ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

The Whites of Their Eyes

Mark Thoma wonders what’s going on:

Then here’s the question. Why hasn’t the Obama campaign opened their Christmas gifts and made use of them? Why haven’t they gone after McCain’s “disgrace” remark regarding Social Security? Have they said anything at all about that? Why haven’t they hammered away at some of his statements and the inconsistencies surrounding them about carve-out privatization plans? Will they do anything with the implication identified above that McCain must be planning to cut benefits? Why so much silence from the Obama campaign on the Social Security issue?

He’s not the only one. All I’d observe is that I recall Obama supporters having very similar sentiments about Obama’s campaign against Hillary Clinton about 12 months ago. People wanted to see hard-hitting attacks and they were disappointed. Attacks came eventually, of course, but not until substantially later. And beyond that, the attacks mostly came as counterpunching efforts, a kind of judo. Now maybe this means that Obama’s team has a brilliant strategy of patience that they’re implementing. Or maybe it means that they made the wrong decision last summer and wound up getting lucky and winning anyway by accident and have no learned the wrong lessons.

Politics

For Second Day In A Row, McCain Cites The Non-Existent ‘Czechoslovakia’

Yesterday, ThinkProgress noted that during a press availability, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said that he’s been concerned by “a couple of steps that the Russian government took in the last several days,” including “reducing the energy supplies to Czechoslovakia.” Of course, “Czechoslovakia” dissolved into two independent countries 15 years ago and now, the Czech Republic and Slovakia are member states — separately — of the European Union.

Slip of the tongue? Perhaps. The McCain campaign even scrubbed the transcript of the event. However, he did it again today. Touting his “League of Democracies” idea to garner support for action against Iran’s nuclear program during a town hall meeting this afternoon, McCain cited a recent example of Russia working against American interests:

McCAIN: And I regret that and I regret some of the recent behavior that Russia has exhibited in I’ll be glad to talk about that later on including reduction in oil supplies to Czechoslovakia when they agreed with us on a missile defense system.

Watch it:

This is at least the fourth time in the last year that McCain has harkened back to the old days when the Iron Curtain divided Europe. But his forgetfulness has more history. McCain referred to the non-existent country — once in 1994 and another time in 1999 — which caused then Gov. George W. Bush to question McCain’s cozy relationship with the media:

“I don’t think there is any plot; I hope there isn’t,” Bush said. “But it’s an amazing phenomenon, I’ll tell you that. It’s like the flap over the foreign-leader deal. A guy gets up and quizzes me — it’s my fault for trying to answer — but John McCain says something about the ‘ambassador to Czechoslovakia.’ Well, I know there is no Czechoslovakia (there’s a Czech Republic and a Slovakia), but yet it didn’t make the nightly national news. I’m not going to gripe about it, but the media question is starting to pop up.”

But “McCain is running on his supposed foreign policy superiority” and as MoJo blog points out, he “really shouldn’t be making these mistakes…[he] can’t possibly be ignorant of the basic state of the world.”

Climate Progress

Note to media: Newt Gingrich is an eco-fraud

Gingrich is — and always has been — pro-pollution. His 527 is bought and paid for by the oil companies, so it’s no surprise he is touting the cruel offshore drilling hoax.

Notwithstanding Andy Revkin’s claim that Gingrich is part of a “move to the pragmatic center on climate and energy” or the We campaign’s Gingrich-Pelosi couch-fest on climate, Gingrich is pushing hard for standard conservative screw-the-climate solutions (see Eco-Gingrich says, “Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay More.”).

Now the Alaska Wilderness League has looked at the money funding his 527, “American Solutions for Winning the Future” in a report titled, “Follow the Money.” I know that you’ll be shocked to learn

The major donor list for Gingrich’s 527 reads like a “who’s who” of Big Oil’s backers. Robert Johnson IV, of the Johnson Company, Inc. and assistant chief attorney for the Exxon Mobil Production Company, contributed $50,000, while Dan W. Evins, an oil jobber for Shell who started the Cracker Barrel chain of restaurants, contributed $100,000.

None of this should be the least bit surprising to the media or anyone else, except of course those who have ignored Gingrich’s entire history and naively believed his new claim to be an environmentalist.

What is typically particularly lame about Ginigrich’s efforts is that the poll his 527 did to justify his drilling hoax plan doesn’t even trust the American people with honest choices. The front page of his website blares:

New Research on Energy Security
81% of Americans Support Greater Use of Domestic Energy Resources. MORE>>

Here was the question posed:

Read more

Politics

Brit Hume stepping down from Fox News.

humeweb.jpgThe Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz reports that at the end of the year, Fox News’s top anchor, Brit Hume, will step down from his roles as the network’s Washington managing editor and the host of “Special Report.” According to Kurtz’s sources, Hume will continue at the network in a senior statesman role similar to Tom Brokaw at NBC News. He will also continue as as a panelist on “Fox News Sunday.” No replacement has been announced.

Yglesias

Psychodrilling

Here comes Bush, echoing John McCain by conceding that offshore drilling won’t actually do anything to reduce oil prices but saying it’s a good idea for psychological reasons:

The Green Lantern Theory as applied to foreign policy is wrongheaded, but as applied to energy supplies it’s downright bizarre. Demand for oil is growing faster than supply, leading to high prices and over the long run global demand will probably keep growing. The smart strategy would be to start reorienting our infrastructure to build a less oil-dependent country. Psychology has nothing to do with it.

Security

Iraq’s Displacement Crisis

Our guest blogger is Peter Juul, a national security consultant at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

refugee_mother_newborn_ssh.jpgAmid all the self-congratulation among American supporters of the “surge” and the controversy over a potential long-term security agreement between the United States and Iraq, there has been remarkably little discussion about the ticking time bomb of Iraq’s displaced population. Through no fault of their own, these refugees and internally displaced persons have the potential to seriously disrupt Iraqi politics and roll back the security gains of the past six-plus months. And the United States and Iraqi governments are doing next to nothing to find solutions to the status of Iraq’s displaced people or the problems associated with their potential return.

The political dynamics of refugee return were made clear in a weekend article in the New York Times detailing the struggles of a group of displaced Iraqi Shi’a to return to their homes in Diyala province. Their homes razed, these returnees are waiting on assistance from the Iraqi government. As the Times notes, “Whether supplies and compensation are forthcoming could make the difference between the return’s success and its failure.”

More broadly, the issue of refugee return is contentious because the property of many refugees and IDPs has been expropriated by sectarian militias. These militias in turn “resettled” members of their own sect, reinforcing the homogenization created by the expulsion of refugees. As a new report on the plight of Iraqi refugees by the International Crisis Group notes, “militias and armed groups exploited the refugee crisis for self-enrichment and war racketeering.” This sectarian cleansing has created two intertwined political dilemmas critical to any peaceful political settlement in Iraq.

Read more

Politics

McCain Backtracks From His Radical Opposition To Gay Adoption

mccainkid.jpgIn a statement sent to Andrew Sullivan, the McCain campaign is backing away from the radical stance on gay adoption that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) endorsed in a weekend interview with the New York Times. “McCain could have been clearer in the interview in stating that his position on gay adoption is that it is a state issue,” said spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker.

Here’s how Hazelbaker explains McCain’s position:

McCain’s expressed his personal preference for children to be raised by a mother and a father wherever possible. However, as an adoptive father himself, McCain believes children deserve loving and caring home environments, and he recognizes that there are many abandoned children who have yet to find homes. McCain believes that in those situations that caring parental figures are better for the child than the alternative.

In his initial interview with the New York Times, McCain stated straight-forwardly that, “we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no I don’t believe in gay adoption.” Asked where he stood “if the alternative is the kid staying in an orphanage, or not having parents,” McCain said his “concern” was that the child be with “a traditional couple.”

Q: Even if the alternative is the kid staying in an orphanage, or not having parents.

Mr. McCain: I encourage adoption and I encourage the opportunities for people to adopt children I encourage the process being less complicated so they can adopt as quickly as possible. And Cindy and I are proud of being adoptive parents.

Q: But your concern would be that the couple should a traditional couple

Mr. McCain: Yes.

Critics reacted swiftly to McCain’s comments, calling them “terrible” and “thoughtless.” As Winnie Stachelberg and Robert Gordon pointed out at the Wonk Room yesterday, McCain’s stated approach ruled out “adoption by gay individuals –- even though these adoptions are permitted in every state except Florida.” McCain’s stance seems to rule out adoption by single heterosexuals as well.

Noting that about 130,000 children wait in the foster care system each year and nearly every child welfare organization in the country opposes bans on gay adoption, Stachelberg and Gordon asked if McCain really thinks that “hundreds of thousands of children should sit in foster care and orphanages while we wait for ‘Ozzie and Harriet’ families to appear?”

In an update to their Wonk Room post, Stachelberg and Gordon write that it’s hard to tell if the last sentence in Hazelbaker’s clarification means “McCain personally doesn’t agree with Florida.” They conclude that McCain owes more “straight talk” on the issue because “barring gay people from adopting is morally wrong.”

Update

Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody says that McCain’s clarification may have opened “a can of worms” with social conservatives, writing that “this move hurts him with the Evangelical base.”


Update

,Adam Pertman, the executive director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, told the AP that McCain “needs to read the research and rethink his comments.”

Yglesias

No Specifics

In order to afford extending Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy, plus his own new proposed tax cuts for the wealthy, John McCain has proposed some unspecified cuts in Social Security. Why won’t he specify? Well:

“The lesson of history is that too many specifics at this point polarize the debate, that is the argument Carly was trying to make,” Taylor Griffin said. “However, John McCain does believe that we can fix Social Security without raising taxes. As president, John McCain will call on Congress to develop a bi-partisan solution to Social Security — and if they won’t, he will.”

As Mark Kleiman says “‘Too many specifics at this point polarize the debate’ translates into English as ‘If we told the retirees how completely we plan to shaft them, they might not vote for us.’”

I hasten to add: Not just retirees! One common scheme is to try to propose cuts that exempt current retirees and the soon-to-be-retired from any pain in favor of huge planned cuts for folks my age down the road on the theory that we don’t really care about our future.

Politics

Bush vetoes Medicare bill.

Today President Bush vetoed the bipartisan Medicare bill that would have prevented a 10.6 percent cut in doctor pay for Medicare fees. His statement explained he objected to roll back elements of the private pay-for-service Medicare Advantage plans. The bill passed both chambers of Congress with veto-proof majorities. Congress will attempt to override the veto “as soon as possible,” said Carol Guthrie, spokeswoman for the Senate Finance Committee. “There’s no time to waste.”

Update

Moments ago, the House voted 383 to 41 in favor of overriding the President’s veto.

Climate Progress

Hawaii Representative Crafting ‘Environmentally Responsible’ Plan That Would Endanger His State

Abercrombie on Fox It seems that Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) is crafting a plan that could lead to the inundation of Hawaii’s beaches, the extinction of its species, and the destruction of its water supply. Abercrombie and John Peterson (R-PA) are creating a “working group” to establish a “comprehensive, environmentally responsible energy plan,” whose members will be announced today. The centerpiece of this plan is opening protected coasts to drilling for more oil, as Abercrombie told the Hill:

Simply standing up and saying, you can’t drill your way out of this doesn’t work. The people are standing up and saying, “Yes, we can.”

The unique beaches, coral reefs, and oceanic ecosystems of Hawaii won’t be directly threatened by expanded offshore drilling, as the ocean that surrounds it doesn’t have fossil reserves. An oil spill or two could get tourists to flee the beaches of California, Florida, and the states of the eastern seaboard in favor of the Aloha State.

But in reality, Abercrombie’s advocacy of increasing fossil fuel production as a climate crisis looms will have deeper repercussions for this necklace of islands than perhaps any other state in the nation. Big Oil wants the world to keep burning fossil fuels at a rate that would increase global temperatures by five to seven times more than we’ve already experienced. Even more modest increases would spell catastrophe for islands like the Hawai’ian chain:

Rising Sea Levels Submerging Islands. In 2006, President Bush declared the 1200-mile chain of Northwestern Hawaiian Islands part of the largest marine sanctuary in the United States. But U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration researchers found that “by 2100 up to 65 percent of some islands would be lost if the sea level rose 18.9 inches (48 centimeters), which is the average IPCC projection.” A 34.6 inch rise “could result in up to 75 percent of NWHI wildlife habitat disappearing.” Whale Skate Island, home to seals, turtles, and seabirds, has already disappeared under the waves. [Endangered Species Research, 2006]

Coral Reefs Dying. “The combined stress of global warming and ocean acidification” due to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases is already causing coral bleaching. “Especially in the state of Hawaii, we depend on the reefs for tourism as well as our economy. Also, recreational and commercial fisheries,” said Coral Reef Ecologist Ku’ulei Rodgers to NBC affiliate KHNL. “The coral reefs are the basis for all of the foundations and key species and if we lose the reefs we also will lose the fish and other organisms that are involved.” [KHNL, 7/2007]

Water, Wildlife, Economy Under Threat. In the 2007 legislation to cut Hawaii’s greenhouse gas emissions, the state legislature found, “The potential adverse effects of global warming include a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of businesses and residences and the inundation of Hawaii’s freshwater aquifers, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, extended drought and loss of soil moisture, an increase in the spread of infectious diseases, and an increase in the severity of storms and extreme weather events.” Further, “Climate change will have detrimental effects on some of Hawaii’s largest industries, including tourism, agriculture, recreational, commercial fishing, and forestry.” [H.B. 226, 2007]

It is difficult to encapsulate the threat of global warming to these jewels of biodiversity. Everything from the unique snow-dependent wekiu bug on Mauna Kea to the Hawaiian monk seals are under threat. The destruction of Hawaii’s unique habitat is not just devastating to its wildlife. As the National Wildlife Federation notes, “At Honolulu, Nawiliwili and Hilo, sea level is already rising 6-14 inches per century, and the EPA estimates it is likely to rise another 17-25 inches by 2100. Sand replenishment to protect the coasts from a 20-inch sea level rise could cost $340 million to $6 billion.”

Abercrombie has criticized the Bush administration for its “obstruct, confuse and delay” strategy on global warming. His “drill, drill, drill” advocacy is no better.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up