be unacceptable and, in my view, dangerous to the region and, indeed, to the world,” Holbrooke continued, “not only because he possesses the potential for weapons of mass destruction but because of the very nature of his regime.

“His willingness to be cruel internally is not unique in the world, but the combination of that and his willingness to export his problems makes him a clear and present danger at all times,” he said.

The Bush administration “will have to deal with this problem, which we inherited from our predecessors and they now inherit from us,” Holbrooke said.

Now the good news is that Holbrooke didn’t follow that up with “so Bush should invade the country for no real reason.” Then again, neither did Bush start saying we should invade Iraq for no real reason back in January 2001. But after 9/11, Bush saw a political opportunity to build support for an invasion of Iraq, and Holbrooke agreed with him since, after all, Saddam’s “willingness to be cruel internally is not unique in the world, but the combination of that and his willingness to export his problems makes him a clear and present danger at all times” so an invasion seems like a good idea once it’s politically possible.

I’m not very excited by the prospect of Hillary Clinton making him Secretary of State.

Yglesias

Bankrolling the Next War

Laura Rozen reports on how Freedom’s Watch, the group that made a name for itself whipping GOP support for the surge, is now gearing up to propagandize for the next war. One thing they’ll have plenty of as they make the case for bombing Iran is money:

Its top donors include Sheldon Adelson, the CEO of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation, a philanthropist for pro-Israel causes, and, according to Forbes, the third wealthiest man in the United States; John Templeton, a conservative philanthropist; Mel Sembler, a shopping mall developer from Florida, former U.S. ambassador to Italy, and a board member of the American Enterprise Institute; Matthew Brooks and Richard Fox, co-founders of the Republican Jewish Coalition; and Kevin Moley, a former advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney and past U.S. ambassador to international organizations. One of group’s financial backers told the New York Times that Freedom’s Watch easily expected to raise $200 million in donations by November 2008. Raising big money “will be easy,” said the anonymous benefactor, who added “that several of the founders each wrote a check for $1 million.

In addition to being really rich, Mel Sembler — and a few other relatives in Florida — is a very generous donor to sundry Republican politicians and Joe Lieberman. Adelson is much the same, but used to gives to Democrats as well as Republicans — Harry Reid got $1,000 in 1995 (presumably casion-related rather than national security), Carl Levin got $1,000 in 1996, the DNC (i.e., Bill Clinton’s re-election campaign) got $100,000 in 1996 — but no Dems whose names I recognize seem to have gotten Adelson bucks in quite some time.

Politics

ThinksGiving: ThinkProgress Reader Henry Waxman

Our guest blogger is Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA).

chwax.jpg In my role as Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, I know firsthand how important accountability is and the positive impact it has on our government.

This role is even more critical when dealing with an Administration that routinely insists on secrecy. The Bush Administration has done everything it can to avoid public scrutiny and to limit congressional oversight. The Administration has rolled back open government laws and expanded those laws that allow it to operate in the shadows.

ThinkProgress plays a critical role in combating this secrecy. It unstintingly shines a spotlight on corruption and radical right-wing propaganda, while at the same time helping readers to better understand the issues progressives care about. It provides valuable context and background on an extraordinary range of issues, including contracting corruption, the importance of having independent Inspectors General, and the war in Iraq. At the same time, it facilitates a forum for lively conversation on these and many other topics.

It is a must-read for political news because it provides intelligent, up-to-the-minute coverage and analysis of the most important issues facing our country.

We live in a world that is both increasingly more connected and yet vulnerable to misleading information and propaganda. That is why it is more important than ever for organizations like ThinkProgress to continue to provide smart and thoughtful commentary. It is an invaluable service and essential to our democracy.

ThinkProgress’ “citizen centered” approach is breathing new life into journalism and giving many of us the information we need when we need it.

Henry Waxman

To contribute, simply click on this icon:

Politics

OPEC leaders debate ditching the dollar.

The Observer reports that during OPEC’s meeting this past weekend, leaders of the oil-producing nations “argued that pricing – and selling – oil using the crippled dollar was damaging the cartel.” The meeting was supposed to have been private, but was mistakenly broadcast to the media for more than half an hour after a technician had incorrectly plugged the TV feed into the wrong socket. (HT: The Zoo)

Yglesias

Call Him Rich Al

I could understand if giant business enterprises were paying Alberto Gonzalez tens of thousands of dollars to give speeches. It’d be a kind of bribe, a kind of wingnut welfare — yet another signal that in the United States committing crimes on behalf of the conservative movement can be a good career move — that we’re familiar with. But instead we’ve got colleges and universities getting in on the game, specifically the University of Florida and Washington University in St. Louis.

Culture

Iraqi Soccer

Back in July, Jeff Klein wrote about perennial expectations that some success on the part of Iraq’s national soccer team would bring the country together. As he notes, it keeps not happening: Soccer doesn’t stop civil wars. And now we read in an article headlined “Iraq says the worst is over in Baghdad” that “The newfound calm, which continues to be shattered by occasional car bombs and roadside blasts, did not come soon enough for four members of the Iraqi national soccer team who fled during a trip to Australia and requested asylum.”

Photo by Flickr user Mushroom and Rooster used under a Creative Commons license

Media

NY Post Claims Giuliani Has Not ‘Mentioned’ 9/11 ‘Prominently’

nypost2.jpg Today the New York Post has a front-page article slamming Rudy Giuliani for “playing” the “9/11 card” in his presidential campaign. It highlights criticisms from 9/11 families and firefighters who charge that Giuliani is “distorting the truth” with his new mailings to voters in Iowa and New Hampshire touting himself as “America’s Mayor.”

Giuliani’s exploitation of 9/11 for political gain is nothing new. The New York Post’s Carl Campanile, however, is just discovering it:

In one piece, Giuliani is hailed as “America’s Mayor” who displayed “Strength through Leadership.”

While Giuliani’s supporters have long boasted about his performance after the attacks, he himself had not, until now, mentioned it as prominently.

“After the worst attacks on US soil, Rudy Giuliani went to work rebuilding New York City and faith in America,” reads the mailing, which features a photo of the former mayor set over the city skyline.

Giuliani, it says, “led the largest rescue and recovery operation in US history.”

Giuliani has made 9/11 the focus of his campaign. In October’s Democratic debate, Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) said that there are “only three things he [Giuliani] mentions in a sentence: A noun and a verb and 9/11.” Giuliani has, for example, claimed that he was inspired to run for president while leading New York City after 9/11. “I remember having this sense that I can do this,” Giuliani told ABC News last week. Some other examples:

“For me, every day is an anniversary of Sept. 11.” [9/7/07]

“And, you know, you can disagree with the message, ultimately, but September 11 is part of our debate. We can’t — we’d be putting our head in the sand if we took September 11 out of the debate.” [10/17/07]

“Each time I wear it [my flag lapel pin], it reminds me of Sept. 11.” [7/07]

“I support security at the borders. I think security is enormously important in the post-Sept. 11 period. I think we have to know who’s coming into this country.” [2/07]

TPM has put together a video with instances of Giuliani’s 9/11 exploitation:

Digg It!

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up