ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Another Iraq Contractor Avoiding Millions In Taxes Through Off-Shore Havens

mpriweb.jpgLast March, the Boston Globe reported that KBR — one of the top profiteers of the Iraq war — has avoided paying more than $500 million “in federal Medicare and Social Security taxes by hiring its workers through shell companies” based in the Cayman Islands.

Today, the Globe reports that another Pentagon contractor, Virginia-based MPRI, has also established offshore havens that have the appearance of avoiding payment of millions of dollars in Medicare and Social Security taxes and also evading scrutiny from the IRS:

In March 2005, one of the Pentagon’s most trusted contractors – Virginia-based MPRI, founded by retired senior military leaders – won a $400 million contract to train police in Iraq and other hotspots. Two months later, MPRI set up a company in Bermuda to which it subcontracted much of the work. [...]

A year earlier, MPRI headed a joint venture that won a $1.6 billion contract to provide US peacekeeping forces in Kosovo and elsewhere. Three months later, MPRI set up a company in the Cayman Islands to do the work.

But tax lawyers say that MPRI appears to be avoiding the payment of roughly $4 million dollars a year in Social Security and Medicare taxes for the police-training contract alone and is sidestepping scrutiny by hiring workers through offshore entities based outside the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service.

MPRI has hired “roughly” 400 employees through the Bermuda shell company, but the company also avoids taxes by hiring its workers as “independent contractors.” But experts, and even MPRI employees themselves, say their work would unlikely “pass the IRS test for self-employment.

Georgetown professor Albert Lauber said [...] that genuine independent contractors come into a job with their own equipment, require little training and oversight, and generally get the job done on their own schedule.

MPRI’s police trainers, who asked not to be identified, said they do not work that way. One former trainer working for MPRI in Iraq said that police trainers in Baghdad received letters at the end of 2005 saying that they might experience a brief disruption in their payments because “payroll was being moved to Bermuda to satisfy US tax code.”

The letters became a running joke among the trainers. “We said, ‘What do you mean, to avoid tax codes?‘” the former trainer recalled.

The Globe notes that as a result of MPRI’s practices, “workers cannot receive unemployment compensation when their jobs end and may be deprived of other protections under US law.”

Yglesias

Angst

David Sirota has a nice post up on book-related anxiety as a publication date becomes imminent. The good news, as I’ve discovered, is that either my book is universally beloved (unlikely, but if true perhaps not reassuring to other authors) or else that in general people who don’t like one’s book are too polite to say so (reassuring).

Yglesias

Catch-22

Griff Witte and Ellen Knickmeyer report that “The shortage in U.S.-funded supplies threatens the Palestinian government’s ability to provide security in the West Bank, which Israel has made a condition of future withdrawals from the occupied territories.” And why is there a shortage in U.S.-funded supplies? Well, in addition to making competent Palestinian security forces a condition for withdrawal from the West Bank, “Israel has traditionally viewed Palestinian security forces as potential adversaries” and therefore “Israel failed to approve delivery of the requested supplies in time for the deployment, according to senior Palestinian officials.”

Obviously, obviously, complex situation, much blame to go around, etc., but this kind of thing — things which most Americans are very ill-informed about — is why Arabs tend to doubt Israel’s protestations that they’re eager for a fair and peaceful resolution of the conflict.

Economy

Memo To Bush: ‘Magic Wand’ Not Needed To Deal With Gas Prices

President Bush said Tuesday that he has no “magic wand” to affect gas prices. In reality, gas price is “all about government policy.” As the United States has some of the lowest gas taxes in the world, the price at the pump is dominated by the cost of oil:

Gas price pump
Energy Information Administration

The rise in the price of oil in recent years involves four components:

The effects of supply and demand. Exxon Mobil senior vice president Stephen Simon testified the supply-demand equilibrium is at “somewhere around $50-55 a barrel” — about half the current price.

The weaker dollar. Since 2001, “the dollar has lost 45% of its value” against the euro. In 2003 one gallon of gas in the U.S. cost $1.50 and 1.50 Euro. Today’s $3.60 gallon of gas costs only 2.25 Euro.

Geopolitical risk. Since 2003, the United States has been committed to a three-trillion-dollar war in Iraq, the heart of the turbulent oil-producing world. Furthermore, the burning of oil is continuing to increase global warming, “one of the greatest national security challenges ever faced.”

Speculation. “Investors have looked to commodities
not only as a hedge against inflation but as a hedge against the tumbling greenback
.

In recent years, the United States has gotten locked into a vicious circle in which the latter factors worsen each other. Suspending the federal gas tax would exacerbate the problem — in the words of Thomas Friedman, “we will have increased our debt to China, increased our transfer of wealth to Saudi Arabia and increased our contribution to global warming for our kids to inherit.”

Immediate action to deal with rising gas prices should deal with the root problems, not worsen them. Center for American Progress analysts Sam Davis and Daniel J. Weiss describe how a demand-independent “reliefbate” plan could be paid for by closing several oil tax loopholes. The Washington Post’s Dan Froomkin further recognizes that there are “two hugely significant factors” that President Bush could affect immediately: “the war in Iraq and the value of the dollar.”

But the federal fuel tax is but one brushstroke in a much broader picture. As the Center for American Progress’s energy opportunity agenda states:

The realities of global warming and our growing dependence on oil, much of it imported, will make energy more pivotal than ever to our economic, environmental, and national security fortunes in the 21st century. The challenge we face is nothing short of the conversion of an economy sustained by high-carbon energy — putting both our national security and the health of our planet at serious risk — to one based on low-carbon, sustainable sources of energy. The scale of this undertaking is immense and its potential enormous.

Politics

Bush loyalist Fran Townsend joining CNN.

Last month, President Bush appointed his former Homeland Security Adviser Fran Townsend to the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board. Now, Townsend is picking up another job. Politico’s Mike Allen reports today that Townsend will be joining for Bush Press Secretary Tony Snow as a CNN contributor.

Yglesias

Plan A

Kevin Drum, talking about Ricardo Sanchez, mentions the idea that “the Wolfowitz/Feith/Rumsfeld plan to immediately draw down to 30,000 troops and essentially abandon Iraq is pretty well known, though never officially acknowledged by the Bush administration to the best of my knowledge.”

Clearly — both in retrospect, at the time, and in advance to anyone with any sense — this was a pretty stupid plan and couldn’t possibly have worked. But given that the alternative hasn’t worked either, wouldn’t it possibly have been better if Bush had just listened to Rumsfeld? I’ve suspected for a while that a lot of pro-war Democrats basically expected that outcome — “the war” would be a “success,” and then there would be the giant postwar mess that average Americans didn’t care much about because it didn’t involve U.S. troops, and then guys like Ken Pollack would point out that they’d written articles saying that successful reconstruction “will likely require a presence of as many as 200,000 troops” for “one or two years” and claiming Bush ineptly screwed things up.

Climate Progress

California tightens building standards yet again

California Title 24 Climate ZonesThe California Energy Commission (CEC) last week adopted stricter energy efficiency standards for new construction. Known as Title 24, California’s standards seek to reduce heating, cooling, and electricity bills for consumers. Title 24 dates from the 1970s, but has been updated continuously since. Concern about natural gas availability and price has been one spur driving the standards (natural gas is heavily used for both heating and electricity generation in California).

Here are a few examples of changes. Because the standards are complex, changes cannot be reduced to a single number. For example, Air Conditioning standards get changed with the size of the unit, and window U-factors (rate of heat loss) vary with climate zone.

Read more

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up