ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Joe Arpaio: ‘Illegals’ Are ‘All Dirty,’ Should Be ‘Checked’ Like ‘Fruits and Vegetables’

joeaEarlier this year, Arizona’s controversial Sheriff Joe Arpaio exploited the H1N1 “swine flu” scare to argue that it should “underscore the need for illegal immigration enforcement.” Today, GQ has posted a piece by Alexander Provan in which the Sheriff suggests that undocumented immigrants should be checked like “fruits and vegetables” because they are “diseased” and “dirty”:

All these people that come over, they could come with disease. There’s no control, no health checks or anything. They check fruits and vegetables, how come they don’t check people? No one talks about that! They’re all dirty. I sent out 200 inmates into the desert, they picked up 18 tons of garbage that they bring in—the baby diapers and all that. Where’s everybody who wants to preserve the desert?”

Whether he’s an “idiot savant” or the “Bull Connor of our generation,” Arpaio’s hardline anti-immigrant rhetoric and controversial immigration enforcement tactics have allowed him to make a name for himself. However, Provan points out that Arpaio’s convictions against undocumented immigrants weren’t always so strong. In 2005, Army reservist Patrick Haab was arrested by Arpaio’s men for holding seven suspected undocumented immigrants face down in the desert at gunpoint. Haab was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. According to Provan, at the time Arpaio held that “being illegal is not a serious crime. You can’t go to jail for being an illegal alien.” Arpaio told the Arizona Republic’s Michael Kiefer:

“I want the authority to lock up smugglers, but I am not going to lock up illegals hanging around street corners. I’m not going to waste my resources going after a guy in a truck when he picks up five illegals to go trim palm trees.”

Haab was never prosecuted thanks to a legal loophole found by the newly elected county attorney at the time — Andrew Thomas — who had run on an anti-immigrant platform. Thomas made national headlines and appeared on Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes “to brag about what he’d done” and Arpaio learned his lesson.

Four years later, Haab could just sign up for Arpaio’s posse program which allows regular armed citizens to hunt down undocumented immigrants as long as they can provide their own weapons and pass a 160 hour law enforcement class. Arpaio loves to brag about locking up 32,000 supposedly “diseased” immigrants for smuggling themselves across the border, even though it meant creating a $1.3 million deficit in just three months. Provan notes that Arpaio brushes off the fact that he hasn’t caught any major smugglers or kingpins because going after gardners and dishwashers helps him make sure he doesn’t “lose touch with the street.”

Arpaio has made his own national headlines recently due to his theatrical response to the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to change his agreement with federal immigration authorities in way that will only allow him to check the immigration status of his inmates, not enforce immigration law on the streets of Maricopa County. ICE head John Morton has yet to officially sign off.

Media

Hiatt Dismisses Criticism Of His Publication Of Misleading ‘Czars’ Op-Eds: ‘I Did Question It’

Fred HiattIn July, the Washington Post published an op-ed by Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), in which the House Minority Whip claimed, “At last count, there were at least 32 active czars that we knew of, meaning the current administration has more czars than Imperial Russia.” “Vesting such broad authority in the hands of people not subjected to Senate confirmation and congressional oversight poses a grave threat to our system of checks and balances,” wrote Cantor.

At the time, ThinkProgress pointed out that several of the “czars” named by Cantor were in fact confirmed by the Senate. Noting that White House Communications Director Anita Dunn recently criticized the Post for running the op-ed without even questioning Cantor’s facts, The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz asked Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt to explain how Cantor’s column got published:

Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt tells me: “Actually, I did question it. The senator’s staff responded that the 32 number was based on research they had done at the Commerce Committee, and they backed it up with various media reports (they cited a Politico report of 29, but said there were three unfilled), some of which we also found.

“We also ran a piece shortly after this one, by David Rivkin, challenging the criticism and saying there is nothing unconstitutional about having ‘czars.’ “

Considering that Cantor is in the House, not the Senate, it appears that Hiatt is referring to the other factually-challenged “czar” column by a GOP member of Congress. Even though people publicly pointed to inaccuracies in Cantor’s article, the Post nevertheless allowed Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) to publish a piece in September making almost the exact same claims. “A few of them have formal titles, but most are simply known as ‘czars,’” wrote Hutchison, which is not true.

In her comments to Time, Dunn specifically griped about the Post running the claim that all the so-called “czars” bypassed Senate confirmation, despite the fact that many of them did go through that process or hold positions statutorily created by Congress. In fact, the Politico list that Hiatt cites in his defense makes this issue clear.

This isn’t the first time Hiatt has stood by columns that he’s published despite their serious factual flaws. When Post columnist George Will included multiple errors about climate change in a column, Hiatt defended Will, saying that “in general we do careful fact checking.”

Yglesias

NASA Smash Moon

What with the travel and the Nobel hubub, I didn’t get a chance yesterday to say anything about NASA’s audacious effort to blow a hole in the Moon. It reminded me that I’m pretty sure I once read someone making the case that it would be in the interests of the Planet Earth to destroy the Moon altogether. Eliminate the tides and reduce the risk of flooding. Plus I believe the argument was that destroying the Moon would moderate the seasons. Sort of the ultimate geo-engineering program. On reflection, this is probably not such a great idea but I think you have to admit that it would rate pretty high on the “awesome” scale to see it happen.

Politics

Byrd rips Massey Energy for refusing to fund a new school so students can move away from coal processing plant.

Don Blankenship The Marsh Fork Elementary School in West Virginia sits just 300 feet from a Massey Energy coal silo and “downhill from a slurry impoundment.” Massey’s plans to build a second silo are facing “protests from environmentalists and some residents over the threat of flood and claims that children are exposed to coal dust, among other things,” especially because the company is refusing to build a new school, away from the toxic chemicals. Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) is taking Massey to task for its “disregard for human life and safety“:

“Such arrogance suggests a blatant disregard for the impact of their mining practices on our communities, residents and particularly our children,” Byrd said in a statement. “These are children’s lives we are talking about.” [...]

“If Massey were not operating near Marsh Fork Elementary, we would not be debating what to do about moving these young students someplace safer,” Byrd said. “This is not the taxpayers’ burden to remedy. This is Massey Energy’s responsibility to address.

Massey has criticized Byrd’s comments, noting that the school district never asked the company for funding. (Regardless, Massey has said it has no interest in donating any money because it already “pays millions of dollars in taxes each year.”) Brad Johnson has more here on what Massey and the coal industry have really given West Virginia.

Yglesias

Scandinavian Convenience

I’ve been really struck these past couple of weeks by how ubiquitous 7-Eleven is in Stockholm and Copenhagen. It’s all the more striking because before I went to Stockholm the only European 7-Eleven I’d ever seen was in the Copenhagen Airport while switching planes en route to Helsinki. But in these two cities, the chain appears to have far more outlets than in any American city I’ve ever been to.

7-Eleven_Copenhagen 1

At any rate, it turns out that my visits to Iceland, Finland, France, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Iceland, and the Czech Republic never turned up any 7-Elevens because they don’t have any in those countries. In Europe they operate exclusively in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. The Scandinavian version of 7-Eleven is actually brought to us by Norway’s Reitan Group operating under license from the original company, and the individual stores are franchises. It’s basically what you get at home, though in keeping with the general Nordic vibe things are a bit more spic and span. The main difference I can see is that in Copenhagen you can buy hard liquor at 7-Eleven.

Sweden, by contrast, has a North Carolina-style system where you can only buy booze at the government liquor store. They also have an equally ubiquitous home-grown Swedish convenience store chain in Stockholm called Pressbyrån that I liked a lot.

Climate Progress

PG&E CEO: We left Chamber Of Commerce because they lied to us about climate policy; Chu says “it’s wonderful” companies are fleeing the Chamber

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu on Thursday applauded companies that have quit the U.S. Chamber of Commerce because they disagree with the business group’s climate change policy. “I think it’s wonderful,” Chu told reporters at a solar energy event on the National Mall. He said companies that left the Chamber object “to foot dragging, to denials” and realize that efforts to reduce emissions of greenhouse gasses are “part of our economic future in the United States.”

… “I would encourage the Chamber of Commerce to realize the economic opportunity that the United States can lead in a new industrial revolution,” said Chu, a supporter of alternative fuels and strong regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.

You just can’t keep up with all the news about the nano-Chamber of Commerce.  But here are the key points:

Read more

Yglesias

Transit Pricing

linjefoering_m_vand664 1

I rode the Copenhagen Metro today and damn was it expensive—about $4 for the cheapest available (i.e., two zone) single ticket. That left me scratching my head as to why you would possibly put the fare so high. It turns out, however, that if you buy tickets ten at a time you get almost a 40 percent discount.

That’s much more reasonable, but it still strikes me as high. In general, cities everywhere seem to me to tend to charge too much for fares. The marginal cost of an additional passenger is extremely low—running a half full train costs the same as running a 75% full train—so basic economic logic indicates that the price of riding should also be very low. If the concern is that you shouldn’t have everyone’s tax dollars going to subsidize something that not everyone can take advantage of then the best solution might be to have a special tax on property located near metro stations. At the end of the day, getting more people to ride a system you’ve already built is beneficial even to the people who don’t ride it. In DC, for example, if people stopped taking Metro you’d have terrible traffic jams. Even someone who never rides Metro is benefiting from the fact that other people do ride it.

Politics

Citing ‘Fascism, Socialism, Obamaism,’ Republican Strategist Launches Impeachment Campaign

While the international community is heralding President Obama for his leadership, right-wing activists here in America are clamoring to impeach him. Republican operative Floyd Brown, “one of the nation’s dirtiest political strategists” and the architect of the racially-charged Willie Horton ad against Michael Dukakis, has launched a campaign to impeach Obama. Brown, who registered his impeachment website in August, worked closely with congressional Republicans to push a similar crusade against Clinton, starting in 1994. During the 2008 campaign, Floyd ran commercials claiming Obama is Muslim.

Rather than cite any specific crime, Brown is demanding Obama’s removal for pursuing progressive agenda items like health and clean energy reform. His website blares: “Are you willing to let [Obama] construct a totalitarian regime… fascism, socialism, Obamaism… take your pick?”

Brown, a proud “birther,” explained to radio host Alan Colmes yesterday that he is also outraged because he doesn’t believe Obama was born in America:

COLMES: During the campaign, you were putting out stuff suggesting Obama is Muslim, wasn’t born here, stuff like that. [...]

BROWN: I’m still disputing his birth certificate.

Colmes asked Brown why he had not raised his voice during the Bush presidency, when, for example, Bush went to war in Iraq without a war powers act. Brown failed to dispute that charge, instead mumbling that although he did not want to impeach Bush, “a lot were”:

COLMES: Should Bush have been impeached for going to war without the consent of Congress, without a war powers act being obeyed?

BROWN: You know what, I’m not going to defend Bush because Alan you know as well as I do I didn’t like Bush.

COLMES: Alright, but you weren’t trying to impeach him were you?

BROWN: Uh no, but many were. I wasn’t, but a lot were.

Brown concluded that Obama is “dangerous because he’s not truthful.” Listen here:

Right-wing activists have been demanding the removal of President Obama for months now. In March, tea party rallies featured professionally-produced signs that said, “Obama Bin Lyin’ IMPEACH NOW.” Last week, a Newsmax column argued that a military coup could “resolve” the “radical left…Obama problem.” And right-wing websites, Fox News’ Glenn Beck, and various conservative talk show hosts have floated the idea of armed revolution against President Obama. Some have suggested using violence as a means of “Pulling our government down, pulling our President out, and putting him back where he should be.”

Claiming Brown’s movement is “mushrooming amongst conservative activists,” conservative news site World Net Daily is promoting the impeachment campaign and producing “IMPEACH OBAMA!” bumper stickers. World Net Daily is supported by the national Republican Party through purchases of e-mail address lists.

Brown is a prominent player in Republican circles. The Washington Post reported that Brown helped throw a fundraiser for RNC Chairman Michael Steele when Steele was running for U.S Senate in Maryland. As the former executive director of the Young Americans Foundation, Brown hosted dozens of Republican lawmakers and connected them with conservative youth activists to help them run for office and wage right-wing rallies on college campuses from 2001 to 2006.

Yglesias

The Trouble With States

capitoldome

The other day Reihan Salam opined that “I think we need to do a far broader rethinking of state and federal responsibilities.” I tend to agree. But a big part of the problem here is that it’s difficult to think of what kind of issues are actually well-suited to be dealt with at a state level. It’s easy to think of kinds of issues that Arlington County, Virginia should address on its own without input from people who live in Norfolk, VA or Montgomery County, Maryland or Boise, Idaho. These are your local government responsibilities. And it’s also easy to think of issues that should be decided in common between Arlington and Norfolk and Montgomery and Boise. These are your federal responsibilities. But it’s very hard to think of what kinds of things should involve Arlington and Norfolk, but not Montgomery County. Conversely, it’s pretty easy to think of things that should involve Arlington County and Montgomery County but not Norfolk or Boise. These would be metropolitan region issues.

But we don’t have any level of governance that addresses metro area issues. And we don’t really live our lives “at the state level.” And insofar as co-residents of a single state do have idiosyncratic issues in common that tends to be because important fiscal and regulatory powers have been allocated to state government rather than because it actually makes sense for them to have been allocated this way.

There’s not a ton that can be done about this. The constitution doesn’t let us appoint a “commission on middle-tier governance” to redraw boundaries. But the boundaries we have don’t follow any real economic or social logic. And the states themselves are a ludicrously mixed bag. California is giant, with the population of a medium-sized country like Poland. And nobody lives in Wyoming. The state of Florida contains eight separate MSAs that contain more people, including places I’ve never heard of like Palm Bay/Melbourne/Titusville.

Economy

Will The New Democrats Cripple Consumer Protection Before It Even Begins?

Rep. Melissa Bean (D-IL)

Rep. Melissa Bean (D-IL)

Today, President Obama made his case for creating a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) to oversee consumer financial products, saying that “with seven different federal agencies each having a role [in consumer protection], there is too little accountability, too many loopholes.”

As it moves through Congress, the proposal to create a new agency has come under assault from the financial services industry, Republicans in Congress, and existing bank regulators trying to protect their turf. The proposal has already been scaled back in the House, and will no longer mandate that financial firms offer customers a “plain vanilla” version of a product, before moving on to more complicated and expensive ones.

But a second troubling development is underway — led by the so-called New Democrats — which would continue the practice of allowing nationally chartered banks (like Bank of America or Wells Fargo) to ignore state regulations that are stronger than federal regulations:

Democrats are split over whether the proposal should allow states to trump federal regulations and enforce their own, often tougher consumer rules against national banks, such as Bank of America Corp., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. This would permit states to bar certain fees and late charges otherwise allowed by federal regulators…Rep. Melissa Bean (D., Ill.) is preparing an amendment that would prevent states from enforcing tougher standards against national banks than the federal entity’s.

This is a monumentally misguided effort on the part of the New Dems. “The system that is being proposed by the New Dems is the system we have now. That’s the system that failed,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director for U.S. PIRG.

Indeed, we’ve already seen the wreckage that preempting state law can cause. Under the Bush administration, bank regulators repeatedly exempted national banks from state laws aimed at reeling in subprime lending. And according to a new study from the University of North Carolina’s Center for Community Capital, those preempted anti-predatory lending laws (APLs) could have made a huge difference in mitigating the subprime crisis:

[W]e observe a lower default rate for neighborhoods in APL states, in states requiring verification of borrowers’ repayment ability, in states with broader coverage of subprime loans with high points and fees, and in states with more restrictive regulation on prepayment penalties. We believe that these findings are remarkable, since they suggest an important and yet unexplored link between APLs and foreclosures.

The New Dems’ proposition would bake-in an exemption for the national banks, meaning that those banks could focus all of their effort on weakening regulation in Washington, and the states would be powerless to do anything about it. In a briefing with bloggers today, Austan Goolsbee of the Council of Economic Advisers emphasized that the Obama administration “did not call for national preemption,” and said that states with “a particular reason” for providing additional protections for their consumers should be allowed to do so.

Read more about the case for a consumer protection agency in today’s Progress Report.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up