ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

NFL Ownership Rules

There’s a lot to admire about the quasi-communal ownership structure of the Green Bay Packers, but what’s particularly noteworthy about them is the fact that this unusual structure is actually against the rules of the National Football League: “Every other NFL franchise is controlled or entirely owned by one majority shareholder, and NFL rules prohibit otherwise. (The Packers’ ownership structure predates current NFL rules.)”

This isn’t some kind of massive first-order public policy problem, but given that the vagaries of stadium finance almost inevitably seem to end up implicating the state in the business of high level sports we may as well treat it as one. Basically there’s no reason the various public agencies that end up embroiling themselves in football should stand for this. Why shouldn’t more communities be able to purchase NFL franchises and operate them for the broadly conceived good of a fanbase? It actually seems to me that something along these broad ownership lines is the most logical capital structure for most pro sports teams. You could imagine something like a team being owned by a group of several thousand season ticket holders who’d elect a board amongst themselves and hire a professional manager. As fans, their priority would be to put a winning team on the field. Business considerations would of course be an important element of that—you need revenue to hire players and coaches—but the structure of the “business” would resemble the basic relationship involved in being a season ticket holder. You’re putting money on the line because you can afford it and because you love to root for the team.

Economy

Republican Crowd Cheers As Tea Party Rep. Labrador Condemns Corporate Tax Dodgers

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Western Republican Leadership Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.

An unlikely scene emerged at a Republican conference Thursday afternoon: a tea party congressman deplored corporate tax-dodging, and the conservative audience responded with cheers.

Freshman Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) spoke to the GOP crowd yesterday at the Western Republican Leadership Conference. Though the majority of his speech echoed standard Tea Party rhetoric, Labrador deviated from a discussion of Republican tax philosophy to condemn corporate tax cheats. Labrador said, “I believe that it is fundamentally unfair that companies like GE are making huge profits and not paying taxes.” The Republican audience applauded Labrador’s criticism:

LABRADOR: When people scream about Republicans being unwilling to raise taxes on the rich, they’re actually partly right. We don’t want to raise taxes on anyone. Not just the poor, not just the middle class, not just the rich. We don’t want to raise taxes on anyone. But we do believe that everyone should pay the taxes that are assessed to them and not find ways to avoid them through accounting tricks. I believe that it is fundamentally unfair that companies like GE are making huge profits and not paying taxes. (Applause)

Watch it:

Thursday’s scene displayed just how fed up Americans of all ideologies are with corporate tax cheats. With polls showing more than three in five Americans supporting increasing taxes on corporations and millionaires (including two-thirds of Republicans), perhaps outcries like these — even among conservative audiences — will become more commonplace.

Labrador aside, most Republican politicians have dismissed or even encouraged corporate tax dodging. In the presidential race, Newt Gingrich told ThinkProgress we should “celebrate” corporate tax dodgers and let them pay whatever rate they please, while Herman Cain said he “would like to see no taxes on corporations.” In the Senate, Ron Johnson’s (R-WI) reaction to corporate tax dodging was to call for a corporate tax cut, John Barrasso (R-WY) dismissed the issue because, in his view, “we don’t need more revenue,” and Pat Toomey (R-PA) said corporate taxes are already too high.

Finally, in the House of Representatives, Rob Woodall’s (R-GA) response to corporate tax dodging was to push for “the lowest corporate tax rate we can get,” Jeff Duncan (R-SC) argued that companies like GE are actually paying their fair share, and Louie Gohmert (R-TX) called for completely eliminating the corporate income tax.

Yglesias

Parking Subsidies In Memphis

What’s $8.73 million between friends:

Loeb’s planned $19.2 million renovation of the square’s mostly vacant, century-old commercial buildings would reveal their exteriors to be art in themselves.

Behind the historic buildings would rise an $8.73 million, city-built facility that parks both cars and stormwater. Above, three levels of parking; below, a basin to keep floodwater out of Midtown homes.

Again, why? No reason there shouldn’t be parking structures near buildings if there’s demand for them. But if there’s demand, then you don’t need a subsidy to build the garage. If you’re building more parking than there’s unsubsidized demand for, you’re creating extra air pollution and traffic congestion.

Security

Rep. Heck Says President Obama Deserves ‘No’ Credit For Qaddafi’s Death

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Western Republican Leadership Conference in Las Vegas, NV.

Following the death of deposed Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi, ThinkProgress spoke with Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV) at a Republican conference Thursday to get the Tea Party congressman’s take on the matter. We asked Heck, who voted against American involvement in NATO air campaign in Libya, whether President Obama deserves credit for yesterday’s outcome. “No,” replied Heck. He remained steadfast in his opposition to America’s role in protecting Libyan civilians, despite Qaddafi’s ultimate demise.

KEYES: Do you think that President Obama deserves credit for Colonel Qaddafi’s death today?

HECK: No. The people who deserve credit are the folks that have fueled that uprising and that have come up against…from the groundswell of folks that decided they no longer wanted to live under oppression. You got to say, does the ends justify the means? While it was a great day that this may have occurred and while there’s one less tyrant, the fact is I still believe that we had no reason from a national security perspective to go and get involved in Libya to begin with.

Watch it:

Heck’s decision not to give credit to President Obama places him at odds with his party’s presidential frontrunner, Mitt Romney, who told an Iowa crowd Thursday that the president “absolutely” deserves credit.

Still, Heck is not alone. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) also let partisanship prevent him from giving President Obama, or the United States, any praise, choosing instead to dole out compliments to “the French and the British.” For his part, Heck chose to credit Libyan rebels for Qaddafi’s downfall, which is fair, but ignores the fact that President Obama’s decision to support NATO airstrikes is what enabled those rebels to survive and overthrow the dictator. In fact, the U.N.-backed resolution and resulting airstrikes in March came just as Qaddafi’s forces were preparing to massacre rebels in the city of Benghazi.

Back in June, Congress voted on whether or not to support Obama’s decision to join international airstrikes against Qaddafi’s forces. Heck joined 93 percent of House Republican in voting for the resolution to rebuke American involvement in Libyan operations.

Update

The Daily Show had more on Republicans’ reactions to Qaddafi’s death.


The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
No’Amor Qaddafi
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

Climate Progress

Funniest Denier Punking Ever: Lord Monckton Isn’t An Act by Sacha Baron Cohen, Is He?

Is climate science denier Lord Monckton really just another act by Sacha Baron Cohen — creator of Ali G, Borat and Bruno?

That is the “mistake” Australian satirists make in this must-see video — which the UK Guardian callsbuttock-clenchingly embarrassing and hilarious in equal measure” – already seen by 800,000 Australians and now more than 300,000 viewers on YouTube:

In their post, DeSmogBlog puts in the disclaimer “(just to be absolutely clear here folks, he isn’t!)”

In the real world, the science-based world of “facts,” I suppose that is a reasonable statement.  But what about in Monckton’s world of pseudoscience?

Read more

Politics

Before Saying Communities Could ‘Ban Mosques,’ Herman Cain Called Building Them A ‘Guaranteed’ Right

Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain’s reputation as the anti-Muslim candidate was furthered in July when he declared on Fox News Sunday that Americans “have a right to” ban mosques.

However, Cain wasn’t always so opposed to religious liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. On August 16, 2010, Cain discussed New York’s Park51 Islamic Center controversy on his Atlanta-based radio show. Though Cain opposed the project because he viewed it as “disrespectful,” he prefaced his argument by noting that “build[ing] a mosque on private property is one of those guaranteed liberties we have in this country. I understand that.”

Herman Cain in 2010:

CAIN: I have tried to stay away from this issue, because I understand, like many of you, that people who are capable of getting the necessary permits and are capable of getting the necessary funding to build a mosque on private property is one of those guaranteed liberties we have in this country. I understand that. You understand that. We all understand that.

Herman Cain in 2011:

WALLACE: You’re saying any community, if they want to ban a mosque?

CAIN: Yes. They have a right to do that. That’s not discriminating based upon religion.

Notably, Cain met with Muslim leaders in late July and apologized for some of his derogatory words, including his declaration to ThinkProgress that he “will not” appoint Muslims in his presidential administration. Though Cain has unfortunately continued to parrot the absurd threat of Sharia law since then, it is notable that the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO did acknowledge Muslims’ rights as recently as last year.

During his presidential campaign, however, Cain’s anti-Muslim fearmongering was likely influenced by a small handful of misinformation experts detailed in the Center for American Progress’ recent report, Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America.

Economy

Governor Who Signed The First Statewide Paid Sick Days Law: Having Sick Employees Attend Work ‘Makes No Sense At All’

Gov. Dan Malloy (D-CT)

Amongst developed nations, America has the weakest labor protections. In fact, the U.S. is the only industrialized nation that does not guarantee its workers some form of paid sick leave, even though sick employees attending work and infecting other costs the U.S. economy $180 billion in lost productivity annually.

To remedy this, some cities have taken matters into their own hands, with Washington D.C., San Francisco, and Seattle passing their own paid sick days requirements. Milwaukee passed its own law as well, only to have it overridden by the Republican state legislature, while Philadelphia is inching closer to crafting a law.

There is even one state that decided to implement a statewide requirement that workers be provided with paid time off to deal with illness: Connecticut. Yesterday, ThinkProgress spoke with Gov. Dan Malloy (D-CT), who signed Connecticut’s requirement into law. He explained that it “makes no sense at all” for sick employees to attend work, particularly when they’re in professions that involve interaction with vulnerable populations:

There’s no doubt that the very nature of biological interaction forces that to happen. That’s why having sick people come to work in hospitals and nursing homes makes no sense at all, and certainly why having those same folks go to work in a daycare facility where you have a particularly vulnerable population makes no sense at all. So I think in some sense, that reality allows us to have more and more people understand what we’re talking about on a public health benefit.

Watch it:

We also spoke with Seattle councilmember Nick Licata, who spearheaded his city’s effort to enact a paid sick days requirement. “I think what’s really important about paid sick leave is that it’s a victory where we’re moving something forward as opposed to a victory where we were stopping something bad from happening,” he said. “We have to start thinking about how to make this country a better nation,” instead of “thinking about how to save the last scrap of food on the table.” Watch it:

A paid sick days initiative will appear on the ballot in Denver in November.

Yglesias

Public Parks Should Be Occupied

Lurking at the end of an article about how McPherson Square is a more friendly tent camp cite than Freedom Plaza, Lydia DePillis offers a more provocative point:

Regardless of what you think about their politics, both occupations are a vast improvement over the typical state of those parks. They’re much more public spaces, put to excellent use as hubs of 24-hour activity rather than dead zones.

New York City doesn’t have this problem, but Washington, DC and some other American cities really do seem to me to be plagued with excessive useless parkland. If you had a park featuring a playground no kids were ever on, or a basketball court that was never in use, people would be asking “what went wrong here?” That’s not to say that every park should have a playground. But every park should be used for something. If there’s not going to be any regular programming on your patch of publicly owned land, it makes more sense to sell it and let people put up buildings. Do an unusually wide sidewalk to make room for some extra trees and benches if you need extra trees and benches.

That’s not to say we should pave all the parks. But we should be thinking of something to actually do with them. Cities are full of people, and most of the country doesn’t have Southern California weather. There’s limited practical demand for just sitting around outside.

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up