ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Rove: ‘This Administration Put More Into Alternative Energy Research Than Any Administration in History’

Last night on The O’Reilly Factor, Karl Rove attempted to defend the Bush administration’s energy record by falsely claiming that it had spent more on alternative energy research than “any administration in history”:

ROVE: This president and this administration put more into alternative energy research than any administration in history by a significant factor. And as a result, things like the lithium ion batteries which are needed for cars, plug-in cars, all kinds of cellulosic and other forms of ethanol, hydrogen, wind, solar, all of these with one exception saw a dramatic movement in terms of being able to come to market.

Watch it:


O’Reilly questioned Rove’s assertion, saying “maybe that’s true and maybe it isn’t,” and called Bush’s actions on energy “invisible.” O’Reilly was right to be skeptical. Since 1980, federal spending on energy research has declined, and since the mid-1990s, “R&D spending has been stagnant for renewable energy and energy efficiency.”

In 2006, Bush stated that “America is addicted to oil.” However, his 2006 budget called for “significant cuts in renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean air, and climate change related-programs.” In fact, Bush has continually slashed funding for renewables from the federal budget, while threatening to block legislation that would have funded renewable energy by transferring money from oil and gas industry tax breaks. In 2007, the administration attempted to completely “eliminate federal support for geothermal power.”

The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) said that, though the President’s 2008 budget request included $2.7 billion for research, it “cuts 2007 spending for efficiency and renewables by 16%.”

The Wonk Room offers a further deconstruction of George Bush’s energy policies here.

Transcript: Read more

Yglesias

Overstretch

Kay Steiger writes about one somewhat hidden problem facing women looking to get ahead in academia:

Once women earn tenure and arrive at the institution they immediately begin getting pulled into various “service” commitments. This includes heading committees, become program coordinators, or take other leadership roles. While this is good for women that long to go into administration at a university, it often pulls female professors away from research.

I think the urge is to make sure women are represented in leadership roles but when this pulls time away from their principal mission of research, it becomes a bad thing.

Something similar seems to be true in other professions and also for underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities. Because there are relatively few women (or black people or whatever) working for Organization X and there’s a desire to make sure that women/minorities are included in this that and the other thing, the smallish number of members of the underrepresented group wind up overburdened with peripheral tasks rather than focusing on their core competencies. It’s one of several ways in which the underrepresentation of women in certain fields just makes it per se more difficult for women to get ahead with the whole thing stuck in a bad equilibrium.

Politics

Issa dismisses torture: ‘We treated our hospital patients worse.’

Today, during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) dismissed the torture of prisoners at Guantanamo and other U.S. detention facilities. According to Issa, “we treated our hospital patients worse” than we treat al Qaeda detainees. Former attorney general John Ashcroft chimed in, joking that doctors “were poking needles into me”:

ISSA: It is sort of amazing that as a member of the permanent Select Intelligence Committee, I’ve never heard any allegation of any detainee being denied food or water for a week. It’s clear that we treated our hospital patients at times worse than al Qaeda.

ASCHROFT: What’s more, they were poking needles into me all the time time.

The torture tactics used in U.S. detention are far harsher than the “poking with needles” that Ashcroft underwent at the hospital. They include, as the Center for Constitutional Rights has observed, severe sleep deprivation, “forced nudity, sexual humiliation, religious humiliation, physical force, prolonged stress positions and prolonged sensory overstimulation, and threats with military dogs.” Some interrogations have resulted in “severe physical and mental pain and suffering.”

Update

A rush transcript of this exchange was initially incorrect. We have corrected the post to reflect the accurate testimony. We regret the error.

Climate Progress

Are biofuels a core climate solution?

algae.jpgAs part of my ongoing series on core climate solutions (see links below), let’s examine biofuels.

If we are going to avoid catastrophic climate outcomes, we need some 11 “stabilization wedges” from 2015 to 2040 (see here). So if you want to be a core climate solution, you need to be able to generate a large fraction of a wedge in a climate-constrained world. And that is a staggering amount of low-carbon energy (see “Is 450 ppm politically possible? Part 1“).

Princeton’s Socolow and Pacala describe one wedge of biofuel in their original August 2004 Science article on the wedges:

Option 13: Biofuels. Fossil-carbon fuels can also be replaced by biofuels such as ethanol. A wedge of biofuel would be achieved by the production of about 34 million barrels per day of ethanol in 2054 that could displace gasoline, provided the ethanol itself were fossil-carbon free. This ethanol production rate would be about 50 times larger than today’s global production rate [actually, now more like 60 times current U.S. biofuels production], almost all of which can be attributed to Brazilian sugarcane and United States corn. An ethanol wedge would require 250 million hectares committed to high-yield (15 dry tons/hectare) plantations by 2054, an area equal to about one-sixth of the world’s cropland. An even larger area would be required to the extent that the biofuels require fossil-carbon inputs. Because land suitable for annually harvested biofuels crops is also often suitable for conventional agriculture, biofuels production could compromise agricultural productivity.

Biofuels thus have several problems as a large-scale medium-term climate solution:

Read more

Politics

The Jews Are Allright

J Street has a very comprehensive look at American Jewish political opinions. You’ll see that Jews massively disapprove of George W. Bush in general, and his foreign policy in particular, and his approach to the Middle East in particular particular. Jews are overwhelmingly backing Barack Obama and Democratic congressional candidates. Jews overwhelmingly favor more aggressive US diplomatic involvement in the Arab-Israeli conflict, clearly believe that only a peace agreement can provide real security for Israel over the long run, and recognize the need for the United States to exert meaningful pressure on both sides to get a deal.

Security

Defending Mugabe and Bashir: China’s Olympic Dream?

Our guest blogger is David Sullivan, Research Associate at the ENOUGH project.

mugabechina.jpgThe Beijing Olympics may be just around the corner, but the dream among human rights activists that the games might push the Chinese towards being a responsible stakeholder in international affairs has run up against an appalling recent track record in Africa.

In Sudan, the BBC recently uncovered evidence of Chinese military support for the Sudanese government in Darfur, a violation of the UN’s arms embargo made all the more egregious by its discovery coinciding with the decision of the Prosecutor of International Criminal Court to charge President Omar al-Bashir for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

On Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe stole reelection and inflation is now at 2,200,000%, China joined with Russia to veto targeted sanctions that would have imposed an arms embargo and travel and financial restrictions on Mugabe and 13 of his top henchmen. These sanctions would have imposed a direct cost on the men most responsible for the campaign of terror and violence that made free and fair elections impossible, without affecting Zimbabwe’s imploding economy.

The good news is that China’s blatant support for Zimbabwe may prove a misstep that could limit its ability to defend ally and suspected war criminal Omar al-Bashir at the Security Council. The Zimbabwe veto infuriated Britain and the United States (President Bush said he was “displeased”) who are now more likely to veto any efforts by China to support the suspension of the International Criminal Court’s case against Bashir.

The bad news is that the U.S. continues to push issues like Sudan and Zimbabwe to the Security Council without the high level bilateral diplomacy with China that is necessary to support effective action. Despite the company he may find there, President Bush has defended his decision to attend the opening ceremony of the Olympics on the grounds that not going would “make it more difficult to speak frankly with the Chinese leadership.” But until such conversations include subjects like stopping support for genocide and crimes against humanity in Africa, the U.S. is unlikely to garner effective responses to these issues at the U.N. headquarters in New York.

An equally important question looms for Beijing as it tries to assert itself as a major world power: Does China really want to be known around the globe as the chief defender of war criminals, tyrants and bad governments in general? From Sudan and Zimbabwe to Burma and North Korea, China is quickly and rightly becoming known as every despot’s best friend.

Media

O’Reilly Jokes About Waterboarding His Staff In Order To Identify Who Leaked Jackson’s Comments

Last week, the media went into a frenzy after Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly released footage of Rev. Jesse Jackson criticizing Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) before an interview. Yesterday, TV Newser released a leaked portion of the Jackson transcript that O’Reilly and Fox News had chosen to not make public.

Appearing on Shepard Smith’s Fox News show yesterday, O’Reilly explained that he “held it back” because “it was not relevant to the general subject — one civil rights leader disparaging another, over policy.” Towards the end of the interview, Smith asked O’Reilly, “do we know leaked it?” “No,” replied O’Reilly, adding that he would find out because he had “the waterboard over here”:

O’REILLY: So, we held it back, and then, some weasel got the whole thing, leaked it out to the internet, and here we are.

SMITH: Do we know who leaked it and what’s happened to that person?

O’REILLY: No, but I have the waterboard over here, and we have a couple of people that, you know, we’ll dunk. We’ll find out.

When Smith said, “we don’t allow torture here,” O’Reilly replied, “well, you talk to some of my guests.” Watch it:

It’s not surprising that O’Reilly would so casually joke about using waterboarding as an interrogation technique. In February, O’Reilly defended the Bush administration’s use of the tactic by claiming that “it’s not fatal” and “it doesn’t leave a lasting physical injury.”

O’Reilly doesn’t know what he’s talking about when he downplays the effects of waterboarding. In 2007, former Navy survival instructor Malcolm Nance described waterboarding to Congress, saying “It is an overwhelming experience that induces horror and triggers frantic survival instincts.” Nance concluded of his experience being waterboarded, “I was being tortured.”

Yglesias

Time Change

The Yglesias/Ackerman/Rosmiller/Goldenberg “Iraq in Strategic Context” panel has had its time change. We’re now at 3PM tomorrow rather than 1:30 PM.

Politics

Ashcroft: I was not pushed out, my departure was ‘voluntary.’

Earlier this week, the Dallas Morning News released an interview with former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias, who stated that former Attorney General John Ashcroft was “pushed out” of the Bush Administration because he “refused to sign off on the warrantless wiretaps.” Iglesias said that “had Ashcroft done the wrong thing, the unconstitutional thing, and signed off on it, he’d probably still be the AG.”

During a hearing today before the House Judiciary Committee, Ashcroft denied Iglesias’ account, telling Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), “My departure was a decision of my own. It was a decision I made. It was voluntary.”

Watch it:

Ashcroft refused to answer further questions about his departure saying, “I’m not a book writer like so many other people are. I have written books, but they’re not very interesting,” a likely reference to Scott McClellan’s tell-all book about the administration.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up