ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Missouri Lawmakers Override Governor’s Veto Of Bill Allowing Employers To Deny Access To Birth Control | The Missouri legislature has overridden Gov. Jan Nixon’s (D) veto of a bill that would allow employers or health insurance providers to stop offering coverage for contraception, abortion, or sterilization if doing so violated their religious or moral convictions. Nixon had vetoed the legislation in July after it passed in May. The Missouri House voted 109-45 — the exact number of votes needed — to overturn Nixon’s decision, and the Senate approved the override 26-6. The contraception measure was designed to push back against an Obamacare regulation requiring contraception coverage to be included in insurance plans at no additional cost. According to the Associated Press, Missouri has had a law since 2001 requiring contraception to be covered under pharmaceutical benefits.

Alyssa

Death By Fiction In The ‘Innocence of Muslims’ Riots

It’s a twisty path we thread when we argue that popular culture has an impact in the real world. I believe, firmly, that what we see in movies and on television, what we read in the few books that become mass phenomena these days do shape our assumptions about what is normal and what is real, that we can help build the dream of a more just and inclusive world and work through the nightmares we may be building for ourselves. I do not believe that mass culture makes individual killers pick up guns and build bombs and murder the diplomatic representatives of foreign nations. But that doesn’t mean that popular culture can’t enrage people, that certain narratives and characters can’t become the stones disturbed minds use to sharpen their views of the world, and that movies can’t become a tool by which people ficitonalize themselves.

Oldboy and The Dark Knight Rises are good movies. Innocence of Muslims, the movie that sparked protests in Egypt and Libya, the latter of which ended in the deaths of four Americans, may not even be a real movie at all—BuzzFeed suggests it may be cut together from other footage. If it is, and the trailer is any indication, then it is is a very bad one, abysmally written and acted, with laughable production values, and rotten ideas. Seung-Hui Cho and James Holmes seem to have ruminated over the former in private, though whatever those films meant to them will probably never be really comprehensible to us.

Innocence of Muslims appears to be something even more complicated, a fiction that began with its creators and has spawned further fictions that have, at last, resulted in an international crisis. Sam Bacile, the pseudonym of the man who was initially credited with making the movie, has been up front about his opinions about Islam, telling the Wall Street Journal that Islam is a cancer,” and that “The movie is a political movie. It’s not a religious movie.” Bacile is a familiar type, a person who conflated individual extremists who happen to be Muslims with the entirety of Islam. But it’s unclear who he actually is as a distinct individual—he appears to be neither Israeli, nor a real estate developer, as he’d previously claimed.

It isn’t merely the production of the movie, if it even exists as a full feature, or who actually made it, that’s in question. Initial reports suggested that protests against the film had spiraled out of control, leading to the deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and other American diplomatic workers. Now, it seems that the protests may have provided cover for a planned attack, though whether the attackers instigated the protests or took advantage of them remains unclear.

The ideas behind the clip are shameful and ignorant, and the execution of them is a travesty of filmmaking. Bacile, whoever he is, and whoever else may have been involved in the movie’s production, of course have the right to make it, just as those of us who find it unattractive and shoddy have every right to harshly criticize it. But there’s something truly tragic about the fact that the clip, an irrelevant little piece of trash, was presented as a U.S.-government-sponsored provocation, used to spur precisely the kind of division between Americans and Muslims that the film’s producers hoped it would create—Steve Klein, who consulted on the film, told the Associated Press he told Bacile “you’re going to be the next Theo van Gogh.” It’s a sign of intellectually insecurity to need to violently suppress ideas that offend you, particularly when the expression of those ideas comes in a form that will convince no one, that presents no real threat. And the narrative of how the clip came to be viewed as a major provocation is a story it will be as important to untangle as who made it, and how they managed to present it as a legitimate enterprise.
Read more

Security

GOP Rep. On Claim That Obama ‘Sympathizes’ With Libyan Attackers: ‘I Wouldn’t Make That Charge’

Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX)

WASHINGTON, DC — Mitt Romney’s accusation that President Obama “sympathizes” with those who attacked and killed four Americans in Libya, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, is finding few backers on Capitol Hill, even among Republicans.

ThinkProgress spoke with Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX), a conservative GOPer and a member of the House Tea Party Caucus, today about whether he believes Obama indeed “sympathizes” with those who attacked the United States, as Romney charged last night. “I don’t,” Marchant replied. We asked if that was a fair allegation to make: “I wouldn’t make that charge against him,” said the Texas congressman.

KEYES: Do you think that President Obama sympathizes with those who attacked our embassies in Libya and Egypt?

MARCHANT: I don’t.

KEYES: Do you think that’s a fair charge to make against him?

MARCHANT: I wouldn’t make that charge against him.

Watch it:

Marchant isn’t the only Republican unwilling to join Romney’s attacks. Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, who served under President George W. Bush, told ThinkProgress today that he doesn’t believe “President Obama sympathizes with those who attacked us.” Other Republican officials, speaking off-the-record to BuzzFeed, criticized the remarks, saying Romney is “incompetent at talking effectively about foreign policy” and calling the episode an “utter disaster.”

Greg Noth contributed to this post.

LGBT

REPORT: An Ally’s Guide To Supporting LGBT Equality

A new report from the Movement Advancement Project, with support from several other LGBT organizations, outlines all the primary challenges still facing LGBT Americans to help allies understand what support is still needed. The guide provides a broad overview of what LGBT equality would look like: having “the same chance as everyone else to pursue health and happiness, earn a living, be safe in their communities, serve their country, and take care of the ones they love.” Here’s what that includes:

  • Fair and inclusive workplaces, with equal access to employment benefits.
  • Access to competent and welcoming health care providers, as well as the insurance to cover those costs.
  • Access to identity documents for transgender and gender non-conforming people.
  • The legal protections of marriage equality at the state and federal levels.
  • Secure recognition of ties between parents and children.
  • Safe communities, bully-free schools, welcoming faith communities, and an inclusive military.

No doubt, LGBT rights have come a long way, but the effort for full equality is far from over. The community cannot achieve that goal alone, and making sure allies understand the struggles still faces is essential overcoming them.

Election

EXCLUSIVE: Florida To Restart Voter Purge Prior To Presidential Election

Local election supervisors were informed this week that Florida plans to restart its controversial voter purge prior to the November 6 election. In a detailed PowerPoint presentation obtained by ThinkProgress, Governor Rick Scott’s Department of State lays out the plan.

The initial purge effort, conducted in May, informed hundreds of fully eligible U.S. citizens that Florida believed they were ineligible to vote. Among those targeted was a 91-year-old World War II veteran.

Election officials were told to expect a revised lists of voters for possible removal in two to three weeks but “not later than October 15, 2012.”

The presentation outlines a proceedure to “update” their flawed purge list by cross-checking it against a federal Department of Homeland Security database (SAVE). This task is apparently being done by hand and has not been completed since there is “no established automated process yet.”

The Florida Department of State acknolwedges that, in many cases, the federal SAVE database will not establish definitively whether or not someone is a U.S. citizen. In that case, they are directing election officials to mail them letters to “re-affirm registration status” and “remind them of eligibility requirements and that it is illegal to be registered and vote when someone is not a U.S. citizen.”

Volusia County Supervisor of Elections Ann McFall, a Republican who was recently informed of new purge, told ThinkProgress:

We’re 55 days in front of a huge election. It just doesn’t help us whatsoever. I went through the SAVE training today—it’s the most convoluted thing you’ve ever seen in your life. It’s awful.

Even if they got the list of names to us tomorrow, there wouldn’t be time. That person has due process. Anyone has due process in the state and country.

Florida claims that the purge proceedures they outline “is not subject to the 90-day moratorium preceding a federal election.” The Department of Justice disputes that interpretation and has sued Florida to stop the purge.

Update

We’ve uploaded the full PowerPoint presentation outlining the new purge

Health

Woman Launches Campaign Against JCPenney’s Shockingly Thin Mannequins

Mannequins are meant to give shoppers a general sense of what a store’s clothes might look like on a human body. But at department store JCPenney, the mannequins are sending a different message. They are so outrageously thin that one woman actually stopped to take a picture comparing the mannequin’s leg to her own arm. It was about the same size:

Dae C. Sheridan, a psychotherapist, professor, and mother of two, was so disturbed by the unrealistic body image portrayed by the JCPenney mannequins that she wrote a letter asking the company to change its sizing. “Super-thin images of unrealistic ‘perfection’ are everywhere,” Sheridan wrote, “and lead healthy, beautiful girls to feel ‘less than.’ That internalized pressure, stress and shame leads to irrational thoughts about their bodies and a decreased sense of self-worth”:

Now, I realize that lots of people have, and will continue to walk on by, unfazed by that same mannequin. Maybe it’s because they are busy with their back-to-school shopping, maybe it’s because they are more focused on other things… but my greatest fear is that nobody notices because of the way the media, retailers such as yourselves, and popular magazines portray the female body.

Nobody notices because of the saturation of an unrealistic thin-ideal and beauty standard in our culture which teaches girls and women to attempt to “achieve” impossible proportions. People walk by, faced with emaciated chic and famine fashion, because sadly, this is becoming our “new normal”.

The term “skinny jeans” is already fraught with critique of body-image, forcing women to assess whether they are, in fact, “skinny” enough to wear the pants. And it’s not just adults who are marketed into this self-ridicule. Such products are pitched to young girls, who increasingly suffer body image problems. According to JustThink.org, “The number one magic wish for young girls age 11-17 is to be thinner,” and 80 percent of 10 year-old girls in the United States say they have been on a diet.

And, morals aside, it may be in JCPenney’s business interests to change their mannequins. The Girl Scouts released a report revealing that 81 percent of girls would rather see unedited images of models, and 75 percent “would be more likely to buy clothes they see on ‘real-size models’ than on super-skinny ones.”

Economy

Orange County Lawmakers Successfully Push Paid Sick Leave Initiative Off November Ballot

Workers in Orange County, Florida, might not have paid sick leave to look forward to in the coming months, after conservative lawmakers successfully negated a ballot initiative that would have required any business of more than 15 employees to provide paid sick days. The Orange County Commission voted to delay consideration of the measure last night.

The commission ruled that the initiative couldn’t appear on the ballot because an outside lawyer was needed to edit the ballot language. That lawyer’s revisions won’t be due until October 16, meaning that the sick days measure won’t meet the September deadline for initiatives slated for the November ballot.

Sick leave advocates were outraged. When the vote was announced — after six hours of debate — they “stood in unison and turned their backs on commissioners, with some chanting ‘no justice, no peace’ as they walked out.” In a statement, Citizens for a Greater Orange County called the commission’s move “voter suppression in its purest form” and saying they will sue the commission:

Instead of putting the first ever citizen-led petition in Orange County on the November ballot they violated the law requiring them to let voters have their say. In the process, they silenced the voices of more than 50,000 citizens who signed petitions to put Earned Sick Time on the ballot. These commissioners should be ashamed. Because of their failure to follow the law and perform their duties proscribed in the county charter, we will be filing a court suit later today.

The Orange County Commission’s refusal to put Earned Sick Time on the November ballot is voter suppression in its purest form. The advocates who helped gather the necessary signatures played by the rules for citizen-led initiatives under the Orange County Charter.

The comissioners are not the first to claim that the Earned Sick Leave ballot language is unclear. They were perhaps inspired by the the lawsuit filed by big businesses earlier this year to block the measure. In that suit — which was dismissed yesterday — businesses argued that it was unclear whether churches and non-profits would be exempt from the paid sick leave law. (They would not.)

Orange County’s paid sick leave effort would require any employer with more than 15 workers to provide one hour of sick time for every 37 hours worked, maxing out at 56 hours of sick leave a year. A worker could use that leave to take off when sick or to take time to care for a sick family member. Such policies are beneficial to businesses, because employees don’t come in sick to infect other workers.

Justice

How GOP Casino Billionaire Sheldon Adelson Spent $1 Million Trying To Buy A Senate Seat

Billionaire Casino Mogul Sheldon Adelson

Billionaire Casino Mogul Sheldon Adelson

On its website, Freedom PAC says its top priority is electing Rep. Connie Mack IV (R-FL) to the U.S. Senate this November. And with billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson bankrolling the effort, it has just launched a major new ad buy, lauding Mack as a tax-cutter.

Though Adelson said in April that he would make his future contributions through secretive 501(c)(4) to avoid having his multi-million dollar donations publicly disclosed, in June he donated $1 million to Freedom PAC. That contribution represents the lion’s share of the roughly $1.1 million the super PAC has reported raising to date. With his largess, the group reported a $997,500 ad buy Tuesday in support of Mack.

The ad — titled “Proud” — says Mack would be a “conservative senator for change” and would back “less taxes [sic], less spending, and more jobs.” Indeed Mack has signed Grover Norquist’s pledge to never raise taxes for any reason, ever. Mack has also endorsed Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan — who have promised more tax cuts for the rich — as “America’s comeback team.”

Thanks to Citizens United and subsequent court rulings, billionaires like Adelson can now spend as much as they have to fund “independent expenditures” through super PACs — allowing them to completely circumvent the $2,500-per-election individual contribution limit for donations to federal candidates. Adelson’s now-legal attempts to buy the presidency and buy congressional seats like this one have so far cost him and his wife more than $42 million already this cycle.

But if the controversial billionaire gets his way, he stands to get back that and much more. By electing Mitt Romney and a supportive Senate majority with anti-tax Republicans like Mack, Adelson could save $2.3 billion in taxes.

Watch the spot:

Climate Progress

How Drilling Could Threaten Our National Parks

national park map

by Jessica Goad

America’s national parks are undoubtedly some of our “best ideas.” They are unique places across our country where public lands are preserved for their natural, cultural, or historic value, as well as for the unique contributions they provide to local and regional economies and our national economic strength. This is why we have set aside national parks, national seashores, national memorials, and other places managed by the National Park Service for future generations.

Even though we have protected these national park units to allow them to achieve their full environmental, cultural, historical, and economic potential, threats to their preservation do arise. One of those threats today is the potential for future oil and gas development within national parks. We requested data from the National Park Service, which identified 42 park units where non-federal oil and gas drilling is or could be occurring in the future. Of these, 12 units currently have oil and gas operations within them, while 30 units may be threatened in the future with drilling. (see map above).

This data was compiled by the National Park Service by assessing three factors:

  • The parks’ proximity to oil and gas resources
  • Drilling activity already occurring near the parks’ boundaries
  • The existence of non-federal mineral rights within the parks

These existing mineral rights are either inholdings—where an individual owns a piece of property completely surrounded by a park unit—or are non-federal subsurface mineral rights, which are frequently referred to as “split estate” where the federal government owns the surface of the land and a private entity owns the right to access the minerals below the ground. Private individuals or companies owned these mineral rights before the parks were created and have the legal right to access them.

Currently, any development activity on public lands, including national parks, must take place in accordance with various federal environmental laws to protect air, water, wildlife, and public health. Additionally, operators must comply with National Park Service oil and gas regulations within park units.

But this time-tested process is now threatened by some politicians in Washington—influenced by the oil and gas industry—who propose to roll back or even completely eliminate federal oversight of energy on public lands in favor of more relaxed state regulations. This shift in management oversight of drilling in national parks would be more dangerous to maintaining the balance needed to develop our national parks to their full and varied potential, thereby placing the 42 areas highlighted above at an even greater risk.

Oil and gas drilling is a dirty business that, if done improperly, has the potential to do substantial harm to national parks and other public lands. Drilling involves not just the construction of rigs but also roads, pipelines, and other infrastructure. Toxic chemicals such as naphthalene and benzene are sometimes used in oil and gas drilling and production activities. There is also the equally real threat of spills, which are frequent both onshore and offshore. One estimate found that in North Dakota in 2011 alone there were more than a thousand spills of oil, wastewater, or other drilling fluids.

The potential for future drilling within national parks is a real threat when seen through the lens of today’s political context. The American people deserve the right to have their say in the development of our national parks and public lands through their elected representatives in Washington. Rolling back federal regulations and having the states make these decisions would be exceedingly dangerous.

Jessica Goad is the Manager of Research and Outreach for the Center for American Progress’s Public Lands Project.

Security

EXCLUSIVE: Bush Homeland Security Secretary Disagrees With Romney’s Remarks On Libya

Former Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge (R)

WASHINGTON, DC — In an interview with ThinkProgress today, former Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge criticized the charge, made by Mitt Romney, that President Obama “sympathizes” with those who attacked and killed four Americans in Libya.

Romney said in a press release last night that “It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.” (When the U.S. Embassy in Cairo first addressed the situation, no attacks had yet occurred. The first comment from the embassy on the issue was to condemn religious incitement.)

ThinkProgress spoke with Ridge, who served under President George W. Bush from 2003 to 2005 and endorsed Romney earlier this year, on Capitol Hill today to get his reaction. He was unwilling to criticize Romney directly — “I don’t want to get in the he said, she said” — but rebuffed his charge that Obama’s sentiments were with those who carried out the attacks. “I don’t think President Obama sympathizes with those who attacked us,” Ridge said. “I don’t think any American does.”

KEYES: Do you think that President Obama sympathizes with those who attacked us and attacked the embassies?

RIDGE: No, I don’t think President Obama sympathizes with those who attacked us. I don’t think any American does. I’m not going to question the strength of his words.

Watch it:

Romney is finding few defenders for his charge, even among fellow Republicans. Buzzfeed spoke with a senior Republican foreign policy hand who said that Romney was “just trying to score a cheap news cycle hit” and now it’s become an “utter disaster.” Top Republicans in Congress are also refusing to echo their presidential candidate’s in press releases.

Greg Noth contributed to this post.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up