ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Beck: ‘What a surprise,’ Obama didn’t call on Fox News during his press conference.

On his radio show today, conservative talker Glenn Beck recycled a year-old talking point to complain about President Obama not calling on anyone from Fox News during his press conference last night. “What a surprise” he said sarcastically before asking, “I mean how can the guy face Ahmadinejad but he can’t face Fox?” Listen here:

It’s hard to suggest that Obama doesn’t want to “face” Fox News, given that its White House correspondent, Major Garrett, was called on at the two previous prime-time news conferences. When Fox suggested that they were not being given enough access to Obama during last fall’s presidential campaign, Garrett actually defended Obama. “[M]ay I point out Obama has done 5 interviews with me and one with Chris Wallace, one with Brit Hume and one with Bill O’Reilly,” Garrett wrote in an e-mail obtained by Huffington Post.

Politics

MoveOn calls for Bybee impeachment.

MoveOn released a video today calling for the impeachment of Jay Bybee. Watch it:

Since ThinkProgress launched our Bybee impeachment campaign 10 days ago, a few lawmakers have indicated support for such action. More support is needed, however. Last Sunday, CAPAF President and CEO John Podesta called for Bybee’s impeachment on CNN, arguing, “If he would do the right thing, he should just simply resign. If he doesn’t…I think a simple matter would be to remove him from office.”

Climate Progress

Clean energy messaging 101: ‘Green’ jobs are out, ‘clean energy’ jobs are in

As readers know, I try to stay up-to-date on messaging, which is why I have a whole category devoted to rhetoric.

I have now sat through a couple of extended presentations about clean energy and climate messaging from people who definitely know how to do this sort of thing.  I will present some of the results in a series of posts.

One general theme emerges, I think, which is really Messaging 101:  Be specific.

“Green jobs” is not specific and requires people to fill in the blank depending on what the word “green” means to them.  For some, this apparently means “environmental jobs” as opposed to real jobs for regular folks.

Clean energy jobs” is much better (according to multiple sources).  People have a much better notion of what clean energy is.

The same goes for “renewable energy” or “renewables.”  Interestingly, for different reasons, I had blogged a year ago that it was Time to stop using the phrase “renewable energy.”

Read more

Yglesias

What Happens When CRE Goes Bust?

206-20090429-real-commercialsmallprod_affiliate91

The McClatchy story about the looming financing crisis in the commercial real estate market is very interesting. At the same time, the accompanying chart seems to indicate that the financial consequences, as such, of CRE-related losses will be less severe than the consequences of the collapse in the residential housing market. Not because the situation is necessarily better, but just because the scale of the loans involved is smaller.

But here’s my question. What happens to the tenants when you have CRE foreclosure? I read this:

The reality is already on display. On April 16, the nation’s second largest mall developer, General Growth Properties, filed for bankruptcy protection. The Chicago-based company owns more than 200 malls across the U.S., and was unable to renegotiate its debts as they came due.

Six days later, a 40-story office tower on New York’s Avenue of the Americas was seized by its creditor, a Canadian-owned pension fund. The tower’s owner, Macklowe Properties, couldn’t meet loan terms.

Presumably, vacancies at the General Growth malls and the office building on Sixth Avenue were part of the issue in the owners’ inability to pay their debts. But at the same time, it’s presumably not the case that all 200+ General Growth malls are uniformly empty. Same with the office building in Manhattan. So what happens to you if you’re running a store or a restaurant or a company and the owner of the office building or mall you lease from goes bankrupt?

Health

Flu Farms: Decreasing Factory Farming Could Help Avert the Next Swine Flu Epidemic

Our guest blogger is Aysha Akhtar MD, MPH, a fellow for the Oxford Center for Animal Ethics and a neurologist and public health specialist at the Food and Drug Administration.

Granjas CarrollIn order to better avert the threat of swine flu epidemics like the one currently spreading around the globe, public health efforts must address the conditions that allow pigs to become breeding grounds for infectious disease. As the number of confirmed cases of swine flu around the globe increases, we grow closer and closer to having a pandemic on our hands. Surprisingly, however, there is very little discussion about how swine flu got started in the first place.

The primary reservoir for influenza viruses is aquatic birds, but humans are not readily directly infected by the strains from those animals. Pigs, however, are highly susceptible to both avian and human influenza A viruses. In pigs, viruses swap genes, and new influenza strains emerge with the potential to infect humans. The current swine influenza A, called H1N1, is a triple hybrid avian/pig/human virus, “definitely” of swine origin.

More focus needs to be placed on preventing pathogens from getting into the human population in the first place, and that means starting at the farm. The source of the current epidemic has not yet been identified, but the first confirmed case of swine flu occurred in La Gloria, Mexico, a town surrounded by industrial pig farms, partly owned by Smithfields Foods. Even if these particular farms are not confirmed as the primary source, based on research into the previous outbreaks of swine flu, it makes sense to consider factory farms as very likely potential sites for the development of these pathogens.

In recent years the influenza virus has undergone an “evolutionary surge,” with new variants emerging rapidly. According to the World Health Organization, we are seeing more new infectious diseases and epidemics than ever before, and they are appearing at an alarming rate. Increased human travel is certainly a factor, but perhaps the most significant variable is the change in animal agricultural practices that have occurred in the last few decades:

– By 2020, world meat production is expected to double.

– In the U.S. alone, approximately 1 million land animals are slaughtered for food every hour.

– The percentage of operations in North America with 5,000 or more animals expanded from 18 percent in 1993 to 53 percent in 2002.

As a result of the rise in animal product demand, traditional farming practices have been mostly replaced in developed countries by immense intensive animal operations, and developing countries are rapidly catching up. Read more

Yglesias

Smearing Cass Sunstein

Cass Sunstein is a brilliant progressive lawyer whose views on regulation are, if anything, somewhat more conservative than those of most Democrats. He’s friendly to cost-benefit analysis, and a proponent of the idea that public policy should try to “nudge” people as an alternative to more heavy-handed intervention. Barack Obama has nominated him to head up the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where that’s what he’ll be working on.

Naturally, elements on the right have embarked on a dishonest smear campaign. Julian Sanchez has the details.

Politics

Brownie Attacks Obama Administration’s Response To Swine Flu: Officials Are Just Crying ‘Chicken Little’

Yesterday, former FEMA chief Michael Brown went on Fox Business to talk about the response of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Obama administration to the H1N1 flu virus. Brownie, who gained infamy for his incompetent response to Hurricane Katrina, launched into a tirade accusing the WHO for addressing the H1NI virus in a selfish bid to gain “more attention” and said the Obama administration is recklessly overreacting:

BROWN: Well I think there’s one thing they’re legitimately worried about and that is this H1N1 is a new strain we haven’t seen before so we’re not sure how Tamiflu and everything will work against it. Here’s what I really think is going on. I think they want to raise this level because that gives them more attention, it gives them more, you know, more legitimacy, and allows them to get out there and say ‘oh look at us, we’re in control we’ve got this thing taken care of.’ It legitimizes what they’re doing. We shouldn’t be scaring the public. [...]

Neil, my theory always was after Katrina that the Bush administration and now the Obama administration will do it too. They will come out and they will do everything including the kitchen sink because they don’t want to get caught with their pants down. But what that does is, that’s the same as crying the sky is falling, chicken little. And next time people will be less inclined to believe it.

Watch it:

Host Neil Cavuto tried to rehabilitate Brownie’s image by telling him that he was a “sacrificial lamb” for the Bush administration’s Katrina failures. But just as Brown was woefully unqualified to take the job of FEMA director, it is unclear that he knows anything more about reacting to a possible pandemic.

After all, Brown (aka “Brownie“) was a central figure in the Bush administration’s dismissive, inadequate response to the disaster. He waited days after Louisiana had declared an emergency to even request DHS personnel to the Gulf region. As officials attempted to inform Brown that people were dying at the New Orleans Superdome, his press secretary responded that Brown needed “much more that (sic) 20 or 30 minutes” to eat at a restaurant. Brown told the press he had just learned about the situation at the Superdome four days after Katrina made landfall and a day after his colleagues had tried to tell him. He later resigned in disgrace.

Despite Brown’s attacks, the Obama administration has been praised by experts for its response to the flu outbreak. Officials have made rapid moves to dispel “unjustified fears about the flu virus,” while “stressing the need for precautions, such as washing hands, covering sneezes and seeking medical attention for flu-like symptoms.” The WHO has raised its global alert level to phase 5 because the virus appears to be spreading easily person-to-person, and cases are appearing that have no link to Mexico.

Yglesias

Public Health Taxes Poll Pretty Well

I’m an enthusiastic proponent of the idea of public health taxes—raising additional revenue at the margin not by taxing people’s work, but by taxing consumption of public health hazards like sweeteners and booze. And here’s Ezra Klein discovering that such taxes are possibly more popular than he’d imagined. He cites this slide from an NPR/Kaiser poll:

treatmentchart_2-1

I think part of the reason this gets a relatively good result is that it’s framed in the context of revenue. We’re not talking about taxing soda, we’re talking about providing for health care. But that will cost money. And the money has to come from somewhere. And taxing public health hazards sounds like a reasonable place to get it. I’ve said before that I think this is the right way to think about it. Taxing soda in order to make people skinnier sounds totalitarian and it’s not obvious to people whether or not the health benefits would even be large. But taxing soda in order to pay for health care sounds like a relatively benign way of raising taxes—at the margin, it will do more to promote health than to depress economic activity.

This kind of thing is important, because I think as we move toward raising the volume of revenue that we’ll be needing over the next 10-15 years it’s crucial to think hard about the efficiency of the tax code. That means cracking down on deductions and loopholes and pigouvian consumption taxes, not just higher rates.

As it happens, though, I don’t think paying attention to this kind of polling is that significant. For one thing, as Kevin Drum emphasizes, opinion on unfamiliar issues is extremely malleable. But more important, I just don’t think public opinion on issues is all that important a driver in politics—just look at the fate of mortgage cramdowns or what have you. The important point is that if you’re going to have a more generous welfare state and an aging population and continued advances in medical science you’re going to need more money, and you’re going to need to get it in a way that’s consistent with economic growth. Voters really don’t like recessions. Taxes on public health hazards meet that standard, so they should be appealing.

Economy

Banking Lobby Successfully Defeats Mortgage Cram-Down Provision

Today, a proposal to change bankruptcy law and allow bankruptcy judges to cram-down mortgage payments for troubled homeowners failed in the Senate by a vote of 45-51. The provision, which was introduced as an amendment by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), required 60 votes to pass. In recent weeks, support for the measure evaporated in the face of furious lobbying by the banking and mortgage industries. Prior to the vote, Durbin — who this week said that bankers “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill” — took to the floor to decry the banking industry’s influence in the cram-down debate:

At some point the senators in this chamber will decide the bankers shouldn’t write the agenda for the United States Senate. At some point the people in this chamber will decide the people we represent are not the folks working in the big banks, but the folks struggling to make a living and struggling to keep a decent home.

Watch it:

The American News Project noted that the Mortgage Bankers Association was “in a celebratory mood” at its annual meeting this week, because “a massive lobbying campaign” against cram-down appeared to be working.

Update

The House passed the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights today, 357-70.

Politics

Banking lobby successfully defeats mortgage cram-down provision.

Today, a proposal to change bankruptcy law and allow bankruptcy judges to cram-down mortgage payments for troubled homeowners failed in the Senate by a vote of 45-51. The provision, which was introduced as an amendment by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), required 60 votes to pass. In recent weeks, support for the measure evaporated in the face of furious lobbying by the banking and mortgage industries. Prior to the vote, Durbin — who this week said that bankers “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill” — took to the floor to decry the banking industry’s influence in the cram-down debate:

At some point the senators in this chamber will decide the bankers shouldn’t write the agenda for the United States Senate. At some point the people in this chamber will decide the people we represent are not the folks working in the big banks, but the folks struggling to make a living and struggling to keep a decent home.

Watch it:

The American News Project noted that the Mortgage Bankers Association was “in a celebratory mood” at its annual meeting this week because “a massive lobbying campaign” against cram-down appeared to be working.

Featured

Doodlebug Shayne says, “Specter voted AGAINST it.”

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up