ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

75 percent of Americans support gays serving openly in the military.

A new Washington Post-ABC News poll released today shows 75 percent of Americans polled “said gay people who are open about their sexual orientation should be allowed to serve in the U.S. military” — a dramatic rise from the 61 percent who supported the notion in 2001. Support has increased across party and ideological lines:

Support from Republicans has doubled over the past 15 years, from 32 to 64 percent. More than eight in 10 Democrats and more than three-quarters of independents now support the idea, as did nearly two-thirds of self-described conservatives.

Today is the 15th anniversary of the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy. At that time, a majority of all Americans — including 75 percent of conservatives — supported a ban on gays in the military.

Yglesias

Pelosi: The End Could Be in Sight

Nancy Pelosi referring to Maliki’s increasingly insistent calls for a timeline for US withdrawal from Iraq says “the end could be in sight” and calls for “a high-level meeting with the Iraqis to work out the terms of our redeployment from Iraq” but cautions that this “will not happen without the election of Barack Obama as president of the United States.”

Politics

Live Blogging: Al Gore To Appear This Morning At Netroots Nation Convention

gore.jpg“Former Vice President Al Gore is scheduled to speak this morning to more than 2,000 bloggers and others meeting at the Netroots Nation convention. His appearance here has been kept hush hush, with word only that a mystery guest would be coming on stage after a question-and-answer session with Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House.” Watch a live stream of the conference here.

11:08 AM ET: Moderator Gina Cooper asks Pelosi a question about Gore’s goal to shift America from fossil fuel to renewable energy in 10 years. Pelosi then pretends to check her Blackberry and says that she had recently received an e-mail from the vice president. As a recording of his voice comes on — “In relationship to this question on energy, Dear Nancy, Thursday I issued a challenge to reset our energy commitment…” — Gore walks onstage to a standing ovation and long, sustained applause.

11:18 ET: Gore comments on the absurdity of increased drilling to address global warming. He compares it to an old remedy for a hangover: “the hair of the dog that bit you.” “They’d recommend just going in and having another drink in the morning. That’s sort of what that reminds me of,” said Gore. “When you’re in a hole, stop digging.”

11:25 ET: Dave Roberts at Grist is live-blogging too. He notes Gore argues that “defenders of status quo are the ones who got us in this mess. Ridiculous to open a few more areas for drilling to produce oil in 10 years that will be sold to China. Makes about as much sense as responding to an attack from Afghanistan by invading some other country.”

11:27 ET: Gore praises Netroots Nation, commenting on the excitement of the event: “You will tell them that this was the beginning of an effort that was the start to reclaim the integrity of American democracy.”

11:31 ET: Gore responds to a question about whether he would be willing to serve in the next administration:

I am really honored by the suggestion that some have made that I consider taking a position of some kind in the next administration, and I want to convey my respect for the idea, even as I explain to you why that’s not the best thing for me. … I feel the highest and best use of the talents and experiences I’ve gained in my life is to enlarge the political space for elected officials and cabinet members to address this climate crisis. I’ve seen first hand how important it is to have a base of support for these bold changes. … I’m devoting my life to bringing about a sea change of public opinion across party lines that supports the truly massive policy change that we have to have.

11:35 ET: Gore puts it bluntly: “The idea of turning coal into liquid fuels for our cars is insane.”

11:37 ET: Responding to a question on technology, Pelosi thanks Gore for his work on the issue, stating, “Without him, there would be no Netroots Nation. We would not have the technology. You know that.” Gore jokingly responds, “I think I’ll refrain from saying that.”

11:43 ET: Ari Melber and the Northwest Progressive Institute are also live blogging.

11:56 ET: Gore talks about the economics of renewables: “When demand for oil and gas goes up, the price goes up. When the demand for solar and wind goes up, the price goes down.”

12:03 ET: Pelosi responds to a question about Maliki’s comments this morning endorsing Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) plan for withdrawal from Iraq:

On the one hand, the administration is saying that everything is great, security has been achieved in Iraq. On the other hand, we can’t bring our troops home. How does that makes sense? [...]

So with the prime minister saying it’s time for you to go, I think it’s time for our country to sit down with the Iraqis and work that plan out. [We need to be] respectful of what the prime minister says, and respectful of the will of the American people, who have been against this war for a long time. … And we owe it to our troops who are there, and we owe them so much more as we discussed early. … [We should] have a high-level meeting with the Iraqis to work out the terms of our deployment out of iraq. … So, the end could be in sight.

Yglesias

Pelosi on Partisanship

The Speaker prefers to bargain from a position of strength: “The bigger our victories, the more bipartisanship there’ll be in the congress.” I think that’s about right — you see a lot of bipartisanship when one party’s running scared.

Yglesias

Everything’s Coming Up Disraeli

Normally, I go weeks — months, even — at a time without anyone mentioning Benjamin Disraeli. But here’s David Brooks (via K-Drum) and here’s The Economist (which is at least British) and here’s Reihan Salam. Suddenly it seems one cannot understand contemporary politics without a sound grasp of . . . 19th century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli.

Everyone needs a usable history, but this kind of seems like a weird reach.

Media

Some Quotes

Here’s National Review on Barack Obama’s plan for Iraq last week:

We haven’t won the Iraq war, of course, which is why the debate over it is so consequential. Obama took to the pages of the New York Times Monday to explain, “My Plan for Iraq.” He reiterated his support for a 16-month pullout. We think — and certainly hope — that somewhere deep inside Obama realizes how unworkable and risky this timeline would be.

And here’s the Prime Minister of Iraq:

U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes [...] The Americans have found it difficult to agree on a concrete timetable for the exit because it seems like an admission of defeat to them. But it isn’t.

This barely seems to be getting any play in the American press thus far, but at a minimum it deserves to dominate tomorrow’s Sunday shows.

Politics

Maliki endorses Obama’s plan for withdrawal from Iraq.

Today, Der Spiegel reports that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has endorsed a 16-month timetable for the United States to withdraw from Iraq:

maliki.jpgIn an interview with Der Spiegel released on Saturday, Maliki said he wanted U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq as soon as possible.

U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.” [...]

Asked if he supported Obama’s ideas more than those of John McCain, Republican presidential hopeful, Maliki said he did not want to recommend who people should vote for.

Whoever is thinking about the shorter term is closer to reality. Artificially extending the stay of U.S. troops would cause problems. [...]

“The Americans have found it difficult to agree on a concrete timetable for the exit because it seems like an admission of defeat to them. But it isn’t,” Maliki told Der Spiegel.

Not only is the plan now accepted by Iraqis, but as a Center for American Progress report explains, it is also logistically workable — despite what reporters such as ABC’s Martha Raddatz have suggested. Maliki’s comments come as Obama begins his trip in the Middle East, which will include Iraq. Full interview with Maliki here. (HT: Democracy Arsenal)

Update

Susan Rice, Obama’s senior national security adviser, has put out a statement in response to Maliki’s comments: “Senator Obama welcomes Prime Minister Maliki’s support for a 16 month timeline for the redeployment of U.S combat brigades. This presents an important opportunity to transition to Iraqi responsibility, while restoring our military and increasing our commitment to finish the fight in Afghanistan.”


Update

,ABC News reports that the White House accidentally sent around a Reuters story about Maliki’s interview to its “extensive distribution list.”

Politics

Friends of P

I’m up outrageously early on a Saturday because I’m about to head off to see Nancy Pelosi talk to the Netroots Nation. I don’t attend 8:30 AM events on a Saturday lightly, so I think it’s time to once again remind people that whatever disappointments they may have with the new Democratic congress and its leadership that, at the end of the day, among real liberals in Washington, DC Pelosi is by far the most powerful. And among powerful elected officials in Washington, Pelosi is the real liberal. There’s a reason she’s the one who shows up to an event like this even when she’s not courting the base in a primary.

Yglesias

Bold

Wow. I hadn’t realized that Al Gore gave a speech recently calling on us to move to 100 percent renewable sources of electricity in ten years. That’s audacious seemingly to the point of madness. Why focus so exclusively on cleaner electricity generation rather than on a balanced approach that involves efficiency (i.e., using less electricity) and also the transportation, heating, etc. sectors. After all, replacing a conventional car with an electric one — or a bus with a trolleybus or tram — reduces emissions regardless of how you get your electricity.

In that sense, it makes way more sense to put some of our existing dirty electricity infrastructure to use in the short-term as a substitute for our currently lamentable transportation infrastructure, while we switch the nature of our electrical infrastructure on a more tempered pace. Of course there’s nothing wrong with big ideas to expand the overton window, so I don’t think it’s terrible to see some folks pushing radical ideas, but on the other hand I do worry about the public becoming polarized between a “holy shit we need to do something crazy and extreme” faction and a “that sounds crazy and extreme so let’s do nothing” faction. It’s more important to start taking some concrete steps down the path to mitigation than to spend too much time drawing up the outlines of ecotopia.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up