Lott Trots Out Frist’s Failed Argument

Posted on

"Lott Trots Out Frist’s Failed Argument"

In his interview last night on Hardball, former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) advanced the Frist theory of constitutional law:

If the Democrats had not overplayed their hand, if they would have stopped with Miguel Estrada or maybe one or two more — but when it got to be a routine sort of thing, I thought that was putting in place a change in the rules that basically was not supported by history or by the Constitution. I was very much offended by that.

Unfortunately for both Frist and Lott, the constitution doesn’t work this way. Judicial filibusters are either constitutional or unconstitutional. Their continued attempts to put the constitutionality of the filibuster on a sliding scale reveals that the push for the nuclear option is about power, not principle.

« »

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.