ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Scott Brown Claims ‘No Republicans’ Are Talking About Shutting Down The Government — 9 GOPers Disagree

As the nation inches closer and closer to a government shutdown, the right is readying itself for the upcoming public-relations battle. Their approach appears to be two-fold. First, obfuscate the potential ramifications of a shutdown, especially for senior citizens and the poor. We saw this tactic at work when Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) falsely claimed that Social Security checks would be uninterrupted during a shutdown, and when Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) told Fox News that a government shutdown wouldn’t “hurt one bit.

The second leg of the GOP approach is to deny that anyone on the right is discussing a government shutdown. This orchestrated Republican strategy was on full display last week; both House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) rejected the idea that any GOPers were talking about shutting down the government.

The newest Republican to repeat this debunked denial is Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA). This morning, Brown told Fox & Friends that “There’s no Republican that’s going to shut the government down or wants to shut the government down.” He went on to declare that “the only people talking about that right now are the Democrats”:

BROWN: There’s no one in my caucus that has ever said, “oh gosh, let’s make a political win and shut the government down.” There’s no Republican that’s going to shut the government down or wants to shut the government down. The only people talking about that right now are the Democrats and it’s — the scare tactics need to go away. We need to sit down in a room and hammer these things out, period.

Watch it:

Despite Brown’s assertion, as ThinkProgress noted last week, there are at least nine Republicans who have publicly discussed shutting down the government if their various demands aren’t met:

Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR): “Womack said he would be open to forcing a government shutdown over spending.” [The Hill, 12/12/10]

Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA): “If government shuts down, we want you with us. … It’s going to take some pain for us to do the things that we need to do to right the ship.” [9/10/10]

Rep. Tom Price (R-GA): Q: do you think shutdown should be off the table? PRICE: Everything ought to be on the table. [2/11/11]

Rep. Steve King (R-IA): “[King] said last week that he wants Boehner and other House leaders to sign a ‘blood oath’ that they l include a repeal of health care reform in every appropriations bill next year, even if President Barack Obama vetoes the bills and a government shutdown occurs.” [Roll Call, 9/10/10]

Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI): If Obama…responds to the mandate from voters and understands he can’t disregard it, then he thinks Obama will do well “If he doesn’t, he will shut government down,” Walberg said. [Jackson Citizen Patriot, 11/03/10]

Rep. Alan Nunnelee (R-MI): Q: Are you willing to participate in what would lead to a shutdown of the federal government to stop this monstrosity from going down he tracks? NUNNELEE: I agree with Congressman Boehner. We need to do whatever is necessary to make sure this bill never goes into effect. [11/09/10]

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX): “If it takes a shutdown of government to stop the runaway spending, we owe that to our children and our grandchildren.” [11/15/10]

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX): “This is the way the government should adjust. If they can’t pay their bills, wait.” [12/16/10]

Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL): “We will do what we have to do, to shut down the government if we have to, to choke Obamacare if we have to.” [2/12/11]

Just yesterday, Walsh doubled down on his threat, saying, “If my Republican leadership asks me to vote for a budget, even a two-week budget, that doesn’t have spending cuts, I will say no and I will shut down government.” Republicans like Brown, Boehner and Cantor are attempting to paint Democrats as the group at fault if a shutdown were to occur. However, their argument is undercut by the growing number of GOPers joining the Shutdown Caucus.

Update

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) appeared on The Laura Ingraham Show yesterday and echoed the same sentiment as Scott Brown, telling the host that, “I don’t know anybody in the Republican Party that’s looking forward to, or proposing, shutting down the government.”


Update

,In an interview with Fox News, freshman Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC) became the 10th GOPer to endorse the prospect of a government shutdown, declaring that “nothing’s off the table at this point.”


[upd

Climate Progress

Montanans Protest GOP Assault On Environment, Climate, Health

Protests over the radical Tea Party agenda have spilled over from Wisconsin into Montana, where hundreds rallied on the state capitol steps on Monday. Republicans gained control over both chambers of the state legislature in 2010, and, like their colleagues in other states, are challenging Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) with budgetary plans to cut health, environmental, and labor programs in order to pay for corporate tax cuts. Supporters of a safe and healthy middle class rallied in Helena yesterday to protest the “unprecedented GOP attacks on public services and education and laws that protect land, air, water and wildlife”:

Conservationists, sportsmen, firefighters, teachers, correctional officers and others gathered for a pair of rallies on the Capitol’s north lawn and demanded that Republicans focus more on creating jobs and less on ramming through controversial bills and budget cuts aimed at slashing government employees and rolling back bedrock environmental laws.

Montana Republicans are pushing:

– A bill by State Sen. Chas Vincent (R-MT) to gut the Montana Environmental Policy Act because, Vincent says, it’s what “venture capitalists” need.

– A bill by State Rep. Scott Reichner (R-MT) to slash workers’ compensation insurance because “businesses are being crushed.”

– A bill by State Rep. Walter McNutt (R-MT) to close the Montana Veterans Home in Columbia Falls.

– A bill by State Sen. Jason Priest (R-MT) to prevent the establishment of a state health insurance exchange.

– Bills by State Rep. Joe Read (R-MT) to declare global warming “natural” and “beneficial,” and to prevent the EPA from enforcing climate pollution rules.

– Bills to slash health programs like vaccination, water safety, anti-smoking, child nutrition, and the Montana Healthy Kids health insurance program for children.

– A $32 million cut to higher education in the state.

Meanwhile, Republicans are pushing bills to cut or eliminate taxes on corporations.

Cross-posted on ThinkProgress.

Alyssa

Having Killed The Radio Star, Video Dispatches Itself

Alternate title: “Queue Can’t Always Get What You Want”

I waste enormous amounts of time flipping through blogs and Facebook, but I don’t actually watch that much YouTube. That’s because when I’m skimming text, I feel as though I’m controlling my use of my own time, but once I hit play on a video, it unfolds at an unchangeable rate. I can’t skim it, so I genuinely feel as though I’m wasting time. This is not a sound time management strategy, but it’s the nature of my particular beast. I’m sure there’s a psychological term for it. Maybe at Lifehacker?

Which is why I’m so thrilled about the new YouTube “Queue” feature. A video comes up on FB or in my RSS feed. I want to watch it, but I’ll feel like I’m procrastinating if I press play immediately. I happily save it for later. Even better, the feature is utterly non-functional, so I never actually have to watch anything, but feel much better about skipping it.

x-posted at Joshua Malbin

Yglesias

The Pyramid Scheme Myth

To continue with the theme of Social Security’s admirable structure as an approach to funding middle class retirements, it’s important to tie this in with the pyramid scheme allegation.

Imagine a society with no Social Security, and also no imprudent or short-sighted people. Everyone puts a healthy share of their annual income away in a savings vehicle, and everyone manages to retire on a decent income. Thanks to the ups and downs of the financial markets, there’s a certain inefficiently noisy quality to the income of retired people, but due to the magic of infinite prudence the problem is very manageable. Now imagine that demographers are predicting a one-time demographic adjustment in the ratio of old people to non-old people in the population. This will lead to a decline in the rate of economic growth, and therefore to the expected return on investment. Either workers will need to start increasing their savings rate, or else they’ll need to accept lower living standards when retired. In other words, they’ll face the exact same choice we currently face in the form of higher taxes or lower benefits. Of course people could try to compensate for lower expected returns by engaging in riskier investment strategies, but we’re talking about a perfectly prudent population.

Under the circumstances, I don’t think anyone would be saying “saving for your retirement is a pyramid scheme—it depends on the assumption of future economic growth!” Future growth is a prudent assumption. But I also don’t think people would just be saying “well, we need to make some tough choices.” I think they’d be saying that we shouldn’t meekly accept the premise of slower economic growth. They’d be calling for more immigration, especially of high-skill people.

LGBT

State Marriage Watch: Montana Committee Approves Bill Outlawing Local Non-Discrimination Laws

Lawmakers introduce a marriage equality bill in the Maryland Senate, where the measure is expected to pass, while legislators in Montana approve a measure that would prohibit localities from outlawing discrimination against gay people. That’s in today’s State Marriage Watch:

– MARYLAND: Earlier today, Maryland Senators introduced SB 116, ‘Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act,’ which would allow gays and lesbians to marry in the state while exempting religious institutions from conducting the same-sex marriage ceremonies. State Senator Robert Garagiola introduced the measure and stressed that religious institutions would not be required to recognize these relationships. Listen to audio from today here.

– HAWAII: Tomorrow, Governor Neil Abercrombie will sign a bill allowing gays and lesbians to enter into legally-recognized civil unions. The Hawaii Senate passed the final version of the measure by a vote of 18-5 on Thursday. “I have always believed that civil unions respect our diversity, protect people’s privacy, and reinforce our core values of equality and aloha,” Abercrombie said in a statement. “For me this bill represents equal rights for all the people of Hawaii.”

– WYOMING: On Friday, the Wyoming senate passed a bill to prevent “any recognition of civil unions or marriages among same-sex couples who were wed or entered a union outside of the state.” The body added an amendment to allow out-of-state couples in civil unions access to Wyoming courts and the measure will now have to go back to the House, where it already passed last month by a vote of 32 to 27.

– WEST VIRGINIA: Yesterday, supporters of a bill pending in the House and the Senate “to add sexual orientation to the state’s nondiscrimination law gathered at the steps of the Senate. Most wore stickers proclaiming they ‘stand with Sam,’ referring to Sam Hall, a gay coal miner who filed a lawsuit against Massey Energy in December for discrimination. Watch video of the rally here. The bill’s fate “probably lies with the House of Delegates, where similar legislation died in 2008 and 2009.”

– NEW MEXICO: The House Consumer & Public Affairs Committee voted down three proposed measures “that would define marriage, for legal purposes as being between a man and a woman.” House Joint Resolution 7 “would have made gay marriage unconstitutional if approved by the Legislature and by voters in the 2012 general election” and HJR8 would “seek to amend the Constitution to prevent New Mexico from recognizing otherwise legal out-of-state marriages between persons of the same sex.” House Bill 162 would have bared the state from recognizing same-sex marriages from out of state.

– MONTANA: The House Judiciary Committee approved a bill Monday that would “prohibit local governments from enacting ordinances or policies seek to protect residents from real or perceived discrimination based on their sexual orientation and gender as the cities of Missoula did through an ordinance and Bozeman did through a policy.” The panel also tabled a separate measure “which would have broadened the Montana Human Rights Act to prohibit discrimination statewide based on gender identity or expression and sexual orientation.”

For a complete overview of the latest developments in the marriage battleground states of Rhode Island, Maryland, New York, California, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Wyoming, Iowa, and New Mexico, click here.

Politics

Joining Wisconsin, Montanans Protest Tea Party Assault On Workers And Environment

Protests over the radical Tea Party agenda have spilled over from Wisconsin into Montana, where hundreds rallied on the state capitol steps on Monday. Republicans gained control over both chambers of the state legislature in 2010, and, like their colleagues in other states, are challenging Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) with budgetary plans to cut health, environmental, and labor programs in order to pay for corporate tax cuts. Supporters of a safe and healthy middle class rallied in Helena yesterday to protest the “unprecedented GOP attacks on public services and education and laws that protect land, air, water and wildlife”:

Conservationists, sportsmen, firefighters, teachers, correctional officers and others gathered for a pair of rallies on the Capitol’s north lawn and demanded that Republicans focus more on creating jobs and less on ramming through controversial bills and budget cuts aimed at slashing government employees and rolling back bedrock environmental laws.

Montana Republicans are pushing:

– A bill by State Sen. Chas Vincent (R-MT) to gut the Montana Environmental Policy Act because, Vincent says, it’s what “venture capitalists” need.

– A bill by State Rep. Scott Reichner (R-MT) to slash workers’ compensation insurance because “businesses are being crushed.”

– A bill by State Rep. Walter McNutt (R-MT) to close the Montana Veterans Home in Columbia Falls.

– A bill by State Sen. Jason Priest (R-MT) to prevent the establishment of a state health insurance exchange.

– Bills by State Rep. Joe Read (R-MT) to declare global warming “natural” and “beneficial,” and to prevent the EPA from enforcing climate pollution rules.

– Bills to slash health programs like vaccination, water safety, anti-smoking, child nutrition, and the Montana Healthy Kids health insurance program for children.

– A $32 million cut to higher education in the state.

Meanwhile, Republicans are pushing bills to cut or eliminate taxes on corporations.

Update

Protesters in Ohio and Indiana have also descended on their state capitols to defend workers’ rights.

Health

Santorum Sets Tone: Health Law Will End The Nation, Wisconsin Labor Protestors Are Like Drug Addicts

Potential 2012 presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum (R) is determined not to be outflanked by fellow conservatives on the Affordable Care Act, telling a group of activists in Spartanburg, SC over the weekend that the law is so bad, it will literally end the nation:

If we don’t repeal ‘Obamacare,’ America as we know it is over,” he told the Palmetto House Republican Women and other members of the conservative faithful during a dinner speech held at the Marriott in Spartanburg.

Santorum also took a page out of former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty’s (R) rhetorical playbook by comparing the federal government to a drug dealer and the states and individuals who accept government dollars, including the Wisconsin labor protesters, to drug addicts:

“What these folks are in Washington is no better than a drug dealer,” said Santorum, who lives with his wife and seven children in northern Virginia.

“They give you a subtle narcotic to make you feel better as you do worse.”

He went on to compare protesting union members in Wisconsin to addicts.

“They are acting like their drug is being taken away from them,” Santorum said.

This kind of rhetoric is red meat to the GOP base; expect Republicans to trip over themselves in condemning the health law (and every other accomplishment) in the strongest terms possible as we move closer to the primary season. They will likely have to moderate their approach in a general election setting, but I suspect that so-long as they stick to very general broad-brush condemnations they’ll be on safe ground politically. As we’ve seen, the problems arise when Republicans have to address the specific provisions in the law and register their positions on such popular elements as keeping children on their parents’ plan and eliminating coverage denials based on pre-existing conditions. Those elements are already in place and while one can somehow justify saying very extreme things about a 2,000 page bill that took months and months, claiming that extending dependent insurance to college students will destroy the nation is going to be a much tougher sell.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up