ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

12 nuns turned away from Indiana polls for lacking photo IDs.

Today, Sister Julie McGuire had to turn away 12 fellow Indiana nuns — all in their 80s or 90s — from a polling place because they lacked a state or federal photo ID, as mandated by the recent Supreme Court decision. AP reports:

“One came down this morning, and she was 98, and she said, ‘I don’t want to go do that,’” Sister McGuire said. Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.

They weren’t given provisional ballots because it would be impossible to get them to a motor vehicle branch and back in the 10-day time frame allotted by the law, Sister McGuire said. “You have to remember that some of these ladies don’t walk well. They’re in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts.”

Sister McGuire also underscored the difficulty in obtaining IDs for these women: “We’re going to take from now until November to get them out and get this done. You can’t do this like school kids on a bus. I wish we could.” More on the ID Divide here.

Economy

Will McCain Fund His Corporate Tax Cuts With Massive Cuts In Social Security?

mccain.gif

John McCain’s ‘economic plan’ packs a solid one-two punch for the middle class. His first hit is in his sweeping, unprecedented tax cuts–tax cuts that that go primarily to corporations and high-income tax payers, stripping the government of $300 billion in annual revenues.

Now John McCain has made it very clear that he plans to balance the federal budget by the end of his second term.

Criticism has been broad, coming from Paul Krugman, the Wall Street Journal, the American Prospect and Robert Bixby, director of the non-partisan Concord Coalition.

To balance the budget, McCain would need to cut federal programs down to a level they haven’t seen since 1976–decreasing spending by programs like the Department of Education, Department of Agriculture and Department of Labor over 40% if you hold constant defense spending, which the senator has agreed not to cut. No president would propose and no Congress would pass such draconian cuts.

So how will McCain balance the budget? James Pethokoukis of U.S. News thinks he has the answer: massive cuts in Social Security benefits. The cuts Pethokoukis outlines would not only eliminate the Social Security shortfall but also generate $2.9 trillion to help pay for McCain’s tax cuts. He points to McCain aides’ suggestions that he might raise the retirement age and cut the growth in benefits over time.

Implementing those two solutions would actually result in more money going into Social Security than is needed to fund scheduled benefits. There would be money left over to help reduce taxes or increase spending on education or energy or whatever [...] Now if you did a combination of price indexing starting in 2015 and extended the retirement age to 70 by 2050, that $5 trillion deficit turns into a $2.87 trillion surplus.

If Pethokoukis is right, McCain is attempting to do something that no president has ever done before: using payroll tax revenue to fund other functions of government. The result would be huge cuts in the program that lifts 13 million seniors out of poverty and a shift of the tax burden from progressive corporate taxes onto regressive wage taxes.

The gaping whole in McCain’s budget plans has left us all to speculate. But it cannot be a good sign for the McCain campaign when even McCain sympathizers think they detect a plan for massive cuts in arguably the most popular government program in history.

Politics

Laura Bush’s Katrina Amnesia: Slams Burmese Govt. For Ignoring ‘Warnings’ Of Impending Natural Disaster

In an “unusual foray into foreign policy” yesterday, First Lady Laura Bush admonished the Burmese government for its “inept” response to the recent cyclone that killed over 20,000 people. The First Lady heaped particularly harsh criticisms on the Burmese government for not adequately warning residents about the incoming storm:

It’s troubling many of the Burmese people learned of this impending disaster only when foreign outlets such as Radio Free Asia and Voice of America sounded the alarm. Although they were aware of the threat, Burma’s state-run media failed to issue a timely warning to citizens in the storm’s path.

Watch it:

In fact, equally harsh criticism could be leveled at President Bush. As Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck in 2005, Bush was on vacation, and the White House ignored warnings about the dangers ahead:

2001: FEMA ranked a major hurricane strike on New Orleans as “among the three likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country.”

Two days before landfall: Federal officials told the White House “that the city’s levees might be overtopped or breached.” Bush later famously said “nobody could have predicted” the breaches.

Hours before landfall: Federal officials warned the White House that flooding “could leave the New Orleans metro area submerged for weeks or months.”

Laura Bush added, “I hope that the military will realize they have to accept aid from everybody they can possibly accept it from.” The White House, however, turned down aid from other countries offering to help after Katrina:

Turned down foreign aid: After Katrina, the administration rejected many “allies’ offers of manpower, supplies and expertise worth untold millions of dollars,” the Washington Post reported. The most common responses: “sent letter of thanks” and “will keep offer on hand.”

“The response to the cyclone is just the most recent example of the junta’s failure to meet its people’s basic needs,” she concluded. Yet the Bush administration has also turned its back on the hurricane survivors:

Undermined workers: President Bush issued an order in 2005 suspending application of the Bacon-Davis Act, allowing contractors to pay less than prevailing wages in Katrina-damaged areas.

Toxic trailers: FEMA “suppressed warnings” about levels of formaldehyde in FEMA-provided trailers to Katrina refugees.

Laura Bush’s Katrina amnesia went unchallenged by the press corps, who instead proceeded to ask about daughter Jenna’s upcoming wedding.

Update

Dan Froomkin notes “Laura Bush’s Disastrous Diplomacy.”

Climate Progress

Francophile Newt wants to build a few hundred nukes too — and shut down every coal plant!

First John McCain and now Newt Gingrich turn out to love the cheese-eating surrender monkeys. Better start checking them both for U.S. flag lapel pins!

francophilelogo.jpg

On the Hugh Hewitt show (see here), Gingrich dissed the new ad he made with Speaker Pelosi on climate and offered “real solutions:”

HH: Now can I ping you a little bit, Mr. Speaker? You made the ad with Nancy Pelosi, and I think that campaign is asking Americans to suspend critical thinking, not that I’m on one side or the other.

NG: Well…

HH: I just think thirty second ads on something that complicated asks…it’s not the way to debate this, because it almost makes it impregnable to debate. Did you consider the downside of doing the ad with her?

NG: Yeah, we spent six weeks thinking about that decision, and I do a newsletter every week. You can go to xxx.xxxx.xxx [sorry, for some reason, my PC just refused to copy that link], my first name, and sign up for it. It comes out for free. Over 700,000 people get it. And next week will be on energy policy and environmental policy. And I’m going to outline a stunningly different view than Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi. But my message to conservatives is you’ve got to get on the stage and debate. You can’t stand off-stage and scream no. And I’m perfectly happy, if you’ll look at the ad carefully, we said this was a topic we disagree on a lot of issue. But we agree we should try to solve this. And I’m perfectly happy to offer real solutions, and I’ll give you one example.

HH: Go ahead.

NG: If the United States produced the same percent of electricity from nuclear power as France, we would take two billion, two hundred million tons of carbon a year out of the atmosphere. And by that one step, we would be 15% better than the Kyoto goals.

Now, we’ve already seen that if we did what France does — and yes, it boggles the mind that two leading Freedom-fry eating conservatives are publicly advocating doing just that — we’d need, say 600 to 700 nukes by 2050, depending on whether we embrace electricity as a transportation fuel [See "McCain calls for 700+ new nuclear plants (and seven Yucca mountains) costing $4 trillion"].

But Gingrich’s final statement suggests

  1. He wants to build 1400 nukes and shut down every last coal plant, every gas plant, and every refinery or (more likely)
  2. He wants 400 nukes, he wants to shut down every coal plant, and he made a classic climate error and a classic energy mistake.

Read more

Politics

Hispanic media coalition calls Limbaugh’s comment ‘nasty, bigoted, racist.’

story.gifBrian Maloney of the right-wing site Radio Equalizer defends Rush Limbaugh’s comment about Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa being a “shoe shine guy.” “As to Limbaugh’s remark, was it indeed racist? This one’s easy: not at all!” writes Maloney. “There’s nothing race-specific about his comment. Are ‘shoe-shine guys’ usually Hispanic? No.” Alex Nogales, president of the National Hispanic Media Coalition, has quite a different take:

What can I tell you? It’s the same kind of nasty, bigoted, racist type of comment that has become so prevalent in today’s society, as practiced by Lou Dobbs, as practiced by [Sean] Hannity, [Bill] O’Reilly, [Michael] Savage — all these guys who are appealing to a particular bigoted audience, and fanning the fires of bigotry and racism by doing these kinds of things without real concern about the consequences of their words.

Update

Mario Solis-Marich writes, “As a member of the largest minority ethnic group and a member of the media, I am continually puzzled and outraged by the idea that anyone can say anything about Latinos without fearing any consequence.”

Politics

I Don’t Care if I Ever Get Back

Hillary Clinton shows off her deep connection with the common man:

“We’re going to knock balls out of the country’s park,” [Mrs Clinton] says, standing in a minor-league baseball stadium, “for the home team, which is America”.

Glad we cleared up which country we live in.

Economy

Big Oil’s Corporate Welfare: Doing The Numbers

Photo © 2007 by Crashworks at FlickrYesterday, Alex Knapp at Outside the Beltway and Kevin Drum at Political Animal proposed getting a grip on tax proposals for the oil industry. As Drum put it: “[F]orget a windfall profits tax, let’s work first on getting rid of the massive corporate welfare infrastructure we’ve constructed for an industry that really, really doesn’t need it.”

Like Alex, Kevin couldn’t find the numbers behind Big Oil’s subsidies:

If I spent several months on this topic instead of half an hour, maybe I could figure this all out, but surely someone else has already done this?

Alex and Kevin, the Think Progress Wonk Room rides to your rescue.

In its report “Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy Markets 2007,” the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that FY 2007 subsidies for the oil and natural gas industry totalled $2.1 billion. Center for American Progress Action Fund fellows Sam Davis and Daniel Weiss identify the worst of these tax loopholes and lost royalties that involve Big Oil:

The bipartisan Energy Advancement and Investment Act of 2007 had several provisions to close tax loopholes and recover royalties from big oil companies. These provisions would raise $25.9 billion over 10 years by:

  • Modifying Section 199 to exclude gross receipts from the sale of oil and gas from the domestic production deduction. Raises $9.4 billion.
  • Modifying Section 907 to eliminate the distinction between foreign oil and gas extraction income and foreign oil related income. This would combine foreign upstream and downstream income into a single oil basket for foreign oil and gas extraction income purposes. Raises $3.2 billion.
  • Extending the oil spill liability trust fund tax through 2017, and increase it from 5 to 10 cents per barrel. Raises $2.7 billion.
  • Recovering forgone royalties by establishment of an excise tax on removal price of taxable oil or gas from federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico. Raises $10.6 billion.

A significant bipartisan majority of the Senate voted for these provisions as an amendment to the Senate energy bill on June 21, 2007, but it fell two votes short of the super majority of 60 votes needed to end debate and pass the amendment.

Eliminating the entire “massive corporate welfare infrastructure” for Big Oil is a much weightier task, of course, entering into the realm of overall corporate tax policy. The Wonk Room has done extensive analysis of Sen John McCain’s (R-AZ) corporate tax proposals and how they would benefit Big Oil.

As economist Reuven S. Avi-Yonah writes in a Wonk Room report, Sen. McCain’s “economic stimulus plan” involves a $1.7 trillion increase in corporate welfare by cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 to 25 percent and by allowing first-year expensing of equipment purchases — a potent new form of tax sheltering.

Domestic Policy Advisor James Kvaal has written in the Wonk Room that the cut in the corporate tax rate alone would deliver about $3.8 billion in tax cuts a year to the five largest American oil companies:

Politics

Wash. Post’s Abramowitz: ‘I don’t think McCain is being cut a break by the press for verbal miscues.’

Last month, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) repeatedly made the false claim that Shi’a Iran is training Sunni al Qaeda. In a Washington Post discussion today, a questioner observed, “I’m surprised that more hasn’t been made out of all of the verbal slip ups by McCain.” The Post’s Michael Abramowitz brushed over McCain’s many gaffes, saying the press has sufficiently critical of McCain:

ABRAMOWITZ: I don’t think McCain is being cut a break by the press for verbal miscues: When he confused the Sunni and the Shia, the press was on it immediately.

As Media Matters has documented, media outlets including CNN, The Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, Reuters, and the AP ignored or overlooked over the gaffe in their reporting. Just last week, Abramowitz stuck up for McCain’s premature declarations of Mission Accomplished in Iraq, stating:

ABRAMOWITZ: I think McCain will certainly be attacked over the war during the campaign but I doubt that he will be blamed for “Mission Accomplished” because he was always more sober than than the White House about progress in Iraq.

Yglesias

The Most Exciting Week of the Year

Did you know that this week is National Charter Schools Week. I know I’ll be celebrating!

Seriously, though, charter schools are great. Parents ought to have some diversity of options when considering where to send their kids to school, but the public money shouldn’t be spent without a measure of public accountability and the charter school framework is a good way in which to accomplish that.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up