ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Poll: Marriage Equality Support Improved 21 Points Over 8 Years | Numerous polls have consistently shown a majority of Americans support marriage equality, but NBC polling had only found a plurality — until now. The latest results show 51 percent favor allowing same-sex marriages, while just 40 percent oppose it. This is a huge shift from 2004, when just 30 percent supported equality and 62 percent were opposed. In addition, 55 percent of respondents said that if marriage equality passed in their state, they would support the law. The trend toward supporting the freedom to marry is undeniable.

Economy

Public Transit Use Rises Steadily As GOP Threatens Severe Transit Cuts


Americans are relying more on public transportation than ever before, according to a report released Monday by the American Public Transportation Association. The rate of ridership has increased steadily in the last two years, with a 2.6 percent bump (or 7.9 billion trips) over the first three quarters of 2012.

Last year saw the second highest annual ridership since 1957, and the momentum seems to be growing. All forms of public transit, from buses to heavy rail like Amtrak, saw increases in ridership from January to September this year. Heavier use of public transit cuts down on use of fuel, carbon emissions, and congestion, while saving commuters time and money.

This encouraging trend toward public transit, however, could be easily stifled by Congress. Transportation funding is in dire straits, as APTA President Michael Melaniphy noted:

As Congress works to resolve our country’s deficit problem, it also needs to work to resolve the transportation deficit. Otherwise public transit and highway funding will be facing an annual $15 billion shortfall in the next 10 years. We continue to see that in areas where the local economy is improving and new jobs are being added, public transportation ridership is up. This makes sense since nearly 60 percent of the trips taken on public transportation are for work commutes. Public transit service is an important resource for employees and employers as it is instrumental in helping people travel to their jobs.

Though more and more people are relying on public transportation to get to work, Republicans are intent on further bankrupting these systems. The House GOP released a transportation bill in February that would have eliminated funding for mass transit systems, disproportionately hurting low-income urban communities for whom public transportation systems are the only way to get around. The bill failed, but Republicans continue to call for cuts to federal spending on transportation.

If a deal cannot be reached to avert the discretionary spending cuts in the so-called fiscal cliff next year, crucial public transportation programs will be essentially de-funded. One of the programs in danger is the Federal Transit Administration’s New Starts Program, which awards grants for major projects like Washington’s metro line to Dulles International Airport and the Bay Area’s new line to the Oakland International Airport. Amtrak, which suffered serious damages from Hurricane Sandy in October, would lose $131 million. An austerity budget like the one proposed by Republicans could sabotage a steadily growing industry and cut off whole communities that are increasingly relying on mass transit systems.

Security

Susan Rice Withdraws Name From Consideration As Next Top Diplomat

NBC news is reporting Susan Rice has withdrawn her name from consideration for Secretary of State. NBC’s Brian Williams reports that in a letter to the President, Rice said: “I am highly honored to be considered by you for appointment as Secretary of State.

“The position of Secretary of State should never be politicized. I am saddened that we have reached this point even before you have decided whom to nominate.” President Obama has also put out a statement reading in part: “While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment and put our national interests first.”

Update

Read Rice’s full letter to the President here.

Justice

Prison Guard Beats Up 15-Year-Old Inmate On Camera, Keeps Job

For the third time in in recent memory, a Florida guard has been recorded viciously assaulting a defenseless teenage inmate on camera — but this guard is still supervising children. Shannon Lynn Abbott, an employee at the private Milton Girls Juvenile Residential Facility, threw an unidentified 15-year-old prisoner against a wall and a hard floor on a tape obtained by the Miami Herald. Though the prisoner showed no signs of resistance during the attack, Abbot and another guard proceeded to sit on the prisoner for several minutes while other people entered the room. Yet though Abbott is currently under arrest for assault, she’s somehow still in charge of young inmates:

Although the encounter got Shannon Linn Abbott arrested, it didn’t get her fired. The 33-year-old bailed out and was back on the job right afterward and supervising children, to the extreme dismay of the Department of Juvenile Justice.

Similar inhumanity is sadly common in the American juvenile prison system. Kids as young as 13 are thrown into solitary confinement and often denied access to basic health care. Many are in juvenile detention for minor school disciplinary violations that simply  ”making adults mad.”

Though private prisons like Milton Girls are rife with cruel treatment of prisoners, some members of Florida’s state legislature have pursued an illegal end-around to try to privatize the state’s prison health care system.

Alyssa

The Female Pilots Who Were Cut From ‘Return Of The Jedi’ And The Future of Star Wars

As someone who’s been shouting from the rooftop about all of the amazing female characters who already exist in the Star Wars Expanded Universe and really should be featured in the upcoming sequels to the films, I was excited to see Luke Plunkett report this bit of Star Wars trivia at Kotaku:

Turns out that there were four female pilots cast and filmed for Return of the Jedi‘s climatic Battle of Endor. Two of them were A-Wing pilots, the other two piloting an X-Wing, with one, played by Vivienne Chandler, having an entire page of dialogue.

Sadly, according to Star Wars Aficionado, they’ve remained mostly unknown and unseen until now. The two A-Wing pilots, one elderly, can at least be seen buried in the extras on the Star Wars blu-rays (I’ve never seen them), but the two X-Wing pilots went straight to the editing room floor. Bizarrely, one of the A-Wing pilots, pictured up top, had her lines dubbed over by a male voice actor in post-production (though people are telling me she’s still visible in the film).

Things like this really make me increasingly convinced that it would not just be nice, but important to see a Star Wars movie that’s centered around a woman who is on the same kind of hero’s journey Luke Skywalker took all those years ago. This is a moment when we have a generation of young actresses who are credentialing themselves primarily as action stars, from Jennifer Lawrence, to Chloe Grace Moretz, to Hailee Steinfeld, and to a lesser extent, Saorsie Ronan and Abigail Breslin. We have proof that female-centered action franchises, like The Hunger Games, can be global smash hits. But what we don’t have is women worked into major franchises like The Avengers as equals. Having the next trilogy of Star Wars films focus on a woman like Jaina Solo, Han and Leia’s daughter, would be a real passing of the torch, and passing it in a way that’s fully integrated into the franchise already.

Climate Progress

Big Questions About UK Shale Gas

by Robin Webster, via Carbon Brief

Shale gas has received the official nod — David Cameron told an influential committee of MPs last night that there is a “gas revolution taking place across the world” and “I want us to be part of that revolution”. But the government’s support for shale gas has also been criticised over the past few days by experts who have labelled it ” misleading and dangerous” and “categorically and mathematically” incompatible with the government’s climate change targets.

The arguments over shale – often repeated in media coverage of the issue – seem to boil down to three key questions. We take a look at them.

1. How much shale gas is there in the UK?

In 2011, the British Geological Survey (BGS) estimated the UK has 150 billion cubic metres of shale gas reserves – that’s about two years of current UK gas consumption. It’s also around 5.3 trillion cubic feet, if we’ve got our conversion right. But then oil and gas company Cuadrilla announced that it had discovered 200 trillion cubic feet of shale gas under Lancashire, near Blackpool.

This is obviously a much larger amount. How can the two figures be compared? It’s important first of all to note that the BGS figure refers to reserves – the amount of shale gas it believes can be extracted once economic and political limitations are taken into account.

Cuadrilla’s figure refers to the total amount it believes is in the ground, of which it might be possible to extract about 10 to 20 per cent. If correct, Cuadrilla’s find could still be globally significant.

The BGS numbers are also about to be updated. The BGS has been commissioned by the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to make a thorough assessment of the onshore shale gas resource across the whole of the UK. It’s due to be launched in the New Year, but last Saturday the Times announced – presumably on the basis of a leaked copy – that the report will:

“…estimate that the 1,000 square kilometres covered by the Bowland Basin to the east of Blackpool contains 300 trillion cubic feet of gas, equivalent to 17 times the remaining known reserves in the North Sea.”

This seems to be a surprise to the BGS however. A press spokesperson told us yesterday that its assessment has not yet been released, adding “we don’t know where these figures have come from”. The figures are according to a BGS spokesperson currently a “closely guarded secret” and not even senior managers know what they are. (h/t to Leo Hickman who rang BGS first).

This is all second guessing and none of this really tells us what the BGS have concluded. But rumours have been circulating for some time that the number is going to be big. When it is finally released, it will be hailed by advocates of the fuel as proof that the UK has adequate resources to participate in David Cameron’s “shale gas revolution”.

2. Will UK shale gas cut energy prices?

Read more

Health

Top Senate Democrat Says Obama Has Rejected Raising The Medicare Age

A top Senate Democrat is claiming that President Obama is no longer open to raising the Medicare eligibility age as part of a package to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff, the Wall Street Journal reports. Obama himself didn’t rule out keeping younger seniors out of the health care program during an interview with ABC News on Tuesday, saying he would “look at every avenue.”

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the assistant majority leader, told reporters that officials have informed him that “it was no longer on the table.” “It’s no longer one of the items beings considered by the White House,” he said.

Obama flirted with the proposal during the 2011 budget talks, though the majority of Democrats oppose it. Indeed, the idea would only save the federal government a net $5.7 billion, while shifting an added $11.4 billion in health care spending to states, employers, and individuals, who would have to find coverage elsewhere.

During a press conference today, Democratic Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) bluntly rejected the idea. “As I have said, don’t even think about raising Medicare age,” she said. “We are not throwing America’s seniors over the cliff to give a tax cuts to the wealthiest people in America.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was asked about the Medicare provision on Thursday, but did not address it directly.

Health

Why One 15-Year-Old Girl Wants The FDA To Crack Down On Her Gatorade

A petition calling for beverage producers to stop using a little-known chemical additive in their products has gained more than 150,000 signatures on Change.org, sparking a debate about the U.S.’s current regulation of the food and beverage industry.

15-year-old Sarah Kavanagh started the petition after checking the label on her Gatorade and discovering that “brominated vegetable oil” (BVO) — an additive used to keep flavor from separating — was listed on the bottle. When she researched the substance further, she found out that it can be associated with serious neurological and fertility issues, and wondered why it was still allowed to be used in the United States:

Use of the substance in the United States has been debated for more than three decades, so Ms. Kavanagh’s campaign most likely is quixotic. But the European Union has long banned the substance from foods, requiring use of other ingredients. Japan recently moved to do the same.

B.V.O. is banned other places in the world, so these companies already have a replacement for it,” Ms. Kavanagh said. “I don’t see why they don’t just make the switch.” To that, companies say the switch would be too costly.

The renewed debate, which has brought attention to the arcane world of additive regulation, comes as consumers show increasing interest in food ingredients and have new tools to learn about them. Walmart’s app, for instance, allows access to lists of ingredients in foods in its stores.

BVO is found in approximately 10 percent of all drinks sold in the U.S., including Mountain Dew, Fanta Orange, Fresca, and Gatorade. Although evidence suggests serious effects of BVO may not occur unless consumed in very large quantities, its use points to larger issues concerning the way food is regulated in the United States. Serious loopholes in laws and regulations allow thousands of additives into food without any oversight from the FDA.

When setting up regulation of food additives, Congress exempted two types from FDA oversight: those already approved by the agency and those “generally recognized as safe.” It is the second type — “the loophole that swallowed the law” — that is a cause for concern. As the New York Times points out, companies using this loophole “can create a new additive, publish safety data about it on its Web site and pay a law firm or consulting firm to vet it to establish it as ‘generally recognized as safe’ — without ever notifying the F.D.A.” In fact, of the 10,000 additives allowed in food, 3,000 have never been reviewed by the FDA.

And the debate over BVO is just the latest of several controversies surrounding the chemical content of other beverages, in which energy drinks have been tied to more than a dozen deaths, and sugary drinks conclusively linked to obesity.

– Greg Noth

Justice

Prosecutors Ignore 2/3s Of All Sex Abuse Against Native Americans — Eric Cantor Is Keeping It That Way

Rapists should be legitimately prosecuted, but Eric Cantor has ways of shutting that whole thing down

As Irin Carmon explains in a must read piece at Salon, Native American reservations are virtually law-free zones for women victimized by non-Indian rapists. Eighty percent of Native American rape survivors were attacked by non-Indians, and these crimes are currently beyond the reach of tribal authorities. Meanwhile, federal officials have the theoretical power to prosecute sexual assaults on reservations, but they lack the resources to do so. The result is that many abusers quickly learn they are free to attack women without consequence:

We have serial rapists on the reservation — that are non-Indian — because they know they can get away with it,” said Charon Asetoyer, executive director of the Native American Women’s Health Education Resource Center in Lake Andes, S.D. “Many of these cases just get dropped. Nothing happens. And they know they’re free to hurt again.” . . .

Overall, American Indians are two and a half times likelier to be victims of violent crime than the general population, according to the Department of Justice. But a 2010 report by the General Accounting Office found that there is an unusually high rate of refusals to prosecute by U.S. attorneys, who “declined to prosecute 46 percent of assault matters and 67 percent of sexual abuse and related matters.” The report noted that violent crimes actually had a higher rate of declination, possibly because the evidence was harder to come by.

A major step towards solving this problem is the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act, which passed the Senate with strong bipartisan support last April. Among other things, this bill would restore tribal authorities’ ability to prosecute non-Indians who commit domestic violence against the members of their tribe. According to the Census Bureau, 39 percent of Native women are subject to domestic violence at least once. Many of these incidents involve rape.

In the House several top Republicans, including members of the House Leadership, proposed a compromise bill that would extend these protections to Native domestic violence victims while allowing defendants to remove their case to federal court. Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), however, reportedly refuses to accept any protections for Native women that would expand tribal jurisdiction. As a result, there is a very real danger that Cantor will kill the bill by simply waiting out the clock until the new Congress is sworn in.

In the immediate aftermath of the Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock debacles, one would think Cantor would be willing stop standing on the side of rapists for purely political reasons, even if he cannot actually bring himself to care about holding rapists accountable. Apparently, however, the #2 man in the House still stands with the likes of Akin and Mourdock.

House Republicans: Stop Blocking VAWA

First Name:

Last Name:

Email Address:

Zip or Postal Code:

LGBT

NARTH: Gay-Affirming Therapists Are Biased Against Clients’ Religious Beliefs

Last week, NARTH, a professional organization for ex-gay profiteers, released new “Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Unwanted Same-Sex Attractions and Behavior.” This document strives to legitimize ex-gay therapy by downplaying research that shows the efforts to be ineffective and potentially harmful and emphasizing myths about what may “cause” homosexuality, like the impact of sexual abuse. According to the guidelines, clinicians who seek to affirm homosexuality — that is, the preponderance of mainstream therapists — are actually engaging in bias against clients’ religion when they deny the possibility of sexual reorientation:

Furthermore, clinicians with a strong gay-affirming position may tend to emphasize clinical literature that describes examples of harm — such as disappointment in not achieving complete sexual reorientation — in the course of change-oriented therapy and may decide that conducting such therapy is clearly unethical and harmful. They may maintain this view even when clients explicitly say they want to change their unwanted same-sex attractions and/or behavior. These clinicians may believe that clients cannot establish realistic therapeutic goals for themselves nor make a truly voluntary decision to develop their heterosexual potential, assuming that clients want to change only because they have been oppressed and discriminated against by society.

They may discount the reality that many clients who want to explore the possibility of change experience significant conflict between their religious beliefs and their same-sex attraction and that religious affiliation may be the most stable aspect of a client’s identity. Some clinicians have even equated agreeing to help someone develop their heterosexual potential as analogous to agreeing to help an anorexic lose weight. They may tend to espouse the immutability of sexual orientation, basing this conclusion on unsubstantiated biological research — a conclusion that remains premature.

This perspective demonstrates the naivete inherent in bias toward ex-gay treatments. First, ex-gay proponents take advantage of clients’ desire to change their sexual orientation by reinforcing it, essentially sacrificing professional perspective in the process by giving clients’ desired outcomes priority over reality. Then, they place sexual orientation and religious beliefs on a false equal footing, suggesting that sexual orientation might be easier to change if the client’s religious affiliation is more “stable.” This ignores that research has repeatedly demonstrated there is an enduring biological component to sexual orientation, whereas religious beliefs are simply ideas that many people change throughout their lives.

Therapy is not like consumer economics where “the customer is always right.” Rather than help clients work through the conflict they’re experiencing because of their sexual orientation, ex-gay profiteers attempt to milk that conflict by reinforcing it and promising change that will never actually be accomplished. That they defend this strategy by claiming to be less biased by research shows that they care more about profiting off their assumptions than actually helping clients achieve wellness.

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up