ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Blame Biden

polls.png

As I noted this morning the New Hampshire polls didn’t actually get the level of support for Barack Obama wrong. Instead, they undercounted Hillary Clinton’s supporters. How’d that happen? Jay Carney has friends of friends who have the answer:

He didn’t find any evidence that white respondents who were telling pollsters they planned to vote for Obama did not. What he found, instead, is that a certain percentage of Democratic voters in the last days of polling presumed Biden (especially) and (to a lesser degree) Dodd hadn’t dropped out. By and large, come election day, those Biden and Dodd supporters ended up casting ballots for Hillary. Also, of the 5 percent or so who were still undecideds in the last polls, almost all broke for Hillary. And a tiny percentage of Edwards supporters switched to Hillary.

When you think about it, this makes perfect sense. Obama got 38 percent of the vote in Iowa. Not only is Iowa only one small state, but 38 percent of the vote is way less than half. Nevertheless, based on that plurality he was about to march to the nomination. As a result, while Obama continued to hold his own in terms of his baseline level of support, all the uncommitted people — supporters of minor candidates, undecideds, some soft Edwards people — voted for Clinton to keep the race going. In Iowa, a similar dynamic probably helped Obama. People knew that a Clinton win might end the competition, so Obama can, so to speak, the benefit of the doubt. Unlike most political bloggers, most voters haven’t been following this thing since the first quarter of 2007. A lot of them want to see how the competition plays out.

Politics

’10,000 years’ McCain wins anti-war GOP vote.

On CBS’s Face The Nation last week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) claimed Americans would not be “concerned” if the U.S. spends “10,000 years” in Iraq. Earlier in the week, he said it “would be fine with” him if the U.S. military stayed in Iraq for “a hundred years” or even a “million years.” Despite his push for an indefinite presence in Iraq, McCain somehow had a “wide advantage” yesterday with New Hampshire Republicans who “disapproved of the war“:

Exit polls found 64 percent of Tuesday’s Republican voters still support the conflict — and Romney, whose criticism of Bush’s management of the war has been muted, led McCain among those voters. But among the 34 percent who said they disapproved of the war, McCain had a wide advantage over the GOP field — even over Texas Rep. Ron Paul, the sole advocate of a U.S. withdrawal in the Republican field.

Yglesias

Fascist Fascism

Spencer Ackerman’s noted that somehow in the course of composing his tome You’re a Fascist: Nanny-nanny boo-boo, Jonah Goldberg managed to become a pretty serious apologist for Mussolini. And now here on his brand new “liberal fascism” blog we see the same thing. He means to argue that Mussolini, Hitler, and Vladimir Putin all admirered FDR and that therefore FDR was a fascist, but he can’t help but get himself tied up with the idea “that Mussolini was the first world leader to stand-up to Nazi aggression” and some bemoaning of the fact that many of the pro-Mussolini segments of his book got left on the cutting room floor.

Now we shouldn’t find this surprising since, as Jeet Heer has observed, National Review were Goldberg works has a long history of admiration for fascist political movements. But of course this is why people associate fascism with the political right. Jonah Goldberg, American conservative, thinks Mussolini, fascist, gets a bad rap just as his predecessors at NR used to pen paens to Franco.

Politics

Exit polls pigeonhole Democrats of faith in New Hampshire.

In last night’s New Hampshire exit polls, voters “from both parties were asked about their church attendance and if they were Protestant, Catholic, Mormon, Other Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Something else, or None.” But as the Faith in Public Life blog points out, “only Republicans were asked if they were born-again or evangelical Christian. Asking only Republicans about their religion shows that the media is still stuck on the outdated and false notion that evangelical Christians are the GOP’s political property.” (The same thing happened in Iowa.)

Climate Progress

Should LEED continue to lead in green building?

In Salon’s article “How to build a green building without really trying (or caring about the planet),” I was expecting to read a piece on how intuitive it is to use building materials and structural design in a wise and consequently green manner. Boy, I was wrong — about the article.

Writer Daniel Brooks’ focus on LEED certification as the green building movement leader results in a criticism of the state of green building. His premise is that scrutiny of the standard’s application turns out buildings that fit LEED’s happenstance checklist better than true environmental benchmarks.

For example, for the same number of points, designers could add an inexpensive bicycle rack (and not actually change any behavior) or install an efficient heating system – much more expensive, but much more influential on environmental impact.

True, LEED is changing itself a few ways in 2008. It’s teaming up to evaluate communities, not just buildings, and it’s reassessing its checklists. But if our country is to seriously go down the path of green building, LEED isn’t going to suffice.

And because buildings alone account for 39 percent of our emissions, we must be looking into green building and retrofitting. Not to mention, energy efficiency is often called our ‘first fuel’ and is the quickest way to ensure emissions reductions while we develop more comprehensive and long-term solutions.

That said, competition for LEED is welcome, particularly if the marketplace is the most efficient and cost effective place to raise standards. Or perhaps something more like what the California Public Utilities Commission recently initiated. I’ve also heard rumblings over how useful a strict, nation- and industry-wide standard would be (one standard would make building across statelines easier). This is certainly a niche calling out for more policy development, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

– Kari M.

Politics

The Housing Issue

win-map-large%201.jpg

As you can see from this convenient map drawn from my short print article on foreclosures in the new issue of The Atlantic, neither Iowa nor New Hampshire is a place that’s bit especially hard-hit by the wave of foreclosures afflicting the country. Thus, a potentially huge political story hasn’t really gotten much political play with all the candidates focused on the early states and all the political press focused on the candidates.

That’s about the change. Clark County, Nevada comprising Las Vegas and its suburbs is one of the very hardest-hit places in the country, and Florida and California are full of badly afflicted counties. Since neither candidates has staked out a clear profile on this topic, it seems like a good opportunity for both of them to try to exploit.

Politics

GOP urging Rep. Doolittle to resign.

The Hill reports that “friends and colleagues” of Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) are urging the congressman to retire at the end of his term. Doolittle is currently under federal investigation for his ties with fallen lobbyist Jack Abramoff and contractor Brent Wilkes. Former Republican congressman Richard Pombo — “who lost his seat amid ethics allegations” — has reportedly called on his “longtime friend” Doolittle “to not seek reelection in the interest of keeping the district a GOP stronghold.”

Yglesias

But What About the Good News

One point I’ve heard time and again repeated by Pakistan analysts is that the popularity of Islamist movements in Pakistan is often wildly overestimated by casual western observers. In particular, people seem to be falling prey to an inability to appreciate scale. Pakistan has 161 million people, so the ability of Islamist parties to organize large demonstrations doesn’t necessarily indicate that they’ve got a widely popular mass movement on the verge of taking control of the country. When election day comes, they’re rarely gotten anything more than fringe levels of support.

That said, five years ago they did get their best result ever. But Jonathan Landay reports for McClatchy that much of that support has slipped away, and they’re almost certain to do worse this time around. Fear of an radical takeover, in short, isn’t a good reason to welcome lack of democracy in Pakistan.

Yglesias

Grindin’ Consultant

The world often seems awash in people with hazily-defined “consultant” jobs of various sorts, so I was fascinated to read this (emphasis added) in Tyler Cowen’s review of Sudhir Venkatesh’s Gang Leader for a Day:

His, subject, too has moved on. J.T. grew tired of running a gang, particularly when the crack trade dried up and with it a lot of the business. He tried managing a dry cleaning business and then started a barber shop, which failed. For a while, he tried to market himself as a consultant for higher-ups in the drug economy. Right now he seems to be living off his savings. The two men see each other every now and then, but they don’t seem to have established their previous rapport.

It’s interesting that it didn’t work out. I wonder if that was due to some specific failure on J.T.’s part or if the world of drug distribution just shows an admirable ability to resist the consultantification that’s sweeping over the rest of the economy.

Politics

Paulson Contradicted By His Former Company Goldman Sachs On Economic Recession

On Monday, President Bush said the United States currently has “a resilient economy,” an attempt to counter growing fears of a coming recession. Similarly, on Tuesday, White House spokesperson Tony Fratto ignorantly proclaimed, “I don’t know of anyone predicting a recession.”

Yesterday on CNBC, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson also downplayed talk of a recession, giving assurances that economic growth will continue. At the same time, however, he refused to directly deny whether there is a recession:

PAULSON: [T]he economic data is mixed. We’re watching this very closely. I said I think that we’re facing some strong headwinds, but the economy’s going to continue to grow. [...]

Q: So people who think we’re in a recession have it wrong? They’re not seeing the real picture right now?

PAULSON: I simply said that, we grew at five percent in the third quarter, almost five percent in the third quarter. Again, spending was strong, right up through the fall. There’s some concerns, There’s some [inaudible]. There’s some mixed economic data, and we’re watching it very closely right now.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/01/paulsonrecess.320.240.flv]

But today, “Goldman Sachs became the latest Wall Street firm to predict that the U.S. economy will drop into recession this year.” As AmericaBlog observes, prior to taking his job in the Bush administration, Paulson was the CEO of Goldman Sachs. CNBC reports:

“Over the past few months, we have become increasingly concerned that the US housing and credit market downturn would trigger not just a growth slowdown and substantial Fed easing — our long-standing view — but also an outright recession,” Goldman Sachs said in a note to clients Wednesday. “The latest data suggest that recession has now arrived, or will very shortly.”

Merrill Lynch has also stated that “Friday’s employment report, which sent shares tumbling worldwide, confirmed that the US is in the first month of a recession.”

Transcript: Read more

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up