ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Gingrich’s Economic Recovery Plan: Obama Should Spend At Least 35 Days Talking To Republicans

This morning on NBC’s Today Show, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich blasted President Obama for not working enough with Republicans on the economic recovery package. He said that Obama was wasting time giving “partisan” speeches to House Democrats, when he should be hosting bipartisan meetings. Gingrich then held himself up as a model:

GINGRICH: I think he is in real danger of becoming Jimmy Carter instead of Ronald Reagan. … What we got last night wasn’t let’s reason together, let’s sit down and negotiate.

You know, when we did the balanced budget bill — which saved $405 billion in federal debt over four years and it’s the only time since the 1920s — President Clinton and I had to negotiate for 35 days in order to work out all the details. [...]

This is more money than the Iraq war and the Afghanistan war have cost in seven years, and you don’t just ram that through unthinkingly. You expect your representatives and senators to try to make the bill work.

Host Matt Lauer pointed out to Gingrich that “the situation is different this time around” than during the Clinton administration. Gingrich responded that if the situation was so grave, Obama shouldn’t be “making partisan speeches in front of a partisan audience.” Watch it:

Gingrich’s comparison of the economic recovery package’s cost to that of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is unfortunate. After all, President Bush did “ram” the Iraq war through Congress and to the American public by lying and presenting false intelligence.

In contrast, Obama has gone out of his way to work with congressional Republicans, meeting with them more than Bush met with Democrats during his entire presidency; he has even held private one-on-one meetings with Republicans.

But as House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) has made clear, “Being bipartisan does not mean having to lay down and say we’ll do whatever you want.” Gingrich is not interested in a compromise bill; he wants capitulation. From the beginning, he has been urging Republicans to vote against a economic recovery package that has any spending at all — even though spending is more stimulative than tax cuts.

Today’s Labor Department announcement that the U.S. economy lost 598,000 jobs in January alone underscores why Obama can’t sit down and talk with Republicans for 35 days. Today’s Progress Report has more key principles to guide the economic recovery discussion.

Transcript: Read more

Climate Progress

The Nelson-Collins War On Green Jobs

Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Susan Collins (R-ME) are leading a bipartisan effort in the Senate to strip hundreds of billions of dollars from the economic recovery plan, which makes strong, job-creating investments in the public welfare, from health care to clean energy. Because of Republican threats to filibuster the bill, votes of senators like them are key to passage. But the Nelson-Collins gang’s proposed cuts disproportionately harm women, children, and their future. The Wonk Room has already detailed their plan to cut support for education and health care. Nelson and Collins also looking to eliminate tens of billions of dollars in programs that would invest in a green economy:

Nelson-Collins Proposed Green Economy Cuts

They’re also proposing cutting $750 million from NASA’s exploration budget. These proposed cuts come on top of the Senate’s plan to cut half the funding for the Green Jobs Act from the House-approved package. Nor have Nelson and Collins proposed to cut the $4.6 billion in support for advanced coal plant research or $50 billion in nuclear loan guarantees. Support for coal and nuclear programs would have extremely low job-creation potential and would disproportionately help industries which contribute millions of dollars to Congress.

Update

The Apollo Alliance has an action alert: “Tell your Senators that clean energy and good jobs MUST remain a priority in the stimulus.”
The specific recommendations:

- increasing funding for green-collar job training and other key workforce training programs;

– increased investments in ready-to-go transit projects and rail upgrades;

– the Feingold amendment, allowing utilities to access funds for large-scale energy efficiency projects in private buildings;

– the Udall amendment, co-sponsored by Kerry, Whitehouse and Bingaman, to increase funding for State Energy Programs;

– construction and renovation projects that prioritize energy efficiency; and

– loan guarantees for retooling factories and retraining workers to “Make it in America.”


Update

,The AAS Public Policy Blog notes that “$20 billion in research infrastructure will produce 402,000 jobs,” and asks readers to “express your opinion on the funding of NASA and NSF in the stimulus bill by calling your Senators’ offices.”

Politics

Actually, it’s what Ronald Reagan hath wrought…

Lamenting the onset of a new generation of actors-turned-politicians, The Corner’s Mark Hemingway has a post entitled “What Al Franken Hath Wrought,” linking to a story about actor Val Kilmer considering a run for New Mexico governor. Revealing a rather peculiar lack of awareness, the Corner’s very next post is a link to an archive of articles about actor-turned-politician Ronald Reagan:

cornerreagankilmer.gif

Update

Looks like TPM’s Eric Kleefeld had the same thought.

Yglesias

Pep Talk

by Ryan Avent

Something I should have remembered from the campaign but didn’t, was that during weeks when I was deep in the print media weeds I’d often become quite pessimistic about the political state of things, only to feel remarkably better after hearing Obama deliver a speech. The guy knows how to buck up a crowd. For example:

These are substantive responses to shallow Republican critiques, delivered confidently, and with just the right amount of righteous disdain. Now as Tim Fernholz notes, polling suggests that this stimulus battle isn’t having as much of a negative effect on the public as some of us stuck here in the bubble may have feared. If that changes, however, I really don’t think that Obama could make too many public appearances. The more he’s out there personally delivering the message, the better.

(Via Ta-Nehisi Coates)

Yglesias

Complying with Obama’s Executive Order

By Brian Beutler

Last week, a military judge named James Pohl, who was presiding over the case of Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri, refused to comply with Barack Obama’s order to delay the proceedings of Guantanamo detainees while the military commissions undergo review. Al-Nashiri is alleged, among other things, to have masterminded the attacks on the USS Cole.

As I noted, though, in order to comply with section seven of the order, the Pentagon would have to do an end run around Pohl:

The Secretary of Defense shall immediately take steps sufficient to ensure that during the pendency of the Review described in section 4 of this order, no charges are sworn, or referred to a military commission under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the Rules for Military Commissions, and that all proceedings of such military commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered, and all proceedings pending in the United States Court of Military Commission Review, are halted.

And today Susan Crawford, the convening authority for the commissions, dropped the charges against him. This brings the proceedings against al-Nashiri into compliance with the order while reserving her the right to refile the case at a later date.

Politics

Who will be the next Secretary of Health and Human Services?

The Wonk Room’s Igor Volsky gives his rundown of the leading candidates to replace Tom Daschle: Sebelius, DeLauro, Schakowsky, Wyden, Stabenow, Smith, Lew, Cutler, Feder, Edwards, and Shalala. Let us know who you’d like to see Obama pick.

Update

Igor explains his omission of Howard Dean from the list:

A number of readers have added Howard Dean to the list. And while I’m impressed by the Governor’s health care accomplishments in Vermont, his presidential campaign and his tenure as chairman of the DNC, I intentionally omitted Dean because I do not think that he’s on Obama’s short list.

The reason is this: Dean has few allies in the Obama camp. As Obama’s transition head and CAPAF CEO John Podesta pointed out, Rahm Emanuel “was never negative about Dean, I wouldn’t characterize it as the other way, either.” Jonathan Cohn agrees with me.

Health

Anyone But Bredesen? The Leading HHS Candidates

bredesen.jpg

Since former senator Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination for Health and Human Services Secretary on Tuesday, the internet has been buzzing with rumors of his potential replacement. Progressives are particularly weary of Phil Bredesen, a second-term Governor of Tennessee who may be “one of the top contenders for the job.”

As Jonathan Cohn explains, Bredesen “presided over massive cuts to Tennessee’s Medicaid program and, by all appearances, relished fighting with advocates for the poor more than the advocates of the cuts.” “I can’t overstate the opposition his nomination would engender in the health advocacy community,” writes Ezra Klein, before noting that in 2005 Bredesen’s wife accepted donations for the renovation of the governor’s mansion from Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Tennessee.

Since Bredesen’s vision for health reform contradict Obama’s health principles, ThinkProgress has compiled a list of alternative nominees.

Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D-KS)

The Red State Reformer
kathleen_sebelius.jpg
PRO: As Insurance Commissioner, Sebelius rejected an Indiana company’s bid to gobble up the biggest health insurer in Kansas. As Governor, Sebelius tried to provide health coverage to children under 5 and enacted legislation allowing residents to purchase prescription drugs from Europe and Canada.

CON: Despite her health background and close relationship with Obama, Sebelius doesn’t know Washington.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT)

The Appropriator

PRO: From her seat on the Labor, Health, and Human Services-Education Appropriations Subcommittee, DeLauro increased funding for all kinds of medical research and has worked aggressively to lower the rising costs of prescription drugs, pushing the 108th Congress to adopt legislation allowing for drug importation.

CON: As an appropriator, DeLauro has experience funding initiatives but may have little knowledge of how the different parts of the health system interact.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)

The Public Plan Pioneer
schakowsky.jpg
PRO: Congresswoman Schakowsky describes her approach to health care as a kind of beefed up “Medicare for all” system. She strongly supports building a public health care plan and has said that public funding will be the most efficient way to finance a health care system.

CON: Schakowsky could be caricatured as a single-payer advocate and may face stiff Republican opposition during confirmation.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)

The Abolisher
ronwyden.jpg
PRO: Wyden has been a persistent advocate of health care and has the right connections to make reform happen. He has introduced bipartisan legislation that abolishes the employer health system and requires employers who had covered their employees to convert the total they spent on insurance into salary increases, allowing workers to purchase coverage on their own.

CON: Wyden’s plan contradicts Obama’s health principles and would likely outrage some health advocates.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)

The Social Worker

PRO: Stabenow sits on the Senate Finance Committee, where she played a major role in the crafting the SCHIP expansion legislation.The National Organization for Women endorsed Stabenow for the HHS position, highlighting her background as a social worker and her strong support for drug importation from Canada.

CON: Tapping Stabenow would remove a strong health care advocate from the all-important Senate Finance Committee.

Former Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR)

The Wannabe
gordonsmith.jpg
PRO: Smith seems to have some genuine bipartisan leanings. During the election, Smith tried to capitalize on Obama’s popularity by including the President in campaign ads, and went so far as to endorse Sen. Ron Wyden’s (D-OR) controversial health care plan. Smith would lend credibility to Obama’s campaign pledge to build a bipartisan cabinet.

CON: Smith has a poor voting record on health care issues and has twice voted against allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Smith’s sudden embrace of universal coverage came in the midst of a close re-election campaign and may be suspect.

Jacob “Jack” Lew

The Budget Man
lew_190.jpg
PRO: As a former Director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Clinton, Lew has intimate knowledge of the substance of federal programs, the budget process and appropriations. Lew drafted parts of Clinton’s health care reform legislation and is respected by members of both parties.

CON: Lew’s work at Citigroup could provide ammunition for a confirmation hearing. He is also currently serving as Deputy Secretary of State.

David Cutler

The Policy Wonk
cutler.jpg
PRO: Cutler helped draft the Clinton’s health plan and was an architects of Obama’s health proposal. In fact, he has already been tapped to advise the President on health policy.

CON: Cutler left Washington in 1994 to return to his full time duties at Harvard University. While he has previously advised former Democratic presidential nominees John Kerry and Bill Bradley, he may lack Hill connections.

Judy Feder

The Health Reformer
judy-feder.jpg
PRO: Feder is widely credited with setting the stage for the health reform debate of the 1990s and has worked to expand health insurance coverage as an HHS appointee. Feder is a Professor of Public Policy at Georgetown University and recently ran for Congress in Virginia’s 10th District.

CON: Despite her bona fide policy expertise, Feder is relatively unknown outside of Washington.

Elizabeth Edwards

The Health Blogger

PRO: As a leading spokesperson for health care reform, Edwards has been particularly critical of policies that unfairly penalize Americans for preexisting conditions. Edwards is an effective communicator, a Wonk Room blogger, and is beloved by health advocates.

CON: Edwards is battling incurable cancer. She has also criticized Obama’s health care plan for not including an individual mandate.

Donna Shalala

The Bureaucrat
shalalaportraithires.jpg
PRO: As Clinton’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, Shalala played an integral role in launching the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

CON: Shalala did not play a major role in policy deliberations or build significant Congressional relationships during her eight years as Secretary in the Clinton Administration.

Update

A number of readers have added Howard Dean to the list. And while I’m impressed by the Governor’s health care accomplishments in Vermont, his presidential campaign and his tenure as chairman of the DNC, I intentionally omitted Dean because I do not think that he’s on Obama’s short list.

The reason is this: Dean has few allies in the Obama camp. As Obama’s transition head and CAPAF CEO John Podesta pointed out, Rahm Emanuel “was never negative about Dean, I wouldn’t characterize it as the other way, either.” Jonathan Cohn agrees with me.

Climate Progress

How hot is Australia? Only the koala know for sure.

Down came a jumbuck to drink at the billabong….

k3-small.jpg

[Click photo for full pic.]

A reader sends a note with a wonderful series of pictures attached:

Since you’ve been focusing on Australia a lot lately, these images might make some good symbols of what’s going on there. A koala invaded a home to get some water (very rare for koalas to anywhere near people), during this most recent heat wave.

The reader was himself forwarding an email about Australia’s worst heatwave on record, which read:

Read more

Yglesias

Slash and Burn

By Brian Beutler

Reading posts like this, I’ve started to wonder who’s advising the so-called moderates as they hash over which provisions to cut from the stimulus. Ben Nelson serves on the Armed Services, Agriculture and Appropriations committees, and his partner in crime, Susan Collins, serves on the Homeland Security, Armed Services, Aging, and Appropriations committees. In their service to the country, these two senators might have learned a thing or two about arbitrarily or opportunistically slashing or inflating spending numbers, and in that regard they’re well-suited to the task, but they aren’t particularly known for their economic acumen, and their responsibilities on the Hill reflect that fact.

Meanwhile, David Brooks writes that “[m]oderate economists [have] looked at the package and complained about the vast parts that don’t even pretend to stimulate,” and though I think I know basically who he’s talking about, I don’t see any evidence that those peoples’ criticisms are the basis for the work the centrists are doing.

This is of a piece with the problem I was trying to describe here. The size and details of the Democratic stimulus proposals emerged from a process that involved consultation with some of the leading economic minds on the left. Conservative Republicans had a big opportunity to call upon serious skeptics to craft their opposition and alternative proposals, but, of course, serious skeptics don’t support things like the Jim DeMint plan, so they instead called upon Grover Norquist, Mitt Romney, and Joe the Plumber and did a war dance for continuing the Bush tax cuts and an end to government spending. No big surprise there.

But now it seems the stimulus won’t pass unless it’s first cut by $100 billion. That number is, of course, totally arbitrary–arrived at, once again without the input of any of Brooks’ so-called moderate economists. The opening bid, then, was crafted by Larry Summers, et al. The counter bid was designed by cranks from the Heritage Foundation. In between is a version of the Summers bid after a bunch of amateurs hacked at it blindly with a machete. These would appear to be the three options. To a group of 535 sane people, the choice would be obvious, but, as John Cole notes, one of the parties (200 or so members of Congress) are not sane, so the obvious choice is out of the running.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up