ThinkProgress Logo

Security

The Winger Within – Kyl Obstructs Key Nominee On Nuclear Policy

Kyl--cheneyOn Wednesday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified forcefully that the blocking of crucial State Department nominees more than a year after President Obama was inaugurated was endangering the security of the United States.

We’re now more than a year into a new administration and whether you agree or disagree with a particular policy, a president deserves to have the people that he nominates serving him.

Following the revelation that Senator Shelby was holding up all nominees, almost 30 of the President’s appointments have now cleared the Senate. However, one key State Department nominee remains stuck due to an anonymous hold – Laura Kennedy the nominee for the Conference on Disarmament. This is a post that the President wants to elevate to an Ambassador-level position. The conference is the forum for negotiations on the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty, a vital treaty that would ban further production of nuclear weapons. As a result of this hold, the United States does not have a negotiator participating in this major international – a fact that greatly undercuts security of the United States and the President’s nuclear agenda.

So what mysterious Senator, is holding up this nominee, hamstringing US foreign policy, and undermining American security? Well none other than Arizona Senator Jon Kyl.

Josh Rogin of the Cable confirmed this today and asked Kyl about his obstruction. Demonstrating the heart of a lion, Kyl told Rogin “I’m not sure if I have a hold on her.” Kyl’s staff however rushed to clarify, telling Rogin that the White House hasn’t let them in on the ins-and-outs of all the START negotiations. Kyl’s aide told Rogin:

For some reason they’ve [the Administration] been reluctant to respond. Consequently, Senator Kyl is reluctant to consider their nominees.

While not surprising, Kyl’s aide’s statement is revealing. It essentially admits that the reason Kyl is just crassly obstructing Kennedy has nothing to do with Kennedy’s qualifications, but everything to do with Kyl being a nuclear extremist. An Administration official told Rogin, “Kennedy’s position has nothing to do with those items [START or CTBT] … He will have every chance to scrutinize START when it is submitted for ratification. His pleas for info now are a transparent effort to kill the negotiations.”

Kyl’s foreign policy radicalism is pretty well-known, just yesterday I noted that Kyl associates with a tin-foil hat right wing extremist who believes that Obama is pushing America’s “submission to Shariah.” Kyl after all wants more, not fewer nuclear weapons, and he wants to conduct new explosive nuclear tests in the backyards of citizens from Utah, Nevada, and perhaps even Arizona.

This is also not the first time Kyl has obstructed nominees relating to nuclear weapons. Kyl infamously blocked Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher and slowed lead START negotiator Rose Gottemoeller’s confirmation – both of whom are crucial figures in the negotiations with Russia. Then just a few months later – in an act of stone-cold hypocrisy – attacked the Administration for not getting a new START deal done by the December 5th deadline.

John Isaacs smartly notes that Kyl has not officially come out against a new START treaty and has softened some of his “red lines.” But a Senator does not have to explicitly state his opposition to the treaty to gum up the process and block the President’s nuclear agenda, as Kyl is so clearly demonstrating.

Politics

Inhofe trying to get Bunning to end filibuster so highway funding doesn’t expire.

Last night and today, Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) filibustered an extension of unemployment benefits, telling Democrats who were trying to pass the bill “tough sh*t.” Benefits will expire for many workers on Sunday. Both Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) have supported Bunning, with Cornyn saying, “somebody has to stand up, finally, and say enough is enough.” But not all Republicans are pleased with Bunning’s antics. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) said that he is trying to contact Bunning because the bill also contains transportation funding that, if allowed to expire, will lead to furloughs of employees of the Federal Highway Administration:

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., said the money for road projects runs out over the weekend. Inhofe’s office also said employees of the Federal Highway Administration will have to be furloughed beginning next week. Inhofe, who is a key player on transportation issues in Congress, said he has tried to contact Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., who blocked action on the bill that would have extended roads funds and jobless benefits.

“I’m going to call in all my chits,” Inhofe said. “We are great friends.”…Inhofe said he hopes to get the impasse resolved by the time the Senate returns on Monday.

According to the latest National Journal ranking, Inhofe is the most conservative member of Congress, while Bunning is the third most conservative.

Yglesias

In the Fight

225px-John_Boehner_official_portrait

MoveOn takes a break from public option advocacy to hit a Republican over health care:

“As House Minority Leader and a favorite of the insurance industry, John’s shown the courage to stand up for the big guy,” MoveOn charges in the ad.

“He’s defended health insurance companies’ rights to jack up your premiums, to drop you whenever they feel like it, and most recently, to maintain monopolies that hurt consumers.”

I think that’s an example of the political upside to passing health reform. As is well-known by now, if you ask people about “Obama’s health care plan” or something along those lines, it polls very poorly. But many of the specific provisions poll well. Anyone who already voted for one or the other version of health reform is vulnerable—very vulnerable—to the attack that he or she voted for Barack Obama’s trillion dollar death panel boondoggle. But a candidate who’s willing and able to embrace that vote and say something passed at least has the chance to fight back with ads accusing his or her opponent of defending health insurance companies’ rights to jack up your premiums, to drop you whenever they feel like it, etc.

Even if they manage to make themselves somewhat more popular than Republicans, House Democrats are going to face big losses anyway so there’s no sense in being too pollyannish about any strategy. Bottom line is that when you’re facing trouble, it’s smart to at least give yourself a fighting chance.

Climate Progress

Energy and Global Warming News for February 26: Goodbye, Hummer; Olympics going for the green

http://www.rogerwendell.com/images/fueleconomy/no_hummers.gifGoodbye, Hummer

The world might be saved: It looks as if the Hummer is destined for the junkyard. The plan by General Motors to sell the muscular brand to a Chinese company went up in a puff of exhaust smoke on Wednesday after government officials in China said that they had never received the necessary application for approval and thus couldn’t grant it.

We suspect the deal collapsed because the Chinese Communist Party “” which rarely shows much shame “” is worried about China’s image as the most polluting nation on the planet. If true, that is good news.

Read more

Alyssa

Stars and Stripes

Captain America by DuckBrown.
Image used under a Creative Commons license courtesy of DuckBrown.

I quite like Jon Krasinski, even though I tend to think The Office had aired a couple of seasons more than it ought to have.  I thought he was far and away the best thing about It’s Complicated: unlike the other actors who played Meryl Streep and Alec Baldwin’s theoretically-grown children, he, as an in-law-to-be, was the only one who seemed like a plausible grown-up, while still managing to seem open and easy-going without being boring, which I think is a surprisingly hard sweet spot to get.

All of that said, though, he is not Captain America.  I mean, I don’t think Chace Crawford is either.  But I just think Krasinski is far too much of a relatable, regular guy to take up the shield as Steve Rogers.  I think that he’s into the running speaks to the body type that’s become so popular among young Hollywood actors today: the tall, almost willowy type that looks good in slim-fit suits.  Sam Worthington may be the only actor in this particular generation with a real jaw.  And he’s already overcommitted and in danger of overexposure.  We don’t need him to be Captain America, too.

Health

Republicans ‘Agree On About 80% Of The Issues,’ But Want To ‘Start Over’ On Health Reform

In May of 2009, GOP wordsmith Frank Luntz released a messaging memo instructing Republicans how to derail Democratic efforts to pass health care reform. The memo instructed Republicans to “acknowledge the crisis” and need for reform and argue that health care reform would lead to “the government setting standards of care,” government “rationing care,” and would “put the Washington bureaucrats in charge of health care.” “This plays into more favorable Republican territory by protecting individual care while downplays the need for a comprehensive national plan,” the memo states.

Republicans have been successfully deploying Luntz’s strategy for most last year and even used his tactics at yesterday’s health care summit. The Republican leadership acknowledged the crisis and agreed with some of the Democrats’ reforms, but demanded that the President abandon the existing legislation and “start over” on reform:

Watch a compilation:

Throughout the summer of 2009, Republicans claimed that they actually agreed with 80 percent of the Democrats’ bill. In September 2009, for instance, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) told a town hall meeting that “Republicans and Democrats agree on 80 percent of fixing the nation’s healthcare system.” Rep.Charles Boustany (R-LA), who delivered the Republican response to the President’s congressional address in September, also said, “I would venture to say that we agree on about 80% of the issues right now. It’s just a matter of hashing out those few areas where we disagree, but there’s really not been that kind of real discussion, and it needs to happen.”

Unfortunately, even after yesterday’s “real discussion” and a drawn out negotiating process that only moved the President’s health care principles further to the right, Republicans are still more interested in deploying poll-tested catch phrases and strategies than genuinely addressing the health care crisis.

Yglesias

Stuffed

The Onion: “Senator Dikembe Mutombo Blocks Record Amount Of Legislation”.

Something to note about the modern-day fad where Republican members of congress criticize the very idea of big, comprehensive bills is that the nature of Senate obstruction makes such bills necessary. Even when you have the requisite 60 votes to break a filibuster, a determined opponent can force to 30-hour periods of cloture “ripening.” That’s not a big deal if you’re trying to move your ideas through a few major bills. But it means that it would be totally impossible for the leader to just come to the floor with a series of a few dozen small-bore proposals on a related topic and then let each one be voted on individuallly.

Politics

Rep. Steve King Sings The Praises Of Lobbyists On The House Floor: ‘Somebody Needs To Stand Up’ For Them

The Center for Public Integrity reported recently that the health care debate kept more than 4,500 lobbyists employed at various points throughout the year, effectively drowning out the voices of the American public. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said these lobbyists descend “into the offices of members of Congress and say, ‘Don’t vote for change. Keep the status quo alive.’”

This afternoon, while speaking on the floor of the House of Representatives, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) defended the role of Washington lobbyists, saying that they “do a very effective and useful job on this Hill” and went as far as to say that “somebody needs to stand up” for them:

KING: The people of my district deserve every bit of as much representation in this Congress as the people do in any district. But this structure, this iron-fisted structure in this House of Representatives, that’s what breaks down deliberative democracy and it undermines our constitutional republic and it denies the very legitimate knowledegable input from all across this country. Think about how this works. Each of the 435 of us we go home to our districts. We build a network of advisors providing information for us … in a whole series of ways. Town hall meetings, individual meetings, individual lobbyists, yes lobbyists do a very effective and useful job on this Hill.Somebody needs to stand up for the lobby, it is a matter of providing a lot of valuable information.

Watch it:

This isn’t the first time King has lauded lobbyists. Last year, he praised astroturf lobbying group Americans for Prosperity for busing in protesters to Washington, DC, even comparing them to Paul Revere. And unfortunately, he isn’t the only member of Congress who has taken it upon himself to defend lobbyists. During the Senate Finance Committee’s mark-up session of its version of the health care bill, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) demanded that the committee delay its votes to give health care lobbyists “at least 72 hours” to read the bill.

Of course, lobbyists hardly need members of Congress standing up for them. Last year was a record year for lobbying expenditures, with $3.47 billion being spent to pay lobbyists to influence-peddle at every level of the federal government.

Yglesias

Hayek on Health Care

Stethoscope

An offhand Twitter joke and some pushback I got led me to look up what Hayeks’ The Road to Serfdom says about universal health care. Some interesting stuff on Page 125 of the edition that’s in Google books:

Nor is there any reason why the state should not assist individuals in providing for those common hazards of life against which, because of their uncertainty, few individuals can make adequate provision. Where, as in the case of sickness and accident, neither the desire to avoid such calamities nor the efforts to overcome their consequences are as a rule weakened by the provision of assistance, where, in short, we deal with genuinely insurable risks, the case for the state helping to organise a comprehensive system of social insurance is very strong. There are many points of detail where those wishing to preserve the competitive system and those wishing to supersede it by something different will disagree on the details of such schemes; and it is possible under the name of social insurance to introduce measures which tend to make competition more or less ineffective. But there is no incompatibility in principle between the state providing greater security in this way and the preservation of individual freedom.

I take this as saying that Hayek would support a universal health care system but would prefer it to be financed with a flat or regressive tax base. One interesting issue here regards preventive care. Things like regular checkups, wellness advise, basic screening, etc. don’t meet the definition of “genuinely insurable risks.” At the same time, based on what we actually know about medicine an ounce of prevention really is worth a pound of cure and as long as you’re going to be having the state pick up the tab for illness it seems very practically sound to also have the state invest in prevention. But defining what does and does not count as “prevention” would entail a degree of non-Hayekian planning. My take would be that these medical issues are sufficiently technical to think that Hayek’s general point about the superiority of the market to technocracy in organizing knowledge almost certainly doesn’t hold. But either way, we could have a much more constructive debate about health care if the right-wing took more of a Hayekian view and less of a Randian one.

Economy

Cornyn: ‘I Admire’ Bunning For Saying ‘Enough Is Enough’ On Unemployment Benefits

After repeatedly blocking an extension of unemployment benefits last night — telling Democrats “tough sh*t” and whining about being forced to miss a college basketball game — Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) returned to the Senate floor this morning to once again object to a motion to move the extension forward.

Last night, Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) supported Bunning, saying that “everybody in the country now knows that the senator from Kentucky has a hold on this bill…That’s something that we honor in this body.” And today it was Sen. John Cornyn’s (R-TX) turn to justify Bunning’s obstruction. Cornyn said that he admires Bunning’s stand because “if there is one message that I hear from my constituents in Texas and from people around the country it is ‘stop the spending‘ and be responsible when it comes to these unmet liabilities”:

I admire the courage of the junior senator from Kentucky, Senator Bunning. It’s not fun to be accused of having no compassion for the people who are out of work, the people for who these benefits should be forthcoming, and I believe will be forthcoming. But somebody has to stand up, finally, and say enough is enough, no more inter-generational theft from our children and grandchildren by not meeting our responsibilities today. And that’s what I interpret him to have done.

Watch it:

Cornyn said that he wants to redirect money from the economic stimulus package into the jobless benefit extension, which would cause money already dedicated to tax cuts and other stimulus programs to be revoked. Democrats want to consider the benefits extension emergency spending instead. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) even agreed to hold a vote on Bunning’s suggested options for paying for the extension, but Bunning refused because he “did not expect his colleagues to adopt it.”

The House passed an extension on a voice vote last night (meaning no one objected to the measure), and today Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) criticized Bunning’s obstructionism. “It is really hard to understand why one senator in the United States Senate is holding up the extension of unemployment insurance at this time,” she said. Vice President Joe Biden also weighed in, saying “I wish that senator would think about how that man or woman [whose benefits expire] would explain to their kids how they’re going to get by.”

The Senate adjourned today without the extension passing, and is not scheduled to return until Monday. 1.1 million workers are scheduled to have their unemployment benefits expire in March, and 5 million will lose their benefits by June if no extension is put into place.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up