ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

Fun With Tax Deductions

Bruce Bartlett offers this sobering table that illustrates what a mess the current tax code is:

taxmess

Furthermore, even within income classes of people with roughly similar incomes there is now a crazy quilt of effective rates that vary enormously depending on things like whether one owns a house or rents, whether one has children, how much of one’s income is derived from wages or capital, and various other factors. As one can see in the table below, for those in the middle quintile (20%) of income, 25% had no tax liability or a negative liability while the rest paid between 3.2% and 9% of their income in federal income taxes. Even among the ultra-wealthy, the top 1% of tax filers, effective tax rates vary 10-fold between 2.6% and 26.9%.

I think a fair amount of variation in effective tax rates based on the number of dependent children you have around makes sense. Realistically if John’s a single guy making $65,000 a year and Mary’s trying to raise two kids on $80,000 a year, there’s no reason to think distributive justice that requires Mary to pay a higher tax rate. But for the rest this is very dubious. In particular, the wide array of deductions & credits for people who do this or that, each with their own phase-out points (or not) and different levels of refundability (or not) is a mess.

Yglesias

Chile Earthquake

Earthquake hits Chile. This one is much more powerful than the Haitian earthquake—1000 times more powerful, I’m hearing—but fortunately looks like it will be much less devastating thanks toa Chile’s vastly superior infrastructure, government capacity, and general level of wealth.

Update

Here’s an English translation of tweets from the Chilean Red Cross.


Update

,Here’s more information on earthquake magnitudes: “A magnitude-8.8 earthquake will feature 101.8 times as much shaking as the magnitude-7.0 one. 101.8 is less than 102, which is 100. So the amount of shaking is nowhere near the 1000x that Mr. Yglesias heard.”

Security

Rep. Tom Perriello Tells ‘Spineless’ Senate To Get ‘Its Head Out Of Its Rear End’ And Confront Climate Crisis

Tom PerrielloRep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) is “sick” of the “insider baseball crap” dominating the Senate debate over global warming and energy reform. In an interview with Grist, the first-term congressman stated in no uncertain terms that the country is at risk from global warming and our economy is at risk of losing the clean energy race. Like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Perriello has not one lick of sympathy for those in the Senate who deny these threats:

That’s more insider baseball crap. I don’t really care. I’m sick of starting with what can we get through the Senate; let’s start with what solves the damn problem. Until the Senate gets its head out of its rear end and starts to see the crisis we’re in, our country is literally at risk. Our economy is at risk, because these jobs are being created overseas. It should have the same urgency with this problem that it had bailing out Wall Street. We are swearing an oath to do what’s necessary to protect this country, not do what’s necessary to get a bill through the Senate.

Perriello repeatedly expressed his belief that Congressional inaction on jobs, national security, and scientific “challenge of our era” is due to a lack of courage and responsibility:

This is the challenge of our time—the jobs opportunity, the national security challenge, the scientific challenge of our era. Any plan that uses market forces to signal a carbon-constrained environment is going to move us in the right direction. People who don’t support this kind of aggressive energy independence are just selling Americans short.

– We’re so far behind China, Europe, and other areas in the energy jobs of the future because neither party has had the guts to take this on. There are so many spineless people in D.C.

– Every week the Senate doesn’t act, it either freezes that investment and innovation or it sends it overseas. We’re giving up jobs. The Senate—the ridiculous tactics of the Republicans and the timidity of the Democrats—is standing in the way of the kind of job creation we need.

– Unfortunately, good ideas, ideas that could save our country, sometimes take 30 minutes to explain and only 30 seconds to demagogue. In between those two things is leadership, and we haven’t had the moral courage to take this on.

Perriello’s principled support for cap-and-trade legislation has made him a target of Republicans and polluters, who have mocked him with ads about snowstorms and flooded his office with forged letters of opposition.

Cross-posted on The Wonk Room.

Yglesias

Alphabetism

Given my last name, I’ve long been concerned about the last socially accepted form of systematic institutionalized arbitrary discrimination in the United States: Alphabetism. Nobody ever made Matt Yglesias and Rachel Zabarkes sit in the back of the bus, but we sure as hell did have to stand at the end of the line at snack time in school (worse, later she got married and changed her name to Rachel Zabarkes Friedman and briefly worked at National Review). By the time they handed me my diploma at college graduation, practically everyone and their families has already scattered elsewhere. And of course if I co-author anything with anyone, my name goes last.

So I want to heartily endorse David Lake’s proposals for reform. Personally as a matter of principle I try to list people in reverse alphabetical order, but often find myself overruled in formal contexts.

Climate Progress

Wal-Mart to cut 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gas pollution by 2015

What do you think of the sustainability efforts of the retail giant? Our guest blogger is Sarah Collins, intern with CAP’s Energy Opportunity team at the Center for American Progress.

In 2009, Wal-Mart received the Aspen Institute Energy and Environment award for Corporate Energy Efficiency.  To build on this success, Wal-Mart just announced its new sustainability goal: to eliminate 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gases from the supply chain by 2015.  This amount, roughly equivalent to the company’s total corporate emissions last year, is “the equivalent of taking more than 3.8 million cars off the road for a year.”  Efforts to reach this goal involved extensive collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund, ClearCarbon Inc., the Carbon Disclosure ProjectPricewaterhouseCoopers, and the University of Arkansas’ Applied Sustainability Center.

Read more

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up