ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

NRA Approval Rating Takes A Hit After Press Conference | Americans’ approval of the National Rifle Association has steadily declined since their tone-deaf response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in December. The gun lobbying group now has a negative favorability rating, down 10 points since the week before CEO Wayne LaPierre’s press conference, during which he called for more guns in schools and blamed media glorification of violence. Just 42 percent of respondents approved of the NRA, while 45 percent now view it unfavorably, according to a new survey by Public Policy Polling. Fifty percent of the public also rejected the NRA’s proposal for more guns in schools, and 64 percent oppose another idea to arm teachers. Gun owners also oppose arming teachers. Only a narrow margin of Republicans support the push for more guns in school, with 39 percent against.

Health

Top Public Health Schools Condemn CIA For Thwarting Disease Prevention In Pakistan

Child receiving measles vaccine in Pakistan (Photo credit: Measles Initiative)

Twelve of the deans leading the nation’s top public health schools have written to President Barack Obama to condemn the use of public health programs as cover for covert activities.

In 2011, it was reported that the Central Intelligence Agency utilized a vaccination program as cover to confirm the whereabouts of Osama bin Ladin in Abottabad, Pakistan. Since then, health workers have been targeted for violence throughout the country, with over a dozen murdered in the past three weeks alone. The upswing in violence caused the United Nations to suspend their vaccine work in December, while the covert operation itself led the Pakistani government to kick out the NGO Save the Children in Sept. 2012.

In the course of the one-page letter, the deans or such schools as Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and UCLA take the President and the administration to task for their role in the spreading mistrust of health workers, and close with an impassioned plea to prevent further uses of health programs for intelligence-gathering:

Independent of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, contaminating humanitarian and public health programs with covert activities threatens the present participants and future potential of much of what we undertake internationally to improve health and provide humanitarian assistance. As public health academic leaders, we hereby urge you to assure the public that this type of practice will not be repeated.

International public health work builds peace and is one of the most constructive means by which our past, present, and future public health students can pursue a life of fulfillment and service. Please do not allow that outlet of common good to be closed to them because of political and/or security interests that ignore the type of unintended negative public health impacts we are witnessing in Pakistan.

The letter specifically refers to a recent spike in treatable diseases run rampant in Pakistan, following the surge in suspicion towards vaccination programs and the workers who administer them. In particular, have measles have jumped from 4,000 in 2011 to 14,000 in 2012. Likewise, Pakistan is one of only three countries where polio remains endemic, a statistic that will be unlikely to change should attacks on health workers continue.

Climate Progress

Hacking The Planet: World Economic Forum Raises Concerns About ‘Rogue’ Geoengineering

A commercial airline? Or a rogue geoengineering experiment?

The World Economic Forum has put out a new report on global risks for 2013, and the report’s chapter on “X factors” — concerns more remote than the report’s primary risks, but still worthy of note — includes a section on rogue “geoengineering” experiments.

Geoengineering involves large-scale efforts to either remove carbon from the atmosphere, or to remake the atmosphere’s chemical or physical make-up to offset the effects of climate change. The most plausible scenario mentioned by the report uses aircraft to inject particles into the atmosphere to mimic the way eruptions of volcanic ash block sunlight, and thus cool the climate. More far-fetched scenarios go so far as deploying mirrors into orbit to reflect sunlight.

Such projects involve a host of funding and deployment problems, as well as the serious risk of unintended consequences for both the climate and the billions of humans who rely on it. For instance, a project at the UK-based Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering project, or “SPICE,” working on the idea to mimic volcanic ash, was delayed in October over environmental concerns. Unfortunately, this leaves an opening for smaller nations or even commercial interests to begin experimenting with geoengineering unilaterally, say researchers at the World Economic Forum:

Nobody envisions deployment of solar radiation management anytime soon, given the difficulties in resolving a suite of governance issues (evidenced by the fact that even the relatively simple SPICE experiment in the UK foundered in the midst of controversy). Beginning with Britain’s Royal Society, many academic and policy bodies have called for cautious research as well as broader conversation about the implications of such technologies.

But this has led some geoengineering analysts to begin thinking about a corollary scenario, in which a country or small group of countries precipitates an international crisis by moving ahead with deployment or large-scale research independent of the global community. The global climate could, in effect, be hijacked by a rogue country or even a wealthy individual, with unpredictable costs to agriculture, infrastructure and global stability. [...]

For example, an island state threatened with rising sea levels may decide they have nothing to lose, or a well funded individual with good intentions may take matters into their own hands. There are signs that this is already starting to occur. In July 2012 an American businessman sparked controversy when he dumped around 100 tonnes of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean off the west coast of Canada in a scheme to spawn an artificial plankton bloom. The plankton absorb carbon dioxide and may then sink to the ocean bed, removing the carbon – another type of geoengineering, known as ocean fertilisation. Satellite images confirm that his actions succeeded in produce an artificial plankton bloom as large as 10,000 square kilometres.

The July 2012 incident was first reported by The Guardian in October, noting the gambit may have violated two international agreements and possibly involved misleading the local indigenous population about the nature and risks of the experiment. Russ George, the American businessman who oversaw the iron sulphate dump, is the former chief executive of Planktos Inc., and has been involved in other failed efforts to pull off large commercial dumps near the Galapagos and Canary Islands. Those attempts led to a warning from the EPA and to his ships being barred from ports by the Spanish and Ecuadorean governments. George had apparently hoped to net lucrative carbon credits.

The basic problem with geoengineering is that portions of the climate cannot be walled off to perform small-scale tests. This means geoengineering projects essentially have to jump straight from the experimental and computer modeling phases to a full-on implementation phase — as Russ George recently attempted. This means, at best, that geoengineering is last-resort, break-glass-in-case-of-emergency response to climate change, to be attempted when all other efforts have failed.

At worst, geoengineering is a distraction jumped on by interest groups, who wish to delay far more technologically and economically feasible efforts to tackle climate change by simply reducing the amount of carbon human beings emit into the atmosphere.

Economy

White House Doesn’t Rule Out Ending Debt Ceiling Standoff With $1 Trillion Platinum Coin

With Congressional Republicans once again threatening to take the nation’s debt limit hostage for spending cuts, economic circles have been abuzz with the possibility that a standoff could be averted via use of a $1 trillion platinum coin. An obscure law, read literally, gives the Treasury Secretary the ability to mint platinum coins of any denomination. Deposited with the Federal Reserve, such a coin would give the federal government the ability to make payments without needing to issue more debt, defusing the possibility of a default due to the debt ceiling.

The idea has won the endorsement of Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman, a former head of the U.S. Mint, and Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe. “Should President Obama be willing to print a $1 trillion platinum coin if Republicans try to force America into default? Yes, absolutely,” Krugman wrote.

Today, NBC’s Chuck Todd asked White House Press Secretary Jay Carney if the administration had ruled out using the platinum coin option. Carney refused to disavow the idea, instead reiterating that Congressional Republicans should simply raise the debt ceiling:

TODD: Do you guys have a position on this trillion dollar business?

CARNEY: Uh, I would simply go back to what I’ve said. The option here is for Congress to do its job and pay its bills, bills that have already been racked up. [...]

TODD: On the 14th amendment you flatly said you believe you do not have the power under the 14th Amendment. Do you believe you have this power to mint a trillion dollar coin?

CARNEY: There is no Plan B. There is no backup plan. There is Congress’s responsibility to pay the bills of the United States. This is not about future spending. We will have that debate and continue to have the debate about the budgets that we design and the path forward in the deficit reduction. And the president’s principles in this matter are very clear. You know, there is no alternative to Congress raising the debt ceiling. It’s its responsibility. Congress has to pay the bills of the United States. That is an obligation that they assigned to themselves.

TODD: You’re a little evasive in your answer. Are you trying to leave room or not leave room?

CARNEY: There is no substitute for Congress extending the borrowing authority of the United States.

Watch it:

There are several economic arguments made against using the coin, but as Business Insider’s Joe Wisenthal noted, none of them really hold water.

The coin doesn’t allow for new spending; it simply would ensure that America continues to pay bills that Congress has already run up. (The Federal Reserve would also sell bonds in order to prevent inflation.) And with Congressional Republicans threatening to push the country into a default in order to get their way on the budget, it seems that the White House is, for the moment at least, unwilling to take its own last resort off the table, silly as it may sound.

Alyssa

What Fans Should Know About Labor Battles In Sports: They Aren’t, And Shouldn’t Be, About You

The National Hockey League’s 113-day lockout of players is over, and for players, owners, and everyone involved in the game, that’s great news. It is also good news for sports fans, who have endured lockouts in three of the four major American sports in the last two years.

Even better news is that after such volatility in the world of sports, we could be entering an unprecedented era of labor peace. Since 1968, when the National Football League first locked out its players, there have been 19 work stoppages in the four major leagues, but we’re now guaranteed labor peace until at least 2016, when Major League Baseball’s collective bargaining agreement expires. If MLB does what it did in 2011 and negotiates a new agreement without a stoppage, and if both the National Basketball Association and its players union refuse to opt out of their current agreement in 2017, we will make it until at least 2020 without a stoppage, meaning the next eight years could become the longest period of labor peace in professional sports since the players’ union movement began.

Whenever the next dispute rolls around, though, here is something for fans of the four biggest sports to keep in mind: labor disputes in sports aren’t, and shouldn’t be, about you.

Every time sports leagues stop because of a labor fight, fans get up in arms about how they are the only people truly hurt by lockouts and strikes. Observers, including the president of the United States, often urge both sides to come together and strike a deal, ignoring that there are real issues at stake and real points of disagreement. That view couldn’t be more misguided.

Labor battles, in sports and elsewhere, are about workers’ rights — to fair pay, to safety, to health care, to retirement security. They are about workers who feel they are entitled to those rights and owners or executives who feel the workers are entitled to less. Whether those workers are locked out from Caterpillar or from professional hockey, whether they are median wage construction workers or millionaire athletes, doesn’t diminish the importance of their issues. And since, as I’ve written, labor battles in sports reflect the same issues as labor battles elsewhere, the implications of a labor fight in sports often stretch far beyond the playing field.

The idea that fans are the victims also ignores those who are adversely affected by work stoppages. Small businesses — restaurants and bars, fan shops, an assortment of others — lose customers. Arena workers, the people who ensure you, the fan, can watch a game in a safe environment and the people who clean up your mess once you leave, lose paychecks. Some front office workers take pay cuts. Others are laid off. In the case of hockey, it even hurts charities.

Players, who provide the labor that makes our sports so enjoyable (and so profitable), lose paychecks. They face attempts to reduce their pay, to eliminate their pension, to make their health care less generous. Sound familiar? It’s the story of every labor battle in America, played out on a far more public (and far more expensive) field.

You? Assuming you’re not in an industry that depends on one of those sports, you lose the ability to watch a game. That certainly isn’t fun, and I suppose it’s even justified if you choose to stop coming back. But losing a leisurely activity isn’t the same as losing your livelihood, and it’s time to stop pretending it is.

LGBT

NOM Spokesperson Endorses Imprisonment For Lesbian Couples Who Are ‘Buying Sperm On Craigslist’

Over the past year, Jennifer Roback Morse of the National Organization for Marriage’s Ruth Institute has become increasingly vitriolic in her anti-gay comments. She has openly endorsed ex-gay therapy and lifetime celibacy for gay people, she has warned parents not to let their kids have gay friends, she has suggested marriage equality will destroy society, and she has claimed same-sex couples can’t be monogamous because they can’t have children. In a new interview captured by Equality Matters, Morse blatantly suggests that lesbian couples who seek out sperm donors — or who are “buying sperm on Craigslist” — “should be in jail” because they treat their children like property and “chattel.” Zinnia Jones has the transcript:

MORSE:  And what we’re doing now, Todd, as a result of the sexual revolution and all its fruits, is that we are in full-on retreat from human relationship between a man and a woman in order to create that child. So going online to buy sperm from a stranger is about as far as you can possibly get from the participation in divine love and divine creation. The fact that these two women want to have sex with each other has no bearing whatsoever on whether this should be permitted or not.You know, buying sperm on Craigslist should be abolished. Buying sperm at all should be abolished. And furthermore, these people should be in jail, I’m afraid.

I mean, you know, honestly, I just can’t even imagine where people think this is going to lead. You know, because the child is no longer a gift from God and a fruit of human love participating in God’s love. The child is now a product, manufactured by adults, and therefore the child cannot be fully the equal of its parent. The object cannot be the equal of its producer or its maker, you know. And so the further we go down this path, the further away we are going from the true ideal of equality before God, of equality before one another, of treating one another with dignity. And the child becomes a kind of chattel. So the legal complications and the sort of ick factor of all of this, it’s important to sort all that out and look at it, but let’s not take our eye off that ball, which is that we have defaced the creator’s plan and intention here by this behavior.

Listen to it:

Morse’s point is a galling insult not just to the millions of same-sex couples raising children, but to any couple who’ve sought assistance in having a child, whether through surrogacy, sperm donation, fertility treatments, or even adoption and foster care. Her implication is that any children being raised by parents who are not biologically related will receive an inferior amount of love and support. Morse has a degree in economics; she has no business casting judgment about which children are “gifts from God” and which aren’t.

Justice

Reagan-Appointed Judge Tosses Notre Dame’s Attack On Birth Control

Last week, Reagan-appointed federal Judge Robert L. Miller dismissed the University of Notre Dame’s effort to undermine Obama Administration rules ensuring that working women will have access to birth control. The court did not reach the merits of the suit, instead dismissing it as, at best, premature:

HHS announced guidelines requiring health plans to cover contraception and abortion inducing drugs. for plan years after August 1, 2012. . . . Several months later, HHS finalized the regulation, but announced a year-long “safe harbor” from enforcement for nonprofit entities of a certain type, including the University of Notre Dame. HHS announced that it would amend the regulations before the end of the safe harbor to accommodate those entities by requiring their insurers to provide cost-free coverage for the contraceptive and abortion-related services. In furtherance of the anticipated amendment, HHS issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPRM”). . . .

The present regulatory requirement isn’t sufficiently final for review to be ripe because the defendants have announced it will be modified and have underscored that announcement by providing Notre Dame with a safe harbor that protects it from the regulation as it exists today. Notre Dame lacks standing to attack the present regulatory requirement because it isn’t subject to that requirement, and, taking the defendants at their word, never will be subject to the present regulation. The defendants’ dismissal motion must granted.

For the record, Judge Miller’s claim that the regulations require coverage of “abortion inducing drugs” is completely and utterly false. The rules require coverage of “[a]ll Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.” Nothing covered by these rules — including emergency contraception — has anything to do with abortion. Indeed, increasing access to birth control will actually reduce abortions by preventing unwanted pregnancies.

Additionally, it is worth nothing that Miller’s opinion rests on a very narrow ground. Notre Dame’s case was tossed out both because it is exempted from current rules under the safe harbor for some non-profits and because the state of the rules that will apply when that safe harbor ends is in flux. Virtually every court to consider a case brought by a non-profit challenging the birth control rules has agreed with Miller that these lawsuits should not move forward for the time being, but the same cannot be said about lawsuits brought by for-profit businesses.

Under current law, these claims by for-profit businesses are especially weak. As the Supreme Court explained in United States v. Lee, “[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity.” There is no guarantee, however, that the same justices who decided Citizens United will not also decide to wipe out decades of precedent governing religious employers seeking immunity to the law.

NEWS FLASH

AIG Won’t Join Shareholder Lawsuit Suing Government Over ‘Onerous’ Bailout | American International Group, the insurance giant that received a $182 billion federal bailout to protect it from collapse in 2008, will not join a shareholder lawsuit against the federal government over the bailout’s terms, the Wall Street Journal reported. AIG had contemplated joining the lawsuit at the request of its former chairman, Maurice Greenberg, who filed the suit in 2011. AIG paid back the loans in 2012, and it has been running a series of television advertisements thanking taxpayers for saving the company.

Health

Younger Americans Resort To Groupon To Get Cheaper Health Care

In a striking example of the intersection between America’s broken health care system and 21st century information technology, doctors and dentists are successfully luring younger Americans between the ages of 20 and 40 into purchasing online coupons for their health care needs, Kaiser Health News reports.

The coupons tend to attract younger patients looking for one-off services that don’t require much follow up. Tellingly, even though many of these Americans already possess private insurance, the online deals are more generous than their benefits:

Health and medical deals make up about 5 to 10 percent of the online coupon industry, according to Unaiz Kabani, data product manager at Yipit, a service that aggregates companies’ daily deals. Groupon, the market leader, had about 115 million subscribers in 2011, which he says are mostly 20- to 40-year-old college-educated women. Living Social says it has about 70 million members.

Health providers often see good results after an initial offer, but the patients who come in for treatment frequently don’t return.

“When you’re looking at a demographic that’s young, where some may have insurance, some many not, they’re more inclined to be episodic,” said James Doulgeris, a health care business and marketing strategist at HCP Associates.

He said coupons are often the cheapest option for healthy people who may not need follow-up appointments. Even for those enrolled in a private insurance plan, the cost of using an online deal or a retail clinic may be less than seeing an in-network physician.

ThinkProgress has previously reported on multiple instances of Americans resorting to desperate measures such as online “crowd funding” — in essence, cyber-begging — in order to pay for their medical care. This is as much a testament to the consumer-assisting potential of the Internet as it is an indictment of America’s increasingly costly health care system.

Although many of the Americans utilizing such deals are doing so out of convenience and don’t suffer from recurring or debilitating health problems, the fact that a fair number of them already have private insurance should serve as a warning sign regarding the pitfalls of inadequate coverage. And the problem only gets worse for those with more extensive medical needs. While Obamacare will assist Americans in purchasing private insurance through its federal subsidies, its “essential health benefits” do not encompass several common — and expensive — treatments such as vision care and dental care for adults.

NEWS FLASH

Chris Kluwe On Colbert: ‘People Are People’ And Deserve Equal Treatment | Minnesota Vikings punter Chris Kluwe stopped by The Colbert Report Tuesday night to chat with Stephen Colbert about his advocacy for marriage equality. Colbert asked him about his written takedown of Maryland Delegate Emmett C. Burns Jr. for trying to , and Kluwe explained that he believes “people are people and deserve to be treated the same as everyone else.” In his initial piece, Kluwe pointed out that marriage equality is not going to turn Burns or anybody else into a “lustful cockmonster,” and he now confirms that after the defeat of Minnesota’s marriage inequality amendment, he has seen “zero cockmonsters running around the streets of Minnesota.” Watch it:

Older

Newer

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up