ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Hobby Lobby Appeals Federal Court Ruling On Providing Contraception To Employees | On Monday, U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton ruled that the arts-and-crafts chain Hobby Lobby must abide by an Obamacare provision requiring employers to provide their workers with contraception coverage without a co-pay despite the company owner’s conservative religious beliefs. NewsOK reports that the company has now officially appealed the federal court ruling, in which Judge Heaton stated that for-profit corporations such as Hobby Lobby have not successfully demonstrated that they have “a constitutional right to the free exercise of religion” and therefore must abide by the Obamacare requirement.

Politics

Fox Pundit Jokes Food Stamps Could Be A Diet Plan

Fox Business kicked off Thanksgiving eve with a joke about food stamps. Discussing Newark, New Jersey Mayor Cory Booker’s challenge to live on food stamps for one week, Fox pundit Andrea Tantaros said that living on a $133 monthly allowance for food would make her look “fabulous.” Meanwhile, a record number of Americans actually rely on this budget, for less than $1.50 per meal.

STUART VARNEY (HOST): Could you live on $133 per month for food?

TANTAROS: I should try it because do you know how fabulous I’d look? I’d be so skinny. I mean, the camera adds ten pounds, it really does. I’d be looking great.

Watch it:

Far from a diet, not having enough food to eat is a harsh reality for 50 million people. The average Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) household has a monthly income of $731, and 76 percent include a child, elderly or disabled person. Without SNAP, even more Americans would go hungry.

HT: Media Matters

Climate Progress

GOP 2016: Science Committee Member Marco ‘Not A Scientist’ Rubio Says Age Of Earth Is ‘One Of The Great Mysteries’

The leading contenders for the GOP presidential nomination are already jockeying for title of ‘most anti-scientific’.

The title of most ironic anti-scientist goes to Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who proudly displayed his anti-intellectualism in a new GQ interview:

GQ: How old do you think the Earth is?

Marco Rubio: I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States. I think the age of the universe has zero to do with how our economy is going to grow. I’m not a scientist. I don’t think I’m qualified to answer a question like that. At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all. I think parents should be able to teach their kids what their faith says, what science says. Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I’m not sure we’ll ever be able to answer that. It’s one of the great mysteries.

Uhh, Sen. Rubio, may not be a scientist but he is a member of the Senate’s Commerce, Science, & Transportation Committee. And presumably because he’s from Florida, home of the Kennedy Space Center, Rubio is actually on the Science and Space Subcommittee (!) which “has responsibility for science, engineering, and technology research and development and policy; calibration and measurement standards; and civilian aeronautical and space science and policy.”

The painful irony is that it is science and space science and NASA that have provided us with an accurate dating of the Earth – 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years:

This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.

Ah but I guess Rubio believes that kind of complicated sciency stuff is best left to scientists, not the people who oversee them and fund them. After all,  there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created — and we should “teach them all,” including “The World Turtle (also referred to as the Cosmic Turtle, the World-bearing Turtle, or the Divine Turtle),” which is “a giant turtle (or tortoise) supporting or containing the world.” And as I’m sure you know, this theory is entirely self consistent, hence the dictum “It’s turtles all the way down.”

For the record, while people can believe whatever they want, teaching them whatever someone happens to believe is not the path to a competitive 21st-century workforce — so it isn’t irrelevant to how our economy will grow as Rubio suggetss. The National Center for Science Education posted this statement on creationism from “scientists at universities and colleges in Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana”:

Students who accept this material as scientifically valid are unlikely to succeed in science courses at the college level. These students will need remedial instruction in the nature of science, as well as in the specific areas of science misrepresented by Answers in Genesis.

Rubio naturally denies the reality of manmade climate change, too – if you reject the basic, universally-accepted stuff like radiometric dating, you’re gonna have trouble acknowledging things that are accepted by only 97% to 98% of climate scientists.

TPM has more in its piece, “Creationism Controversies The Norm Among Potential Republican 2016 Contenders.”

Economy

Why The National Hockey League Lockout Isn’t Killing Your City’s Economy

The National Hockey League’s second lockout of players since the 2004-2005 season is now 67 days old, as league owners continue their attempts to extract huge concessions from players. Now that nearly two months of games have been canceled, cities across the country are beginning to worry about lost revenue from those cancellations.

Pittsburgh says it stands to lose $2.1 million for each lost home game. Long Island, New York said in September the lockout could cost it $60 million. Detroit pegged its potential losses at $1.9 million per lost game.

But cities often inflate the impact sporting events and sports stadiums have on their economies, and recent studies show that they’re likely overstating the losses from the NHL lockout too. When economists Robert Baade, Richard Baumann, and Victor Matheson examined monthly taxable sales in three Florida metro areas that have multiple franchises in each of the Big Four sports leagues, they found that work stoppages in professional sports had “no statistically significant effect on taxable sales“:

Our detailed regression analysis of taxable sales in Florida over the period from 1980 to mid-2005 reveals that none of the labor disruptions in the big four professional leagues have been associated with any statistically significant reductions in taxable sales and none of the franchise expansions or new stadiums have been associated with any statistically significant increases in taxable sales.

If that seems counter-intuitive, it shouldn’t. Baade, Baumann, and Matheson, and a host of other economists, have done extensive research that supports the idea that professional sports franchises, and the publicly-financed stadiums in which they play, have little overall economic impact on their home cities. That’s because most of what is spent by fans in and around stadiums isn’t new money injected into the local economy; rather, it’s money diverted away from other sectors of the city’s economy. So when the NHL cancels games, most of the money doesn’t leave the local economy. It’s just spent elsewhere.

“Money not spent by local fans on the NHL is money available to be spent elsewhere in the economy. The NHL’s loss is a gain for local restaurants, theaters, and other entertainment options,” Matheson said in an email. “So, the $2.1 million figure is probably a pretty good estimate of gross losses but an extremely poor estimate of net losses.”

The loss of revenue from NHL games certainly has negative effects for businesses in the neighborhoods around the arenas where those games would be played, and for the people who work at those businesses and staff arenas. But like the effects of stadiums and teams in general, Matheson said, the effect of lost games on the entirety of metro area economies is negligible.

NEWS FLASH

Israel, Hamas Reportedly Agree To Ceasefire | Reuters is reporting that Hamas and Israel, apparently unilaterally, have agreed to a ceasefire. Reports of an agreement yesterday fell through as violence continued throughout the evening and into today when a bomb exploded on a bus in Tel Aviv. “Israel as agreed to a truce but will not life the blockade” of Gaza, Reuters says on Twitter. The deal, which comes after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived in the region yesterday to meet with Israeli and Egyptian leaders, is expected to be announced this afternoon.

Update

CNN reports the the ceasefire will begin at 2 p.m. ET

NEWS FLASH

Illinois Likely To Issue Drivers Licenses To Undocumented Immigrants | Several leading Illinois political leaders have proposed legislation allowing undocumented immigrants to get driver’s licenses, which, if passed, would make Illinois the third and largest state to do so. Illinois Governor Pat Quinn (D), Speaker of the House Michael Madigan (D), and Senate President John Cullerton (D) are all supporting the law, making passage likely. The law would likely improve road safety in Illinois by requiring the state’s roughly 250,000 undocumented immigrants to pass state driving tests and by getting them access to auto insurance.

Health

Boehner Reverses Course, Promises To Repeal Obamacare Through ‘Oversight’

After President Obama’s decisive re-election, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) starkly admitted that “Obamacare is the law of the land.” Facing backlash from fellow Republicans and critics of the landmark health reform law, the Speaker’s office softened that stance, asserting that “full repeal” still remained the GOP objective. But with the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the bulk of the law, Democratic control of the Senate, and President Obama’s victory, some have wondered what — if any — recourse Republicans have at the federal level to undo Obamacare.

On Tuesday, Boehner explained how, exactly, Republicans would go about dismantling the law in an op-ed on Cincinnati.com. In his piece, Boehner contends that House Republicans will conduct “vigorous oversight” of the law’s implementation in an effort to neuter its provisions:

The tactics of our repeal efforts will have to change. But the strategic imperative remains the same. If we’re serious about getting our economy moving again, solving our debt and restoring prosperity for American families, we need to repeal Obamacare and enact common-sense, step-by-step reforms that start with lowering the cost of health care. [...]

Congress has a constitutional responsibility to conduct thorough oversight of the executive branch, and congressional oversight will play a critical role in repealing Obamacare going forward.

Over the past couple of years, I have noted there are essentially three major routes to repeal of the president’s law: the courts, the presidential election process and the congressional oversight process. With two of those three routes having come up short, the third and final one becomes more important than ever.

Vigorous oversight of the health care law by the House can be expected and, in fact, is already under way. The House Ways & Means Committee recently issued a subpoena directing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services turn over any and all information regarding how taxpayer dollars have been used to promote Obamacare.

“Oversight,” as Boehner uses it, is basically a code word for obstruction. This isn’t exactly surprising — after the election, ThinkProgress reported that the GOP would still try to stall Obamacare implementation through a combination of holding up the law’s funding for Americans’ insurance subsidies and statewide insurance exchanges, Republican governors’ refusals to expand their states’ Medicaid pools, and GOP efforts to repeal Obamacare’s revenue sources and cost-containment measures, such as its taxes on large medical device manufacturers and the Medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).

Although Boehner does not mention any such specifics in his op-ed, in the absence of a way to fully repeal the law, these are the types of provisions that the GOP will most likely conduct their “oversight” on. But recent polls have shown that public support for repealing Obamacare is plummeting, making such GOP tactics a waste of time at best and bad policy for Americans’ health and financial security at worst.

Climate Progress

Spoils: Film Documents Americans Who Reap An ‘Extraordinary Harvest’ From Waste

Food waste is a big deal in America. As grocery stores stock their shelves with holiday goodies, preparing for the rush of feasting consumers, much of what retailers sell won’t end up in people’s stomachs — it’ll end up in the trash.

Each year, 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted around the world, much of it in rich countries where grocery stores throw out imperfect products and consumers toss uneaten food. Since the 1970′s, America has seen a 50 percent jump in the amount of food wasted, according to the National Resources Defense Council. Consumers play a major role, tossing away roughly 250 pounds of food per person every year. But supermarkets play an even bigger role, discarding 10 percent of America’s total food supply at the retail level.

All that uneaten food accounts for nearly one quarter of U.S. methane emissions, a greenhouse gas that traps 25 times more heat than CO2.

This problem has spawned a range of reports and education programs designed to get Americans and retailers to waste less. But there’s another option that often gets overlooked: why don’t we just eat more of the food that grocery stores are throwing in the dumpster? That cuts back on both consumer and retailer waste.

There are already plenty of people, often called “freegans,” who do this. (A few years ago when living in New Hampshire, I was one of them for a short time; although not nearly to the degree that some of the most hardcore, full-timers are). The term freegan, which blends together “free” and “vegan,” is finally becoming more widely known in mainstream culture — even if it is a practice that has been around for as long as food itself.

Part money-saving opportunity, part political-statement, and part environmentalism, the modern freeganism movement — also known simply as dumpster diving — has spawned a culture of its own.

A new short documentary film, called “Spoils: Extraordinary Harvest,” intimately explores this culture. The film follows groups of dumpster divers in New York City and paints a portrait of the people who dig for wasted food. (Full disclosure: the Director, Alex Mallis, is an old friend of mine).

I really like the film because it doesn’t try to pretentiously puff up the importance of dumpster diving — which, in my experience, people who engage in the practice sometimes do. It simply provides a raw look at how it’s done. To me, these characters are the urban equivalent to our romanticized notion of indigenous cultures that “live off the land” and take only what they need.

Watch the 20-minute film below. It’s something to consider as you sit down to your Thanksgiving meal this week.

Spoils: Extraordinary Harvest from Alex Mallis on Vimeo.

NEWS FLASH

Uganda ‘Kill The Gays’ Bill Appears On Parliamentary Agenda | Box Turtle Bulletin notes that Uganda’s long-proposed “Kill The Gays” bill has finally appeared on today’s Parliament’s agenda. It’s unclear when it will come to a vote; it could be called forth immediately or could linger as “business to follow” for weeks. Speaker Rebecca Kadaga has urged the Parliament to take action on the legislation as a “Christmas gift” to the country.

Politics

How The Worst Drought In Half A Century Is Causing Millions To Go Hungry

More than 17 million of America’s food insecure households could go hungry this Thanksgiving, and they might have a harder time finding a warm meal, as food banks that distribute to food pantries, soup kitchens and emergency shelters rely on ever thinning supplies.

The shortage is a result of a severe, lingering drought that has depleted midwest crops, sending prices higher for food staples like meat, vegetables, and fruit. According to Reuters, the higher food prices have meant the U.S. government buys fewer commodities, purchases originally intended to support agriculture prices and reduce surpluses. The unintended result means government donations to food banks, a major source of their inventory, have fallen by more than half:

Government commodity purchases through The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) fell by more than half to $352.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, from $723.7 million three years earlier, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. [...]

Government commodities once made up 28 percent of the food flowing through the Feeding America network, which includes about 90 percent of U.S. food banks and provides food for about 37 million people during the year. This year those commodities account for 17 percent, Feeding America said.

Demand for food assistance has only climbed in the slow economy, with food stamp assistance at a record high in August. While this year’s average Thanksgiving meal costs about the same, but groceries are expected to cost 3-4 percent more next year. Food banks fear not meeting this demand, as their waiting lists lengthen, while some nonprofits have had to buy more of their food.

The extreme weather — made more likely by global warming — could pose an even greater threat to next year’s supplies. USDA predicts higher grain prices could send poultry prices up 4 percent, beef by 5 percent, and dairy by 4.5 percent, with higher prices lingering for years.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up