ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Carol Browner: Environmental Regulations Create Market Opportunities

The Washington Post’s Al Kamen has the scoop that Carol Browner, the Clinton administration’s Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, has been tapped for a new position “as head of environmental, energy, climate and related matters” in President-elect Barack Obama’s White House. She may be heading a new National Energy Council, recommended in the the Center for American Progress Action Fund’s Change For America blueprint for the new administration, to drive “both policy and strategic options with respect to energy and climate change.”

On December 1, CAPAF hosted Browner, New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, and Gov. Ed Rendell (D-PA) for a lively discussion on the future of energy and environmental policy. In the question-and-answer period, Browner explained her view that government can spur economic growth by raising standards:

As a former regulator — and I can cite you any number of stories — when the government steps up and says there’s a requirement, that we’re going to have to take sulfur out of diesel fuel, you’re going to have to get rid of CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) by a date certain, what the government is doing is creating a market opportunity.

American innovation and American ingenuity time and time again has risen to that challenge, and inevitably more quickly and at less cost than was anticipated.

And so, while the governor has been talking very importantly about how we need to make investments, those investments, when they are partnered with a government requirement — a regulation that we’re going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, that we’re going to reduce this climate pollutant — the upside is phenomenal, more than we can possibly imagine in this room.

Watch it:

Browner, 52, has continued her leadership on energy and the environment since leaving the EPA. A principal at the Albright Group consulting firm and chair of the National Audubon Society, Browner is a director at the Center for American Progress, Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection, and the National Brownfields Association. She is a top adviser on Obama’s transition team, overseeing energy policy and meeting with environmental leaders.

Browner’s view that higher standards build economic growth has proven to be true. A study of California’s green economy found that its “energy-efficiency policies created nearly 1.5 million jobs from 1977 to 2007″ and grew the economy by $45 billion without any growth in per-capita electricity use. Writing in favor of strong global warming standards, Hank Ryan, chair of the California Small Business Association, explains that energy regulations have given “California small businesses a competitive edge over their counterparts in other states because while they’re wasting money on inefficiency, we’re spending it on employees, building a better product, advertising, and capital improvements.”

Politics

‘Frosty the Coalman’: King Coal Launches Holiday-Themed Greenwashing Campaign

The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) has launched a new holiday-themed greenwashing campaign through their website AmericasPower.org aimed at painting their “environmental oxymoron” clean coal technology as “clean,” “affordable,” and “adorable.” As Switchboard explains, the campaign features “animated lumps of coal belting out songs like ‘Frosty the Coalman,’ ‘Clean Coal Night,’ and ‘Deck the Halls (with Clean Coal!).’” An excerpt from “Frosty the Coalman”:

Frosty the Coal Man, is a jolly happy soul.
He’s abundant here in America and he helps our economy roll.
Frosty the Coal Man, is getting cleaner every day.
He’s affordable and adorable and helps workers keep their pay.

There must have been some magic in clean coal technology,
For when they looked for pollutants there was nearly none to see.

Listen here:

It is not clear if ACCCE will expand its new holiday campaign beyond their website, but in the past ACCCE has spread its falsehoods on TV, radio, and in print, often spending millions. In early 2008, ACCCE’s clean coal campaign reportedly had $50 million to spend on pro-coal, anti-climate initiatives.

The Wall Street Journal recently credited ACCCE’s misleading campaign with convincing politicians, the media and the public that “clean coal” is a cure-all for global warming pollution from coal-fired power plants. Even President-elect Obama has taken the bait.

Clean coal, of course, is nothing of the sort. Al Gore put it bluntly: “Clean coal’s like healthy cigarettes — it does not exist.” Similarly, Kevin Grandia writes, “Nothing like mercury emissions, asthma attacks and melting polar ice-caps to get me in the holiday spirit.”

Update

More from WattHead and Joe Romm.

Climate Progress

You won’t believe your ears: Frosty the Coalman, Clean Coal Night, Deck the Halls with Clean Coal

If you thought you’ve heard it all before, you are so, so naive. In an unintentionally brilliant parody of The Onion, a major coal industry front group has put online what I can only describe as pagan greenwashing, America’s Power Clean Coal Carolers — something guaranteed to offend everybody.

coal-carolers.jpg

Yes, lumps of coal are singing the most grotesque and bastardized version of beloved Christmas carols:

Frosty the coal man is a jolly happy soul…
There must be magic in clean coal technology
For when they looked for pollutants
There was nearly none to see.

And this is the least offsensive one. Note to industry: Clean coal is magical in the way Harry Potter is magical — neither of them exist in the real world. That’s why you can’t see the pollutants, the power plants are invisible themselves.

In the twisted minds of the industry Mad Men who put this together, it makes perfect sense to turn songs about the birth of Jesus into songs about “clean coal.”

tiffany.jpgAnd yes, each of the carolers has a name and an attitude, just like the Spice Girls, if the Spice Girls were a leading cause of cardiopulmonary illness, that is. My favorite is Tiffany. I think I love her, cough, cough.

I’d say clean coal had jumped the shark, but I think you have to actually exist first before you can become self-parody. Perhaps I need to add a new Climate Progress category for “unintentional humor.” And isn’t putting a lump of coal in a stocking how we used to punish children?
Read more

Politics

Obama again denies discussing Senate successor with Blagojevich.

Yesterday, President-elect Obama denied discussing with Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D-IL) who should fill his recently-vacated U.S. Senate seat. However, bloggers quickly noted two different news accounts suggesting that Obama had recently met or spoken with Blagojevich regarding his successor. Yet in a joint interview with the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune today, Obama again denied any contact with Blagojevich regarding his seat:

Q: Have you ever spoken to Gov. Blagojevich about the Senate seat?

OBAMA: I have not discussed the Senate seat with the governor at any time. My strong belief is that it needed to be filled by somebody who is going to represent the people of Illinois and fight for them. And beyond that, I was focused on the transition.

Yesterday, Obama senior adviser David Axelrod said he was “mistaken” when he recently suggested that the President-elect had met with Blagojevich to discuss the open seat.

Health

The Blago Giveth, And The Blago Taketh Away: Examining Blagojevich’s Health Care Record

blagallkids.jpg Before a wiretap revealed that Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D-IL) had attempted to “strip a Chicago children’s hospital of $8 million in state money after a hospital executive declined to make a $50,000 contribution,” Blagojevich ‘s health care reform — All Kids — was the apple of every advocate’s eye.

Implemented in July of 2006, All Kids made Illinois “the first state in the nation to offer health coverage to all children.” The program “increased health coverage for children by increasing enrollment of children who are already eligible for Medicaid and SCHIP and giving parents with “higher incomes an opportunity to buy health insurance coverage for their children.”

In many ways, the initiative proved to be national model for reform. To deter employers from “dropping dependent coverage and families from dropping private coverage to enroll their children in All Kids,” the state imposed a 12-month uninsurance waiting period for children in families with income over 200 percent of the federal poverty line. All Kids set no cost sharing for preventive care regardless of income and established sufficiently high premiums for higher-income families to prevent the program from crowding out private coverage.

One component of All Kids also implemented a “primary care case management for all children enrolled in Medicaid and SCHIP,” ensuring that children had access to immunizations and regular checkups. In fact, an August 2007 Kaiser Foundation report observed that financing for the All Kids expansion came largely from from projected savings from the new primary care component and a disease management (DM) program. “Combined, the PCCM and DM are estimated to save $57 million each year, which would cover the first-year costs of the All Kids program, estimated at $25 million,” Kaiser reported.

Building on this program, “the governor proposed the comprehensive Illinois Covered plan to extend coverage to the state’s 1.4 million uninsured adults.” After the funding mechanism for the proposal (a gross receipt’s tax) “came up against opposition from the legislature, the governor scaled back the reform measures” and attempted to use his “administrative powers to add more people to the state’s FamilyCare insurance program.”

Although the governor’s expansion of FamilyCare was thrown out in court, “the state has enacted two helpful health care initiatives” expanding the All Kids health insurance program to 19-and 20-year-olds and requiring hospitals “to offer discounts to uninsured Illinoisans” below a certain percentage of the poverty line.

Politics

Interrogators played Christina Aguilera, Sesame Street, and ‘Barney’ theme song to torture detainees.

One of the Bush administration’s psychological torture techniques against detainees has been to blast loud music to deprive detainees of sleep, causing some to “knock their heads against the walls and the doors, screaming their heads off.” According to British human rights group Reprieve, these are among the songs that the U.S. has used frequently:

christy.gif– “Dirrty,” Christina Aguilera

– “F*ck Your God,” Deicide

– “Shoot to Thrill,” AC/DC

– “We are The Champions,” Queen

– “I Love You,” from “Barney and Friends”

– “Born in the USA,” Bruce Springsteen

– “Babylon,” David Gray

– “White America,” Eminem

– “Sesame Street” theme song

Others include Aerosmith, Britney Spears, Don McLean, Lil’ Kim, Limp Bizkit, Matchbox 20, Rage Against the Machine, Red Hot Chili Peppers, and Tupac Shakur. Reprieve has launched a new anti-music torture initiative, Zero dB.

Yglesias

Pence: Rightward Ho!

Anyone hoping the Republican Party might start repositioning itself in a more constructive manner won’t find much to like in this Mike Pence op-ed explaining that more dogmatic adherence to the conservative creed is what the party needs:

We must develop new strategies for strengthening our armed forces and homeland security, and be willing to oppose any effort to use our military for nation-building or progressive social experimentation. We must again be the party of economic growth. The American people know we cannot borrow, spend and bail our way back to a growing economy. Republicans must offer alternatives for restoring growth through tax relief, expanded trade, spending discipline and no more government bailouts. We must detail our alternatives to Democratic plans to raise taxes and expand the federal government in education, health care and entitlements. Ideas like a balanced budget amendment, school-choice vouchers, health savings accounts and welfare reform should take center stage in the Republican agenda. And we must have a vision for defending the cherished values of life and marriage whenever they come under attack from the courts, the new administration or congressional liberals.

It would be comforting to think that something as dumb as this couldn’t possibly succeed politically, but progressives should be under no delusions — if the Obama administration fails to restore prosperity, they will be beaten very badly in 2010 and 2012 no matter how nutty the GOP agenda.

Politics

Rep. Schakowsky: I must not have been a serious Senate contender because Blago ‘didn’t ask me for anything.’

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell this afternoon that she had spoken to Gov. Rod Blagojevich to ask if she was under consideration for President-elect Obama’s vacated Senate seat. She said that the governor didn’t ask her for anything, so she “must have been out of the running”:

SCHAKOWSKY: On Nov. 18 I had a phone conversation with the governor. Probably all of it is on tape. I thought at the time that I was a serious contender but I realize now that I probably wasn’t because he didn’t ask me for anything. So I must have been out of the running.

Watch it:

Asked about “Senate Candidate 5,” identified as Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL), Schakowsky reminded viewers “we’ve only seen one side of the conversation.” “I would be very surprised if Rep. Jackson did anything wrong,” she said.

Economy

Bush’s IRS Quietly Slashing Corporate Taxes

corpii1.jpgThe Wonk Room and ThinkProgress have been documenting the many last-minute regulatory changes that President Bush’s administration is pushing through as his term winds to a close. White House spokesman Tony Fratto’s assertions aside, the changes weaken health care, workers rights, and expose the environment to further pollution and irresponsible behavior.

But the Bush administration is also making sure to wreck the tax system on its way out the door. Today, Time’s Stephen Gandel reported that, in the last year, the Internal Revenue Service has been “unusually aggressive in doing what it can to lower corporate taxes, going above and beyond what has been allowed in the past”:

The IRS this year has issued 113 notices, many of which will lower the taxes companies will pay this year and in the future. That breaks the previous record of 111 in 2006, and is nearly double the 65 issued in the last year of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

These changes “drain billions of dollars of badly needed tax revenue at a time when the federal deficit is mushrooming.” Gandel also notes that “many of the changes may lower corporate tax revenue for years to come.”

One of the more egregious examples of Bush’s various gifts to big business was a change to the tax code — enacted in the midst of the $700 billion bailout debate — which gave “American banks a windfall of as much as $140 billion.” Gandel notes that Wells Fargo will receive a $5 billion tax break from this change, while Capital One will receive a $500 million windfall.

Perhaps the largest windfall though, will come from a proposed change stating “companies that lose money in any given year are entitled to a rebate on money they have paid in taxes for the prior two years“:

For instance, in 2008 there are projected to be 107 companies in the S&P 1500 that will lose money, as much as $80 billion. About half of those companies were profitable in 2007, making nearly $30 billion as a group. That means, based on an average corporate tax rate of about 30%, those companies could receive as much as $10 billion in tax rebates from last year alone.

As the Wonk Room has noted, the tax code is already riddled with “tax loopholes, shelters, and giveaways” that minimize corporate taxes. The United States currently raises below average corporate tax revenue and will be facing record deficits and a rapidly climbing debt in the coming years. With widespread federal spending necessary to stimulate the economy, changes to further lower corporate tax revenue are ones the country can not afford.

Politics

O’Reilly: ‘Fox News Is Not A Far-Right Operation’

In an interview with CNN founder Ted Turner last night, Bill O’Reilly claimed that those who believe that Fox News is a conservative outlet are sorely mistaken:

O’REILLY: Right and I’m a nice guy. Well, maybe that’s overstating. I’m an honest guy, who’s just trying to do the best I can. But, you know, I think that you underestimate Fox News and its appeal to traditional Americans.

TURNER: That’s true. And I also said in there that I knew that that was our most vulnerable spot before I even went on the air with CNN that a right wing network would pose a threat because not only was CNN pretty much in the middle but so were CBS, NBC, and ABC. And you’re right. The far right did not have a voice.

O’REILLY: You can’t possibly think that Fox News is a far right operation? I mean, because it’s not.

TURNER: I do.

O’REILLY: Oh, come on. I mean, maybe coming from a Jane Fonda point of view it is, but come on.

TURNER: Well, I was married to Jane Fonda.

O’REILLY: I know. I mean, but how can – I’m a far right guy? I mean, the far right hates me. You either don’t watch or you’re so far left.

Watch it:

O’Reilly wants you to believe that Dick Cheney’s preferred station — which promotes Sean Hannity’s partisan mud-slinging, Newt Gingrich’s hate speech, Karl Rove’s propaganda, Glenn Beck’s racist rants, John Bolton and Bill Kristol’s war mongering, and Mike Huckabee’s variety hour — is not at all indicative of Fox’s right-wing bent.

In a Nov. 2003 interview with Jonah Goldberg, Bill O’Reilly explained his view:

O’REILLY: They complain about the right-wing media? I don’t even buy the fact that the Fox News Channel is a right-wing media. I just think we give access to people like you and other conservatives…

GOLDBERG: Right. And I’m not right-wing either.

Right.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up