Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Rove calls contempt vote ‘ludicrous,’ admits to exerting no ‘personal privilege.’

By Ben Armbruster  

"Rove calls contempt vote ‘ludicrous,’ admits to exerting no ‘personal privilege.’"

Share:

google plus icon

While he has refused to appear before Congress, Karl Rove did make time to show up last night on Fox News. Sean Hannity asked Rove about the House Judiciary Committee’s vote yesterday to hold him in contempt of Congress for ignoring subpoenas. Rove called the vote “ludicrous,” but admitted that he has “not exerted any personal privilege on this”:

ROVE: I have not exerted any personal privilege on this. The White House has said we want to stand up for the doctrine of separation of powers and for the right of the president to not have his aides and former aides called up at the convenience of the Congress for no good reason at all.

Watch it:

Rove’s answer makes clear that he has no legal basis for refusing to appear before Congress. He also claimed in the interview that he has already answered questions pertaining to his alleged involvement in the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman (D), but as Marcy Wheeler points out “Rove didn’t deny the central allegations against him” in the case.

Update

Reacting to the contempt vote, former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman said, “I think it takes us one step closer to the truth, one step closer to justice.”

‹ ThinkFast: July 31, 2008

Federal judge: White House aides can be subpoenaed ›

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.