ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Shelby tries to blame Obama for bank bailouts that happened ‘last fall.’

This morning on Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace asked Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) why he believes the Obama administration is “taking us down the road to socialism.” Shelby said it was “obviously” the case, and pointed to last fall’s bank bailouts as the prime example:

WALLACE: Sen. Shelby, you say that the Obama administration is taking us down the road to socialism. Explain.

SHELBY: Well, obviously. So, they intervene last fall in the bank crisis. No one has ever done it on that scale before. Now the automobile crisis.

Shelby seemed to catch himself moments later, saying, “you have to go back to the Bush administration. They started it.” Watch it:

Yglesias

White House Preparing to Step Up on Health Care

The Obama administration has been assiduously pushing for health care reform from day one, but the president has tended not to speak out much on the specific details of the debate. Instead, the strategy has been to talk in a fairly general way about the desirability of reform and leave specifics up to congress so as to ensure maximum buy-in from key legislators. But according to Sheryl Gay Stolberg from The New York Times, we’re about to witness something of a shift in strategy whereby the “is preparing an intense push for legislation that will include speeches, town-hall-style meetings and much deeper engagement with lawmakers.”

One particular area of focus, it seems will be the public option. This is crucially important and also, I think, something where a lot of legislators will be looking to the White House for leadership. In the early months of this debate, I don’t think it was totally clear how strongly the administration was behind the idea of a public option. More recently, they’ve put their shoulders into it more and the Hill seems to be responding. But in most respects the trickiest issue before the congress remains the question of revenue. It’s not tricky as an intellectual matter, it’s easy to come up with reasonable tax measures that would get us what we need. But it’s politically very tricky.

No real news to that, but the fact of the matter is that it’s on the revenue side where progressive policy really faces its toughest challenges and it remains to be seen what kind of case Obama can make to the public.

Climate Progress

“Let’s get this damn thing started!” — Climate envoy Todd Stern on U.S. climate action and the possibility of deal with China

U.S. Climate Envoy and former Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Todd Stern spoke at CAP Tuesday.  If you want to know where US-China negotiations are headed on climate, I highly recommend watching the video of his talk here (a PDF of his prepared remarks are here).

He is a blunt guy for someone who is the lead State Department climate negotiator, as made clear by the headline quote about the need for the United States to get off its butt and lead the way with domestic climate action.  Duh! (see “US responsible for 29% of carbon dioxide emissions over past 150 years, triple China’s share“).

He emphasized that  “the [current] status quo is unsustainable.” He took that message in his subsequent travel to China last week to discuss bilateral global warming agreements between the U.S. and Chinese governments.

“This is a moment to reevaluate our conceptions about what is possible,” CAP President and CEO John D. Podesta said as he introduced Stern. It’s a crucial opportunity for the United States and China to move forward together on climate issues because, as Stern pointed out, any U.S. action on climate change will not be enough without China.

Read more

Culture

Defense is Half the Game

I’m fond of criticizing NBA pundits for failing to recognize that defense is half the game into their commentary, but it has occurred to me now and then that this issue perhaps could be studied in a more statistically thorough way. Fortunately, Tyler Cowen recommended the blog of 20 year-old Matthew Rognlie today and it turns out he did some of the math back in February:

Why not just measure the standard deviations of offensive and defensive efficiency in the NBA, and see which turns out to be more important? [...] What’s the answer? It turns out that defense really is half the game. In fact, at least in this year’s sample, it’s a little more than half the game, with a standard deviation of 3.39 compared to 3.18 on the offensive side.

It would be interesting to look at this historically and see if there’s a consistent pattern, or a trend that shifts over time, or what. But either way, team defense is hugely important to the game, and the fact that we have a limited ability to quantify it (we have, of course, defensive rebounds, blocks, and steals but there’s more to defense than that) remains the biggest limit to quantifying individual player performance.

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up