ThinkProgress Logo

Health

Cavuto Rallies Against Family Planning Provision In Stimulus

As Amanda Terkel points out over at ThinkProgress, conservatives have started complaining and mischaracterizing a provision of the stimulus bill that would “grant waivers to states to allow them to cover family planning services and supplies to low-income women who are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid.” According to the text of the provision, “the bill would give states the option to provide such coverage without obtaining a waiver. States could continue to use the existing waiver authority if they preferred.”

Adding his voice to the already vocal conservative opposition, Fox News’ Neil Cavuto pretended that preventing unplanned pregnancies and promoting maternal and infant health would do nothing to stimulate the economy.

Watch it:

Cavuto’s rant is bizarre, if not unsurprising. Giving women access to critical health care stimulates the health industry and ensures that women are healthy enough to continue providing for their families. Reducing the number of unplanned pregnancies also insulates the government from greater financial obligations — since low income families often turn to the government for assistance — and generally lowers health care costs.

In fact, according to a 2007 Congressional Budget Office report, publicly funded family planning services would save the federal government $200 million over five years, and $400 million over ten.

But, keeping healthy women is also just good policy. It’s difficult to imagine how unwanted pregnancies help struggling families make ends meet and afford health insurance for their families.

Politics

Vice President’s house now appears unobscured on Google Maps.

In 2005, Maureen Dowd noted that “if you use Google Earth’s database to see [former Vice President Cheney's] official residence, the view is scrambled and obscured. You can view satellite photos of the White House, the Pentagon and the Capitol — but not of the Lord of the Underworld’s lair.” But Gawker reports today that as of last week (when Cheney left office), the overhead view is now clear:

navalobs.jpg

Biden is also moving toward greater transparency in other areas, including disclosing his daily schedule. By contrast, Cheney “drew the line at the obligatory notices for public events.”

Yglesias

Big Change

Here’s an interesting tidbit from Ruy Teixeira:

ruy012609_01.jpg

Poll after poll shows that the public has very positive feelings toward President Barack Obama and his plans for the country. And that includes the major new programs that he is proposing to bring change to a country that badly needs it. A stunning 71 percent of respondents in the most recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, for example, said that Obama has a mandate to “work for major new economic and social programs” rather than for small policy changes.

I have mixed feelings about reporting on these kind of findings. On the one hand, I don’t actually think that elected officials’ future has very much to do with the public’s opinion, such as it is, on this kind of question. I think, for example, that Obama’s re-election prospects will be based much more on whether or not living standards are increasing in 2012 than on whether or not the policies he pursued in 2009 matched up with at-the-time public opinion. So the politically smart thing to do is more-or-less ignore year-one opinion and just do things that you think will work out in the medium-term (of course the wise and moral thing to do is to also think about the long term) irregardless of the polls. But on the other hand, there’s lots of reason to believe that people’s beliefs about short-term public opinion do influence how they act so it’s important to spread the information around when it points in the right direction.

Politics

Susan Rice: Obama will use ‘direct diplomacy with Iran.’

Fulfilling a campaign promise that was relentlessly attacked by the right wing, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said today that the Obama administration will engage in “direct diplomacy” with Iran in order to curb the country’s alleged nuclear program:

susanrice234.jpgWe look forward to engaging in vigorous diplomacy that includes direct diplomacy with Iran, as well as continued collaboration and partnership” with the other four permanent members of the Security Council — Britain, China, France and Russia — plus Germany, Rice said.

‘Not since before the 1979 Iranian revolution are U.S. officials believed to have conducted wide-ranging direct diplomacy with Iranian officials,” notes the AP. Rice “warned that Iran must meet U.N. Security Council demands to suspend uranium enrichment before any talks on its nuclear program.”

Economy

Conservatives Peddle Myth That Stimulus Spends $275,000 For Every Job Created

workmoney.jpgIn staking out their opposition to the economic recovery package, conservatives have been peddling a variety of myths. One of their favorites is that taxpayers will pay $275,000 for every new job:

Rep. John Boehner (R-OH): All told, the plan would spend a whopping $275,000 in taxpayer dollars for every new job it aims to create, saddling each and every household with $6,700 in additional debt.

Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA): [T]his bill will spend a shocking $275,000 for each new job created (assuming they actually materialize). Even worse, this calculation is only a partial measure of cost…It is more than likely the private sector could have created more than one job for $275,000 – especially considering the average U.S. household income is around $45,000.

Today, Paul Krugman broke down this “bogus talking point“:

[I]t involves taking the cost of a plan that will extend over several years, creating millions of jobs each year, and dividing it by the jobs created in just one of those years. It’s as if an opponent of the school lunch program were to take an estimate of the cost of that program over the next five years, then divide it by the number of lunches provided in just one of those years, and assert that the program was hugely wasteful, because it cost $13 per lunch.

Joe Klein called the number “phony-baloney propaganda,” while Dean Baker noted that “the media have been typically derelict in simply reporting this number without making any assessment to evaluate it.”

As Scott Lilly pointed out, the actual cost per job is closer to $50,000, without taking into account the “substantial number of additional jobs [created] beyond 2012.” And even if the conservatives’ number was anywhere close to accurate, their proposed job creation program — tax cuts — would cost more than three times as much per job. As Christian Weller and John Halpin found, “even under the most optimistic assumptions about the relationship between tax cuts and jobs,” President Bush’s 2001 tax cut cost $871,000 for every job created.

Of course, the recovery package is meant do a lot more than create jobs. It will also spark economic activity, which means the jobs won’t simply disappear when the stimulus runs out. And it will invest in education, health care, and infrastructure, raising our standard of living for years to come. To act as if the package is solely about job creation — when it also has to fill the economy’s “output gap” — is disingenuous.

Yglesias

Right-Wing “Reporting”

picture_26.jpg

As another illustration of the conservative media’s human capital problem, consider that some of the people writing for sites like Newbusters are evidently pretty dimwitted:

As NewsBusters reported in June 2007, CAP is led by former President Clinton’s Chief of Staff John Podesta, and the list of all those involved reads like a Clinton administration Who’s Who.

Not feeling the need to keep this secret, Hillary actually bragged to a group of liberal bloggers in October 2007 that she helped create the organization.

Now, according to the Associated Press, she has appointed someone from this institution to a newly-created post within the State Department

For one thing, Todd Stern, the CAP Senior Fellow in question, is hardly the first—and hardly the only—CAP person to get a job in the administration.

But more to the point, in 2007 Newbusters “reported” that CAP/AF CEO John Podesta is the leader of the organization? Really? Does this guy even know what reporting means? How on earth does he get these scoops?

Yglesias

Transit Cuts Map

If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times, but one of the most fast-acting and effective things the stimulus bill could be doing but isn’t is directing funds to local transit agencies to allow them to forestall contractionary service cuts and fare hikes. Transportation for America has a nice map showing the cuts currently taking place around the country.

Politics

New Right-Wing Stimulus Myth: Progressives Want To Spend ‘Hundreds Of Millions On Contraceptives’

In recent days, conservatives have been stepping up their opposition to any stimulus proposal that favors smart spending over tax cuts for businesses. To push their argument — which most economists have discredited — they have tried to call out wasteful spending in the bill. Last week, for example, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) went on a tirade about funding to revitalize the National Mall.

This week, the focus is on contraceptives. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) has claimed that the package would spend “hundreds of millions on contraceptives.” Yesterday on ABC’s This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) about the provision. Pelosi replied:

PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

Today on his radio show, Rush Limbaugh said that if Pelosi “wants fewer births, I have the way to do this and it won’t require any contraception: You simply put pictures of Nancy Pelosi…in every cheap motel room. … That will keep birthrates down because that picture will keep a lot of things down.” Now on the top of the Drudge Report:

pelosidrudge.jpg

As usual, in addition to throwing out insults, conservatives are distorting and simplifying the facts. Here is the actual text from the stimulus package’s summary:

State Option to Cover Family Planning Services. Under current law, the Secretary has the authority under section 1115 of the Social Security Act to grant waivers to states to allow them to cover family planning services and supplies to low-income women who are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid. The bill would give states the option to provide such coverage without obtaining a waiver. States could continue to use the existing waiver authority if they preferred.

Like other portions of the stimulus bill, this measure would not only aid states, but also provide preventative, cost-saving health care to help low-income women support their families and keep working. It focuses on access to recommended services and contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancies and promote maternal and infant health — not abortion. ThinkProgress has learned that an upcoming Congressional Budget Office report estimates that this change would save $200 million over five years and $700 million over 10.

No one would be forcing states to pay for family planning services. States can now cover low-income women if they get a state waiver, but approval can take a long time. Despite these bureaucratic hassles, 27 states have already “obtained federal approval to extend Medicaid eligibility for family planning services to individuals who would otherwise not be eligible.” This bill would simply allow states to skip the administrative delays.

Update

As Media Matters points out, public support for family planning programs is extremely high.


Update

,Today on MSNBC, Sen. James Clyburn (D-SC) responded to Boehner, saying that the family planning provision is part of the House’s comprehensive effort to address health care in order to cut overall costs:

We just passed the State Children Health Insurance program that will expand health care for children by $4 million, taking us to a total of 11 million children.

We are, in this legislation, looking at other aspects of Medicaid. We are looking at electronically storing health records, so that in five years all of that can be a part of the ordinary course of defense with health care. That saves millions of dollars in money. So I think that Mr. Boehner is looking for one little sound bite rather than looking at the total package here and seeing what it will do for the American people.


Update

,TPMDC reports that a “letter written by Wisconsin health regulators in 2007 noted that some states have had to wait for as long as two years before their request was approved.”


Update

,Digby checks the media on its misinformation when talking about the stimulus bill.

Culture

Best Guards in the East

Have I really not yet blogged on how ridiculous it is that Allen Iverson is an Eastern Conference All-Star starter? It’s ridiculous! Here’s some comparison cases:

easternguards.png

These are three Eastern Conference guards who are scoring more efficiently than Iverson, grabbing more rebounds than Iverson, turning the ball over less than Iverson, and dishing out more assists than Iverson. Are we supposed to believe that defensive prowess is making up the difference? And this is hardly the result of an exhaustive search. And besides the guards who are better than Iverson on all four of these metrics, there are plenty of guards who are better on two or three.

Politics

Fred Hiatt on Kristol: ‘I thought he wrote a good column.’

hiattweb.jpgToday, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol wrote his final column for the New York Times and — despite a dismal record with the facts — will soon take up residence at the op-ed pages of The Washington Post. Noting that “[i]t’s extraordinary to see the job security someone like Kristol enjoys,” Steve Benen asked, “In what universe does the nation’s second most prominent newspaper decide it wants to pay and publish the failed cast-off of its chief rival?” Perhaps a universe in which Fred Hiatt is boss. The Post’s editorial page editor explained the decision:

I think he’s a very smart, plugged-in guy,” Hiatt told Politico, “and the question of how and whether the conservative movement and the Republican party are going to right themselves, and redefine themselves, will be one of the really interesting subtexts of the Obama era.” [...]

I thought he wrote a good column,” Hiatt said, of Kristol’s work at the Times.

It does seem fitting that Hiatt — whom Forbes magazine has said is the nation’s third most influential liberal — would think highly of Kristol. After all, both fervently advocated and continue to support the Iraq war, both defended the Bush administration’s leak of Valerie Plame’s CIA identity, and both seem to have trouble making sure their editorials are 100 percent truthful.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up