ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Denver Video: Pollution CEOs Versus Youth Activist Jessy Tolkan

Last week the Rocky Mountain Roundtable hosted a day-long symposium on energy and climate change. One session included top officials from major global warming polluters — electric utility Xcel Energy, Arch Coal, Dow Chemical, natural gas corporation GHK, and top coal corporation Peabody Energy. The five men have, of course, become millionaires as their companies have spewed millions of tons of global warming pollution into the atmosphere. At the Roundtable, the pollution executives defended government subsidies for their respective industries, claimed solidarity with average Americans, and pooh-poohed any possibility of change from the status quo:

– Xcel Energy CEO Dick Kelly complained, “Consumers want access to renewable energy and information. People have expectations that the solutions are readily available. That’s not true.”

– Arch Coal CEO Steven Leer — whose company has spent decades litigating and lobbying against the Clean Air Act — admitted, “The Clean Air Act worked.” Leer, who owns $27 million in Arch stock options, continued, “Everybody’s seen pain at the pump.”

– Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris — who made $10 million last year and has fired 7000 American workers — complained, “It’s been a tough couple of years,” and urged the audience, “We can’t as a government abdicate helping corporations.”

– GHK founder Robert A. Hefner III argued, “We can have totally green natural gas plants” in order “to replace coal.”

– Peabody Executive Vice President Fred Palmer — a $25,000 donor to Gingrich’s ASWF 527 corporation — claimed “Clean coal is not an oxymoron.” He then stated, “The United States is not the problem,” putting blame on China.

The Wonk Room interviewed Jessy Tolkan, leader of the Power Vote campaign and executive director of the Energy Action Coalition, for a response:

As one of the most powerful voting blocs in America, we are going to make it abundantly clear that we don’t want an abundance of dirty energy in this country. We want an abundance of clean energy, and we’re going to force our elected officials to listen to us and not the oil and coal and natural gas industry.

Watch it:

In the interview, Tolkan also called Newt Gingrich’s “Drill Here, Drill Now” campaign “a bunch of bullshit,” saying she’s still naive enough believe we should tell the truth. Tolkan recommends that everyone check out PowerVote.org and join the Energy Action Coalition on September 27th in the Green Jobs Now Day of Action.

See also the Wonk Room video interview with Van Jones of Green For All.

Media

The Whining Pose

gallmcobamagi.jpg

I think The Washington Post has managed to run an editorial that’s unfair to both presidential candidates, moaning about sundry points including the idea that “Though both candidates vowed to shake up Washington, neither offered bold or innovative proposals.” This is nonsense. I don’t think John McCain’s plan to try to unravel group insurance pools through various changes in the tax and regulatory treatment of employer-sponsored health care benefits will produce the kind of beneficial results that McCain claims for his proposal, but it’s certainly bold and innovative. They complain that “Obama’s agenda for the most part might have been lifted from Democratic stump speeches of four or eight years ago” as if it’s just inconceivable that John Kerry proposed anything bold. Meanwhile, the “for the most part” clause manages to waive away Obama’s entire suite of energy-and-climate proposals which are very ambitious and totally unlike anything Kerry or Gore put on the table.

Then back to McCain when they’re upset that he “offered little in substance that President Bush hasn’t been promoting for the past eight years.” Again, I think that’s true — the two political parties each draw from an enduring set of ideas so McCain’s proposals are similar to those of his GOP predecessor just as Obama’s are similar to his Democratic predecessors — but serves as a way of eliding the point that some of these ideas are nonetheless bold and innovative. Health care, as mentioned above, fits the bill as do McCain’s views on the need to cut entitlement benefits and introduce elements of privatization. It’s true that neither campaign has managed to generate a wholly original policy agenda, but why would they? And it’s definitely false to accuse either campaign of lacking any bold ideas.

Climate Progress

No wonder the race is close: Even Apollo Alliance is suckered by McCain’s lies and doubletalk

The Rove/Bush/McCain/Palin strategy of simply lying and lying and lying works. As Mark Twain said 140 years ago, “The most outrageous lies that can be invented will find believers if a man only tells them with all his might.” And while McCain is not a great speaker, he did tell his 10 convention-night energy lies with all his might.

apollo-alliance-logo-web.gifYou might think that people actually working on the clean energy transition like the Apollo Alliance could not possibly think McCain’s blather about clean energy represented a reversal from years of very strong opposition (see “Anti-wind McCain“).

McCain is a eco-Luddite who said late last year, “The truly clean technologies don’t work” and who found a VP/soulmate in a global-warming denier, Big Oil shill, and fellow eco-Luddite (see “Palin is an earmark expert, NOT energy expert“). And while the best thing about the Alliance is that they get energy efficiency, one of the worst things about McCain is that he doesn’t (see “McCain is Cheney’s third term!” and “McCain’s cynical efficiency lies“).

So I was stunned when an “Apollo Weekly Update” titled “With McCain Speech Clean Energy Consensus Gets Clearer” appeared in my mailbox. It’s a fawning review of McCain’s speech — with a credulous take on a wolf-in-sheep’s clothing that rivals Little Red Riding Hood:

Read more

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up