ThinkProgress Logo

Health

Pawlenty’s Flirtation With Universal Health Care: Supported SCHIP Expansion In 2007

The Washington Examiner’s Phil Klein reports that Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty may have an SCHIP problem:

Back in 2007, the newly-elected Democratic majority was in a pitched battle with the Bush White House over the renewal and expansion of SCHIP. Democrats saw it as a down payment on universal health care, but President Bush eventually vetoed the legislation, which raised tobacco taxes and expanded coverage to children from families with household incomes of up to $82,600.

As chairman of the National Governor’s Association at the time, Pawlenty came out in favor of the renewal and expansion of the law. His public statements at the time show a politician who was trying to thread the needle as governor of a liberal state who had future ambitions within the GOP. Though he endorsed the renewal and expansion, he didn’t say how big of an expansion he supported and didn’t specify the funding mechanism. Nor did he explicitly come out against President Bush’s veto.

Klein speculates that Pawlenty will likely argue that he was presenting the position of the NGA and did not endorse a specific funding mechanism (i.e. the tobacco tax) or any other details about how the expansion should occur.

That may be true, but Pawlenty hasn’t exactly shied away from expanding the government’s role in the health care system. In November of 2006 — at the beginning of his second gubernatorial term — Pawlenty said his administration has been “studying very diligently the Massachusetts model about how that would apply to Minnesota,” suggested expanding the state’s Medicaid program, and pledged to “move in stages” toward “universal coverage.” “Everyone should be in a health plan of some sort…but I think as a goal we should start with covering all kids,” he said.

Conservatives are already taking shots at his health care record. On Thursday, fellow Minnesotan Rep. Michele Bachmann (R) told radio host Laura Ingraham that Pawlenty’s health record “will concern the voters.” “We need to have people who have enough foresight and common sense to know these programs aren’t going to work,”she said.

Yglesias

Mapping DC’s Bicycle Socialism

David Alpert brings us DDOT’s presentation (PDF) of Capital Bikeshare station success:

This isn’t a simple map of which stations get empty and full. Rather, as DDOT’s Ralph Burns explained at the recent meeting, DDOT weighed the amount of time it’s empty and full, the total traffic, and an estimate of the revenue from that station. Blue stations have high usage and/or revenue and more time empty and full, while red stations are the opposite. Yellow is the “sweet spot” where revenues are good but the station isn’t too popular that it’s often unavailable.

There’s a dominant pattern here, but also some interesting idiosyncratic elements. The station just south of Union Station, for example, is oversubscribed while the one just east of it is underused. I think the problem here is specifically that the underutilized station is quite hard to see; when I needed to dock there for the first time I had to get an Amtrak cop to direct me.

The politics of the thing would seem to point toward building more stations in the sparsely-stationed periphery, but the actual demand patterns suggests that there’s plenty of room to build more stations in the core. I think it’s not unrealistic to hope that building more system capacity in the high-demand arc will at least marginally increase utilization of those peripheral stations to the point where it makes sense to build more of them.

Politics

The Islamophobia Machine: Tracing Why South Carolina Is Pushing A Bill To Ban Sharia

As ThinkProgress has documented, a small, highly organized coalition of right-wing groups have sponsored legislation in over a dozen states to eradicate the non-existent threat of Islamic Sharia law. To gain an understanding of what is going on in these sharia-banning states, ThinkProgress chose to examine South Carolina’s efforts in detail. Although the state’s former attorney general and local legal experts said they have never heard of Sharia being used in state courts, the legislation still has a good chance of passing.

The South Carolina bill to ban Sharia has roots far removed from the Palmetto State, in places like Florida, New York City, and Arizona. And the political impetus for the legislation began a year prior to its introduction, with the sweeping anti-Muslim hysteria that began in the lead-up to the 2010 midterm elections:

– 2009-2010: ACT! For America, the Florida-based group formed by “radical Islamophobe” Brigitte Gabriel, began developing a presence in South Carolina. In January of 2010, ACT sponsored its first grassroots training session in South Carolina for local activists to learn how to mobilize against Muslim Americans. Brian Treacy — a local blogger who writes under the name “Us Or Them” and who has called for segregating Muslims to stop an Islamic “demographic conquest” — was recruited as a local ACT chapter leader for the Hilton Head area. Other chapters were formed in Charleston, Greenville, and Myrtle Beach.

– July 2010: Billboards popped up around South Carolina depicting a masked man next to the words: “Islam Rising Be Warned.” The ads are sponsored by the Christian Action Network, a radical-right group.

– September 2010: After the height of protests against the proposed Park 51 community center in Manhattan, ThinkProgress interviewed several anti-Muslim activists at the WorldNetDaily conference in Miami. One strategist behind the demonstrations against Park 51, William Murray, told us that he had met with Republican members of Congress (via the Values Action Team weekly meetings on Capitol Hill) to plan the next phase of his movement. Murray said the popularity of the Oklahoma ballot initiative had encourage him and his cohorts to push new anti-Sharia efforts on the state-level the following year.

– October 2010: An Islamic Center in Florence is defaced with strips of bacon forming the words “pig” and “chump.”

– January 2011: State Sen. Mike Fair (R-SC) and State Rep. Wendy Nanney (R-SC) introduced legislation to ban Sharia in South Carolina. The bills (House version, Senate version) are nearly identical to draft legislation produced by Arizona-based attorney David Yerushalmi. As Salon’s Justin Elliott has reported, Yerushalmi’s draft legislation is the basis for most of the anti-Sharia measures around the country. Yerushalmi has also gone on record calling Muslims “our enemies,” and is affiliated with a group that calls for arresting people who even sympathize with the religion.

– January-February 2011: The Alliance Defense Fund, Family Security Matters, and other neoconservative/Christian-right groups e-mailed action alerts promoting the South Carolina bill. ACT chapter leader Brian Treacy writes a letter to the editor defending the effort and organizes new meetings to mobilize activists around the bill.

– March 2011: ACT blasted its list with a request for activists to call South Carolina legislators and voice their support for the Sharia-banning bill.

– March-April 2011: The anti-Sharia bill moved through committee, while Politico reported that the issue may affect the Republican presidential primary given South Carolina’s position as an early primary state. Notably, candidates like Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain use increasingly bigoted language to demagogue Muslims, with Cain even refusing to consider a Muslim American in his administration. Meanwhile, experts tell state legislators that Sharia has never even been used in state courts. A DVD from the same group sponsoring anti-Muslim billboards in South Carolina was on Fair’s desk at the time we interviewed him.

– May 2011: State Sen. Mike Fair (R-SC) spoke with ThinkProgress, and explained to us that he was motivated by a fear of Muslim terrorists and American public facilities becoming too accommodating to Muslim Americans. He also explained that he had read information from Frank Gaffney, a leader in the anti-Muslim world, and attended conferences with ACT for America leader Brigitte Gabriel. Chris Slick, the ACT Director of Online Operations, had coordinated between Fair’s office and ACT, Fair told us.

This timeline does not factor in one of the most important cogs in the anti-Muslim hate machine — the media (from Fox News to hate bloggers to local radio). However, it provides some understanding of how well-funded Islamophobes like Gaffney and Gabriel have successfully orchestrated a national movement centered on demonizing and marginalizing Muslims. Anti-Muslim forces can manufacturer outrage by supplying lawmakers like Fair and Nanney with ready-made legislation, activists, and political support to, as one South Carolina blogger described it, “chase votes” using an “imaginary boogeyman.”

NEWS FLASH

Saleh Taken To Saudi Arabia For Medical Treatment | Saudi officials said that Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Salah was taken to Saudi Arabia for medical treatment one day after an attack on his presidential palace left him and other members of his ruling circle injured. Salah reportedly has shrapnel near his heart. The New York Times reports that “Yemeni officials have insisted that the president was only lightly injured. But he did not make an expected appearance on television on Friday, instead releasing an audiotape in which he slurred his words, suggesting that he might be sedated.”

Climate Progress

New Feature: Featured Comments

I am painfully aware of the limitations of Facebook commenting.  If you’re still having trouble commenting, read “You don’t need Facebook to comment.”  A comment FAQ is coming.

Climate Progress will immediately take four steps to make better use of the talents of our amazing commenters.

First, rest assured, the 120,000 (!) comments on Climate Progress from before the merger with Think Progress still exist.   I apologize that they were taken down  temporarily without warning.  That was as big a shock to me as it was to anyone.  We are figuring out the best way to make them available and, equally important, to draw attention to the best comment streams (more on that soon).

Second, here’s a new feature we are implementing as of today:  If a post gets a comment that is worthy of drawing attention to, we will put it  in the body of the post.

I just did that for a comment (in the great Heidi Cullen post) from one of our long-time readers, Richard Brenne, a leading climate communicator.

UPDATE:  I just added a featured comment for this post from Ted Gleichman.

Read more

NEWS FLASH

Connecticut Senate Passes Transgender Protections Without Transphobic Amendments | Great news from Connecticut: the Senate has passed a comprehensive bill protecting people from discrimination based on gender identity. The bill faced many transphobic amendments to limit its coverage, but all were rejected. Sen. Beth Bye (D), an out lesbian, spoke passionately in favor of the bill, recounting her own experiences with discrimination and the compelling testimony she heard from transgender constituents. Gov. Dan Malloy (D) has promised to sign the bill into law.

Climate Progress

Weekend Open Thread

A cyber-penny for your thoughts.

I would prefer to keep this thread for climate and clean energy  news and comments.  I have  a separate post where you can make complaints and recommendations about the new site design.

 

Yglesias

Online Shelter Magazines Primed For Further Success

It’s not really my bailiwick, but I thought this New York Times joint profile of editors (almost all women) of successful web-based “shelter”/design publications was very interesting and in some ways reminded me of the camaraderie of the early days of political blogging:

But if there’s a guiding rule among the magazines, it seems to be “Do as Lonny Does.” Rue and High Gloss both publish every two months, like Lonny (Matchbook is a monthly). And all of them use flipbook-style software like Issuu; combined with the requisite editors’ picks and gift guides, that can make for a numbing visual sameness. Even the articles can feel oddly familiar: after Lonny featured the Manhattan decorator Vicente Wolf, he turned up in Rue’s first issue last fall.

Ms. Gentilello of Rue said that there is a collegial relationship between the editors of Rue, High Gloss and Matchbook, because of their shared roots in the blogosphere. She recently had dinner with Ms. Contreras of High Gloss during a blogger conference in Los Angeles. [...]

Even so, it’s no surprise that established companies are taking notice, with the social media buzz and the magazines’ readership numbers. (Lonny reported 243,229 unique visitors to its most recent issue, High Gloss said its last issue had about 130,000, and Matchbook cited a figure of about 75,000; Rue wouldn’t give specifics, but said its readership was in the “hundreds of thousands.”)

A couple of points not noted in the piece but that seem relevant to me is that for now the country is mired in the midst of a construction bust of epic proportions. There’s considerable emphasis that we’ve now undershot on the downside and that at some point we’re going to have an actual new boom in building that should benefit this sector of the media. The other is that publications with more visually focused subject matter will naturally benefit from more widespread adoption of tablets. Everyone I know (myself included) with an iPad loves it, and with more and more Android-powered options coming onto the market I expect prices to fall and user base to grow very rapidly. That, too, bodes well for these kind of publications.

Health

GOP Hypocrisy On Medicare Sustainability

Paul Krugman on why Medicare is comparatively more expensive than single-payer health programs in other nations:

What is true is that the U.S. Medicare is expensive compared with, say, Canadian Medicare (yes, that’s what they call their system) or the French health care system (which is complicated, but largely single-payer in its essentials); that’s because Medicare American-style is very open-ended, reluctant to say no to paying for medically dubious procedures, and also fails to make use of its pricing power over drugs and other items.

So Medicare will have to start saying no; it will have to provide incentives to move away from fee for service, and so on and so forth. But such changes would not mean a fundamental change in the way Medicare works.

It’s worth pointing out that the lawmakers who oppose the cost-containment measures Krugman describes are more inclined to fear monger and complain about Medicare’s “unsustainability” and increasing costs. So next time you see Republicans arguing that Medicare is going broke and won’t be there for future generations of Americans, recall that they all voted against, demagogued and proposed amendments to significantly limit the application of comparative effectiveness research in Medicare — so that the program is not paying “for medically dubious procedures” — during the health care reform debate and are now leading the charge to repeal the ACA’s Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).

NEWS FLASH

Speaker At Faith And Freedom Likens Gay Adoption To Children Losing Parents On 9/11 | Speaking at the Faith and Freedom conference yesterday, Renewing American Leadership chairman Jim Garlow compared same-sex couple adoption to children losing their parents on 9/11:

GARLOW: Our President gave a speech a few days ago in which he said, ‘the tragedy of 9/11 was that it robbed so many children of having a mommy or a daddy. Well, you know something Mr. President, your failure to defend marriage and to redefine marriage means that everybody who is under that redefined marriage will lack either a mommy or a daddy and that is morally wrong.

Watch it:

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up