ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

If It Plays in Arizona

Commenter Steve expresses the thing that most people bring up when I mention the idea of Janet Napolitano on a national ticket: “She’s single, never married, and doesn’t seem to have much of a romantic life, so she gets the same closeted-lesbian rumors that dog (fairly or un-) other never-married woman politicians like Condi Rice or Babs Mikulski.”

Okay, fair enough. But she was first elected to statewide office in Arizona in 1998. Then she won again in 2002. And then she won again in 2006. So what’s the problem, in practice? It’s not as if Arizona’s a super-liberal state. Bush got a higher proportion of the vote there than he got in Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Iowa, and Missouri. Compared to, say, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama there’s quite a lot of evidence that Napolitano is a marketable commodity for the median voter.

Climate Progress

Chapter Four Excerpt: The Hell and High Water Scenario

From Hell and High Water (paperback now at Amazon):

We could get a meter [of sea-level rise] easy in 50 years.

– Bob Corell, chair, Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, 2006

The peak rate of deglaciation following the last Ice Age was . . . about one meter [39 inches] of sea- level rise every 20 years, which was maintained for several centuries.

– James Hansen, director, Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA), 2004

Sea-level rise of 20 to 80 feet will be all but unstoppable by midcentury if current emissions trends continue. The first few feet of sea-level rise alone will displace more than 100 million people worldwide and turn all of our major Gulf and Atlantic coast cities into pre-Katrina New Orleans–below sea level and facing superhurricanes.

If our CO2 emissions continue, when could our coastal cities fear this?How fast can seas rise? For the past decade, sea levels have been rising about 1 inch a decade, double the rate of a few decades ago. The Third Assessment Report of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), released back in 2001, projected that sea levels would rise 12 to 36 inches by 2100, with little of that rise coming from either Greenland or Antarctica. Seas rise mainly because ocean water expands as it gets warmer, and inland glaciers melt, releasing their water to the oceans.

Sea-level rise is a lagging indicator of climate change, in part because global warming also increases atmospheric moisture. More atmospheric moisture probably means more snowfall over both the Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets, which would cause them to gain mass in their centers even as they lose mass at the edges. Until recently, most scientists thought that the primary mechanism by which these enormous ice sheets would lose mass was through simple melting. The planet warms and ice melts–a straightforward physics calculation and a very slow process, with Greenland taking perhaps a thousand years or more to melt this way, according to some models.

Since 2001, however, a great many studies using direct observation and satellite monitoring have revealed that both of the two great ice sheets are losing mass at the edges much faster than the models had predicted. We now know a number of physical processes can cause the major ice sheets to disintegrate faster than by simple melting alone. The whole idea of “glacial change” as a metaphor for change too slow to see will vanish in a world where glaciers are shrinking so fast that you can actually watch them retreat.

The disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets is a multistage process that starts with the accelerated warming of the Arctic….

Politics

GOP National Picture

GOPnational.png

A graph based on the same national polling referenced before, this time for the Republican side. John McCain is obviously surging, but his level of support is much closer to the percentage of voters Barack Obama is pulling in than to what Hillary has. If all of these campaigns stay in the race through February 5, the fragmentation of the race will likely have some odd consequences. McCain could move into a dominant position by winning almost everywhere without getting more than forty percent of the vote anywhere. Alternatively, if the states go in different directions the delegate allocation rules (which vary from place to place) could start looking very significant.

Yglesias

Stimulating

I think I side with Brad DeLong in thinking that a fiscal stimulus plan doesn’t sound like the hottest idea. On the other hand, I enthusiastically endorse the practice of using the alleged need for fiscal stimulus as a pretext for passing otherwise desirable measures. I’ve heard suggestions, for example, that we might provide people subsidies to do green retrofits of their homes. If you want to call that a “fiscal stimulus” to broaden the political coalition in support of it, more power to you.

The Bush administration, however, is likely to see things my way in terms of pretext but have a different notion of what “otherwise desirable measures” amounts to, so we’ll have to see how the sausage gets made. Meanwhile, in terms of stimulus-qua-stimulus the reality is that the sausage-making process is usually too slow and too crude to seriously impact the business cycle.

Politics

National Democratic Picture

nationaldems.png

The Democratic race, in chart form, according to the new CNN/Opinion Research national poll. Hillary Clinton’s closing in on the fifty percent mark. My not-backed-up-by-evidence guess would be that undecided voters are very susceptible to “bounce” effects, but people who’ve psychologically committed themselves to a candidate aren’t. In short, even winning in Nevada and South Carolina may not give Barack Obama what he needs.

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up