ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Kyl Shackles Justice Department Watchdog To Bush Administration’s Whims

070601_jonkyl.jpg On April 23, the Senate unanimously approved the Inspector General Reform Act (S. 2324), a bill meant to enhance the independence of federal agency watchdogs.

Yet it passed only after Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) inserted a little-noticed amendment to water down the bill. His amendment deleted a provision giving the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) jurisdiction to investigate misconduct amongst senior officials. The National Law Journal reports:

Unlike all other OIGs who can investigate misconduct within their entire agency, Justice’s OIG must refer allegations against department attorneys to the department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The latter office, unlike the OIG, is not statutorily independent and reports directly to the attorney general and the deputy attorney general.

In October, the House passed a similar IG bill, except that it eliminated the requirement that the Justice Department’s IG refer misconduct allegations to OPR. The White House had threatened to veto the House bill, and the Kyl amendment “was seen by many as a vehicle for the White House’s objections.”

In the past, the White House has repeatedly used OPR to block investigations. Last year, then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales directed OPR to investigate the U.S. attorney scandal, even though it would face a conflict-of-interest by having to look into its two bosses — the attorney general and the deputy attorney general. Justice Department IG Glenn Fine objected, and eventually a joint OPR-OIG investigation was conducted.

More significantly, President Bush personally stepped in and blocked OPR from investigating the administration’s wiretapping program in 2006. CBS News reported:

The memos from OPR chief H. Marshall Jarrett to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, in February, March and April of this year show that while Gonzales publicly told the Senate that OPR was investigating, Jarrett was complaining to higher-ups that he was “unable to move forward” because of the lack of security clearances for himself and six staff members.

At the time, Gonzales attempted to defend the stonewalling, stating, “The president of the United States makes decisions about who is ultimately given access.” This rationale is precisely why IGs, who are statutorily independent, need the power to investigate misconduct.

Yglesias

Dear Washington, DC

It seems unfair for the city to refuse to pick up our garbage for several weeks and then to send an inspector around threatening to fine us for having too much garbage sitting outside the house. We live in the house and don’t want the garbage to be there either.

Politics

Sanchez: Bernie Kerik’s time in Iraq was ‘a waste of time and effort.’

kerik.jpgIn an interview with the New York Daily News, the former top U.S. commander in Iraq, retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, said former NYC Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik’s efforts to train Iraqi police in 2003 were “a waste of time and effort.” Kerik, who was once nominated by President Bush to be the Secretary of Homeland Security, served as the interim minister of interior in Iraq for roughly 90 days. During that time, Sanchez said Kerik focused more on “conducting raids and liberating prostitutes” than training the Iraqis. Sanchez himself has also been criticized for his performance in Iraq, especially his handling of the Abu Ghraib scandal. (HT: TPMmuckraker)

Health

McCain’s ‘Main’ Health Care Concern Is Clearly Not ‘Cost’

An LA Times piece today contrasts John McCain’s health care plan with the Democratic candidates’ plans by implying McCain is more concerned about health care “costs” while his opponents main concern is “coverage.”

But cost control and universal coverage are not mutually exclusive– they are inextricably connected. By neglecting the 47 million Americans without health insurance, McCain is neglecting one of the best ways to bring costs under control: universal coverage that reduces pricey, last-minute hospital visits by uninsured patients, lowers administrative costs, and encourages cost-effective preventive care.

Furthermore, McCain’s plan would increase the amount America’s families would spend on health care in a few key ways:

Eroding away the value of families’ health care tax benefit: McCain would eliminate the tax break for employee-based coverage, replacing it with a $2,500 tax credit for individuals ($5,000 for families) to help pay for private health insurance. Disturbingly, however, this credit will be pegged to general inflation instead of the price of premiums, the net effect being a “massive tax increase.

Confusing cheaper coverage with lower costs: McCain wants to shift as many families as possible into an unregulated national insurance market where some people — particularly young, healthy people — may find coverage with enticingly low monthly premiums. But these attractive premiums would disguise, as Ezra Klein points out, “very high deductibles, lots of personal financial risk, and relatively sparse coverage.” After all, when insurance companies “cut costs,” they aim for one thing: denying as much coverage as possible.

Shifting struggling families into flawed, expensive “high-risk” pools: For unlucky families struggling with pre-existing conditions like cancer, heart disease or diabetes, McCain’s plan would offer a chance to buy into “high-risk pools.” Only trouble, these pools have many of the same draconian limitations as the unregulated private market: waiting periods, premiums that are out of reach for many families, substantial deductibles and co-pays, and limits on mental health and maternity care.

Yglesias

The McCain Foreign Policy

Eric Rauchway and Pete Scoblic have both published nice pieces recently making the point that McCain seems to be indicating a desire to go further than Bush in unraveling the internationalist framework that’s basically served America well since World War II. There’s also what Jacob Heilbrunn says here:

Heilbrunn knows neocons, he wrote the book on them. Of course if you want a longer-form version of the argument about McCain’s dangerous foreign policy vision you need to check out my definitive take. And I’ll spare any mention of a potentially relevant book that you can find way down at the bottom of the floor where finer bookstores stash works whose authors’ last names begin with the letter “Y.”

Politics

McCain Supporter Jon Kyl: ‘We Must Never Make It Appear As If We Went Into Iraq For Its Oil’

On Friday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) raised eyebrows when he implied that the U.S. invaded Iraq for oil by saying at a townhall meeting that his plan for energy independence would “prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East.” Later in the day, McCain stumbled while trying to clarify his comment by claiming he was talking about the first Gulf War.

Ironically, one of McCain’s biggest supporters, fellow Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl (R) implicitly criticizes McCain today in a column attacking lawmakers who want Iraq to pay for more of its reconstruction with oil revenues, writing that “we must never make it appear as if we went into Iraq for its oil“:

It’s one thing to ensure that the Iraqis continue to shoulder more of the burden; it’s quite another to punish our troops if Iraq falters in its efforts. And we must never make it appear as if we went into Iraq for its oil.

At a press conference in Arizona today, McCain tried to recalibrate his oil remarks again, this time saying he will make sure that “dependence” on oil “will never be the source or any reason for us to be in a conflict in the Middle East.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/McCainOilAgain.320.240.flv]

As ThinkProgress noted on Friday, McCain’s comments echo the words of former Fed Chief Alan Greenspan, who wrote in his memoir that he is “saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil.”

Yglesias

Time Machine

Ryan Avent says we can’t go back in time “and redo the last ten years” of transporation policy. But wouldn’t it be nice if we could? And not just on transportation, either. There are tons and tons of policy areas in which a time machine would be an enormous help. Of course kill a butterfly in the past and the next thing you know fascists take over in the present so maybe it’s a bad idea.

Politics

Baghdad Disneyland financier tells Iraqis: ‘I’m not here because I think you’re nice people.’

Llewellyn Werner, chairman of C3, a Los Angeles-based holding company for private equity firms, is pouring millions of dollars into developing the “Baghdad Zoo and Entertainment Experience.” In pitching his Disneyland idea to a deputy Baghdad mayor, Werner – displaying little sense for Iraqi culture – said the waterpark is “integral to the sex appeal” of the new amusement center. Speaking in deliberately slow English, Werner told the Iraqis, “One of the fastest growing sports in the world is skate…boarding.” NPR’s Eric Westervelt reported:

After explaining skate…boarding, Werner tells the assembled Iraqi business and government men, “I’m a businessman. I’m not here because I think you’re nice people. I think there’s money to be made here.”

Listen here:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/nprbaghdaddisney.320.40.flv]

Update

The Mother Jones blog highlighted this quote from Werner: “I also have this wonderful sense that we’re doing the right thing – we’re going to employ thousands of Iraqis. But mostly everything here is for profit.”

Yglesias

Get Out of Jail Free

Facing budgetary pressures, states are looking to save money by letting some folks out of jail early. One can only have mixed feelings about this sort of development. We do over-imprison people in the United States, so from a humanitarian point of view this is nice to see. On the other hand, it’s also true that the crime rate in the United States remains at what I’d consider an unacceptably high level and there are some indications that it’s on the rise again.

Much better than simply letting people out of jail to save money would be a more focused effort to switch our anti-crime priorities away from such a heavy reliance on incarceration and toward more cost-effective methods. Drug treatment programs that work are great, but not just anything called a drug treatment program actually works. Coerced abstinence (PDF) seems promising, as does simply hiring more police officers. It also wouldn’t hurt to see more states and localities trying harder to identify and implement “best practices” from elsewhere on the policing front since some jurisdictions have much more success than others at successfully preventing crime. One could imagine a valuable federal role here beyond the money provided by something like a revived COPS program.

Politics

Limbaugh on Hispanic mayor of LA: I thought he was either a ‘shoe shine guy or a Secret Service agent.’

Today, Rush Limbaugh appeared on Fox News to discuss to Sen. Hillary Clinton’s (D-NY) joke that he has a crush on her. Limbaugh responded with a story about how President Bill Clinton once allegedly tried to hit on his date. He said that Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who was with Clinton, distracted him, because he wasn’t sure if Villaraigosa was a “shoe shine guy” or a “Secret Service agent”:

I understand now why Bill Clinton hit on my date about a year ago at the Kobe Club in New York. I was minding my own business and Clinton came in. And the short version is he used the mayor of Los Angeles to distract me, while hitting on my date. [...]

He came over three or four times, had Ron Burkle with him and the mayor of Los Angeles, who I thought was either the shoe shine guy or a Secret Service agent.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/rushavla.320.240.flv]

More here on Limbaugh’s knowledge of the “Spanish” people.

Digg It!

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up