ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

BEST climate joke: Hockey Stick fight at the you’re-not-OK Corral

Curry repeats Muller’s smear that paleoclimate reconstructions were ‘dishonest’, and NASA’s Schmidt eviscerates her (again)

BEST is now a joke, officially, thanks to Dr. Judith Curry.  Sure, B.E.S.T.  seemed laughable from the start — see “Richard Muller, Charles Koch, Judith Curry and the implosion of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study (BEST).”

How could an effort to restore  the supposedly lost credibility of the global temperature record be run by one climate confusionist (Muller),  have as its sole ‘climate expert’ perhaps the leading confusionist (see “Curry abandons science“), and be funded in part by the world’s  biggest funder of climate disinformation!  And  I haven’t even blogged on the head-exploding conflict of interest of having Muller, who runs a for-profit climate consulting business, installing his daughter as B.E.S.T. project manager when she is the CEO of that business!

But that’s not funny.  What’s funny is that Curry had been advertising herself as some sort of a peace-making, I’m-ok-you’re-ok, why-can’t-we-all-just-get-along bridge builder among scientists — a reconciler, as it were (see “Fred Pearce jumps the shark“).

Now, however, she has devoted an entire post at her blog Climate etc. — judithcurry.com — to defending Muller’s claim (in this youtube clip) that “hide the decline” means the paleoclimate re-constructors of the Hockey Stick were “dishonest.”  For the record, the House of Commons vindication of climate scientists involved in the stolen emails  explicitly stated:

… insofar as we have been able to consider accusations of dishonesty””for example, Professor Jones’s alleged attempt to “hide the decline”"”we consider that there is no case to answer.

Similarly, Michael Mann has  been through multiple vindications that specifically looked at all of these e-mails.  See also RealClimate (here).

NASA’s Gavin Schmidt  showed up on Curry’s blog to make some incisive comments, and, with Curry’s help, demonstrated that, using her standard, her own work is “dishonest.”  Curry also made clear that her days of reconciliation are over.  She has gone native — or, rather, gone tribal — the full disinformer, as they say.

WattsUpWithThat has, typically, tried to make Schmidt look bad with one piece of not-terribly-damning quote mining, but  I will endeavor to pull out all of the relevant comments (including some by Curry and others).  The whole post and comment chain  is only worth reading if you like unintentional humor and ‘credibility seppuku’:

Read more

Politics

Tennessee Bill Dubs Sharia Law ‘Treasonous,’ Would Punish Muslims With 15 Years In Jail

GOP-led states are tripping over each other to compete for the most absurd response to the perceived threat of Shariah law. Thirteen intrepid states are chasing Oklahoma’s unconstitutional coat-tails to bar any consideration of international or Islamic law, even if it means accidentally banning the Ten Commandments or Native American rights.

But with state Sen. Bill Ketron’s (R) new Senate Bill 1028, Tennessee wins the honor of most radical response to a non-existent threat. Introduced last Thursday, the bill claims that Shariah law “continues to plague the United States generally and Tennessee in particular” and requires Muslims “to actively and passively support the replacement of America’s constitutional republic” with an Islamic state. Thus, adherence to the “legal-political-military doctrine” of Shariah law “is treasonous” and “a felony, punishable by 15 years in jail”:

A proposed new state law would make following the Islamic legal code known as Shariah law a felony, punishable by 15 years in jail.[...]

The bill claims that Shariah law is a danger to homeland security.

“The threat from Shariah-based jihad and terrorism presents a real and present danger to the lawful governance of this state and to the peaceful enjoyment of citizenship by the residents of this state,” the bill reads.

The bill exempts any peaceful practice of Islam.

But it also claims that any adherence to Shariah law – which includes religious practices like feet-washing and prayers – is treasonous.

It would require the state attorney general to investigate Shariah-compliant groups.

State House speaker pro tempore Judd Matheny (R) introduced the companion bill in the Tennessee House. Admitting that he is “still researching” Shariah, Matheny also admitted that the bill “was model legislation, given to him by the Tennessee Eagle Forum,” a right-wing “pro-family” advocacy group dedicated to “self-government and public policy making.”

The group, in turn, “confirmed that the law had been drafted by David Yerushalmi,” a self-professed “expert” on Islamophobia who believes that “Islam was born in violence; it will die that way” and that Muslims should “be taught from the cradle to reject the religion of their forebears.” As the Center For American Progress’ Matt Duss notes, Yerushalmi is a close associate of anti-Islam activist Frank Gaffney and has proposed dealing with America’s Muslim problem by making support or adherence to Islam “punishable by 20 years,” by declaring the U.S at war with the Muslim Nation, by declaring that “all non-US citizen Muslims are Alien Enemies,” and by banning any Muslim an entry visa into the U.S.

Noting that the U.S. Constitution both “trumps religious law” and prohibits the government from labeling religious laws “as wrong or treasonous or evil,” the First Amendment Center’s Charles Haynes takes a slightly different view of the bill: “It’s complete nonsense,” he said.

Yglesias

Cheap Gasoline

Ryan Avent offers a chart of “petrol” prices in the developed world:

At a time when the economy needs more stimulus, I would not favor increasing the gas tax. But a time will come when deficit reduction is important, and reducing the deficit through higher gasoline taxes is a very economically solid policy. In the real world, the press has decided that 2011 would be a good year for a giant deficit freakout, and it’s insane that higher gas taxes aren’t on the policy agenda as an option.

Climate Progress

The Mountain Demolition Caucus Passes Coal Amendments To HR 1

Our guest blogger is JW Randolph, Appalachian Voices legislative associate.

Late Friday night and into the wee hours of Saturday morning, the long-anticipated assault on clean air and clean water laws began in the House of Representatives. At 4:39AM on Saturday morning, Republicans passed their bill with zero Democratic support, and only three Republican dissenters (Jones (NC), Flake (AZ), Campbell (CA)).

The House approved a number of amendments to the budget bill (H.R. 1) that would prevent the EPA from updating rules on mountaintop removal permitting, coal ash storage, emissions of coarse particulate matter, and a variety of other clean air and clean water safeguards. Those amendments that were attached included the coal lobby wishlist of #109, #216, #217 (previously labeled as #10), and #498 (previously labeled as #219/220). These were revenue-neutral amendments, meaning they weren’t aimed at reducing the federal budget deficit, but were designed solely to prevent the EPA and other government agencies from updating and enforcing clean air and clean water laws. In short, it was Christmas for polluters.

Three of these amendments were aimed specifically at reversing the actions of the Obama Administration to strengthen permitting requirements for mountaintop removal mines (and thus would reinstate the polluter-friendly rules set up by the Bush Administration). Appalachian Voices supported a “NO” vote on each of the following three amendments. Most Republicans voted “AYE,”and most Democrats voted “NO,” with variations noted below each vote.

#109 Griffith (Defunding EPA’s mountaintop removal guidance)

#109 Ayes Nays Not Voting
Republicans 227 10 3
Democrats 8 175 10
Total 235 185 13

Ds voting Aye: Altmire (PA), Boren (OK), Critz, Donnelly, Holden, Matheson (UT), Rahall (WV), Ross (AR)

Rs voting Nay: Bass (NH), Fitzpatrick, Hayworth (NY), Johnson (IL), Lance (NJ), LoBiondo (NJ), Reichert, Smith (NJ), Webster (FL), Wolf (VA)

216 McKinley (Defunding EPA’s 404c veto authority)

#216 Ayes Nays Not Voting
Republicans 223 14 3
Democrats 17 168 8
Total 240 182 11

Ds voting Aye: Altmire, Boren, Cardoza, Carson, Costa, Costello, Critz, Donnelly, Gutierrez, Holden, Kissell, Matheson, McIntyre, Olver, Peterson, Rahall, Ross

Rs voting Nay: Amash, Bass (NH), Cravaak, Fitzpatrick, Forbes, Gerlach, Johnson (IL), LaTourette, LoBiondo, Paulsen, Reichert, Smith (NJ), Wittman, Wolf

498 Johnson (Defunding Dep. of Interior’s Stream Protection Rule)

#498 Ayes Nays Not Voting
Republicans 228 9 3
Democrats 11 177 5
Total 239 186 8

Ds voting Aye: Altmire, Boren, Costello, Critz, Donnelly, Holden, Matheson, McIntyre, Peterson, Rahall, Ross
Rs voting Nay: Bass (NH), Fitzpatrick, Hayworth, Johnson (IL), Lance, McCaul, Reichert, Smith (NJ), Wolf

Appalachian Voices also joined many of our national partners in opposing #217, which limits EPA’s ability to regulate toxic coal ash. Compared to the mountaintop removal amendments, #217 passed with much greater Republican support, but also lost many more Democrats.

Though these votes didn’t go the way we would have liked, we have now seen 206 members of Congress take an anti-MTR action by either cosponsoring the Clean Water Protection Act, or voting “NO” on #109, #216, or #498 — enough to uphold a presidential veto. It does allow us a clearer picture of where many in Congress stand regarding mountaintop removal, and presents a more clear of who we can work with.

Read more

Politics

Gov. Christie Brags About State Layoffs: ‘Unions Are Trying To Break The Middle Class’

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) has been gaining lots of attention at the moment for his attempt to strip collective bargaining from many of his state’s public employees, essentially busting their union legislatively. But he is far from alone among Republican governors in trying to take a pound of flesh from his state’s working people.

Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ), for instance, proposed a budget yesterday that holds property tax rebates for seniors hostage to benefit cuts for public employees: if public sector workers don’t agree to the cuts, property tax rebates don’t go out. And of course, Christie has rhetorically bashed teachers’ unions since he came into office, in order to score political points. During an appearance on MSNBC today, Christie actually bragged that his state leads the nation in terms of public sector layoffs, claiming that “unions are trying to break the middle class”:

USA Today recently said that New Jersey has shed by percentage more public sector jobs in the last year than any state in America. And the reason we’ve done this is because our government was bloated and too big at every level…In New Jersey, we’re not trying to break the unions, the unions are trying to break the middle class in New Jersey, through the expenses. And they’re close to doing it.

Watch it:

Because of his mass layoffs of public employees, the number of unemployed workers has actually increased in New Jersey since Christie took office. And Christie’s assertion that unions are not good for the middle class is quite troubling.

As David Madland and Karla Walter pointed out, “the middle class is markedly stronger when workers join together in unions.” In fact, the decline in unionization rates over the last forty years has been almost perfectly mirrored by a drop in middle-class incomes. Income inequality in the U.S. is the worst its been since the 1920′s, with nearly 25 percent of the total income in the country going to the richest one percent. The richest 10 percent of Americans control 2/3rds of the country’s net worth.

When unionization rates were high, prosperity was broadly shared, and workers were able to enjoy their fair share of productivity gains. But the overall economy is also stronger when unions are strong: “From 1947 to 1973, the period when unions were strongest and nearly one-third of workers were organized, U.S. economic output nearly tripled in size, growing at an average of 3.8 percent annually.” Since 2001, economic output has been just 2.2 percent annually.

Cross-posted on The Wonk Room.

Yglesias

Strong Public Support For Clean Air Act Regulation of Greenhouse Gasses

Most policy wonks are inclined to think that carbon pricing is a much better idea than regulating greenhouse gasses under the existing Clean Air Act framework. This has led most media coverage of EPA action to lose sight of the fact that the voting public is enthusiastic about the Clean Air Act and basically all kinds of anti-pollution efforts:

The public’s strong preference for regulatory solutions that hide costs rather than make them explicit is regrettable. But it is what it is, and if this is the only politically viable way to regulate air pollution than that’s where we are. The Obama administration needs to stay firm, and the business community and its allies in the conservative movement need to start getting real and come back to the table for negotiations about better ways of promoting clean energy.

Justice

Coburn And Inhofe Place Judicial Nominee On Double-Secret Probation

Sens. Coburn and Inhofe (R-OK) really don’t like judicial nominee Arvo Mikkanen. Yet, as Andrew Cohen explains in a column written in Mikkanen’s voice, they’re not telling anyone why:

Sen. Tom Coburn called me “unacceptable for the position” and said he had “serious concerns” about me. Last week, he pronounced my nomination “dead.”

There was something else the senator said last week that caught my attention. When asked last week to describe why he concluded so quickly and surely that I was “unacceptable” to become a federal judge, Sen. Coburn said: “No comment.” When asked if he knew me, the senator said: “I know plenty. I have no comment.”

Coburn and Inhofe’s kneejerk rejection of Mikkanen is more than a little bizarre, since Mikkanen hardly has the kind of background in progressive legal advocacy that is likely to trigger a conservative senator’s ire. Indeed, Mikkanen spent the last seventeen years of his legal career working as a federal prosecutor.

Moreover, Mikkanen is exceptionally qualified for federal trial judgeship. As an Assistant U.S. Attorney, he has tried over 475 cases in federal court. Mikkanen also has prior judicial experience, having previously served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes.

Which brings up another important reason why Mikkanen’s nomination is welcome — if confirmed, Mikkanen will become the only sitting Native American federal judge in the country.

So Coburn and Inhofe’s refusal to even talk about why they oppose this exceptionally qualified nominee is both misguided and misinformed, but it is also par for the course for these two senators. Coburn is often referred to as “Dr. No” because of his long history of placing holds on popular bills with broad bipartisan support. And Inhofe has a long history of absurd objections to Obama’s judicial nominees.

When Obama nominated Justice Elena Kagan to her current seat on the Supreme Court, Inhofe declared his opposition just a few hours later. When Obama nominated Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Inhofe outlandishly claimed that he decided to oppose her eleven years before she was actually nominated.

So maybe Inhofe deserves a little credit: he at least waited for Mikkanen’s nomination to be announced before he proclaimed that he was utterly opposed to this newly-revealed nominee.

Politics

GA GOP Rep. Would Force Women To Prove Miscarriage Happened Naturally Or Face Felony Charges

Georgia state Rep. Bobby Franklin (R) has made a name for himself by introducing far-right extremist bills. He has introduced legislation barring the state from requiring vaccinations, eliminating income taxes and replacing them with nothing, and requiring state taxpayers to only pay in gold or silver.

Now, he has introduced what may be his most offensive and extreme bill yet. Last week he unveiled HB 1, which would, as the parenting blog Babble explains, “require proof that a miscarriage occured naturally.” If proof could not be provided, the mother could face “felony charges”:

State Rep. Bobby Franklin of Georgia introduced a bill in his state last week that, if enacted, would require proof that a miscarriage occurred naturally. If a woman can’t prove that her miscarriage–or spontaneous abortion–occurred without intervention, she could face felony charges.

According to WebMed, the overall miscarriage rate in the United States is 15-20 percent. The Mayo Clinic estimates that the “the actual number is probably much higher because many miscarriages occur so early in pregnancy that a woman doesn’t even know she’s pregnant. Most miscarriages occur because the fetus isn’t developing normally.” If Franklin’s radical legislation were to be enacted, it could mean that as many as a fifth of pregnant Georgian women would be forced to have their miscarriages reviewed by the government — the bill suggests creating a county registration list for fetal deaths — which would be a dangerous and unprecedented intrusion into their private lives. (HT: ThinkProgress reader Libel)

Featured

UserID4012 writes, “Lovely. Go for it Mr. Franklin. And watch a bigger uprising than what’s happening in Wisconsin.”

Economy

Wisconsin Republican Officials Continue To Pretend Anti-Union Legislation Will Help Balance The Budget

Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) has justified his attempt to strip many of Wisconsin’s public sector employees of their collective bargaining rights by pointing to the state’s budget deficit. “The legislation I’ve put forward is about one thing. It’s about balancing our budget now — and in the future,” Walker said in an address last night.

Today, Wisconsin’s Republican officials took to the airwaves to disseminate the message, with Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and Sen. Ron Johnson both claiming that legislative union busting is necessary to fix Wisconsin’s budget woes:

LT. GOV. KLEEFISCH: These are facts and these are figures. There’s no negotiation on a budget that’s based on facts. We’re facing a $3.6 billion budget deficit in our next biennium. That means we need to have serious cuts…The collective bargaining is also a fiscal piece of this.

SEN. JOHNSON: Gov. Walker, this was dumped in his lap. A $3.6 billion biennial budget deficit. And he’s trying to fix it. He’s stepping up to the plate. And the Republican legislature is stepping up to the plate to actually fix the problem, making the hard choices…Let’s face it, in terms of electoral politics, the largest interest group was public sector labor unions.

Watch a compilation:

Wisconsin’s Republican officials are using the legitimate economic anxiety being felt across the country to push for changes that wouldn’t improve Wisconsin’s budget situation one iota. As Tim Fernholz wrote in the National Journal:

The state’s entire budget shortfall for this year — the reason that Walker has said he must push through immediate cuts — would be covered by the governor’s relatively uncontroversial proposal to restructure the state’s debt. By contrast, the proposals that have kicked up a firestorm, especially his call to curtail the collective-bargaining rights of the state’s public-employees, wouldn’t save any money this year.

Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-IN) — who successfully stripped public employees of their collective bargaining rights in 2005 — was asked yesterday how such a move helps a state with its budget and had no answer at all. Wisconsin officials have informed Walker that his bill would actually result in the state losing $46 million in federal funds that are contingent on workers having collective bargaining rights.

As Adam Serwer wrote at The Plum Line, “this is no longer about ‘fiscal responsibility.’ It’s about whether or not public workers have a right to organize in their own interests — a right a majority of Americans support.” And it’s worth remembering that Walker has implemented a series of tax cuts that make the state’s long-term budget picture substantially worse.

Yglesias

The Weak German Recovery

(my photo, available under cc license)

David Leonhardt offers an update:

Well, it turns out the German boom didn’t last long. With its modest stimulus winding down, Germany’s growth slowed sharply late last year, and its economic output still has not recovered to its prerecession peak. Output in the United States — where the stimulus program has been bigger and longer lasting — has recovered. This country would now need to suffer through a double-dip recession for its gross domestic product to be in the same condition as Germany’s.

Yet many members of Congress continue to insist that budget cuts are the path to prosperity. The only question in Washington seems to be how deeply to cut federal spending this year.

Strange times. What’s true is that Germany’s stimulus did a better job of specifically targeting employment.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up